Connect with us

News

Imported liquid Nano-Nitrogen fertiliser not organic, says a group of academics

Published

on

The liquid Nano-Nitrogen fertiliser from Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Ltd. (IFFCO) imported by the government is a synthetic chemical fertiliser, and not an organic fertiliser, academics attached to the Agriculture and Technology Faculties of State Universities said yesterday.

They issued a statement under the Federation of University Teachers’ Associations (FUTA) letterhead:

“The Nano-Nitrogen fertilizer of IFFCO is a urea-based formulation where urea is coated with polymers to make nano-size particles. Therefore, this fertilizer is a synthetic chemical fertiliser, and not an organic fertilizer. The Nano-Nitrogen fertilizer is recommended to apply as a foliar spray and said to contain 4% Nitrogen. This is rather a new product, which has very recently (2021 March) received approval for large scale production from the Ministry of Agriculture of India. Anyhow, nano-fertilisers are not accepted in organic agriculture in Sri Lanka as indicated in the standard of requirements for organic agriculture (SLS1324:2018),” the statement said.

FUTA added that the Ministry of Agriculture claims that three applications of 2.5 L of this fertilizer at a time (i.e. 7.5 L in total) is adequate to provide required nutrients for the cultivation of one hectare of paddy crop. When applied at this rate, Nano-Nitrogen fertilizer would provide only 300 g of Nitrogen per one hectare.

“However, in general, nearly 105 kg of nitrogen is taken up by the paddy crop yielding 4-5 tons of grains per hectare. Accordingly, Nano-Nitrogen fertiliser should be applied at a rate of 1,250 L per hectare if it is the only source of nitrogen added to the crop, which is an impossible task to be realized within a cropping season,” the academics said.

Given below is the statement in full: “The government of Sri Lanka recently imported liquid Nano-Nitrogen fertilizer from Indian Farmers Fertilizer Cooperative Ltd. (IFFCO). From an initial order of 3.1 million liters, 45,000 liters (90,000 bottles, each carrying 500 ml) were airlifted on 19th October 2021 to Sri Lanka. We have learned that there are many misconceptions being publicized in the mass media on this Nano-Nitrogen fertilizer. As a concerned group of agricultural professionals in the country, academics attached to the Agriculture and Technology Faculties of State Universities in Sri Lanka, we wish to provide correct scientific facts about the imported fertilizer and express our views on this matter as follows.

“The Nano-Nitrogen fertilizer of IFFCO is a urea-based formulation where urea is coated with polymers to make nano-size particles. Therefore, this fertilizer is a synthetic chemical fertilizer, and not an organic fertilizer. The Nano-Nitrogen fertilizer is recommended to apply as a foliar spray and said to contain 4% Nitrogen. This is rather a new product, which has very recently (2021 March) received approval for large scale production from the Ministry of Agriculture of India. Anyhow, nano-fertilizers are not accepted in organic agriculture in Sri Lanka as indicated in the standard of requirements for organic agriculture (SLS1324:2018).

“In media briefings conducted by the Ministry of Agriculture, we learned that three applications of 2.5 L of this fertilizer at a time (i.e. 7.5 L in total) is adequate to provide required nutrients for the cultivation of one hectare of paddy crop. When applied at this rate, Nano-Nitrogen fertilizer would provide only 300 g of Nitrogen per one hectare. In general, nearly 105 kg of nitrogen is taken up by the paddy crop yielding 4-5 tons of grains per hectare. Accordingly, Nano-Nitrogen fertilizer should be applied at a rate of 1,250 L per hectare if it is the only source of nitrogen added to the crop, which is an impossible task to be realized within a cropping season.

“In their official website, IFFCO has indicated that this Nano-Nitrogen fertilizer should be applied only as a top dressing along with a reduced rate of urea, while phosphorus and potassium sources are to be supplied at full rate as per the recommendations. All research reports on this liquid fertilizer have recommended using this fertilizer to fulfil only partial requirements of Nitrogen for crops and often used with 50% recommended dose of urea. Therefore, Nano-Nitrogen is more appropriate to be viewed as a supplementary source of Nitrogen than a major nutrient source.

“Spraying liquid fertilizer may not be practical for some crops unless the farmers have access to drone technology. This is because spraying large areas and taller crops such as maize and sugarcane is not practical with commonly used spray tanks. Moreover, the effectiveness of these foliar fertilizers depends on the ground-cover by leaf area, weather conditions and application technology. Therefore, it is a necessity to provide clear guidance to the farmers on correct application procedures.

“In this context there is a serious question as to what should be recommended to the farmers in Sri Lanka, as the sources of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nutrients are limited in the market with the recent ban imposed on importing synthetic ‘chemical’ fertilizer. It is important to note that the benefit of Nano-Nitrogen cannot be realized when the crop suffers from nutrient imbalances. The Nano-fertilizer is applied at a much lower rate than regular urea fertilizer application mainly because it is a foliar spray. Applying the Nano-Nitrogen fertilizer at high concentrations, in the absence of soil application of Nitrogen fertilizer such as urea, could damage leaves. Therefore, the available option would be to have repeated application of Nano-Nitrogen fertilizer at a lower dosage.

“It should be noted that nano-fertilizers are more expensive than regular nitrogen fertilizers. Thus, considering the cost of the fertilizer and labor cost for application, the use of foliar fertilizers in a crop like paddy is expensive and will increase the cost of production.

“Any fertilizer imported to the country needs to be tested following the accepted protocols prior to giving approval for importation and after the shipment has arrived in order to assure quality and to avoid any negative impacts. Sri Lanka does not have developed SLS standards for nano-fertilizers, yet. These standards should be developed to assure quality of the product free of biurate-like toxic substances. Besides, recommendations should not be made in an ad-hoc manner without conducting any field investigations.

“Furthermore, in the eco-friendly/green agriculture concept, much attention is given to improve and regenerate soil fertility. However, foliar application of fertilizers will not contribute to enhancing soil fertility. Therefore, while failing to achieve higher crop yields, it is highly unlikely that the expensive Nano-Fertilizer we have imported will help in realizing the objectives of green-agriculture.”



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Election monitors flay JVP for postponing PC polls

Published

on

Manjula / Rohana

Election monitors have strongly condemned JVP General Secretary Tilvin Silva’s Jaffna declaration that the long-delayed Provincial Council polls couldn’t be held this year due to financial and legal impediments. Silva said so after declaring open a new NPP coordination office, in Jaffna, over the last weekend.

People’s Action for Free and Fair Elections (PAFFREL), and the Institute for Democratic Reforms and Electoral Studies (IRES), said that Tilvin Silva, in his capacity as the General Secretary of the main constituent of the National People’s Power (NPP), couldn’t make such a declaration under any circumstances.

PAFFREL head Rohana Hettiarachchi and IRES Chief Manjula Gajanayake emphasised that the JVP-led NPP government should be ashamed of the developing situation.

Hettiarachchi said that Tilvin Silva’s statement has to be examined against the backdrop of a parliamentary committee, headed by Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath, tasked to determine the electoral system under which PC polls should be conducted.

Alleging that the JVPer had made the parliamentary committee irrelevant, the civil society activist said that the whole exercise of appointing the Herath-led committee now seemed a farce. The JVP’s ruse to put off PC polls further reminded the country of a similar bid made by President Ranil Wickremesinghe, Hettiarachchi said, asserting that a government couldn’t postpone any poll, claiming it didn’t have the wherewithal.

Hettiarachchi emphasised that conducting elections was the responsibility of the government of the day. PC polls have been delayed for nearly one and half decades. Hettiarachchi said that as the NPP won the parliamentary election in November, 2024, it should be held accountable for further delaying the PC polls since then.

Responding to The Island queries, Hettiarachchi said that the JVP’s move couldn’t be justified, under any circumstances. If the NPP felt that the PC system was not required then urgent action must be taken to initiate a dialogue regarding the PC system and remove it through necessary constitutional means, he said.

Hettiarachchi alleged that the JVP, having gained political power, was now following the despicable agenda of the previous political parties which sought to hold onto power at the expense of the democratic rights of the people. The JVP proved that they were not different from those who were routed at the last presidential and parliamentary polls, the PAFFREL chief said.

Tilvin Silva’s unexpected Jaffna statement contradicted their election manifesto that promised to conduct both Local Government and PC polls in 2025.

Gajanayaka said since 1998 there had been several Supreme Court and Court of Appeal rulings regarding the PC polls due to reluctance on the part of some governments to conduct polls for obvious reasons. Referring to Tilvin Silva’s declaration that money allocated for the conduct of elections were utilised for Ditwah relief, Gajanayake emphasised the need to verify such claims. Gajanayake suggested that there should be provision to conduct a forensic study to find out whether Treasury had the required funds or the government lied.

Gajanayaka said that though the JVP was the dominant party, it would be interesting to know the opinion of Dr. Nihal Abeysinghe, General Secretary of the NPP. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake is the leader of both the JVP and the NPP.

The JVP Jaffna declaration couldn’t be accepted, Gajanayake said, adding that the JVP never really backed the PC system, though it contested them later after having waged a bloody insurgency against the Indian introduced set-up. Gajanayaka recalled the violence unleashed by the JVP in the wake of the Indo-Lanka accord of July 29, 1987, under which the then Congress government forced Sri Lanka to enact the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

SL exports exceed USD 5.7 bn in first four months of 2026

Published

on

The Sri Lanka Export Development Board (EDB) says Sri Lanka’s total exports, comprising merchandise and services, reached US$ 1,380.93 million in April 2026, recording a year-on-year growth of 6 % compared to the previous year.

The EDB in a statement has said that the positive export performance recorded during the first four months of 2026 highlights the resilience of Sri Lanka’s external sector. Sustained export earnings, supported by stable merchandise trade and the growing contribution of services exports, indicate a steady and encouraging recovery trajectory for the Sri Lankan economy in 2026.

Commenting on the export performance in April 2026, Mangala Wijesinghe, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Sri Lanka Export Development Board (EDB), has said: “Sri Lanka’s export sector continued to demonstrate resilience in April 2026, with total exports reaching US$ 1,380.93 million, recording a year-on-year growth of 6 % compared to April 2025. Merchandise exports recorded a notable increase of 9.87%, while services exports continued to make a significant contribution to overall export earnings, reflecting the growing importance of the services sector within the country’s export portfolio.

Continue Reading

News

Easter Sunday carnage: Court told Maulana’s statement cannot be accepted without cross-examination

Published

on

Retired Maj. Gen. Suresh Sallay’s Counsel Shavendra Fernando, PC, recently told Colombo Fort Magistrate Pasan Amarasena that Mohammed Milhilar Mohammed Hanzeer alias Azad Maulana’s statement that implicated his client in the 2019 Easter Sunday carnage couldn’t be accepted as evidence in a court of law without cross-examination.

Fernando also reminded the court that a warrant had been issued in respect of Maulana, one-time aide to Sivanesathureyai Chandrakanthan, alias Pilleyan, over a case of bigamy.

The Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in late February this year arrested Sallay, who served as the Director of State Intelligence Service (SIS)s from Nov. 2019 to early Oct. 2024, just weeks after the National People’s Power (NPP) won a 2/3 majority at the parliamentary election. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake brought in DIG Dhammika Kumara as Sallay’s successor. Sallay previously served as the head of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) from 2012 to 2016.

Making submissions to the court after Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Dileepa Peiris, Fernando emphasised that a court of law couldn’t act on a statement submitted through a third party as it couldn’t be relied upon.

At the onset of his submissions, the retired officer’s Counsel declared that he was making submissions before the court and not for the media.

The crux of the matter was whether Maulana, a fugitive from Sri Lanka law, whose statement, recorded by a team of CID officers, led by its Director SSP Shanie Abeysekera, at the Sri Lankan mission, in Paris, could be accepted without cross-examination.

The Attorney General’s Department and the suspect’s Counsel explained their position with regard to producing Sallay, detained under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) in court.

The ASG requested that an order, issued by the Colombo Fort Magistrate court to produce Sallay in court, be vacated. Responding to the ASG’s statement that there was no provision to produce a person detained under PTA, in court, the President’s Counsel pointed out that no existing provision denied such an opportunity. The retired officer’s Counsel said that it was the Magistrate’s prerogative.

Alleging that there was an ongoing attempt to derail the Easter Sunday investigation, the ASG opposed an opportunity for Sallay to make a statement in court in terms of the Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Fernando emphasised that Salley should be given the opportunity.

Fernando also strongly opposed the ASG’s move, on behalf of the Attorney General, to have an earlier order issued by court, to ensure Sallay received unhindered access to his lawyers, vacated. He questioned how the Attorney General, who heads the Bar, could deny the right of lawyers to have free access to their clients.

Magistrate Amaraseena told the court that a report on Sallay’s health has been received by the court. Fernando has said that he would respond once he received a copy.

During cross talk among lawyers, President’s Counsel Fernando has asked Rienzie Arsularatne, PC, who appeared for the Archbishop of Colombo, Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith, whether the Cardinal had approved and condoned the inhuman conditions in which Sallay was held in a 6X4 rat-infested cell.

ASG Peiris responded jokingly that Fernando might be excommunicated by the Cardinal. Fernando has pointed out that only the Pope could excommunicate and that the Cardinal administered the churches and priests and that, too, only in Colombo.

Based on the statement recorded from Maulana, the CID submitted a 14-page report to the Colombo Magistrate’s court, declaring Sallay as the 2019 Easter Sunday terror mastermind.

Maulana repeated accusations, aired by Channel 4 TV in a documentary “Sri Lanka’s Easter bombings” in its “Dispatches” programme on Tuesday 05, September ,2023.

According to Maulana’s statement recorded in Paris, Seyani Maulavi, an associate of Zahran Hashim, had got in touch with former Eastern Province Chief Minister Pilleyan, in the Batticaloa Prison, where both were held.

Pilleyan had been arrested in connection with the alleged involvement in the assassination of ITAK MP Joseph Pararajasingham on Christmas Eve, in 2005, in Batticaloa, while Maulavi was apprehended over a clash at Aliyar junction, in the east.

Maulavi has reiterated that Sallay met six persons, including Zahran Hashim, at Karadippooval, in Puttalam, in 2018.

The statement claimed that immediately after the Easter suicide blasts, Sallay directed Maulana to pick Jameel, who had been assigned to bomb Taj Samudra, but didn’t do so, and to collect his hand phone. Visits by Mahinda Rajapaksa, Basil Rajapaksa and Namal Rajapaksa to the Batticaloa Prison to meet Pilleyan, too, had been mentioned with Maulana claiming that the visitors gave Pilleyan an assurance he would be released within six months from Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s victory at the 2019 November presidential election.

The CID told court that Gotabaya Rajapaksa, soon after winning the election, appointed Sallay as SIS head to protect the secrets, and the DMI paid Rs 250,000 bail for Maulavi. The CID also alleged direct DMI-Pilleyan link in the abduction of journalist Keith Noyahr, in May 2008, Lasantha Wickrematunga assassination, in January, 2009, attack on Rivira Editor Upali Tennakoon, in January, 2000, and in the disappearance of Prageeth Ekneligoda, on the eve of the 2010 January presidential election.

Another major allegation was that approximately 2,000 men, under Pilleyan’s command, were paid a monthly salary.

The Magistrate, at the end of the proceedings, declared that a decision regarding Sallay being brought to court and an opportunity for him to make a statement would be announced on July 1.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

Trending