Connect with us

News

FSP urges NPP MPs to reject unfair tax policies

Published

on

Pubudu Jagoda

The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) has sent a letter to all MPs of the ruling National People’s Power (NPP) government, urging them to reject what it describes as a severely unfair tax policy outlined in the 2025 Budget. The party has warned that the proposed tax structure will place an unbearable burden on the public, while at the same time granting significant concessions to large corporations and wealthy individuals.

The 2025 Budget, which was presented to Parliament on 17 February, is scheduled for a final decision on 21 March. The FSP stated that tax policies were generally designed to reduce economic inequalities, prioritise economic development, and regulate market consumption patterns. It argued that the 2025 Budget approached taxation solely as a means of generating government revenue, disregarding the economic hardships faced by the majority of the population.

The FSP has raised concerns over the significant increase in Value Added Tax (VAT) on goods and services, which is set to rise by 25.94% in 2025. The government aims to increase tax revenue from Rs. 2,201 billion in 2024 to Rs. 2,772 billion in 2025, resulting in a notable rise in the financial burden on ordinary citizens. According to the FSP’s analysis, this means that in 2024, an average Sri Lankan household paid Rs. 31,623 per month in indirect taxes on goods and services. In 2025, this figure is expected to increase to Rs. 39,817 per month, placing an additional Rs. 4,200 in taxes on each household. The party argued that this increase is unbearable for families already struggling under the weight of the economic crisis.

Citing data from the Department of Census and Statistics, the FSP has highlighted that the average monthly household income in Sri Lanka is Rs. 76,414, while monthly expenses amount to Rs. 63,130. It has warned that nearly two-thirds of a family’s monthly spending would now be consumed by taxes, describing this as a severe economic blow to working-class and lower-income groups. The party accused the government of betraying the expectations of the people who placed their trust in the NPP administration.

While the government has defended its decision by claiming that the higher VAT collection is not the result of introducing new taxes, but rather improving tax enforcement, the FSP dismissed this argument as misleading. It pointed to the Ministry of Finance’s own report, which stated that between 2023 and 2024, businesses collected Rs. 333.1 billion in taxes from consumers but failed to remit them to the state. Despite this massive tax evasion by corporations, the 2025 Budget does not prioritise recovering these unpaid revenues or strengthening direct taxation on high-income earners. Instead, the government has doubled the withholding tax on savings from 5% to 10%, imposed a 15% tax on foreign income earned through online services, and extended import duties on 63 essential goods, including food items, from 1 January 2025.

The FSP also criticised the government’s handling of VAT rates, which have been rising continuously since 2022. The VAT rate, which was 8% in early 2022, was increased to 12% in August 2022, then raised to 15% in January 2023, and further increased to 18% in January 2024. The party warned that the government appears to be following a pattern of gradually increasing VAT, making it even more difficult for ordinary people to afford basic goods and services. Additionally, a Social Security Contribution Tax was introduced in 2023, further exacerbating financial pressures on the public.

Beyond the tax hikes on ordinary citizens, the FSP condemned the favourable treatment given to wealthy individuals and large corporations. It cited a Parliamentary Committee on Public Accounts (COPA) report from March 2024, which revealed that large corporations evaded Rs. 1,068 billion in taxes, while domestic and foreign corporate entities received tax concessions worth Rs. 978 billion. Despite these staggering figures, the government has only planned to increase direct tax revenue by Rs. 141 billion, indicating that it has no real intention of recovering unpaid taxes from the country’s largest businesses.

The FSP also highlighted a controversial clause in the 2025 Budget that offers a six-month amnesty period for overdue tax payments. This clause, buried in the technical section (Clause 1.9) of the budget document—which was only released in English—states that businesses that failed to pay taxes between 2022 and 2023 can settle their dues without facing penalties or interest charges. The party described this as a shameful giveaway to tax-evading corporations, arguing that it directly undermines the government’s claims of enforcing tax compliance.

In its letter to MPs, the FSP urged lawmakers to reject the tax policy and stand against what it called a blatant betrayal of the public interest. The party reminded Parliamentarians that Sri Lanka’s economic crisis, IMF-imposed financial restructuring, and rising inflation have already pushed millions into financial hardship, and that imposing additional tax burdens on struggling families would only deepen the crisis.

The FSP warned that if MPs vote to approve these unfair tax measures, they risk facing public outrage and a loss of trust. It called for an immediate revision of the 2025 Budget’s tax policy, urging the government to shift the tax burden away from ordinary citizens and onto the country’s wealthiest individuals and corporations.



News

Geneva takes up Sallay’s case and govt. ignores opportunity to answer accusations

Published

on

Suresh Sallay

The government has chosen not to respond to questions raised by the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) regarding the detention of retired Maj. Gen. Suresh Sallay in connection with the ongoing investigations into the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks.

The Criminal Investigation Department (CID) arrested the ex-official in late February this year. The Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health and the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers have jointly raised the issue on 20 July, 2026.

Drawing attention of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to what they called alleged arbitrary detention of Sallay, former Director General of the State Intelligence Service (SIS) and former Director of Military Intelligence (DMI), under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), as well as allegations of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment while in custody, resulting in the grave deterioration of his health, and imminent risks of retaliation through further torture and ill-treatment resulting in irreparable harm, should he be released from hospital and returned to custody, the UN sought the government explanation with a 60-day period.

The UN has stated: “This communication, and any response received from your Excellency’s Government, will be made public via the communications reporting website at the 60 days mark. Should your Excellency’s Government respond within 60 days, both the communication and the response, may be published before the 60 days mark. The communications and responses

will also be made available in the subsequent periodic report to be presented to the Human Rights Council.”

In the absence of the government’s response, the UN posted the letter, dated 20 July, 2026, addressed to President Dissanayake. The full letter can be accessed https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=31125

Continue Reading

News

Section of wartime KKS High Security Zone vacated to facilitate economic development in the area

Published

on

The Army, last week, vacated an area, within the wartime high security zone in the Jaffna peninsula. The Defence Ministry said that an extent of 187.56 acres of land, belonging to the Cement Corporation in Kankesanthurai, Jaffna, has been released by the military. The released land, located in Grama Niladhari Division J/233, Kankesanthurai West, within the Valikamam North (Tellippalai) Divisional Secretariat Division, had been utilised by the Sri Lanka Army since the middle of 1997.

The release of the 187.56-acre extent forms part of the initiative to make State land available for the proposed investment zone in Kankesanthurai, thereby facilitating future investment and economic development in the area.

Continue Reading

News

Lawyer lodges complaint against Govt. Printer, Media Ministry Secy.

Published

on

A complaint has been lodged with the Colombo Fraud Investigation Bureau against the Government Printer and the Secretary to the Ministry of Media regarding the online release of falsified documents bearing a forged Speaker’s certificate.

Attorney-at-Law Aruna Laksiri has lodged a complaint with the Colombo Fraud Investigation Bureau requesting legal action against the Government Printer of the Department of Government Printing (No. 118, Dr. Danister de Silva Mawatha, Colombo 08), Prasanna Jayaratne, and the Secretary to the Ministry of Mass Media (Asidisi Medura, 163, Kirulapone Mawatha, Polhengoda, Colombo 05), Dr. Anil Jasinghe.

The complaint alleges the commission of offences by forging and uploading falsified documents online using a forged Speaker’s certification, failure to perform statutory duties, and misappropriation of public property.

The complaint states that a copy of the English translation of the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution was downloaded and printed from the official website of the Government Printing Department (www.documents.gov.lk), which operates under the Ministry of Mass Media. On its outer cover and on page 1, the text “certified on 25th of September, 2026” is inscribed inside brackets.

The complaint pointed out that the Speaker has certified an English translation. Under Articles 23, 79, 83, and 80 of the Constitution, Parliament enacts laws and the Speaker certifies bills strictly in the Sinhala and Tamil languages; under the Constitution, therefore the Speaker cannot apply such certification to an English translation.

Continue Reading

Trending