Connect with us

News

Ex-COPE chief calls for punitive surcharge

Published

on

Prof. Chaitha Herath expressing serious concerns about some state enterprises trying to manipulate government procedures at the expense of public sector financial discipline.

Litro legal wrangle:

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Former Chairman of the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) Prof. Charitha Herath has said the government is duty bound to prevent questionable actions of those who are at the helm of public sector enterprises.

The MP has suggested that those responsible for such actions be made to compensate the relevant enterprise for losses they cause.

Addressing the members of the Sri Lanka Audit Services Association at its 63rd AGM held at the Waters Edge, Battaramulla, early this week, Prof. Herath revealed that the state-owned Litro Gas had resorted to legal action at a cost of approximately Rs 20 mn in a bid to prevent the Auditor General’s scrutiny of its transactions.

Prof. Herath said that Litro shouldn’t be allowed to avoid government supervision under any circumstances.

If necessary laws had been available, a surcharge could have been imposed on those responsible, Prof. Herath said.

Pointing out that the Litro management had moved the Supreme Court in a bid to block the Auditor General, Prof. Herath said 99 percent of the shares of Litro were held by the State-owned Sri Lanka Insurance Company (SLIC).

During the first session of the 9th Parliament, the COPE inquired into the circumstances under which Litro had avoided the State auditing process for nearly two years.

Prof. Herath said: “We were finally able to defeat their attempt. Auditing resumed after the change at the top.”

In July last year, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa brought in Theshara Jayasinghe as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) at Litro. The Viyathmaga activist succeeded Anil Koswatte. Subsequent to the change at the top, a comprehensive audit that had been undertaken on the instructions of Auditor General WPC Wickremaratne recently revealed the amounts categorised as legal fees. Among those whose services had been obtained were Romesh de Silva, PC and Sanjeeva Jayawardena, PC, Chairman of the Monetary Board Risk Oversight Committee, in addition to being the Chairman of the Ethics Committee of the Central Bank.

MP Herath alleged that a despicable attempt had been made to make use of a line or two in the Constitution to deprive the AG of the right to audit the profit-making enterprise.

Prof. Herath asked whether some heads of public enterprises acted outside the purview of the top political authority. MP Herath called for legal provision for recovering losses due to questionable decisions taken by those at the helm of such enterprises.

The UNP-led yahapalana government rejected government auditors’ plea for provision in the National Audit Bill (NAB) to recover losses caused by questionable actions. The Parliament endorsed the NAB in early July 2018 after the removal of proposed provisions as regards surcharge.

Prof. Herath paid a glowing tribute to government auditors for accepting the challenge as well as the difficult task of maintaining financial discipline regardless of threats. The former COPE Chief acknowledged that the auditors faced intimidations, pressure as well as threats from decision makers at the highest levels of the government as well as those involved in corruption.

The National List MP pointed out that as the audit service hadn’t been accommodated within any ministry, governments tend to ignore the difficulties experienced by them. The MP stressed that the auditors served the State and not any particular government formed by a political party or an alliance.

MP Herath explained how institutions that had been independent were gradually brought under ministries over the years leaving the Parliament and the Auditor General as the only ones outside the purview of ministers. According to the former COPE Chief Litro wasn’t the only enterprise that had declared that the parliamentary watchdog committee as well as the Auditor General did not have any authority to scrutinise their transactions.



News

AgriConnect Sri Lanka’ to be launched on 30 October to Modernise the Agricultural Sector Through Digitalisation

Published

on

By

A discussion on the official launch of the ‘AgriConnect Sri Lanka’ programme was held at the Presidential Secretariat on Tuesday  (13) morning between Secretary to the President Dr. Nandika Sanath Kumanayake and a delegation led by Gevorg Sargsyan, World Bank Group Manager for Sri Lanka and the Maldives.

The discussion focused on the official launch of the ‘AgriConnect Sri Lanka’ programme, scheduled to take place on 30 October at TRACE Expert City.

The World Bank delegation provided a comprehensive briefing on the programme and emphasised that Sri Lanka is set to become the first country in South Asia to join this global initiative of the World Bank Group, marking a significant milestone.

Victor Anthonypillai, Senior Country Officer of the International Finance Corporation (IFC), Tomas Ricardo Rosada Villamar Practice Manager at the World Bank, Felipe F. Dizon, Senior Economist and Athula Senaratne, Senior Agriculture Specialist, also attended the meeting. The Presidential Secretariat was represented by Senior Assistant Secretary to the President Dr Danushka Perera and Assistant Secretary to the President R. A. Ruwanpathirana.

President’s Media Division (PMD)

Continue Reading

News

Prison rules to be revised over monks’ attire

Published

on

Harshana

Appointment of committee eyewash, says UNP

The government is considering changes to prison regulations pertaining to the treatment of Buddhist monks serving jail terms, including their right to wear monastic robes when taken outside prison.

Justice and National Integration Minister Harshana Nanayakkara announced the proposed changes yesterday (14) following the submission of an interim report by a committee appointed to review the rules and procedures governing prisons.

The report was handed over to Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake at the Presidential Secretariat.

One of the key recommendations is to amend Prison Standing Order 356 by introducing a new provision, 356(A). The proposed revision would require prison authorities to consult the Department of Buddhist Affairs on the removal of a monk’s robes upon admission to prison. The Commissioner of Prisons would be allowed 10 days to notify the department and take the necessary steps.

A separate amendment to Departmental Order 550 would allow Buddhist monks to wear their robes whenever they are taken outside prison, unless their respective Nikaya formally requests that the privilege be withdrawn.

The committee has also recommended extending similar arrangements, with suitable modifications, to members of other religious clergy who are imprisoned.

The proposals follow concerns raised over the treatment of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera after he was taken into custody. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake subsequently held discussions with representatives of the three main Buddhist Nikayas and appointed the committee to examine the existing legal framework.

Nanayakkara said the interim report had been forwarded to the Acting Commissioner General of Prisons, along with instructions to revise the relevant standing orders in accordance with its recommendations.

The proposed amendments have yet to be confirmed as formally implemented.

Meanwhile, the UNP yesterday criticised the government’s decision to appoint a committee to make recommendations on the attire to be worn by imprisoned Buddhist monks and other religious leaders when taken outside prison, describing the move as unnecessary.

In a statement issued yesterday (14), the UNP said the procedures governing the matter were already clearly set out in the Department of Prisons’ Standing Orders, making the appointment of a separate committee unwarranted.

The party cited remarks by Professor G.L. Peiris, Convenor of the Janathawadi Joint Opposition, who had described the committee’s appointment as a

“complete eyewash” and questioned the need for such a move.

Referring to Standing Order 550 of the Prisons Department, the UNP said convicted prisoners appearing before court for legal proceedings should not be required to wear prison uniforms.

It further stated that the regulations allowed prisoners to wear civilian clothing consistent with what they wore before imprisonment, including attire appropriate to their cultural and religious backgrounds.

The UNP accused the government of unnecessarily prolonging the issue by appointing a committee, despite the existence of regulations governing prisoners’ attire.

The party also called on the government to seek forgiveness from the Mahanayake Thera and the Sangha Council of the Kotte Sri Kalyani Samagri Dharma Maha Sangha Sabha of the Siyam Maha Nikaya over the decision concerning the religious attire of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera.

Continue Reading

News

AC President recuses himself from hearing prison attire case pertaining to Gnanasara Thera

Published

on

Court of Appeal President Justice Rohantha Abeysuriya yesterday withdrew from the bench hearing petitions challenging the decision by prison authorities to require Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera to wear prison attire following his imprisonment.

The decision was announced when the petitions seeking to invalidate the prison authorities’ decision were taken up for consideration on October 14.

Following his withdrawal, a three-judge bench was appointed to hear the petitions.

The petitions relate to the prison authorities’ decision to require Gnanasara Thera to wear prison attire after he was taken into custody to serve the remainder of his sentence for contempt of court.

In September this year, the Supreme Court annulled the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera by former President Maithripala Sirisena in May 2019.

Following the ruling, the Court of Appeal directed the Commissioner General of Prisons to take the necessary steps to enforce the remainder of the monk’s prison sentence.

Gnanasara Thera had originally been sentenced to six years’ imprisonment for contempt of court but had served only around nine months before receiving the presidential pardon in 2019.

Continue Reading

Trending