Business
Bangladesh – Sri Lanka Preferential Trade Agreement: Gains and policy challenges
By Asanka Wijesinghe and Chathurrdhika Yogarajah
0espite enhanced trade partnerships in South Asia, intra-regional trade is far from reaching its theoretical potential. Similar production patterns and competitive sectors can be the causes. However, bilateral discussions to further lower trade costs continue. The ongoing Bangladesh-Sri Lanka discussions on a preferential trade agreement (PTA) will benefit from knowing the potential gains from reducing bilateral trade costs. In addition, knowledge of products with higher potential for export gains will help optimise the economic benefits from a trade deal.
Bangladesh – Sri Lanka Trade:
The Current Status
In 2018, when discussions on a PTA began to firm up, Sri Lanka’s exports to Bangladesh were USD 133 million, while imports from Bangladesh were USD 37 million. Despite the low trade volume, Sri Lanka’s exports to Bangladesh have grown (Figure 1). In addition, Sri Lanka records a bilateral trade surplus with Bangladesh, which is encouraging given the country’s trade deficit concerns. However, weak growth of exports from Bangladesh to Sri Lanka can be seen from 2001 to 2016 (Figure 1).
The current trade deals between the two countries are still partially restrictive. Both countries keep a sensitive list of products that are not eligible for tariff cuts. Sri Lanka maintains a list of 925 products sanctioned by SAFTA (South Asian Free Trade Area) while Bangladesh keeps 993 products. Sri Lanka’s sensitive list covers USD 6.2 million or 23.8% of imports from Bangladesh. The sensitive list of Bangladesh covers USD 77.6 million or 62% of imports from Sri Lanka. Thus, the elimination of sensitive lists may benefit Sri Lanka more.
Figure 1: Trade Intensity between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka

Source: Authors’ Illustration using Trademap Data.
Theoretically, bilateral alliances deepen trade by removing weaknesses in existing multilateral trade arrangements. A trade deal between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka can simplify trade regulations further. In addition, Bangladesh needs alternative preferential access as graduation from Least Developed Country (LDC) status will take away preferential access to its key markets. For Sri Lanka, increasing bilateral participation in production value chains, especially in the textiles sector, might be an economic motivation. Financial support extended by Bangladesh to manage Sri Lanka’s foreign currency pressures might be a political motivation for a trade deal.
Eliminating sensitive lists can lead to trade creation, although it may not happen due to political and economic reasons. When it comes to tariff cuts, both countries will act defensively as certain products in the sensitive lists are vital for employment and revenue generation. Thus, the success of a trade deal depends on how many products with high export potential are under its purview. In this direction, a group of products with specific characteristics can be identified as an offensive list. For example, Sri Lanka’s offensive list includes products that Bangladesh imports from anywhere in the world, produced by Sri Lanka with a capacity for expansion. Sri Lanka has a comparative advantage in exporting that good, and Bangladesh already has a tariff on the product.
Export Gains from Tariff Elimination
If tariffs on the sensitive lists are eliminated, there will be modest export gains for Bangladesh and Sri Lanka in absolute terms. Sri Lanka will gain USD 24.7 to 49.7 million of exports to Bangladesh, while Bangladesh will gain USD 2.1 to 4.5 million of exports to Sri Lanka. Potential export gains are given in a range due to assumptions on elasticity values used in the partial equilibrium model. Elimination of sensitive lists will generate a higher tariff revenue loss to Bangladesh, ranging between USD 13.5 million to USD 19.1 million. By contrast, Sri Lanka’s revenue loss will be slight at USD 1.4 million to USD 1.9 million.
Whatever the arrangement, it is crucial to include the products with high export potential in the offensive lists (See Table 1 for the major products). Out of 39 products in Bangladesh’s offensive list, 21 are intermediate goods, while 18 are consumption goods. Similarly, 75 out of 115 products in Sri Lanka’s offensive list are intermediate goods. Tariff cuts on intermediate products may induce fragmented production between two countries, which would harness country-specific comparative advantages. Major intermediate goods in the offensive lists are dyed cotton fabrics, cartons, boxes, and cases, plain woven fabrics of cotton, denim, natural rubber, and smoked sheets of natural rubber (Table 1).

The ex-ante estimates predict modest gains for Sri Lanka and Bangladesh in absolute terms, even after completely removing the sensitive list. But complete removal is politically challenging for both countries. Moreover, Bangladesh as an LDC may expect special and differential (S&D) treatment. Thus, the outcome can be a limited PTA in line with weaknesses in existing trade agreements governing South Asian trade. The impact on trade of regional trade agreements in force is negative primarily due to stringent general regulatory measures, including rules of origin (ROO), sensitive lists, and prolonged phasing-in. Given that the estimated modest economic gains of a Bangladesh-Sri Lanka PTA do not justify a trade deal that requires substantial resources for negotiations,the PTA should have fewer regulatory measures and tariff concessions for the products on the offensive lists to maximise the economic benefits of a PTA between the two countries.
Link to the full Talking Economics blog: https://www.ips.lk/talkingeconomics/2022/01/20/bangladesh-sri-lanka-preferential-trade-agreement-gains-and-policy-challenges/
Asanka Wijesinghe is a Research Economist at IPS with research interests in macroeconomic policy, international trade, labour and health economics. He holds a BSc in Agricultural Technology and Management from the University of Peradeniya, an MS in Agribusiness and Applied Economics from North Dakota State University, and an MS and PhD in Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics from The Ohio State University. (Talk with Asanka – asanka@ips.lk)
Chathurrdhika Yogarajah is a Research Assistant at IPS with research interests in macroeconomics and trade policy. She holds a BSc (Hons) in Agricultural Technology and Management, specialised in Applied Economics and Business Management from the University of Peradeniya with First Class Honours. She is currently reading for her Master’s in Agricultural Economics at the Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, Peradeniya. (Talk with Chathurrdhika: chathurrdhika@ips.lk)
Business
Blue economy must move from ambition to investable projects – UNDP Country Economist
By Ifham Nizam
The next wave of blue growth will depend not merely on recognising the value of the ocean, but on turning conservation, business and finance into a pipeline of credible, investable projects, UNDP Country Economist Dr. Vagisha Gunasekara said.
Addressing the 11th Annual Technical Sessions of the Biodiversity Action Forum 2026 at Shangri-La Colombo yesterday, Dr. Gunasekara challenged the private sector to move beyond broad commitments to ocean conservation and ask a more practical question: how can businesses, banks, investors and conservation organisations work together to create projects that are commercially viable while delivering measurable environmental and social benefits?
Delivering the keynote address on “The Next Wave of Blue Growth: Private Sector Entry Points for Productive Investment, Conservation, CSR and Blue Finance,” she said the discussion should move from why the ocean matters to how the private sector could participate in the blue economy.
‘The private sector is already in the blue economy, whether it recognises that exposure or not, she said.
The challenge, she added, was whether businesses would engage deliberately with the opportunities and risks associated with marine and coastal ecosystems or wait until environmental degradation translated into higher costs.
Dr. Gunasekara said healthy reefs, mangroves, seagrass beds, clean beaches and productive fishing grounds should no longer be viewed merely as environmental assets.
‘They are productive economic infrastructure, she said.
Such ecosystems underpin tourism, fisheries, food security, coastal protection, livelihoods, shipping and logistics, while supporting biodiversity and a range of economic sectors.
‘When a road is not maintained, there is an economic cost and we know it. But when a reef, a lagoon, a mangrove system or a fishing ground is not maintained, we often fail to see the cost until it is already showing up in lower productivity, weaker tourism value, higher risk and lost livelihoods, she said.
For Sri Lanka, this has particular significance given the country’s extensive maritime space.
‘We are more ocean than island, Gunasekara said, pointing out that the country’s economic imagination had not yet fully caught up with its geographical reality.
‘When we talk about the economy, we talk about agriculture, industry, tourism, trade, investment and infrastructure. But how often do we treat the ocean as infrastructure? Too often, we just treat it as scenery, she said.
Gunasekera stressed that marine degradation was not simply an environmental problem but increasingly a business risk.
Tourism and hospitality depend on beaches, reefs, marine life and clean coastal environments, while seafood and aquaculture depend on healthy ecosystems and responsible production.
Coastal logistics and infrastructure require climate-resilient shorelines and predictable planning, while coastal real estate faces exposure to erosion, flooding and climate-related risks.
For finance and insurance, the challenge is increasingly about understanding, pricing and managing these risks.
‘These risks show up on hotels’ occupancy rates, they show up in fisher catch volumes, they show up in export access, they show up in insurance exposure, they show up in infrastructure damage, in the cost of capital as well, she said.
Gunasekara outlined four major pathways through which the private sector could engage with the blue economy.
The first is productive activity, including sustainable tourism, aquaculture, fisheries, value addition, cold chains, maritime logistics, vessel and marina services, blue technology, renewable energy and other marine services.
The second is CSR and ESG, where companies could move away from one-off initiatives, such as beach clean-ups, towards structured, long-term and measurable corporate engagement.
This could include supporting coastal community livelihoods, monitoring and citizen science, ocean literacy, supplier traceability and measurable nature-positive outcomes.
The third is conservation partnerships, involving private-sector engagement with marine protected areas, restoration sites and conservation landscapes.
Such partnerships, she stressed, should not be confused with privatising nature or weakening public oversight.
Instead, the question should be how business could support effective management, visitor services, restoration and community-based conservation within clear regulatory frameworks.
The fourth pathway is finance, covering blended finance, blue bonds, guarantees, reef insurance, blue carbon, payments for ecosystem services, conservation loans and bankable project pipelines.
Business
Union Bank recognised among Sri Lanka’s Top 20 Women-Friendly Workplaces
Union Bank has been recognised at the Satyn Women-Friendly Workplace Awards 2026 for the second consecutive time, reaffirming the Bank’s commitment to building a diverse, inclusive workplace where women are empowered to lead, grow and thrive. Thishani Dissanayake, Vice President Marketing said “Union Bank continues to support and empower women at every level providing diverse opportunities for growth and this award is a proud reflection of the dedication, efforts and strength of all women at Union Bank”.
Business
Seylan Bank appoints Krishan Thilakaratne Deputy Chairman
Seylan Bank PLC has announced the appointment of Krishan Thilakaratne, Non‑Executive Director, as the Deputy Chairman of the Board with effect from 17th August 2026.
Thilakaratne was appointed as a Non-Executive Director to the Board in 2018, and the progression to Deputy Chairman, reaffirms his long‑standing governance role and leadership capacity.
He currently serves as Director/CEO of LOLC Finance PLC and is a member of the Senior Management Team of LOLC Holdings PLC.
Thilakaratne carries over three decades of experience in banking and finance. He began his career at Seylan Bank in September 1990, at the age of 19, as a Banking Assistant, before joining LOLC Group in 1995. Today, he counts more than 31 years of expertise in management, credit, channel management, marketing, factoring, portfolio management, and Islamic finance.
He holds extensive international exposure, serving on boards in Southeast Asia and Central Asia, including the Philippines, Indonesia, Pakistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Egypt. His leadership roles extend to LOLC Moliya, Tajikistan, OJSC Micro Finance Company ‘ABN’, Kyrgyzstan, Finance, Kazakhstan, Prasac Microfinance Institution Ltd, Cambodia, LOLC Egypt, and additionally advising Lombard Micro Finance Company in Tajikistan.
In Sri Lanka, Thilakaratne has contributed significantly to the financial services sector, serving as a Board Member of the Credit Information Bureau of Sri Lanka (CRIB), Commercial Insurance Brokers (Pvt) Ltd. He has also held the position of Chairman of the Finance Houses Association of Sri Lanka (FHASL), the apex body for Non‑Bank Financial Institutions.
A Passed Finalist of the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) UK and Associate Member of the Institute of Bankers of Sri Lanka (AIB), Thilakaratne has completed the Strategic Leadership Training Programme in Microfinance at Harvard Business School, USA.
-
News6 days agoCountry’s first woman Surveyor General appointed
-
Business5 days agoSriLankan Airlines makes ShakthiSAT Mission possible for talented Sri Lankan student
-
Sports7 days agoTharanga, Weber headline stellar Lausanne javelin field
-
Features6 days agoMedical education in Sri Lanka: Then and now
-
Business7 days agoMannar’s offshore opportunity: the dollar question behind Sri Lanka’s oil and gas search
-
Latest News5 days agoImran Khan moved to private hospital amid deteriorating health
-
Latest News5 days agoGovernment has declared 21, 22 and 23 August 2026 as national days of mourning
-
Latest News4 days agoTharanga edges out Chopra in 88m javelin battle
