Connect with us

Opinion

A word of advice to govt.

Published

on

By N.A.de S. AMARATUNGA

This Government was elected to office with a huge majority, considered impossible in a PR electoral system. There were two important factors that contributed to this victory; one was the immense popularity of the nationalist leaders of the SLPP, and two was the anti-national policies followed by the ‘yahapalana’ government and its dichotomous leadership, that bungled in every aspect of governance. Voters came, even from abroad, in large numbers, in a surge of nationalist feelings that seemed to proclaim “let us get together to save the country”. The Government, however, must not forget that such strong sentiment, like a tide, can turn against it if it does not get its act together.

It should not take for granted that just because it has the support of a large number of people, who have nationalist feelings, it could get away with major blunders, forever. Already the signs are visible that people are not very happy about what is going on, and all that disillusion is not due to Opposition propaganda alone. There seems to be a vibrant Opposition, as it should be, that grabs every opportunity to badly embarrass the Government. Instead of lambasting the Opposition, though there is enough ammunition to do so on account of their miserable failure during ‘yahapalana’ days, the Government must take stock of the situation and take remedial measures as soon as possible.

Issues seem to crop up almost on a daily basis, which, very often, take the form of a comedy of errors, with Government high-ups becoming the target of lampoons. There were several issues that impacted on the daily life of people, which were mismanaged and allowed to grow into disastrous situations; with growing suspicion that there could be corrupt practices also. Price of rice, the irregularity in relation to Customs duty on sugar, and import of contaminated coconut oil, were three such issues that caused a lot of damage to the reputation of the Government, recently. What made it worse for the Government was the unprofessional manner the Government explained matters to the public, and the appearance that an attempt was made to cover up. The various spokesmen for the Government could not, at least, speak in one voice. One would say contaminated coconut oil has not been released to the market and another would say coconut oil in the market is being tested for aflatoxin . The Opposition would latch on to this and shout from the tree tops that the coconut oil will bring cancer to the people in the New Year. With regard to price control of rice, one minister would say they will raid the stores of mill owners and take over the hoarded rice, while another would say they will import rice. The Opposition would shout that there will be no rice for the New Year “kiribath”.

Anyway, the issues regarding rice, sugar and coconut oil should have been more efficiently managed, without appearing to be bumbling along. If there had been any corruption, related to these matters, the Government must get to the bottom of it, find the culprits and punish them, irrespective of whether they are top ministers, government politicians or supporters. Else the canker will grow, resulting in the downfall of the government.

70% of those who voted for this Government are poor people. If the Government makes a genuine effort to improve their lot, mainly their income, health, education and housing, the effort of the Opposition to exaggerate the issues, which it must be said could occur under any government, would have less success. At present the Opposition seems to be having a field day with people tending to rally around it. The President’s visits to the villages would give a lot of confidence to the poor people, but whether what he promises are being implemented by the officials is something that needs to be looked into. The President must also focus on a comprehensive plan to take the people out from their abject poverty. He has said that is his intention and seems to be genuinely concerned about this matter. He had changed the strategy to combat Covid and avoided large scale lockdowns, keeping in mind the need for the economy to recover and things would have not been bad. Covid seems to be under control and the economy also seems to be recovering, according to the World Bank. The World Bank goes by economic parameters, like GDP, but whether the apparent growth reaches the people is not certain. Whether enough is being done to improve the poor people’s living standards is the question.

The President has said he would concentrate on developing an agro-economy. This indeed is laudable as 30% of the workforce, in Sri Lanka, is engaged in agriculture and related activities. Land is of short supply in a small island, and there is a tendency for encroachment, into forest reservation, for expansion of agricultural and other economic activity. This is like the stomach invading lung space and could be equally disastrous. Several such instances have been detected, and the Opposition may have exaggerated all this and attempted to show that the President is Eco-unfriendly. Some of his own MPs have added fuel to fire by taking on the forest conservation officers who are trying to do their job.

How could this problem be solved? An agro-economy would need to contribute at least 25% to the GDP. Now its contribution is only 8%. How could agricultural produce be increased without damaging the environment? What experts like Prof. C.S.Weeraratne have proposed is to employ scientific farming methods, like the use of high yielding varieties, better seeds and fertilizer, improved irrigation, greater mechanization, better storage and transportation facilities. Funding for this work must be found and there cannot be any excuses because people can see that the Government has enough money to spend on the comfort of their politicians. Further, if corruption is curbed, money would be available for these projects. The President is known as a big achiever and a ‘no-nonsense’ person, and his track record in this regard is excellent. It is disappointing and sad to see a Government, headed by such a person, bungling along, due to the activities of incompetent ministers.

Self-sufficiency in essential food items should be a priority. If this is the policy of the Government why is it importing coconut oil. If we are not producing enough coconut, why do we export coconut products. About 7% of our exports, in 2020, were coconut products, and 50% of this was kernel. Is it a better trade policy to export local products and import the same products in a different form from abroad? Is there any logic in this? We must export essential items only if we are producing in excess of local requirements. One hopes there is no corruption involved in the practice of exporting coconut kernel, and then importing it back in the form of oil.

Government must not forget that its sustaining force is its nationalist orientation. Its nationalism should be based on the national consciousness of the people, and it must be defensive and protective, but not oppressive or chauvinistic. It must protect all communities and treat them equally. It must look at every issue from the national point of view, and look for solutions within that framework. Nationalism of this government has been castigated as racial by some commentators who support separatism. Government must avoid doing anything that would be ammunition for such commentators.

Its decision not to enter into the MCC agreement is in keeping with its nationalist policies. The way it handled the UNHRC Resolution was also good, but more could have been done in this regard. It could have made use of the seemingly unsolicited helping hand that Lord Naseby extended. By unwittingly spurning it, the Government appears to be accepting the view of separatists and their supporters that Lord Naseby is a “backbencher”, and, therefore, his view does not carry weight. However, it could be said en passe that the viewpoints of people like Siobhan McDonagh, Labour MP who supports separatists, are being made use of by separatists, despite the fact that she is a “backbencher”.

Some say there is no unity in the Government and there are “ginger groups” and disgruntled members. There is reason to believe that this may be true. Disagreements and disputes came out into the open and there was washing of dirty linen in public. This could be very damaging to the future of the government and the SLPP. Such things should not be allowed to happen. Differences must be settled by engaging in cordial discussions in a spirit of give and take. A nationalist government in Sri Lanka, with its strategic location in the Indian Ocean, could have many powerful external enemies. If it develops internal animosity and strife its days would be numbered. Let it learn a lesson from what happened in 2014, which resulted in the ‘yahapalana’ regime and the ensuing huge damage to the economy and the independence of the country.

But more importantly, if the Government does not improve the poor man’s lot, which could be done only by developing a national economy, based on agriculture that contributes about 25% to the GDP, the Government would be doomed. It is not the time for mega projects, like elevated railroads and highways. Such activity will not reach the poor people sufficiently to alleviate their poverty, as shown in the past where nationalist governments were defeated, despite achieving much with such big projects.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Prof. Harshana Sasanka Rambukwella: A Charismatic Pedagogue

Published

on

Harshana

Yesterday, a sumptuous rainbow manifested over Pera. I could not but think of you, my friend!

Harshana was my batchmate at Pera in 1997.

Since he was the only boy among a bevy of girls, taking the first year English course offered by the English Department, Professor Erskine called him the “thorn among roses” at the very first lecture we had with him. But Harshana Sasanka Rambukwella was never a thorn in anyone’s side, so the name did not stick.

He was a lovely human who was happy to spread goodwill among all he associated with. What I remember most distinctly about him is that he was level-headed even as a raw fresher and could argue a point with strength without showing an ounce of unnecessary aggression. Though he had a temper it was reserved for what called for anger.

My most distinct memory of him is when he and I went to the E.F.C. Ludowyk memorial lecture, when Dr. Jayantha Dhanapala spoke on Neruda, as a poet and diplomat. We were awe -struck and though shy as freshers enjoyed the academic atmosphere and the sophistication Dr. Dhanapala exuded. I am glad we did not know of Neruda’s darker side then. That would have spoilt the experience.

I also remember that we chortled when Professor Walter Perera told us not to partake of the refreshments, sotto voce because he had not thought that many people would show up. Then later, good old “Wally,” told us to go on and tuck in because there was enough to go around, with very visible relief. The two of us laughed and chuckled all the way home.

Those were good times.

I was reminded of his temper when I met him as my Professor in my Sociology of Education class, which he taught with Professor Harini Amarasuriya. It was one of the most enjoyable sessions that I was fortunate enough to attend. He would speak on Pierre Bourdieu with such magnanimous expertise helping even the most reluctant of students understand the depth of the French sociologist and philosopher’s views on education and other matters, relating these theories as they should be adopted in the teaching of English in Sri Lanka. When students in his zoom meetings were quiet, he would say with severity, ” the level of engagement is very low.”

The Charismatic Pedagogue was the title on one of his kuppi talks contributions. He was indeed a charismatic Pedagogue.

When he brought up the notion of the Brown Sahib and Thomas Macaulay, I could not help but feel nostalgic, reminded of the time we had spent as raw freshers at Pera. There was Ramila, who remained his best friend until he passed away and of course Prashani and many others. There was nothing very raw about Harshana. He was always a gentleman whether as a young man or as the gentleman I met last on 6th August 2022, when I first visited the PGIE. He would always check my availability when he called me later on and I would say “What men! Don’t stand on ceremony just call anytime!”

It was pure irony that he was one of the judges at a competition and when my entry which went without my name won, his happiness on my success was very evident when he called to congratulate me.

As a scholar, Professor Rambukwella has made many notable contributions both as the director of PGIE and also through his quite prolific writing and research which include research papers such as , Anagarika Dharmapala: the nation and its place in the world, Patriotic Science–The Corona Virus Pandemic, Nationalism, and Indigeneity, and the countless papers he co-authored with the best in the field, and his explorations on Sri Lankan English and last but not least his magnum opus: The Politics and Poetics of Authenticity: A Cultural Genealogy of Sinhala Nationalism.’ This work translated by his good friend Professor Wasantha A. Liyanage, “Amare,” will influence the Sri Lankan reader for time to come. It was a timely and necessary work which will in future help countless students, scholars and readers make sense of the dialogue surrounding the notion of Sri Lankan Nationalism as manifest in politics and literature and Sri Lankan culture. He was not simply an academic he was a man of taste who lived and loved and partook of culture.

Harshana’s life, though brief made its mark on the world because he was not simply an idealist, he was an activist and a trade unionist. He led by example and was a mentor to countless people, students, writer and scholars and a miscellany of others who defy labelling. This must be a trait that he inherited from his father, who was a mild gentleman when we met him during his stint at the English Teaching Unit, but had a reputation as one of the best teachers and school masters Dharmaraja College, Kandy could boast of.

Harshana was a great scholar, a teacher par excellence and a warm kind hearted human being. He will be missed, not only by Prashani, and the two lovely girls about whom I have heard so much, but by everyone who knew him however briefly.

Rest easy my friend! You will be loved. Your life though brief is a cause for celebration not for lament!

By Ashanthi Ekanayake

Continue Reading

Opinion

Ragging and loss of life

Published

on

Recently another life of an undergraduate was lost due to barbaric ragging at the Sabaragamuwa University. This is not the first time this happened at this University and sometime back a girl committed suicide due to inhumane ragging.  It is pertinent to examine some of the factors as to why this sort of inhumane ragging goes on unabated in the universities. The most important factor as to why ragging cannot be stopped falls on the university administration. Vice Chancellors are mortally scared of these violent student groups backed by their unions to take punitive action against the perpetrators of this violence. This may be because they want to paint a picture of a peaceful atmosphere in the universities to their political masters who appointed them in the first place. These vice Chancellors are also aware of instances where strong action taken against ragging by Vice Chancellors in the past resulted in their removal such as Prof. Epitawatte at Sri Jayewardenepura and Prof, Sujeewa Amarasena at the Ruhuna University. They desist from taking action with the students because of the fear that the students will organiSe protests and even resort to physical violence against them. Academic staff members also turn a blind eye even when they see instances where ragging is openly carried out by the seniors. This may be because they themselves were raggers in the past and see nothing harmful in such sordid instances of ragging. Unlike in the past, ragging today is inhuman, violating privacy and forcing hapless undergraduates into the worst forms of human torture.

Ragging is most prevalent in halls of residence where the wardens and sub wardens simply turn the other way and never try to stop this menace. Wardens are collecting points for their next promotion and do not see that it is their duty to look after the welfare of the students.

Police, too, are to be blamed for not taking action against raggers under the Anti-ragging Act even after the university produces these culprits at the police station. I can well remember the case of a ragging incident at the Peradeniya University, where the accused were handed over to the police and they wanted to record it as a case of two student groups involved in a fight. Some time ago, the Police Department stated that all forms of ragging should be reported to the CID but nothing happened under this arrangement. Similarly, recently the Attorney General gave an undertaking to the supreme court that the vice chancellors have been instructed to prevent ragging in the universities but this is just restricted to actions on paper and nothing substantial has come out.  Similarly, the Attorney General’s department takes years to prosecute raggers who have been caught, produced before judges and released on bail. There is a case of some agriculture faculty students who were caught red handed in a safe house outside the University premises at Peradeniya several years ago. The Attorney General has still not filed action against these students.

This year 1250 students have been selected to the Faculty of Arts at the Peradeniya University, where there are only150 males including 30-Buddhist monks. This shows that males shy away from attending a state university and think that it is better for them to go to a private university where there is no ragging. In fact, private universities have more males than females and the underlying reason is the lack of ragging in these private universities.

The political parties who back the student unions cry hoarse for preserving free education but they do not have the slightest idea that these ragging incidents are a big threat to free education. It is up to the Government to set up effective mechanisms to curb ragging including strict instructions to the police and the legal system to deal with these cases under the anti-ragging act.

by Professor O. A. Ileperuma,
Emeritus Professor, University of Peradeniya

Continue Reading

Opinion

Remembering Dr. Samuel Mathew: A Heart that Healed Countless Lives

Published

on

It is with a deeply heavy heart that I express my sincere condolences on the passing of Dr. Samuel Mathew Kalarickal on the 20th of April 2024. Born in 1948, Dr. Samuel was not only a pioneer of interventional cardiology in India but a giant in South Asian healthcare whose influence extended far beyond national borders.

A Beacon of Excellence and Compassion

Known as the “Father of Angioplasty” in India, Dr. Samuel introduced life-saving coronary interventions when they were still rare. His leadership at Apollo Hospitals and Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital brought cardiac care to global standards. But beyond the accolades, it was his humility, compassion, and unwavering dedication to patients that truly set him apart.

A Lasting Impact on Sri Lanka

Dr. Samuel played a pivotal role in shaping modern cardiac care in Sri Lanka. In the 1990s and early 2000s, many Sri Lankan patients sought his expertise in India, trusting him with their lives. He treated them with care and dignity, leaving lasting impressions on families across the island.

He also trained and mentored numerous Sri Lankan cardiologists, generously sharing knowledge of advanced procedures and technologies. His efforts helped uplift cardiac care back home and empowered many of us to bring those skills to our own communities.

A Mentor Who Lit the Path

To me, Dr. Samuel was more than a mentor—he was a fatherly figure. I fondly recall our time at the 2011 Coimbatore meeting, where he urged me to form the Sri Lanka STEMI Forum. His guidance helped us create national strategies and treatment models for heart attack care—an initiative that continues to save lives today.

A Legacy That Lives On

Dr. Samuel leaves behind more than medical breakthroughs. He leaves behind a legacy of service, inspiration, and heart. His memory will live on in every life he touched, every doctor he guided, and every patient he healed.

You will be remembered always, Sir—not just for what you did, but for who you were.
May your soul find eternal peace.

Dr Gotabhaya Ranasinghe

Continue Reading

Trending