Connect with us

News

US National Security, foremost factor in ‘Export Control & Border Security’ project in Sri Lanka: ex-State Dept employee

Published

on

US Embassy Website carried the above photograph Ambassador Chung introducing the new arrival from Washington

Retired Foreign Service National Political Specialist of the U.S. Department of State Daya Gamage who was in the Political Division of the US Embassy in Sri Lanka has said that the US was stepping up an operation here meant to enhance its own security.

American ambassador Julie Chung announced recently the arrival of an official to join her diplomatic staff, in the wordings of a twitter message from the ambassador “Welcome a new team member from US Export Control and Border Security (EXBS) to work with the GoSL to develop and enhance systems for safe, productive ports, ensuring SL can strengthen trade and exports to build the economy in this challenging period.”

The announcement largely went unnoticed as it would have been considered another Washington assistance to lift Sri Lanka’s economy from its current doldrums, he said.

In what manner could Washington endeavor to help “for safe, productive ports, ensuring SL can strengthen trade and exports,” never came to anyone’s mind, Gamage added.

Gamage issued the following statement: “On the face of the announcement Washington intentions were to “strengthen trade and exports to build the economy in this challenging period” which is an immediate need of Sri Lanka, but the background check revealed the foremost objective was indeed to strengthen and enhance the national security of the United States which was its prime focus since 2016 with the undertaking of building military capabilities and economic power in the Indo-Pacific region to lessen the clout of China. What happened here, with the arrival of the official from Washington, is that the United States Government stepped into Sri Lanka, which is strategically located at the center of the Indo-Pacific region to do just that.

The US is already has three defense and technology agreements with India.

It is interesting to find out the covert motives behind the declared intention to assist Sri Lanka, and how Washington could ‘bind’ Sri Lanka to assist its foremost objective in further strengthening its national security at a time when there is an imminent threat from China in the Indo-Pacific region.

Despite the Rajapaksa-controlled political entity continues to hold a clout in the legislature with its national and global credibility at a low ebb, it has collaborated with its presidential nominee Ranil Wickremasinghe for the latter to have a free hand in the governance knowing full well that he has better inroads to Western portals of power centers to seek economic assistance. The US has 16.6% control over the IMF and a greater clout in the World Bank.

Of course, Ranil Wickremasinghe as prime minister during 2002-2004 period – under Chandrika Kumaratunga’s disabled presidency – due to her political coalition losing control of the legislature in December 2001 elections followed by the surrender of the vital foreign and defense establishments to the prime minister of her rival party – signed two military agreement with the U.S. to facilitate to protect (from the International Criminal Court) alleged American war criminals engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan, and extend the facilities of the Colombo Airport to have easy transfer of alleged 9/11` terrorists in American custody to CIA torture chambers in other countries. India refused to sign both these agreements, vehemently opposing them. Washington progressively increased economic assistance during Wickremasinghe tenure due to the then Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage’s direct involvement in GSL-LTTE peace talks. The Norwegian negotiator Erik Solaheim, who was found favoring the LTTE at that time arrived in Colombo last week as an advisor on environment to President Ranil Wickremasinghe.

Could be Washington’s reading was correct – well fed by Julie Chung’s diplomatic post in Colombo – that President Ranil Wickremasinghe could facilitate to achieve what is intended by sending an official to fulfill the ‘national security’ tasks embedded in four U.S. federal regulations: (1) U.S. Export Control and Border Security (2) Export Control Reform Act (3) Export Administration Regulations and, (4) Bureau of Industry and Security.

The new arrival from Washington’s Export Control and Border Security is attached to the US Commerce Department under which the four US Federal regulations are strictly enforced through overseas diplomatic missions of the US Department of State under which Ambassador Julie Chung functions.

As Ambassador Chung herself in a twitter notification – announcing the new arrival from Washington – mentioned the use of US Export Control and Border Security to strengthen Sri Lanka’s trade and export, it is pertinent to find out what the US Export Control Policy is:

With the stated policy to preserve the qualitative military superiority of the U.S. and to strengthen the U.S. defense industrial base, Washington will use export controls considering the impact of its economy to restrict the export of items which would make a significant contribution to the military potential of any other country while strengthening U.S. defense industrial base.

On May 16, 2019 the China-based Huawei Technologies operating in Sri Lanka was black listed by the Government of the United States. This is one of the world’s largest providers of telecommunications equipment, networking gear, smart phones and more.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on January 28, 2019, charged Huawei with bank fraud and stealing trade secrets. Huawei denied the U.S. charges, saying requests to meet with the US Justice Department had been “rejected without explanation.” The company said that the trade secret theft allegations were “already the subject of a civil suit that was settled by the parties.”

The targeted goals of the US Export Control Policy were, to carry out the foreign policy of the United States, including the protection of human rights and the promotion of democracy, to ensure national security controls are tailored to focus on those core technologies and other items that are capable of being used to pose a serious national security threat to the United States, to ensure national security controls are tailored to focus on those core technologies and other items that are capable of being used to pose a serious national security threat to the United States. One other objective is the national security of the United States requires that the United States maintain its leadership in the science, technology, engineering, and manufacturing sectors, including foundational technology that is essential to innovation. Such leadership requires that United States persons are competitive in global markets. The last objective explains why Washington black listed Huawei Technologies operating in many countries including Sri Lanka.

The Export Control Policy document has clearly stated that the “US needs to do the hard internal work of deciding which specific commodities, software, and technologies should, for example, be controlled to (i) respond to human rights abuses; (ii) support a “global level playing field;” (iii) address “legal, ethical, and political concerns” about emerging technologies; (iv) respond to civil-military fusion policies in countries of concern; (v) avoid disruptions to strategic supply chains; and (vi) respond to “technology acquisition strategies, including economic coercive measures.” The primary agencies responsible for such work are the export control agencies at the departments of Commerce, Defense, State, and Energy.”

It is within these parameters that the Government of the United States will engage in discourses with the Government of Sri Lanka, and an experienced official from the US Department of Commerce, just arrived at the American Embassy, to fulfill Washington’s desire to hold onto its hegemony in the Indo-Pacific region.

What is understood and seen from outside is “to work with the GoSL to develop and enhance systems for safe, productive ports, ensuring SL can strengthen trade and exports to build the economy in this challenging period.”



News

Proposed EPF-ETF merger harmful to private sector workers – FSP

Published

on

Nagamuwa

… alleges NPP trying to implement UPFA, UNP plan

Front-line Socialist Party (FSP) yesterday (24) alleged that the NPP government’s move to amalgamate the Employees’ Trust Fund (ETF) and the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF), under a unified, tripartite governance framework, would be detrimental to the private sector workers.

Addressing the media at Melder Place, Nugegoda, FSP spokesman Duminda Nagamuwa said that the Cabinet of Ministers approved this proposal on 15 June.

Nagamuwa claimed that the NPP was trying to implement what President Mahinda Rajapaksa had sought to do, in 2011, causing the police to open fire on a group of the Export Processing Zone workers, protesting against the move to create a private pension scheme. A worker, identified as Roshen Chanaka, was shot by police on May 30, 2011, and he succumbed to his injuries.

Pointing out that the EPF and the ETF had been established for the benefit of private sector workers but with different objectives, Nagamuwa warned that amalgamation of the two funds could cause unnecessary complications.

The FSP spokesman said that Ravi Karunanayake, in his capacity as the Finance Minister of the Yahapalana government, in late November 2015 had declared their intention to amalgamate the ETF with the EPF.

FSP’s Pubudu Jayagoda told The Island that they expected all political parties, other than the NPP, to disclose their stand on the vital issue. Jayagoda urged the Opposition to take a stand on the vital issue .

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Opposition argues that National Environment Amendment Bill is unconstitutional

Published

on

Premadasa

The Opposition yesterday argued in Parliament that the National Environment Amendment Bill was unconstitutional. The Opposition said that it violated the 13th Amendment.

SJB and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa argued that the approval of the Provincial Councils was required for the Bill to go ahead, as it was a subject in the Concurrent List of powers as per the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.

The MP also said that the clause which enables the Central Government to file legal actions against Local Government bodies was unconditional as well, since local bodies are included in the Provincial Councils list.

“How can you go ahead at a time when the Provincial Councils do not function properly,” Premadasa questioned.

ITAK MP P. Sathyalingam also raised the issue, but Speaker Jagath Wickramaratne, who responded, said the MPs could raise the relevant matters during the debate.

Continue Reading

News

ITAK makes representations to BJP TN President

Published

on

Sivagnanam Shritharan (left) meets BJP's Tamil Nadu state President, Nainar Nagenthran

The leader of the Ilankai Tamil Arasu Kachchi (ITAK) and parliamentarian Sivagnanam Shritharan recently met the Bharatiya Janata Party’s Tamil Nadu state president, Nainar Nagenthran in India during a three-day visit in which discussions centred on the political and livelihood challenges facing Tamils in the North-East of Sri Lanka.

According to a statement issued by MP Shritharan, the talks ranged across a number of contemporary issues confronting the Tamil people among them the demolition of ancestral Tamil Hindu temples and the construction of Buddhist viharas in their place, the skeletal remains being exhumed at the Chemmani mass grave, and efforts to secure justice for the alleged genocide committed against the Tamil people.

The statement said the two sides had also discussed a lasting settlement to the Tamil national question.

“There was an extensive exchange of views between both sides on a permanent political solution for the Eelam Tamils and the political aspirations of the Tamil people.”

The two had agreed to continue such meetings and consultations in future, the statement added, and Shritharan was hosted for lunch during the visit.

Also present was the veteran Tamil political figure K. S. Radhakrishnan, described in the statement as having more than fifty years of experience in Tamil political affairs, along with the BJP’s Tamil Nadu state secretary and several senior party representatives.

Nagenthran, a former Tamil Nadu state minister, has headed the BJP’s Tamil Nadu unit since April 2025 and is leading the party’s bid to unseat the governing DMK in the state.

Continue Reading

Trending