Opinion
UNHRC has institutionalised bias
There is a glaring disparity in the treatment of countries in the world today when it comes to the issue of human rights. Developing nations, which are often plagued by economic instability, poverty, and political instability, have become victims of an unjust approach by the United Nations Human Rights Council.
The UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), a vital international institution, has a crucial role in the protection and promotion of human rights globally. The council is mandated to address human rights violations and make recommendations to member states. However, a concerning pattern of unfair treatment has emerged in the council’s approach towards developing countries in recent years.
The composition of the Council itself raises questions about its impartiality and fairness, as certain developed nations with questionable human rights records hold significant influence over the council. For instance more than a decade after dozens of detainees were held in a CIA-operated secret detention system in Guantanamo Bay – authorized from 2001 to 2009 – no one had been brought to justice for the crimes under international law and systematic human rights violations committed under that programme, including enforced disappearance, torture, and other ill-treatment conducted by the United States of America.
One of the key issues that illustrate the unfair treatment is the double standards applied within the council. Developed countries, with their greater resources and influence, often evade adequate investigations into their own human rights violations. The council’s approach towards developing nations often lacks tangible empathy and understanding of the challenges these countries face. At the Seventy-Seventh session, 24th and 25th meetings of the United Nations General Assembly, expressing his concern, Gerardo Peñalver Portal, Cuba’s Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs, said selectivity, punitive practices, and double standards contribute to the manipulation of human rights against the South, which leads to distrust in the Council. Many other nations echoed his thoughts.
Furthermore, the council’s intervention in developing countries is often motivated by political interests and ulterior motives, rather than a genuine commitment to improving human rights. Developed nations frequently exploit the council as a tool to further their geopolitical agendas, selectively targeting specific countries while turning a blind eye to others with a similar or worse human rights record. This selective approach is a clear manifestation of the power dynamics at play within the council, favoring influential nations over the weaker ones. At the Seventy-Eighth Session,53rd and 54th meetings of the United Nations General Assembly, the Third Committee (Social, Humanitarian and Cultural) approved six resolutions, including on the human rights situations in Ukraine, Syria, Iran, Myanmar and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. At the outset, Azerbaijan’s delegate, on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement, expressed deep concern over the selective adoption of country-specific resolutions in the Committee and Human Rights Council. This practice exploits human rights for political purposes and breaches principles of universality, impartiality, and objectivity, she said.
The unfair treatment in the Human Rights Council’s approach towards developing countries is a troubling phenomenon that threatens the council’s credibility and undermines the quest for universal human rights.
Sri Lanka is being unfairly targeted by the UNHRC. Its crime? Defeating a terrorist group to protect the lives and property of the people!
The war against the LTTE was not started by the Sri Lankan government. It had no option but to take appropriate action against terrorism that the LTTE unleashed on the people and public institutions. It never gave up on reaching a negotiated settlement and held several peace talks and entered into peace agreements. These interludes were utilised by the LTTE to amass weapons and prepare to wage an all-out war with the intention of carving out a separate state, though alternate solutions that aimed to address the Tamil problem were on offer.
The situation came to a head when the LTTE denied water to 40000 farmer families in the Eastern Province and forced the government to go for a military defeat of the LTTE which it achieved in 2009. The western powers, which had been indirectly helping the LTTE, tried hard to stop the war and save the terrorists. The US and Europe have different policies regarding different terrorists, for instance the 9/11 twin-tower attack resulted in immediate bombing and occupation of several sovereign nations, while the complete wiping out of terrorists in Sri Lanka has evoked the wrath of these powers and consequently they manipulate the UNHRC to hound the armed forces and leaders who were responsible for defeating the most brutal terrorists in the world.
Some of the unprecedented actions taken so far by the UNHRC against Sri Lanka, which could be considered illegal according to the UN Charter and accepted procedure, are listed below to refresh our memory while the UNHRC is now in session in Geneva, with the Core Group (USA, UK, Canada) gunning for Sri Lanka;
UNHRC/UN Action:
Despite Sri Lanka appointing the Lessons Learned & Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) in May 2010, without waiting for Sri Lanka to present its report, UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon in June 2010 unilaterally appointed the Panel of Experts (PoE) without UN General Assembly or UN Security Council mandate.
These reports, leaked to the public, became political tools against Sri Lanka and formed the foundation for successive UNHRC resolutions and OHCHR reports.
In 2012 a resolution was passed calling on Sri Lanka to implement the PoE recommendations — even though the PoE had no legal standing and was a leaked report. It marked the first time a state was targeted with a resolution based on a non-UN mandated report & a conflict that had concluded.
UNHRC Actions:
2015 (Sept): Resolution 30/1 was adopted, co-sponsored by Sri Lanka’s regime-changed government, marking the first time a sovereign state endorsed a resolution against itself.
2017 & 2019: Roll-over resolutions (34/1, 40/1) extended intrusive external monitoring, keeping Sri Lanka trapped under UNHRC scrutiny despite the end of conflict.
2021 (March): UNHRC Resolution 46/1, was adopted granting the OHCHR a prosecutorial, evidence-gathering mandate—a significant overreach, since Sri Lanka is not an ICC member. Resolution 46/1 represents a dramatic extension of OHCHR authority—permitting quasi-prosecutorial functions without national or Security Council mandate.
High Commissioner, Volker Türk (2022 to present) has taken steps to expand funding/staff for “Sri Lanka accountability project,” effectively creating a permanent prosecution mechanism within OHCHR. He has issud one-sided reports focusing only on alleged state crimes, avoiding LTTE atrocities, post-2009 rehabilitation efforts, or Western double standards in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and Gaza.
In September 2025, Turk has visited one grave site, guided by LTTE narratives, and but ignored Thunukkai torture chamber graves of 3,000 Tamils documented by families. This selective memorialization reveals bias.
Turk has interfered in domestic cultural/legal matters by calling for legalization of same-sex marriage which is far outside OHCHR’s mandate, disregarding Sri Lanka’s Constitution, sovereignty, and cultural values.
Meanwhile he has failed to acknowledge Sri Lanka’s rehabilitation of 12,000 LTTE cadres, and resettlement of 300,000 displaced civilians as post-war achievements.
Why are the UN General Assembly and UN Security Council watching silently as their powers are being usurped by UNHRC? This reveals the bias of all these international bodies which were set up to ensure equal justice to all its member states.
(Reference – Waduge, 2025)
By N. A. de S. Amaratunga ✍️
Opinion
Eulogy to a supremely gifted son of Lanka
Vidya Jyothi Professor Rezvi Sheriff
We do mourn the passing away of Vidya Jothi Emeritus Professor Rezvi Sheriff on the 30th of March 2026. He was a man who was one of the finest doctors who served the health service of our beloved country and several other nations as well.
I was most fortunate to be selected to formulate and present the citation for Professor Rezvi Sheriff just last year, for the award of the coveted Fellowship of the Sri Lanka Medical Association during the Inauguration Ceremony of the Annual Congress of the Sri Lanka Medical Association on the 23rd of July 2025.
That narrative is reproduced here as the final tribute to a superlative medical scientist, a humane carer, teacher par excellence, an academic of profound scholastic stature and a very close friend.
Our Chief Guest tonight, Guest of Honour, Special Guests, the President, Council, Fellows, and Members of the Sri Lanka Medical Association, and Distinguished Invitees…….
I am delighted to present to you, Vidyajyothi Professor Rezvi Sheriff, MBBS Ceylon), MD(Ceylon), MRCP(UK), FRCP(London), FRCP(Edinburgh), FRACP, FCCP, Fellow of the National Academy of Sciences of Sri Lanka, and Emeritus Professor of Medicine for the superlative award of the Fellowship of the Sri Lanka Medical Association.
In fact, the man is so very well-known, and formulating a citation for him was a veritable Herculean task, similar only to one trying to sell ice to Eskimos. In such a context, I will attempt only to portray some strategic vantage points of a career that clearly defies an adequate description in the time allotted to me. One could write reams about the man and still leave quite a lot unsaid.
Following a spectacular school career, Rezvi entered the Faculty of Medicine, Colombo, in 1966, just one year after me, and we have been close friends ever since. The man went through his undergraduate career, securing many distinctions and gold medals, and qualified in 1971 as the first in class valedictorian, topmost performer of the batch, and the first in the combined order of merit of the two Medical Schools of Colombo and Peradeniya.
From then onwards, there was no looking back. It was a steady, persistent, and exponential climb in the academic ladder to finally reach the pinnacle of the Chair Professorship of the Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Colombo. He is a great researcher and has a monumental plethora of scientific papers published in peer-reviewed, indexed, high-impact medical journals. He has delivered several orations, many plenary lectures, guest lectures, and taken part in numerous academic symposia as a resource person. He has been internationally recognised through fellowships and memberships from prestigious colleges and academic institutions. He has lectured in many centres worldwide, inclusive of a considerable number of universities in the United States of America, Great Britain, Australia, Norway, Japan and Pakistan.
As an Educator, he has mentored thousands of undergraduate and postgraduate students and allied health professionals. He is acclaimed for his quality clinical teaching, integrity, kindness and compassion. His medical journey, culminating in the Chair Professorship of Medicine, has inspired many a generation. He retired from the University of Colombo in 2014 and then worked at the Kotelawala Defence University for another 10 years. Altogether, he has had 60 years of university service and been a professor for 41 years. He was awarded Emeritus status by the University of Colombo, following his retirement.
He is known as the Pioneer Godfather of Nephrology and Transplant Medicine in Sri Lanka. He initiated the country’s first Dialysis Unit and Kidney Transplant Programme, a vision that forever transformed renal care and paved the way for other organ transplantations in Sri Lanka as well.
He has served for six years as the only Sri Lankan Council Member in the International Society of Nephrology. Incidentally, he and I were in the UK around the same time during our postgraduate training. He was in nephrology in the South of England, and I was doing nephrology in Nottingham in the Midlands. He continued in nephrology while I changed track and went in a different direction.
Professor Sheriff’s influence extended beyond the lecture rooms, wards and clinics. He was a member of the First National Health Policy Formulation Team, the University Reforms Committee, the National Education Commission and the Sri Lanka Medical Council. He was the Director of the Postgraduate Institute of Medicine from 2006 to 2011. All these assignments were conferred directly by the Executive President of Sri Lanka.
Professor Sheriff founded major nationally important bodies such as the Sri Lanka Society of Nephrology, the Health Informatics Society of Sri Lanka and the Hypertension Society of Sri Lanka. He was also instrumental in building critical medical infrastructure, such as the CLINMARC building at NHSL, the National Institute of Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation Centre in Maligawatta, the Ceylon College of Physicians Building in Rajagiriya, and the first Kidney Transplant Unit at NHSL. He also set up the most advanced Dialysis Unit in Sri Lanka at the General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University Hospital.
In a kind of nostalgic rumination, Rezvi and I used to be on the opposing teams in the Annual Physicians Versus the Paediatricians Cricket Match. If I remember right, and in a lighter vein, that is perhaps the only time anyone has been able to beat this great man.
Ladies and Gentlemen, legends are found not only in the movies. They are there in real life, too. Role models are remembered, not just for what they achieve, but for the lives they inspire, the opportunities they create, and the kindness they perpetually exhibit. Despite his vast achievements, Professor Rezvi Sheriff remains an extremely humble, deeply religious, superlatively kind, service-oriented person. Today, as we honour him, we celebrate not just a brilliant academic and a superb clinician, but a man who has lived a life of purpose and integrity: a life devoted to service to the community. Some years ago, in recognition of his services to our Motherland, the Government of Sri Lanka conferred on him the National Titular Award Vidya Jyothi, the highest national honour that can be bestowed on a scientist.
Mr President, I am ever so pleased to present Professor Rezvi Sheriff, a superlative clinician and a healer, a fine researcher, a brilliant teacher, a visionary, and a true servant of humanity, for the award of the legendary Fellowship of the Sri Lanka Medical Association.
Ladies and Gentlemen, please be kind enough to rise and applaud this great son of Mother Lanka.
***
With the demise of Professor Rezvi Sheriff, we have lost a superlative son of our hallowed Motherland, and I have lost a very dear friend.
Goodbye, our friend…, May the turf of our Motherland rest ever so gently on you.
May he rest in eternal bliss as we acknowledge the words in the Holy Qaran 𝗜 i𝗜𝗹𝗮i𝗵 𝗻!
(Verily to Allāh we belong, and verily to Him, we shall return)
By Dr B. J. C. Perera
Specialist Consultant Paediatrician
Opinion
Is there hope for Palestine?
Since the creation of Israel, in 1948, Palestine has lost so much that it is a wonder that it is still a part of the world map. Since 1948, Palestinians have lost approximately 85% of the land that made up historic British Mandate Palestine. This loss occurred in several major stages, beginning with the 1948 Arab-Israeli War and continuing through the 1967 Six-Day War and ongoing settlement expansion.
It is necessary to outline the relevant historical facts about the state of Palestine. Palestine was among former Ottoman territories, placed under UK administration, by the League of Nations, in 1922. All of these territories eventually became fully independent States, except Palestine, where, in addition to “the rendering of administrative assistance and advice,” the British Mandate incorporated the “Balfour Declaration” of 1917, expressing support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people”. During the Mandate, from 1922 to 1947, large-scale Jewish immigration, mainly from Eastern Europe, took place, with the numbers swelling in the 1930s with the Nazi persecution. Arab demands for independence and resistance to immigration led to a rebellion in 1937, followed by continuing terrorism and violence from both sides. The UK considered various formulas to bring independence to a land ravaged by violence. In 1947, the UK turned the Palestine problem over to the UN.
After looking at alternatives, the UN proposed terminating the Mandate and partitioning Palestine into two independent States, one Palestinian Arab and the other Jewish, with Jerusalem internationalised (Resolution 181 (II) of 1947). Records indicate that Jewish individuals, or organisations, only owned between 5.8% and 7% of the land in Palestine, prior to the 1947 Partition Plan. The remainder was either privately owned by Palestinians (94.2% according to some fiscal records) or classified as state/public land by the British authorities. The vast majority (90%) of the population was Palestinians. The Partition Plan did not take these demographic facts into consideration and this led to the war in 1948 with Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Saudi Arabia joining forces against Israel. The war was a major loss for the Arab countries as Israel was backed by the west and, following the war, Israel established control over 77% to 78% of the land. The remaining 22%—consisting of the West Bank and Gaza Strip—came under Jordanian and Egyptian administration, respectively.
The Arab countries were very much concerned about this situation and were very sympathetic towards the Palestinians. In a desperate attempt, in 1967, Egypt, Jordan and Syria attacked Israel, which by now, with huge western support, was militarily far superior to the collective strength of these countries and could capture Sinai Peninsula, Gaza strip, West Bank, East Jerusalem and Golan Heights. Again, in 1973, Egypt attacked Israel in a surprise move and inflicted much damage, though finally losing the war. This led to a peace treaty between Egypt and Israel and the return of Sinai. The outcome of all these wars was that today the Palestinians have lost administrative and sovereign control over approximately 85% of historic Palestine, since 1948, with current autonomous Palestinian areas (Gaza and parts of the West Bank) making up less than 15% of the total original territory.
Palestine gradually lost its major military allies; Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Libya, due mainly to the machinations and direct invasions by western forces and Israel. There were internal disputes and betrayals, as well, with Hamas falling out with Fatah and Palestinian Authority colluding with Israel to undermine Palestinians. All this shows the pathetic tragedy that has befallen the historical inheritors of the land of Palestine. Today, they are subjected to the most inhuman harassment and genocide, with daily killings, and their land is being grabbed by Israel. And there is, apparently, no one to help them; the UN can only pay lip service and if this continues Palestine will soon be obliterated from the world map.
However, there may be a glimmer of hope for this beleaguered country if the war between Iran and Israel ends in the way people like Prof. Jeffrey Sachs, Prof. John Mearsheimer, Col. Douglas Macgregor, Prof. Richard Wolf, Miko Peled, etc., predict. These people have made comments like “Iran has the upper hand”, “The US has already lost the war”, “Iran will be the graveyard of American hegemony”, “This will be the end of Israel”.
It was Miko Peled, a Jew by birth, and a Palestinian activist by conviction, who said “This will be the end of Israel” in a recent podcast interview, and he was hoping that it would eventually solve the Palestine problem. Peled’s grandfather, Avraham Katznelson, was one of the founders of Israel who signed Israel’s Declaration of Independence. Peled’s father, Mattityahu Peled, had fought in the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and served as a general in the Six-Day War of 1967.
In 1997, Peled’s 13-year-old niece Smadar, daughter of his sister Nurit Peled-Elhanan, was murdered in a Palestinian suicide terror attack in Jerusalem. After her funeral Peled had said, “Why not tell the truth… That this, and similar tragedies, are taking place because we are occupying another nation and that, in order to save lives, the right thing to do is to end the occupation and negotiate a just peace with our Palestinian partners?” Today Miko Peled is fighting for the liberation of Palestine. He asserted that the raid by Hamas into Israel, in October, 2023, was not terrorism but a heroic act.
Col. Douglas Macgregor, a retired US Army officer, who had faught in the Iraq war, and who was nominated by President Trump as the Ambassador to Germany, and also appointed to the board of the US Military Academy, has said “Iran holds the upper hand”. He has several reasons to support his claim; Iranian missiles outnumber the interceptors of Israel and Gulf states, and already Israel is running out of weapons, the economic fallout in the US, Gulf countries and Europe would be catastrophic if the war drags on, ground forces option would be disastrous as landing them would be a suicidal process given the advance surveillance methods that Iran possess, courtesy China and Russia. Further, he says, several such US campaigns in the past have failed, pointing out that Iraq, which was ‘conqured,’ is now asking the US to leave. The Syrian leader – another country ‘conqured’ – is visiting Russia. A Minister, in Qatar, has told the US to leave her country alone.
Prof John Mearsheimer is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago. In his 2007 book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, Mearsheimer argues that the Israel lobby wields disproportionate influence over US foreign policy in the Middle East. Mearsheimer asserts that Benjamin Netanyahu is driving the push for conflict, rather than US interests. He describes Israel as an “albatross around our neck” regarding this war. He claims the U.S. and Israel initiated this war against Iran, which he does not believe the US can win.
Mearsheimer has argued that “Iran holds all the cards” in the war of attrition, suggesting that Iran is not losing and that the US is facing a strategic defeat. He argues that Iran does not represent a threat massive enough to justify American involvement in the conflict and that the US is fighting ‘somebody else’s war’.
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs is a professor at Columbia University, where he was formerly Director of The Earth Institute, and is Director of the Centre for Sustainable Development at the University. He had been a tenured professor of Economics at Harvard. From 2002 to 2018, Sachs was special adviser to the UN Secretary-General. Regarding the war, he has said that the US and Israel had underestimated Iran and that Iran would be the Graveyard of American hegemony. Further Sachs has called Israel ” a reckless country” and a joint military campaign with it is not in the US interests. He has made a special appeal to the leaders of China, Russia and India to pressure Donald Trump to stop the war, which he says would be very effective.
Prof Richard Wolf, leading economist, says the US is at present heavily in debt and the defence budget for 2026/27 has been increased from 900 bn to 1.5 tr which could affect health, education and welfare programmes. People in the US are on the streets protesting against the war.
What could be gleaned from all these opinions and views of people, who know what they speak of, is that, whatever the outcome of the war, the world will not be the same for all of us. Beginning from Trump and the people of the US, European leaders, China, Russia and India, Iran and the Middle East, particularly the Gulf States, the Global South and finally Israel, would learn that war cannot solve problems, that hegemony is hated, imperialism has to end and, last but not least, if the world wants peace the Palestine problem must be solved.
(Some of the information in this article was derived from Wikipedia)
By N. A. de S. Amaratunga
Opinion
Boots on the ground,minds in the dark
Confronting Sri Lanka’s Expanding Drug Threat
Senior security and intelligence professional with extensive experience in counter-terrorism, strategic risk assessment and law enforcement.
A Rising Tide Beneath the Surface
Sri Lanka’s recent success in intercepting large consignments of narcotics at sea is both reassuring and alarming. Reassuring, because it reflects the growing operational capability of the Sri Lanka Navy and the Police Narcotics Bureau. Alarming, because such volumes do not move without a market.
Are we merely intercepting supply, or are we ignoring a rapidly expanding demand within our own society?
· “If seizures are rising, it is not only a sign of enforcement success, it is also a signal of expanding demand.
“Boots on the Ground”: A New Meaning
In today’s Sri Lankan context, “boots on the ground” must be redefined. It is no longer limited to patrols at sea or coastal surveillance. It is about real presence intelligence-led, community-connected, and action-oriented.
Recent interdictions demonstrate a mature intelligence-to-action cycle. For this, the Sri Lanka Navy and Police deserve commendation.
Yet, behind every success lies a silent force
The Silent Shield: Intelligence Networks
Informants, analysts, and field operatives form the backbone of every successful operation.
* They operate under risk
* Their exposure can collapse entire networks
* Their contribution must be recognised discreetly, not publicly
“An exposed informant today is a lost network tomorrow.”
A Market-Driven Menace
Drug trafficking is not accidental, it is profit-driven.
The scale of maritime smuggling suggests that Sri Lanka is no longer just a transit hub. It is increasingly becoming a destination market.
This transforms narcotics from a policing issue into a national social crisis.
Inside the Network: A Structured Ecosystem
The drug trade operates through layered chains:
* International syndicates
* Maritime couriers
* Local facilitators
* Urban distributors
* Street-level peddlers
Each layer is insulated. Each link is replaceable.
“Break one link, and the chain adapts. Break the system, and the threat collapses.”
Demand Is Engineered
A critical reality:
Drug networks do not wait for demand; they create it.
* Free or low-cost initial access
* Targeting youth and vulnerable groups
* Expansion through peer networks
* Stealth distribution networks
Addiction is often designed, not accidental.
Awareness: Prevention or Promotion?
Sri Lanka’s awareness programmes show mixed results.
While well-intentioned:
* Overexposure can trigger curiosity
* Fear-based messaging is ineffective
* Generic campaigns lack relevance
“Poorly designed awareness can introduce what it seeks to prevent.”
The Missing Link: Awareness + Recovery
Awareness alone is insufficient.
A modern approach must include:
* Simple, relatable communication
* Focus on life consequences
* Clear access to rehabilitation
Shift the message:
From: “Say no to drugs”
To: “If trapped, there is a way out”
When Success Creates Strain: The Justice System Under Pressure
An often-overlooked consequence of increased drug detections is the pressure it places on the justice and prison systems.
A large number of drug-related offences are non-bailable, leading to a steady rise in remand populations. This has resulted in:
* Severe prison overcrowding
* Heightened tension among inmates
* Increased confrontation between prisoners and prison authorities
Overcrowded prisons are not only a humanitarian concern they are an escalating security risk.
The Forensic Bottleneck: Delays in Government Analyst Reports
At the centre of this strain lies a critical dependency the Government Analyst Department.
Every detection requires scientific confirmation. However, the system is under significant pressure:
* High volume of samples
* Shortage of trained personnel
* Limited availability of chemicals and laboratory materials
·
* Multiple deadlines imposed by courts
These constraints have led to delays in submitting reports, which in turn:
* Extend remand periods
* Increase court backlogs
* Fuel frustration among inmates
“Justice delayed in narcotics cases becomes both a legal failure and a security threat.”
A Sensitive Concern: Accuracy of Detections
Another emerging concern is that a number of samples sent for analysis reportedly do not contain narcotics.
If substantiated, this raises serious issues:
* Are arrests being made on insufficient preliminary evidence?
* Are field testing methods reliable?
* Is there undue pressure to increase detection statistics?
The implications are profound:
* Wrongful detention
* Loss of public trust
* Weakening of legitimate enforcement efforts
Each inaccurate detection undermines the credibility of the entire system.
A Dangerous Imbalance
Sri Lanka now faces a structural imbalance:
* Strong enforcement
* Increasing arrests·
* Limited forensic capacity·
* Overburdened courts·
* Overcrowded prisons
This imbalance creates a chain reaction of institutional stress.
The Strategic Gap: Where Is the Research?
Despite strong enforcement, Sri Lanka lacks a research-driven response.
The Police Narcotics Bureau and National Dangerous Drugs Control Board must be strengthened with:
* Dedicated research units
* Data on usage trends·
* Behavioural analysis·
* Evaluation of awareness programmes
Supported by international collaboration.
“Without research, strategy becomes a reaction.”
From Sea to Society
“Boots on the ground” must extend beyond enforcement:
* Religious leaders·
* Teachers and schools·
* Parents·
* Community networks·
The real battle is not only at sea but within society.
A National Priority
The consequences are severe:
* Loss of youth potential·
* Rising crime·
* Family breakdown·
* Long-term public health burden
This is a national security issue with generational consequences.
STRATEGIC CONCLUSION
OFFENSIVE FRAMEWORK (SUPPLY DISRUPTION)
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS
NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
SRI LANKA NAVY / COAST GUARD
POLICE NARCOTICS BUREAU
STF / POLICE OPERATIONS
ARRESTS & SEIZURES
JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Focus: Intelligence-led interdiction, maritime dominance, legal enforcement
PREVENTIVE FRAMEWORK (DEMAND REDUCTION)
GOVERNMENT POLICY & RESEARCH
NDDCB / PNB COORDINATION
EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
TEACHERS / COUNSELLORS
RELIGIOUS & COMMUNITY LEADERS
PARENTS
YOUTH
Focus: Awareness, early detection, social resilience, rehabilitation
INTEGRATED NATIONAL STRATEGY
(OFFENSIVE) (PREVENTIVE)
Sri Lanka has proven its ability to intercept drugs.
But interception alone is not victory.
“If enforcement is strong but society is weak, the problem will return.
If both are strong, the threat can be contained.”
Conclusion
Sri Lanka is no longer confronting a distant or isolated narcotics threat it is facing a deeply embedded, evolving ecosystem that stretches from international waters to the minds of its youth.
The recent surge in maritime interceptions is not merely a success story. It is also a warning.
Every shipment seized at sea is a reflection of a demand that exists on land.
We must therefore move beyond the comfort of operational victories and confront the harder truth: this battle cannot be won by enforcement alone.
“Boots on the ground” must now mean more than patrol vessels and tactical units. It must represent a nationwide presence of awareness, vigilance, intelligence, and responsibility from coastal radar stations to classrooms, from intelligence cells to family homes.
At the same time, we must protect what protects us from the intelligence networks that operate in silence. Their strength lies in their invisibility. Their recognition must remain measured, discreet, and strategic.
The drug economy is adaptive. It creates demand where none exists, exploits vulnerability where it finds it, and thrives where systems are disconnected. If left unchecked, it will not only fuel crime it will reshape society, erode institutions, and compromise future generations.
What Sri Lanka needs now is not a fragmented response, but a coordinated national doctrine:
* Strong at sea
* Smart in policy
* Deep in research
* Present in societyBecause the real battleground is no longer just geography it is generational.
What is required now is not just stronger enforcement but smarter systems, balanced capacity, and a unified national response. Because this is no longer just about drugs. It is about the future of the nation.
Mahil Dole is a retired senior police officer and former Head of the Counter-Terrorism Division of Sri Lanka’s State Intelligence Service. With over four decades in policing and intelligence, he has interviewed more than 100 suicide cadres linked to extremist movements. He is a graduate of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in Hawaii and has received specialist training on terrorist financing in Australia and India.
By Mahil Dole
-
Features6 days agoA World Order in Crisis: War, Power, and Resistance
-
News7 days agoEnergy Minister indicted on corruption charges ahead of no-faith motion against him
-
Sports7 days agoSLC to hold EGM in April
-
Opinion7 days agoWhen elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers
-
Features7 days agoLest we forget
-
News3 days agoTariff shock from 01 April as power costs climb across the board
-
Business7 days agoPan Asia Bank empowers export sector as Strategic Partner of NCE Export Awards
-
News6 days agoMinister Jayakody indicted in Colombo High Court over alleged corruption
