News
‘SLT board fired me from chairman’s post in mighty hurry’: Rohan Fernando
One of two dissenting govt. board members appointed new Chairman
by Sanath Nanayakkare
Rohan Fernando was removed from the post of Chairman of Sri Lanka Telecom yesterday. A few hours after his removal, Fernando called a press conference and said: “I called a meeting of the SLT Director Board at 9 am to discuss usual business. And then I was surprised at the proposal of a motion at the very outset, which was not on the agenda. A situation had arisen where the Malaysian investors of SLT or rather the investors of Global Telecommunications Holdings (GTH) wanted to replace me.
“What surprised me was that a few months ago when there were newspaper reports that SLT chairman would be replaced, those directors wrote a letter denying such a situation and went on to say that it was a decision to be taken by the government being the major shareholder of SLT, and the board of directors had said that they wouldn’t get involved in such a move. That is why I said I was surprised.”
“Clause 105 of the SLT statute says that Directors may appoint and remove the chairman of the board at their respective meetings and may determine the period for which he or she is to hold office. There are ambiguities in the clause though. When the vote came up, two directors who represent the government voted to support my expulsion, which was approved by the Board on a majority consensus.
Reyaz Mihular, a newly appointed director by the government was one of them who voted to expel me and he was appointed as new SLT chairman at the same meeting. SLT has ten directors. Six of them represent the government shares of SLT (about 51%) and other four represent the shares of GTH (about 49%) which has a Malaysian origin. So, when two directors from the government representation voted with the other party, the move was clearly passed. The appointments and the composition of the Board are made through the secretary of the Finance Ministry.
But the Ministry of Finance hadn’t initiated such a replacement move. That’s another reason that makes me surprised at this development. I see it as a boardroom manipulation because this could have been amicably settled through discussion. I thought I should clarify this matter in the interest of SLT and the people of the country. Still I am not sure whether the procedure to expel me was correct or not. I will seek legal advice regarding the matter. I have a letter from the appointing agent which is the Treasury Secretary, therefore, I will get it clarified from the Treasury also.”
“As chairman of SLT, I brought in four main principles to root out corruption, improve efficiency, minimise waste and encourage participatory administration. With these principles. We made a successful and progressive journey. Of course, the Board and the shareholders have a right to fire a chairperson if an organization is performing poorly. But SLT is performing well financially, so it arouses my curiosity how such a thing could have happened without manipulation.”
Fernando said that he had refused to take a salary from SLT and didn’t use a fleet of vehicles or take any house rents. I only accepted a director fee for attending the Board meetings. That is the only perk I had taken. This expulsion is not a loss for me but it came as a shock to me,” he said.
When The Island asked him whether the current Board would have wanted to take SLT in a new direction under a new leader, he replied “If that was the intention, it should have been spelled out at the meeting.”
SLT officially informed the Colombo Stock Exchange yesterday that in terms of the articles of association of the Company, Reyaz Mihular, Independent non-executive director had been appointed as the Non-Executive Chairman of the SLT Board with effect from 20 July, 2023, and Rohan Fernando would continue to be an independent non-executive director of the Board.
Rohan Fernnado was appointed by former president Gotabaya Rajapaksa in January 2020.
Foreign News
AI chatbots could be making you stupider
As large language models take over more and more cognitive tasks, researchers are warning this mental outsourcing comes with a cost.
When research scientist Nataliya Kosmyna was looking for interns, she noticed that cover letters she received were suspiciously similar. They were long, polished and after introductions would often jump to an abstract and arbitrary connection to her work.
It was obvious to her that applicants were using large language models (LLMs) – a form of artificial intelligence that powers chatbots such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini and Claude – to write the letters.
At the same time, during lessons on campus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Kosmyna, who studies the interaction between humans and computers, noticed that numerous students were forgetting content more easily compared to a few years ago.
With the increasing reliance on LLMs, she had a hunch that this could be affecting her students’ cognition and sought to understand more.
The concern that researchers like Kosmyna have is that if we become too reliant on AI, it could affect the language we use and even our ability to do basic cognitive tasks. There is now a growing body of research suggesting that this “cognitive offloading” to AI can have a corrosive effect on our mental abilities. The consequences could be alarming and may even contribute to cognitive decline.
“The ChatGPT group showed notably less brain activity – it was reduced by up to 55%”
It’s well known that the tools we use can change how we think. With the advent of the internet for instance, tasks that once required deep research could be found by plugging a simple query into a search box. As the use of search engines increased, research found we became less likely to remember details, something dubbed “the Google effect”. (Some argue, however, the internet also serves as an external memory system that frees up our brain to do other tasks)
But there is now growing alarm that as we offload even more of our thinking to LLMs and other forms of AI, the effects on our memories and ability to solve problems could get worse. Artificial intelligence tools can write convincing poetry, give financial advice and provide companionship. Students are increasingly outsourcing their own work to AI tools as well.
Studies have already shown that young people might be particularly vulnerable to the negative effects that using AI can have on key cognitive skills like critical thinking. Kosmyna, however, wanted to dig deeper into the potential effects.
Reduced mental effort
She and her colleagues at MIT Media Lab recruited 54 students to write short essays and split them into three groups. One was instructed to use ChatGPT. A second could use Google search, with AI-generated summaries turned off. The third didn’t use technology. Each student’s brainwaves were measured while they worked.
The essay topics were deliberately open-ended, meaning little research was needed for the task, with prompts including questions around loyalty, happiness or our daily life choices.
The results haven’t been published in a scientific journal yet, but they were none-the-less eye-opening, according to Kosmyna. Those who used their own minds had a brain that was “on fire”, showing widespread activity across many parts of the brain, she says. The search engine-only group still showed strong activity in the visual parts of the brain, but the ChatGPT group showed notably less brain activity – it was reduced by up to 55%.
“The brain didn’t fall asleep, but there was much less activation in the areas corresponding to creativity and to processing information,” says Kosmyna.
ChatGPT also affected people’s memories. After submitting their essays, people in the AI group were unable to quote from their essays, and several felt they had no ownership over the work. Other studies have also shown that people become less able to retain and recall information when they use AI tools such as ChatGPT.
While the findings are still undergoing peer review, they echo those from other studies. One study by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania suggests that some people undergo something they term “cognitive surrender” when using generative AI chatbots. This means they tend to accept what the AI tells them with minimal scrutiny and even allow it to override their own intuition.
Similar effects can be found outside the world of AI chatbots too – even in life-or-death situations. A recent multinational study team found that medical professionals who used an AI tool to screen for colon cancer for three months were subsequently worse at spotting the tumours without it.

Outsourcing work to AI also risks losing much of the creativity that produces original work, warns Kosmyna. The essays that students in her study wrote with ChatGPT looked very similar and were described by the teachers marking them as “soulless”, lacking originality and depth, Kosmyna says. “One of the teachers asked if students were sitting next to each other because the essays were so similar.”
While studies such as these illustrate the short-term effects LLMs can have on the brain, the long-term impacts are far less clear. The study by Kosmyna and her colleagues provides a glimpse. Four months after the initial study they asked the students to write another essay, but this time those who had used ChatGPT were told to work without LLM support. The neural connectivity in their brains was lower than those who switched the opposite way, perhaps indicating that they had not engaged with the topics properly in the first place.
Cognitive decline
Yet, LLMs can be a positive tool to aid thinking, but only if we don’t rely on them by outsourcing our mental tasks in the process, says computational neuroscientist Vivienne Ming, author of Robot Proof. She’s concerned though that this is not how most people interact with this technology.
Her reasoning comes from research she conducted for her book, during which Ming asked a group of students at the University of Berkeley to predict real-world outcomes, such as the price of oil. She found that the majority of participants simply asked AI and copied the answer.
She measured their brains’ gamma wave activity – a marker of cognitive effort – finding it showed very little activation. Again her research is yet to published, but Ming worries that if her findings are borne out in further studies it could have long-term implications. Other research, for example, has linked weak gamma wave activity to cognitive decline later in life.
“That’s really worrying,” Ming says. “If that is a natural mode for people to interact with these systems – and these are smart kids – that’s bad.” Deep thinking, she says, is our superpower. “If we don’t use it, the long-term implications for cognitive health are pretty strong.”
That’s because when we rely on LLMs it requires very little cognitive effort, Ming adds, which is exactly what’s needed for a healthy brain.
A small subset of participants though – less than 10% – worked differently and used AI as a tool to gather data that they then analysed themselves. These individuals made more accurate predictions than others participants and showed stronger brain activation too.
For long-term brain health we need to continue to challenge ourselves
Almost two decades ago, Ming predicted that within 20 to 30 years we would see a statistically meaningful rise in dementia rates directly related to our overreliance on Google Maps. “I meant it to be provocative,” Ming says. “If you don’t have to think about navigating then there’ll be some detectable effect.”
While we don’t have data on this exact prediction, the increased use of GPS has been linked to worse spatial memory over time, according to one study of 13 people conducted over three years. And poor spatial navigation may be a potential predictor of Alzheimer’s Disease, according to another study.
It’s clear that the more active our brain is, the more protected it is from cognitive decline. LLMs then, Ming says, could not only reduce creativity but could harm cognition and potentially increase the risk of dementia.
As AI tool use increases, we need to work with it in a way that benefits us rather than harms us. Ming suggests that ultimately, the goal could be a form of “hybrid intelligence” where humans and machines “do the hard stuff” together. By this she means we need to think first and use tools to challenge us later, rather than simply letting them answer questions for us. Kosmyna agrees and suggests learning subjects without AI tools first to build a foundation and then think about using LLMs.
Ming recommends using what she calls the “nemesis prompt” to challenge your own thinking. It works by prompting an AI to act as a “lifelong enemy” or nemesis, then ask it to explain in detail why your ideas are wrong and how you can fix them, forcing you to defend and refine your arguments rather than simply accepting the answers it provides.
Another technique she suggest is prioritising “productive friction” and asking the AI to only provide context and ask you questions, rather than supplying answers. When she tested this by fine-tuning an AI bot not to give answers, she found that more individuals were more engaged.
Ultimately, we should all be wary of cognitive shortcuts, which is something “our brains love”, Kosmyna says. Clearly, for long-term brain health we need to continue to challenge ourselves. Our minds, creativity and cognitive health will benefit in the process.
[BBC]
Latest News
Heat Index at Caution Level in the Northern, North-central, North-western, Western, Sabaragamuwa and Eastern provinces during the day time
Warm Weather Advisory
Issued by the Natural Hazards Early Warning Centre
Issued at 3.30 p.m. on 24 April 2026, valid for 25 April 2026.
Heat index, the temperature felt on human body is likely to increase up to ‘Caution level’ at some places in Northern, North-central, North-western, Western, Sabaragamuwa and
Eastern provinces during the day time.
The Heat Index Forecast is calculated by using relative humidity and maximum temperature and this is the condition that is felt on your body. This is not the forecast of maximum temperature. It is generated by the Department of Meteorology for the next day period and prepared by using global numerical weather prediction model data.

Effect of the heat index on human body is mentioned in the above table and it is prepared on the advice of the Ministry of Health and Indigenous Medical Services.
ACTION REQUIRED
Job sites: Stay hydrated and takes breaks in the shade as often as possible.
Indoors: Check up on the elderly and the sick.
Vehicles: Never leave children unattended.
Outdoors: Limit strenuous outdoor activities, find shade and stay hydrated.
Dress: Wear lightweight and white or light-colored clothing.
Note:
In addition, please refer to advisories issued by the Disaster Preparedness & Response Division, Ministry of Health in this regard as well. For further clarifications please contact 011-7446491.
News
Opposition holds NPP Cabinet responsible for coal scam, three times bigger than bond fraud
The Opposition yesterday called for the entire Cabinet-of-Ministers to accept responsibility for the coal scam. Addressing the media at the Flower Road Office of UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe, former Foreign Minister Prof. G. L. Peiris emphasised that Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody’s resignation, in the wake of the damning report issued by the National Audit Office (NAO), has now implicated the entire Cabinet-of-Ministers.
Prof. Peiris asserted that Jayakody, who had been indicted in the Colombo High Court over alleged corruption, during the Yahapalana administration, stepped down after the NPP failed to suppress the truth on the coal scam.
The ex-Minister declared that Jayakody’s resignation, the first since the formation of new government, with a super majority in Parliament, was a devastating setback for the current dispensation.
The internationally recognised legal scholar said that a future government would move courts against the entire NPP Cabinet. Referring to the NAO report submitted to Parliament, Prof. Peiris emphasised that there was absolutely no ambiguity regards allegations directed at the Energy Ministry. The NAO report proved that the Indian company, Trident Champhar, that won the major contract, didn’t even have the required registration.
Prof. Peiris said that the coal scam was three times bigger than the Treasury bond scams, perpetrated during the Yahapalana time (SF)
-
News4 days agoRs 13 bn NDB fraud: Int’l forensic audit ordered
-
Opinion5 days agoShutting roof top solar panels – a crime
-
News1 day agoNo cyber hack: Fintech expert exposes shocking legacy flaws that led to $2.5 million theft
-
News6 days agoFrom Nuwara Eliya to Dubai: Isha Holdings markets Agri products abroad
-
News2 days agoLanka faces crisis of conscience over fate of animals: Call for compassion, law reform, and ethical responsibility
-
News1 day agoWhistleblowers ask Treasury Chief to resign over theft of USD 2.5 mn
-
News5 days agoChurch calls for Deputy Defence Minister’s removal, establishment of Independent Prosecutor’s Office
-
Life style6 days agoAfter dark in Sri Lanka: Tiny wild cats step into the spotlight
