News
SL rejects UNHRC resolution
Sri Lanka has categorically rejected resolution A/HRC/51/L.1 (Rev.1), titled “Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka,” tabled by the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Malawi, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and the United States, which was adopted by a vote at the Human Rights Council (HRC) in Geneva, on 06th October.
Minister of Foreign Affairs Ali Sabry delivered the statement, on behalf of Sri Lanka as the country concerned, and called on the Members of the Council to reject the resolution by voting against it.
In support of Sri Lanka’s position, opposing the resolution, the delegation of Pakistan called for a vote. Over half of the members of the Council did not support the resolution with 07 countries (Bolivia, China, Cuba, Eritrea, Pakistan, Uzbekistan and Venezuela) voting against the resolution and 20 countries abstaining on the vote. 20 countries voted in favour of the resolution.Representatives of Pakistan, Brazil, China, Venezuela, Japan and Republic of Korea made statements in support of Sri Lanka prior to the vote.
Pakistan said that they share the concerns of Sri Lanka and other Member States that the resolution is intrusive and this level of scrutiny would not be even acceptable to any sovereign state, including the Core Group. They further observed that the resolution fails to recognize the horrendous acts of terrorism committed by the LTTE and its sponsors, lacks balance, proportionality and consistency. At a critical time, when the people of Sri Lanka expect demonstrations of global solidarity and support to face its economic challenges, which are not entirely of Sri Lanka’s own making, the Core Group chose a path that has the potential to exacerbate the problem, instead of improving the situation.
Brazil noted the need to avoid politicization of the work of the Council and reiterated their position that cooperation of the country concerned is key to the success of this Council’s initiatives. Brazil highlighted the responsibility of the international community to support the country in its recovery, including through international cooperation and assistance.
China appreciated the Government of Sri Lanka’s commitment to promoting and protecting human rights, advancing sustainable socio-economic development, improving living standards, protecting the rights of the vulnerable groups, facilitating national reconciliation and combatting terrorism. China regretted that the resolution is tabled without the consent of the country concerned, is a product of politicization, and will by no means play any positive role in the promotion of human rights in Sri Lanka. China highlighted that the work of the Council should be guided by its founding principles and that all parties should promote genuine dialogue and cooperation and refrain from adopting double standards. China rejected the practice of using human rights as a pretext to interfere in the internal affairs and undermine the sovereignty of other countries to the detriment of international cooperation.
Venezuela expressed their deep concern at initiatives that do not have the support of the country concerned and that the Core Group is insisting on imposing hostile initiative, monitoring and oversight mechanism without the consent of Sri Lanka, ignoring the progress made by the Government. Venezuela highlighted that the mechanism financially bleed out over 6 million dollars that could have been better used to support the least developed countries and further that the practice of wasting money seems all too common in the Council.
Japan recognized the progress made by Sri Lanka and said that the Government’s own initiatives, efforts and commitments are indispensable to achieving real change on the ground.Republic of Korea noted with appreciation the efforts of the Government of Sri Lanka to promote national reconciliation, reconstruction and prosperity.Sri Lanka is grateful to the countries which withstood pressure by the sponsors and demonstrated their support to Sri Lanka by voting against or abstaining on the vote as well as by speaking in support of Sri Lanka.
While delivering the Sri Lanka statement as the country concerned, the Foreign Minister regretted that a draft resolution on Sri Lanka is tabled once again despite the progress made domestically on reconciliation and human rights and Sri Lanka’s continued constructive engagement with the Council. He outlined Sri Lanka’s intention to move forward domestically with replacing the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) with a comprehensive national security legislation, and the introduction of Constitutional amendments and a legal framework to strengthen democratic governance, participation and the rule of law as well as independent institutional oversight. On reconciliation and human rights, Sri Lanka is awaiting the final report of the Presidential Commission and the establishment of a domestic truth-seeking mechanism is under advanced discussion. He also referred to Sri Lanka’s upcoming engagement with the UPR process.
Minister Sabry highlighted that while the resolution may meet the objective of advancing the political considerations of the sponsors, it is manifestly unhelpful to Sri Lanka.The Minister strongly opposed the resolution, particularly the proposal in Operative Paragraph (OP) 8 that seeks to ‘extend and reinforce’ the so-called “external evidence gathering mechanism” created by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). The mechanism is outside the mandate envisaged for the Council. No sovereign state can accept the superimposition of an external mechanism that runs contrary to its Constitution and which pre-judges the commitment of its domestic legal processes.
The Minister also noted that many countries have already raised serious concerns on the budgetary implications of this resolution given its ever-expanding mandate. He further noted that this is an unhelpful and misdirected drain on the resources of all Member States, including the donors in the midst of ongoing global crises. In sharp contrast, he said that we are faced with the dire financial needs of developing countries to prevent hunger and child malnutrition.
Foreign Minister Sabry objected to the references in the resolution to matters which are outside the framework of the Council such as domestic economic and financial policy. He further observed that solutions to economic and financial crises faced today by many countries will not be found in the mandate, the instruments or the expertise of the Council.
The result of the vote demonstrates that the resolution is another example of the North-South polarization and politicization of the Council, contrary to its founding principles. This vote also demonstrated solidarity among the countries of the South which continued to support the basic founding principles of the Human Rights Council of universality, impartiality, objectivity and non-selectivity leading to constructive international dialogue and cooperation.The Human Rights Council comprises 47 members, including 13 African states, 13 Asia-Pacific states, eight Latin American and Caribbean States, seven Western Europe and Other States, and six Eastern European States.
News
Sri Lanka faces new grid challenge as rooftop solar surges: former CEB GM
BY IfhAm NIzAm
Sri Lanka could soon face a new electricity-grid challenge—not from too little power, but from having too much solar generation in the wrong places and at the wrong times, a former Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) General Manager told The Island.
The former CEB GM who insisted not to be named warned that the rapid growth of rooftop and utility-scale solar could place increasing pressure on CEB and LECO distribution feeders, substations and the national grid unless transmission, storage and grid-management systems are upgraded at the same pace.
“The issue is no longer simply how much solar we can install. The question is whether the grid can absorb those electrons when and where they are produced,” he told The Island.
He said Sri Lanka should learn from China and India, where the enormous expansion of renewable generation is now forcing policymakers to focus increasingly on storage, transmission capacity, intelligent dispatch and grid flexibility.
“China has already exceeded 1.28 TW of installed solar, while India’s grid-connected installed solar capacity stood at around 162.15 GW as of June 30, 2026. The difficult question now is what you actually do with so much solar when everyone is generating at almost the same time,” he said.
For Sri Lanka, he said, the warning is particularly relevant to the distribution network.
A feeder carrying a high concentration of rooftop solar can, during periods of strong sunshine and low local demand, move from the traditional one-way flow of electricity towards consumers to reverse power flow back towards the transformer and upstream network.
“That means the feeder is no longer simply a one-way road for electricity. At certain times of the day, it becomes a two-way road,” he said.
This can create voltage-rise, protection-coordination and transformer-loading issues and could eventually limit the amount of additional rooftop solar that can safely be connected to particular feeders.
“What matters is where those megawatts are connected,” he told The Island.
He said Sri Lanka therefore needs to begin looking at solar hosting capacity feeder by feeder and substation by substation, rather than treating the national grid as having unlimited capacity to absorb new distributed generation.
The problem is compounded by the evening transition, when solar generation falls rapidly just as electricity demand can increase.
“If the system has a lot of solar in the middle of the day and then loses that generation rapidly in the evening, something else has to respond. That is a flexibility problem,” he said.
This is where battery energy storage systems (BESS) are likely to become increasingly important—but the former CEB chief cautioned against allowing cheap imported battery hardware to drive the market.
“Sri Lanka could soon have huge BESS demand, very cheap battery hardware and everyone suddenly becoming a BESS pundit. What could possibly go wrong?” he said.
He cited fire safety, degradation, poor integration, weak energy-management systems, questionable warranties, incorrect sizing, inappropriate grid locations and poor thermal management as major risks.
“A system can look fantastic in Excel on Day One but perform very differently in Year Two,” he told The Island.
He said the future BESS market would therefore be determined less by who could supply the cheapest container and more by who understood the complete system.
“The future BESS business will not be about who can assemble the cheapest container. It will be about who understands battery, PCS, EMS, grid, safety, degradation and dispatch economics as one system,” he said.
For Sri Lanka, storage should also be considered as a distribution-grid asset, rather than solely as a large transmission-level installation.
Strategically located batteries could absorb excess rooftop solar on constrained feeders during the middle of the day and release electricity later when local demand rises, potentially reducing network congestion and improving the value of distributed generation.
“The question is not simply, ‘How many megawatt-hours of batteries do we need?’ The question is, ‘Where does the battery create the greatest system value?’” he said.
He said China’s and India’s experience could broadly be viewed as three stages: Phase One—build solar and wind; Phase Two—build storage; and Phase Three—redesign the grid around renewables.
Sri Lanka, he said, should learn from that progression before renewable penetration makes grid problems significantly more expensive to solve.
“Installing another large amount of solar is one thing. Absorbing those electrons when the sun is shining everywhere at once is quite another,” he said.
“Solar taught us how to generate cheap electrons. BESS and the grid will decide whether those cheap electrons are actually useful when they are needed.”
“That is perhaps the biggest lesson Sri Lanka should take from China and India’s energy transition right now,” he added.
News
SC rules President Sirisena’s pardon of Gnanasara thera invalid
The Supreme Court yesterday ruled that former President Maithripala Sirisena’s decision to grant a presidential pardon to Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) General Secretary Ven. Galagoda Atte Gnanasara Thera was arbitrary and invalid in law.
A three-judge bench headed by Justice Janak de Silva delivered the judgment in response to fundamental rights petitions filed by the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) and Sandhya Ekneligoda, challenging the former President’s decision to release the monk from prison.
Gnanasara Thera had been sentenced by the Court of Appeal in August 2018 to 19 years’ rigorous imprisonment, to run concurrently as six years, after being found guilty of contempt of court over his conduct inside the Homagama Magistrate’s Court on January 25, 2016, during proceedings related to the disappearance of Prageeth Ekneligoda.
The Supreme Court subsequently upheld the Court of Appeal’s finding of guilt on October 5, 2018.
However, Gnanasara Thera was released from Welikada Prison on May 23, 2019, after the then President Sirisena granted him a presidential pardon.
The petitioners challenged the legality of the pardon, prompting the Supreme Court to examine the exercise of the President’s constitutional power of clemency.
The Court’s ruling yesterday effectively nullifies the pardon granted to the BBS leader.
Viran Corea, PC, with Luwie Ganeshathasan and Khyati Wikramanayake appeared for the CPA, while Counsel Asthika Devendra, with Pulasthi Hewamanne, instructed by Manjula Balasuriya, appeared for Sandhya Ekneligoda.Counsel Thishya Weragoda, with Sanjaya Marambe and Iresh Senevirathne, appeared for Gnanasara Thera. Faiszer Musthapha, PC, with Pulasthi Rupesinghe, appeared for former President Sirisena.
News
Duminda, another indicted in gold-plated T-56 case
The Colombo High Court yesterday served indictments on former Minister Duminda Dissanayake and a woman in connection with the discovery of a gold-plated T-56 assault rifle at the Havelock City apartment complex in Wellawatte.
Following the indictments, the High Court Judge ordered that both accused be released on bail.
Court records indicate that indictments had also been filed against Dissanayake and the same co-accused on September 9, after which they were granted bail.
The case relates to the discovery of the gold-plated firearm at the apartment complex in May 2025.
Two women, aged 40 and 68, were initially arrested in connection with the possession of the weapon, before the investigation was handed over to the Terrorism Investigation Division (TID).
Subsequent investigations by the TID led to Dissanayake being arrested and produced before court. However, he was later released after the Attorney General’s Department informed court that there was insufficient evidence at the time to proceed with legal action against him.
-
News6 days agoNamal remanded until Sept. 18 over Airbus deal investigation
-
Latest News5 days agoTharanga creates history with Diamond League crown in Brussels
-
News5 days agoDispute which triggered listed company director being detained at BIA resolved
-
Features4 days agoAfter the parade: What a traffic OIC’s walk-out tells us
-
Editorial6 days agoPower vs Equality
-
Editorial4 days agoArrests as theatre
-
Latest News4 days agoHarshitha’s composed knock seals Sri Lanka’s semi-final berth
-
Latest News7 days agoSLPP MP Namal Rajapaksa arrested by CIABOC
