Business

‘PUCSL electricity tariff revision is discriminatory’

Published

3 years ago

2023/11/2

Electricity tariff design must meet two main objectives: firstly, raising the money needed to pay for the costs of provision, and secondly, sending the right economic signals to each customer to favour the optimal socio-economic use of electricity.

To achieve the above objectives the principles that must be followed when designing tariffs are;

Economic sustainability or revenue sufficiency,

Equity or non-discrimination among users,

Economic efficiency in resource allocation, and

Transparency, simplicity, and stability of the methodology.

A well-defined and appropriate tariff structure must balance the financial sustainability of the sector on the one hand and the well-being of various segments of society on the other. The CEB’s tariff revisions seem to be mainly focused on the aspect of revenue sufficiency, ignoring the other aspects. As electricity is a commodity, there should be no difference in the prices charged to different users, except when reflecting any differences in the cost of providing services to different classes of users.

A differential tariff implies that some categories are subsidised leading to the question of who pays these subsidies. The current structure is such that households consuming an excess of 60 Kwh, and general purpose bulk supply users subsidise the industrial, hotel and charitable sectors.

Households that consume over 90 Kwh and general purpose bulk customers are charged a tariff that is double that of industries and hotels. With regards to hotels, in effect, domestic consumers subsidise foreign tourists. However, the differential tariff between general bulk supply and industrial/hotel users is meaningless. For example, a hall that hosts weddings and celebrations would be treated as a general bulk customer and be charged double the tariff that a hotel would be charged, even though both host similar events. A restaurant in a shopping mall would be charged as a general customer, but the same restaurant located within a hotel would enjoy a tariff half of that which a hotel incurs. While this differential existed under the previous tariff, it is made worse under the new structure; hotels faced a 10% increase in tariff while general users faced a 20% increase.

If the idea behind a lower tariff for hotels is to make the sector more competitive, then the solution is to address the causes of uncompetitiveness directly. One area is construction costs which raises the level of investment and the cost of maintenance. Protectionism for the domestic construction materials industry raises the costs of steel bars and rods, sanitary ware, aluminium extrusions, granite, electrical fittings, and carpets resulting in high overall construction cost. The effective protection granted on these items can exceed 200%; the savings in finance cost from a lower capital outlay would probably exceed the savings from a lower electricity tariff.

Economic value creation can take place in many different ways in an economy and the service sector is no less important than other sectors. The cross subsidisation between customers violates the equity or non-discrimination principle of a good tariff and discourages use by the overcharged and promotes overconsumption by the subsidised.

For example, the higher domestic tariff may serve as a disincentive for remote work. Remote or flexible work arrangements can reduce transport costs, congestion, energy use and for some, enable a better work/life balance. The government should be facilitating flexible work but the higher rates applicable to some domestic consumers may be a disincentive.

Economic activity is increasingly complex and a value chain can involve many different sectors. For example, the tea industry involves agriculture, processing in factories, transport, warehousing, blending, financing, marketing and exports. Moreover, products are now more knowledge intensive, so a greater part of the value addition arises in non-production-oriented components of the value chain. With differential tariffs, parts of the same value chain may pay different prices for use of the same commodity.

Further, a lower tariff to “industry” penalises new economy enterprises while promoting highly energy intensive users. This distorts resource allocation by encouraging excessive energy consumption, artificially promoting capital-intensive industries where the country may not have a clear comparative advantage. A subsidised tariff also blunts the incentive to economise.

The cost of supplying electricity fluctuates throughout the day, depending on the power generation mix, cost of fuels used, transmission costs and energy losses but as electricity storage is not economically viable, it has to be consumed whenever it is produced. Households with rooftop solar thus enjoy a subsidy. Domestic solar generation takes place in day time where the cost of generation is low but the import of electricity to the house takes place at night when the cost of generation is high. Offsetting units generated against units imported results in a subsidy because of the difference in costs between the two. Time of use metres should be mandated for all domestic users on net metering with the import/export being accounted for on the respective time of use tariff. Indeed all users who consume above 60 Kwh should move to the time of use tariff.

Should the government decide to subsidise the capital or operating costs to serve certain customer classes, it should do so directly from the budget and while a lifeline tariff for the poor is justified the high domestic users pay a tariff 7.4x that of the lowest. Not all households are the same size and an extended family living in a single house may face a much higher tariff although their income level may not differ greatly from the average.

The PUCSL should review tariffs to prevent the distortions highlighted above. Instead of cross-subsidies, the regulator should be working to reduce overall cost of the provision of electricity through better procurement and greater efficiency.

Treating all costs as a pass-through in computing the tariff is a mistake. The PUCSL needs to set efficiency targets in order to set fair and reasonable tariffs. The CEB should be incentivised to control its costs by specifying and enforcing performance requirements. Benchmarking CEB performance against regional and international peers to assess relative efficiency is necessary, as is consulting stakeholders on achievable efficiency targets.

Advocata is an independent policy think tank based in Colombo, Sri Lanka. We conduct research, provide commentary and hold events to promote sound policy ideas compatible with a free society in Sri Lanka. Visit advocata.org for more information.

Advocata spokespersons are available for live and pre-recorded broadcast interviews via 0774858401

CONTACT:

Subashini Kaneshwaren,

Senior Communications Executive, Advocata Institute

Email: subashini@advocata.org

All News Advertisement

Business

Sri Lanka pitches Saudi investors for new investment partnerships

Published

20 hours ago

2026/09/29

Sahan Weerasooriya

Saudi and Sri Lankan dignitaries at the National Day reception.

By Ifham Nizam

Sri Lanka is pitching Saudi Arabia for greater investment and deeper trade ties, seeking to attract Saudi capital into new development opportunities while aligning bilateral economic cooperation with the Kingdom’s ambitious Vision 2030 agenda, Ports and Civil Aviation Minister Anura Karunathilaka, chief guest at Saudi Arabia’s 96th National Day celebrations in Colombo, said.

Addressing the National Day reception at ITC Ratnadipa, Karunathilaka said Sri Lanka was keen to identify new areas of economic cooperation with the Kingdom and create fresh opportunities for Saudi investors and businesses.

‘We look forward to creating new opportunities for the people of both countries by working in cooperation with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 and its broader development initiatives, he said.

The minister said Sri Lanka wanted to move beyond its existing development cooperation with Saudi Arabia and build a broader economic partnership encompassing investment, trade and new development projects.

He noted that Saudi Arabia had already made a substantial contribution to Sri Lanka’s development. Since 1981, the Kingdom has provided concessional financing amounting to around Saudi Riyals 1.5 billion for 13 projects in Sri Lanka, supporting key sectors including energy, healthcare, education, drinking water and infrastructure.

Karunathilaka said Sri Lanka appreciated this support and was keen to build on the foundation created by those projects by opening further avenues for Saudi investment.

The minister’s investment pitch comes as Saudi Arabia advances its Vision 2030 programme, with the Kingdom seeking to diversify its economy and develop new international partnerships. Sri Lanka, meanwhile, is seeking to attract investment and expand economic opportunities through closer engagement with international partners.

Karunathilaka also highlighted the strong people-to-people links between the two countries, noting that nearly 250,000 Sri Lankans currently work and reside in Saudi Arabia.

‘They serve as an important bridge between our two countries and contribute significantly to strengthening the people-to-people ties between Sri Lanka and Saudi Arabia, he said.

He expressed appreciation for Saudi Arabia’s continued assistance to Sri Lanka and thanked the Saudi government for the facilities extended to Sri Lankan Muslims undertaking Hajj and Umrah pilgrimages.

Karunathilaka said Sri Lanka looked forward to working more closely with Saudi Arabia to strengthen political relations, broaden investment opportunities and enhance development cooperation.

Yaser Abdulrahman Al-Hazme, Chargé d’Affaires of the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia to Sri Lanka, said the embassy remained committed to strengthening bilateral relations by promoting political, economic and cultural communication between the two countries.

‘The embassy of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in Colombo has been keen during the past period to strengthen bilateral relations between the two countries by playing its role in supporting political, economic, and cultural communication, Al-Hazme said.

Al-Hazme also highlighted the embassy’s role in strengthening communication between Saudi and Sri Lankan institutions and following up on the interests of Saudi citizens in Sri Lanka.

‘On this precious national occasion, I extend my sincere thanks and appreciation to the government and people of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka for the attention and care given to relations between our two countries, and for the constructive cooperation that has contributed to strengthening the bonds of friendship and partnership between the Kingdom and Sri Lanka, he said.

Business

Sonali Rodrigo earns national recognition from Australia’s finance industry

Published

20 hours ago

2026/09/29

Sahan Weerasooriya

Sonali Rodrigo receiving the prestigious AFG Women on the Move Scholarship at the awarding ceremony held in Melbourne.

Australian finance professional Sonali Rodrigo has been recognised with the prestigious AFG Women on the Move Scholarship, presented by Australian Finance Group (AFG), in recognition of her leadership, industry contribution and impact spanning more than two decades in Australia’s finance industry.

The AFG Women on the Move program is dedicated to supporting and advancing women in the finance and mortgage broking industry, recognising individuals who demonstrate leadership, professional contribution, growth, impact and a commitment to empowering other women. The scholarship is supported by leading industry partners, including HSBC and Thinktank.

Sonali’s career spans more than 20 years in Australia’s finance industry, encompassing senior leadership, financial advisory and governance roles. Alongside her professional responsibilities, she has actively mentored and supported women in their career development, contributed to financial literacy, and helped individuals make more informed financial decisions. Her recognition reflects both her professional achievements and the broader impact of her leadership, particularly in creating opportunities and empowering the next generation of women in finance.

Business

Beyond the crisis: Sectoral paths to durable growth

Published

20 hours ago

2026/09/29

Sahan Weerasooriya

Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka (IPS)

Continued From last Friday

Regional infrastructure improvements beyond the Western Province are essential to close market-access gaps and improve efficiency. The Western Province alone generates 42% of Sri Lanka’s GDP, but the dynamics of such agglomeration may also be highly underestimated. Officially, barely a fifth is deemed ‘urban’ in the province, but IPS re-estimates from the 2024 census using population density and infrastructure access, place the true figure at nearly 61%. The absence of strong secondary cities and industrial clusters outside the province reduces the potential gains from this agglomeration, thereby weakening incentives for firms to locate elsewhere or decentralise operations.

Fiscal incentives can promote decentralised corporate operations by offering tax rebates, lower property taxes, and land access in secondary cities like Kalutara and Gampaha, leveraging the connectivity of Southern and Colombo-Katunayake Expressways. The Hambantota seaport and airport, along with Koggala and Mirijjawela Export Processing Zones, can help develop the Southern Province through geography-based tax concessions.

Immediate measures, such as pricing vehicle entry into Colombo city will support regional agglomeration while tackling the acute problem of city congestion. Adopting a low-cost, technology-anchored free-flow method, similar to the Automated Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) currently used in commercial parking facilities for vehicles entering the city, is one such means. Installing high-mounted overhead ANPR gantries at key arterial entry points can operationalise congestion pricing without disrupting traffic speed. Fee collection can use a system like E-Tags electronic toll collection on expressways, integrated with digital payment gateways like GovPay and LankaQR for dynamic, time-of-day variable pricing.

The renewable energy transition is vital to drive competitiveness, external shock resilience, and green growth. Sri Lanka’s transition to renewable energy (RE) has advanced from a mere aspiration to tangible progress. Yet, the evidence suggests the transition is advancing faster on the generation side than the system built to absorb it. Transmission capacity, market design, financing channels, and digital infrastructure have not kept pace with capacity additions, and this gap is what will determine the pace of the transition through 2030.

Capital spending on transmission must be ring-fenced by legally, operationally, and financially separating the electricity grid (the transmission network) from the rest of the energy sector or by the broader government budget as a protected public investment within the medium-term budget framework. Funding should shift from general budget support to dedicated multilateral facilities, reinforced by sovereign guarantees for eligible borrowing. To safeguard public funds, this must be paired with a clear tariff pass-through mechanism that effectively limits open-ended Treasury exposure.

To build market trust, domestic budget funding should be earmarked for market-design technical assistance, signalling strong policy ownership rather than relying on external donors. Transparency too should be strengthened by publishing a firm implementation timeline in the Budget statement and fully disclosing long-term fiscal commitments from Power Purchase Agreements, capacity arrangements, and ancillary services.

(Concluded)