Connect with us

Features

Privy Council acquits 1962 coup accused, and “nincompoops” as ambassadors

Published

on

“The usual 10%” on a government purchase

(Excerpted from Memoirs of a Cabinet Secretary by BP Peiris)

The Governor-General was requested to ascertain, if possible, which way the Chief Justice’s mind was working and the Chief, apparently, gave no indication at all. To avoid a stalemate, the Government was compelled to eat humble pie and restore to the Chief Justice the Judicial Power they had wrested from him. They came b efore Parliament again with the necessary amending Bill which passed into law as the Criminal Law Act, No 31 of 1962. Except for divesting the Minister of Justice of his purported judicial power, the later Act did not touch the obnoxious provisions of the earlier Act

The Chief Justice, in the exercise of the power lawfully vested in him, constituted a Bench consisting of Sansoni, H. N. G. Fernando and L. B. de Silva, JJ to sit at Bar. In April 1965, after a very lengthy trial, the court convicted the accused, and in convicting the accused, said ‘But we must draw attention to the fact that the Act of 1962 radically altered ex post facto the punishments to which the defendants are rendered liable. The Act removed the discretion of the court as to the period of the sentence to be imposed and compels the court to impose a term of ten years’ imprisonment, although we would have wished to differentiate in the matter of sentence between those who organized the conspiracy and those who were induced to join it.

‘It also imposes a compulsory forfeiture of property. These amendments were not merely retroactive: they were also ad hoc, applicable only to the conspiracy which was the subject of the charges we have tried. We are unable to understand this discrimination. To the courts, which must be free of political bias, treasonable offences are equally heinous, whatever be the complexion of the Government in power or whoever be the offender.’

The right of appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeal having been taken away, the only remedy left to the accused was to appeal to Her Majesty in Council. In this appeal, Gratiaen, Q. C., H. W. Jayewardene, Q. C., and Dick Taverne appeared for the accused appellants. Tennekoon, Q. C., our Solicitor-General appeared for the Crown. The tomes of evidence were not read before the Board. Instead, a preliminary question of law was submitted by Gratiaen and upheld by the Privy Council. The appeals were allowed and the convictions quashed.

In holding the Acts, Nos 1 of 1962 and 31 of 1962 to be void as constituting an interference with the judicial power, their Lordships of the Privy Council said: ‘They (that is, the Acts) were aimed at particular known individuals who had been named in a White Paper and were in prison awaiting their fate… That the alterations in the law were not intended for the generality of the citizens or designed as any improvement in the general law is shown by the fact that the effect of those alterations was to be limited to participants in the January coup, and that after these had been dealt with by the judges, the law should revert to its normal state.’

And so, ended on an extremely happy note an extremely unhappy episode.

Our Ambassadorial post in Washington had been vacant for a long time and the Prime Minister informed her Ministers that the American Ambassador, Miss Willis, had suggested that an early appointment be made. The Prime Minister was again outspoken. She said it was time that they stopped appointing to top posts men of no ability merely because they were party men, that it was time they stopped the practice of appointing SLFP ‘nincompoops’ (her actual words) and that in this case a man of proved ability who could carry himself with dignity and bring honour to his country should be appointed. There was a dearth of such men in the country, she said, and she proposed the name of Shirley Amarasinghe, then Permanent Secretary to the Ministry of Finance. The Cabinet unanimously agreed and the unanimous wish of the Cabinet was conveyed to Shirley on the telephone by the Finance Minister, Felix Dias. Shirley begged to be excused.

In July 1962, yet another Queen’s Speech had to be drafted. C. P. de Silva congratulated me on my draft and suggested that I should be given a knighthood and addressed as ‘Sir Bernard’. I replied that

if that misfortune ever befell me, I would be the most impecunious knight in the Island. My draft was mutilated in Cabinet and a fresh one had to be prepared according to the oral instructions of the Ministers. Each time the Ministers saw their draft, they changed their minds, with the result that the Speech was not finally approved until the Ministers had seen my fourth attempt. The Speech was read to Parliament on July 11,1962. It stated that a vigorous policy would be followed in the implementation of the Official Language Act. This line was added by Felix Dias. In view of previous experiences, I thought it would be wiser not to refer to this thorny problem. India was following a far more sensible course.

Rajagopalachari had said that if the all-India medium is given up in the universities and the various regional languages take its place, boys and girls will stand isolated into fifteen islands instead of being common citizens of all India. Calling upon the boys and girls in the universities not to fall into the trap laid for them, he said: You will not find easy scope for employment, which is the only way by which young men and women can serve their country.

Your present mobility will become a thing of the past and you will have to suffer the life of caste and other group preferences, within a narrow boundary. You may find it easier to pass examinations and tests with a regional medium but what will be the benefit that cheap degrees and diplomas will confer on you? It would be like becoming rich with debased money. Hindi cannot take the place of English as an all-India medium and even if it did, we would have surrendered all advantages to those whose mother tongue is Hindi.

The Speech also contained a line which stated that Parliament would be asked to consider a Bill for the removal of Press monopolies. The Government appeared to be determined to take over the Times of Ceylon and the Lake House newspapers. Resolutions were being passed by bodies all over the country against the proposed Press Bill.

One hundred and fifty editors from thirty-three countries urged the withdrawal of Ceylon’s lamentable Press Bill at a meeting in Paris. In due course, the Bill was introduced in Parliament, but had to be taken out of the Order Paper because the Minister introducing it did not follow the correct procedure. Sirimavo’s Government went out of office before further steps could be taken.

The “Daily News” critic severely criticized the Sinhala translation of the Speech. It was in fact a translation, because the Cabinet approved the English version. This was then translated into Sinhala by an officer of the Cabinet Office and into Tamil by Mudaliyar Sabanayagam, then of the Department of Information.

The critic said: ‘The people have a right to expect the Throne Speech to be flawless both in wording and phrasing. Like the Queen’s English it must possess an impeccability of diction. Yet, the melancholy fact has to be recorded that the Throne Speech read out by the Governor-General was anything but that. It was a clumsy piece of workmanship. That clumsiness arose from the fact that it was a mere translation, and as such it was an object lesson in the danger of allowing a task demanding the utmost care and precision of execution to be entrusted to the wrong hands.’

At about this time Sir Oliver, who was then in London, inquired from my brother G. S., who was our Ambassador in Burma, whether my brother would be kind enough to have him as a guest in the Embassy during a visit which he intended to make shortly to that country. My brother was very happy to receive a former Governor-General but, in the context of the past, had the sense to ask the Prime Minister for orders. Sir Oliver had obtained the necessary visas through our High Commissioner in the United Kingdom and the Burmese Ambassador there. The Burmese Government had been worried because they were unaware of the purpose of the visit. My brother was instructed to inform Sir Oliver, with much regret, of his inability to receive him.

Why is it that, with our representatives abroad today in so many foreign capitals, our Ministers fly across whenever a trade or other agreement has to be signed? It surely cannot be that our Ambassador is not competent to handle the matter. What exactly is he there for? And apropos of that, here is a story. My brother was the most senior official in one of our foreign missions at a time when Ceylon was desperately short of rice. After much correspondence between our Mission and the Ministry of External Affairs, a contract had been entered into between the Government of Ceylon and a private corporation in the foreign country for the supply of a specified quantity of rice at a certain price.

My brother had to sign the contract on behalf of the Government as our Ambassador was out of the Capital at the time. On the day of signing, the officer representing the corporation had met my brother and told him that the sum agreed to by the Government included the usual ten percent. My brother had inquired what that was and was told “Oh that’s for you. The usual business commission. You can take it or leave it”. And he left it. The contract was amended and signed for the reduced amount. The commissions or “cut” came to over two lakhs of rupees. He had a snorter from the Ambassador who had told him that he had no business to interfere with figures settled with our Ministry.

In July 1962, Felix announced his Third budget. He relieved taxpayers of a burden of filling several tax forms connected with the personal tax, the wealth tax, the expenditure tax, the capital gains tax and the land tax. This was a very popular move. The filling up of these forms had been a source of annoyance to many persons. A deficit of Rs 512 million had to be met. To cover this, he increased the rate of income tax and reduced the personal allowances previously allowed for wife and children. He reduced the rice ration by half a measure which was a very unpopular move, though a very necessary one. Fears were expressed that the move might affect the future of the party.

Customs duties were increased. Taxation had reached its maximum limit. There was still a gap of Rs 200 million to be filled. To find a little extra revenue, Felix Dias proposed to impose a sales tax on several articles like tea, coffee, Ovaltine, powdered milk and exercise books. The imposition of such a tax would have sent the very high cost of living still higher and the proposal was rejected. A sales tax on several other articles was therefore imposed. The sales tax was fairly high – 7.5% and naturally, the retailers had to increase their prices to the consumer, which they did.

The tax did not work out in the manner expected by the Government. Having raised the price to cover the extra amount paid to the wholesaler, the retailer and every boutique keeper added a further 7.5% to the consumer who therefore was compelled to pay 15% extra on the previous price. The businessmen were against the Government and consumers who protested were told “You put this Government in; go and tell your Government”.

The Government was extremely agitated, over the reaction of the “rural masses who are with us” to the excessive prices charged by the traders who put the blame on the Government. The Cabinet met on two successive days and, at the insistence of four of the Ministers, Felix was compelled to withdraw the tax within two days of its imposition, a most unusual step after he had announced it in his budget speech as one of his major taxation proposals. Opposition members said that such an important step should not have been taken without mature thought and called for his resignation; but Felix Dias, like Old Man River, went on.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

The Digital Underground

Published

on

Illegal Foreign Exchange, Undiyal, Hawala and Money Laundering, A Four-Part Investigative Series

Forex Platforms, Cryptocurrency, AI and the New Financial Battlefield

THE INVISIBLE FINANCIAL EMPIRE – PART III

The Boyfriend Who Was Never Real

Priya, a 34-year-old professional in Colombo, met “David” on LinkedIn. He claimed to work in fintech in Singapore. For six weeks they exchanged messages daily, about work, about life, about a recent trip he had taken to the Maldives. Eventually, the conversation turned, gently and naturally, to money.

“I’ve been trading on this platform, let me show you,” he said, sharing a screenshot of a sleek trading dashboard showing consistent, impressive returns.

Priya invested a small amount first, $500. Within days, her dashboard showed it had grown to $650. She withdrew $100 successfully, just to test it. It worked. Encouraged, she invested more. Then more. Over two months, she transferred a total of $42,000 into the platform.

When she tried to withdraw her full balance, the platform demanded a “regulatory release fee” of $8,000 before funds could be unlocked. She paid it. Then another fee appeared. Then the platform stopped responding altogether. “David” vanished. The trading dashboard, the customer support chat, the entire brokerage, all of it had never been real.

This is what investigators now call “pig butchering”, and, in 2026, the most disturbing development is not the scam itself, which has existed for years, but what now powers it: artificial intelligence has industrialised the entire operation.

From Manual Fraud to Machine-Generated Deception

For most of the past decade, romance-and-investment scams, like the one that targeted Priya, required enormous manual labour. Scam operations, many of them staffed by trafficked workers held against their will in compounds across Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos, needed real humans to build relationships with victims over weeks, manage fake trading platforms, and respond convincingly to questions.

That labour-intensive model has now been substantially automated. According to financial-crime researchers tracking this shift through 2026, threat actors are standing up entire AI-generated “brokerage” experiences end-to-end, complete with KYC onboarding, branded customer-service chat, animated portfolio dashboards, and falsified live market data feeds, and operating them at industrial scale against multiple victims simultaneously. Generative-AI relationship managers now front the WhatsApp and Telegram conversations that once required real human scammers. AI-cloned regulator letters are generated on demand to justify the fake “release fees” that drain victims a final time before the platform disappears.

What has changed is not the deception itself, it is the production economics. The cost of running a credible synthetic brokerage against one additional victim has collapsed, meaning a single criminal network can now run hundreds of “Davids” simultaneously, each one indistinguishable from a genuine fintech professional until it is too late. (Figure 01)

Sri Lanka: From Victim Pool to Operating Base

Sri Lanka’s relationship to this global scam economy has shifted in an alarming direction over the past two years. The country is no longer only a source of victims, it has become an operating base for the criminal networks themselves.

In April, 2026, Sri Lankan police raided a five-star hotel property, in Ambakandavila, and arrested 150 individuals, including 133 Chinese nationals, 13 Vietnamese nationals, and one Malaysian national, allegedly running a cyber fraud centre with links to international criminal syndicates, based in Myanmar and Cambodia. Investigators say the operation followed a now-familiar regional pattern: recruiters advertise “online marketing” or “data entry” jobs on social media to lure foreign workers to Sri Lanka, confiscate their passports on arrival, and force them to operate scam campaigns under threat.

The Central Bank of Sri Lanka has formally flagged pig-butchering scams as a “developing threat,” warning that foreign scam networks are increasingly targeting overseas nationals through scam farms operating from Sri Lankan soil. A 2026 United Nations report estimated that at least 300,000 people have been trafficked into scam centres across Southeast Asia.

This is not an abstract international problem. It is unfolding in hotels and rented properties across the country, exploiting the same infrastructure, high-speed internet, affordable accommodation, accessible tourist visas, that Sri Lanka has built to attract legitimate digital businesses and tourists.

Where the Money Actually Goes: The Stablecoin Pipeline

Behind every successful pig-butchering scam sits a laundering pipeline that has been transformed almost as dramatically as the scams themselves, and the transformation has a single dominant feature: stablecoins.

According to the Financial Action Task Force’s March 2026, report, drawing on analysis from blockchain intelligence firms Chainalysis and TRM Labs, stablecoins accounted for 84% of the USD 154 billion in illicit virtual asset transaction volume recorded in 2025, the highest share ever observed, and a dramatic jump from just 15% only a few years earlier. TRM Labs separately found that illicit entities received USD 141 billion in stablecoins, in 2025 alone, the highest level observed in five years. (See Table 01)

The scale of state-level abuse is striking. A Russian sanctions-evasion network built around the ruble-pegged stablecoin A7A5 processed more than USD 72 billion in total volume in 2025.

Fighting Fire with Fire: AI on the Defensive Side

The same artificial intelligence reshaping financial crime is also, out of necessity, reshaping the defence against it. Legacy anti-money laundering systems, built on static, rule-based thresholds, have proven badly outmatched by AI-generated fraud operating at machine speed. Research cited by compliance technology analysts suggests that between 90% and 95% of alerts generated by legacy AML systems are false positives, consuming enormous investigator time while genuinely suspicious activity slips through.

This is not a frictionless transition. AI models are notoriously difficult to explain to regulators and examiners in the way traditional rule-based systems are. The practical compromise emerging across the industry is a hybrid model: AI handles the initial scoring and prioritisation of risk, while documented rule-based logic still governs the final decision that must be defensible to a regulator.

The Regulatory Response: Catching Up to the Digital Frontier

Regulators worldwide have begun moving to close the most dangerous gaps exposed by this digital transformation of financial crime. (See Table 02)

What Comes Next

We have now traced this investigation from the centuries-old mechanics of Hawala and Undiyal, through the three-stage architecture that turns criminal proceeds into apparently legitimate wealth, to the AI-generated frontier of digital financial crime reshaping all of it at machine speed.

In our concluding instalment, Part IV: “Sri Lanka at the Crossroads: Economic Consequences, Organised Crime and the Road Ahead”, we bring this series home. We examine precisely what all of this costs Sri Lanka in hard economic terms: lost remittances, exchange rate pressure, tax revenue forgone, and the 2026 FATF evaluation that will determine whether the country’s institutions can demonstrate, with evidence rather than legislation alone, that they are equal to this challenge. We close with a practical policy roadmap.

(The writer, a senior Chartered Accountant and professional banker, is Professor at SLIIT, Malabe.
Views expressed in this article are personal.)

Continue Reading

Features

‘There are no private universities in Sri Lanka’ – some considerations for higher education reform

Published

on

Academics involved in education policy like to say that there is no such thing as a private university in Sri Lanka. The only ‘universities’ in the country are state universities; anything else offering degrees is a private higher education institution (HEI). This position is technically accurate. Yet, in the discourse and imagination of the public, private universities are very real – people teach in them, students register in them, families pay fees, and such degree holders enter job markets in Sri Lanka and outside.

For decades, activists concerned for public higher education have ignored or resisted looking at private HEIs, as if such scrutiny would taint them. Others have worked in both types of institutions, carrying practices from each to the other. The apex body governing state universities, the UGC, has, meanwhile, ignored the concept of conflict of interest and appointed individuals in private higher education in committees and leadership positions. It is unsurprising then that some of the ideologies informing private higher education appear in reform agendas in the state sector.

This is a good time then to consider the varying types of private HEIs around us, and to take a look at some of the issues within them in the hope that higher education reform agendas will include private, as well as state higher education.

What is a ‘private university’?

First, some clarifications. In the public imaginary, a ‘private university’ is typically an institution that provides a foreign or local degree for which the student makes a payment. But this broad classification encompasses a host of diverse institutions and types of degrees which I detail below.

The Non-State Higher Education Division (NSHE) of the Ministry of Education has recognised 295 degrees by 32 institutions. Most of these are private companies and include a handful of established, well-known private HEIs that are ‘university like’. The degrees are local degrees conferred by the institutions accredited by the NSHE Division. While private HEIs conferring local degrees must be accredited by the NSHE Division, there appears to be no legal consequence for not doing so. In addition, there are several permutations of the private degree that miss the net of this Division and the Standing Committee on Accreditation and Quality Assurance (SCAQA) that assists this Division.

For one, degrees conferred by foreign universities offered, via these same private HEIs, are not vetted by the NSHE Division. Secondly, there is a growing plethora of private HEIs which have either no physical presence locally or only a dubious presence. The University Grants Commission has notified the public, through their website, that foreign universities listed in the Commonwealth Universities Yearbook and the World Higher Education Database are recognised, but refrained from giving any other details – which degrees? Offered by what modes? These details are not known. Some of the foreign universities in the lists may be legitimate entities in their own land but the degrees conferred locally, in their name, may not adhere to curriculum or teaching specifications of the NSHE Division or the UGC.

Another troubling phenomenon is the ‘top up degree’, which appears to work on the same principle as that of a pre-paid mobile connection: if I have a Diploma or an HND of a sort, I am eligible to complete a course of study which provides me with a degree, usually from a foreign university. The idea that someone who does not initially qualify for a degree programme should be able to work their way towards one is a progressive notion. This is the concept that open and distance learning (ODL) was based on initially, but which is now sadly exploited. ODL models are expected to provide opportunity for learning for those who may be excluded from traditional learning institutions. In Sri Lanka, however, we have seen ODL become a marketplace offering easy to obtain, for-fee qualifications by institutions with little commitment to superior teaching and learning.

Finally, a perusal of the many types of private HEIs and their varied degrees bring to mind another question – how should the private degrees, provided by state institutions (that are not educational institutions), be regulated? Who should do so?

All of these create a host of problems for the public – for hopeful students and parents and trusting employers. For the higher education sector, recruitment of academic staff, too, has become difficult due to this plethora of ambiguous higher education qualifications, as I discussed in a previous Kuppi article (‘Recruiting academics to state universities’).

Some issues in private HEIs – a bellwether for change in state universities

In this second part of this article, I will discuss some aspects of work in private HEIs – albeit the more established institutions – given that such issues may appear in reform agendas in future.

Across state universities, all permanent staff of a specific category are paid according to the same criteria. The picture is not so clear when it comes to private HEIs since they are different entities legally, typically companies. Private HEIs have salary scales and financial incentives that are different to each other. The more established private HEIs reportedly have attractive renumeration packages, possibly a reason for academics of state universities migrating eagerly to such institutions during sabbatical years and on retirement. This may not of course be the case with other less established, or improperly registered HEIs of which we know little. Academic staff of these more accepted private HEIs seem to value the high financial remuneration they receive (in comparison to state universities) as something that makes their work rewarding.

Attractive remuneration is important to sustain the good life and is at times seen as the institution’s way of encouraging good work. Yet, this has implications for the future of the institution: to continue to deliver on promised financial packages, institutions must continue to have large profit margins. One strategy has been to enroll multiple cohorts of students per year, even up to three or four intakes per year. This can result in exploitative work conditions, since staff must cater to all these cohorts in that same year. If there is inadequate staff, employees are further burdened. On the other hand, if there is a sudden drop in enrolments (degrees can go out of fashion) unexpected layoffs occur. Similar to other sectors that employ short-term contract staff – including state universities – in private HEIs, too, individual teachers, who are on short term contracts that need regular renewal, can feel pressured to work under difficult or exploitative conditions.

At the same time, even in the more established private HEIs, work norms differ from those of state universities in that they include promotional work that keeps the institution’s name in the eye of the public. The Marketing (or similarly named) unit comes up in conversations as one of the most important departments. It appears to weigh in on decision-making related to the number of staff, the amount of re-sits per exams, and other pedagogically important matters. This is a worrying example of how financial rationales interfere with pedagogically or academically sound processes, resulting in problematic results in the classroom. On the plus side, junior colleagues, who had experience in both state and private HEIs, also felt that they faced less harassment in private HEIs – primarily due to the private HEIs ability to take swift action in reported cases of harassment. This is a real indictment on state institutions and their reluctance to address chronic issues of harassment in our universities.

Yet, while we hear much about problems in state universities, we hardly hear of problems that staff in private HEIs face. One rationale for a lack of public expressions by staff is that expressions of discontent might lead to trouble given the importance of reputation for private HEIs. The worry about reputational damage is a growing concern in state universities, too, as evidenced by social media policies and internal conversations on reputational damage, consequent to negative publicity. Institutional worries of reputational damage are harmful in the long run since these impact not only freedom of expression by student and staff, but also research that is possible in and about the education sector.

Some thoughts at the end…


A close look at the private higher education sector is important given its strong presence in the country. Impending reform needs to regulate this diverse array of higher education offerings in the private sector, as well as the state institutions that offer privately-funded options of higher education (a topic for a separate Kuppi on its own). It is time we carefully considered how to build a whole system of higher education out of this broken mess.

Kaushalya Perera is a senior lecturer at the University of Colombo.

Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.

Continue Reading

Features

Ready for solo spotlight

Published

on

Nish Peiris: Excited about future plans

Singer Nish Peiris is set to take the next big step in her music journey.

The talented vocalist, who has been seen and heard in the scene here for a short while, and was also featured with the now-defunct band, Inner Vision, has announced that she will be fully committing to her solo career, after completing her degree this year.

“I’m finishing my degree this year, and after that I’ll be fully committing to my solo music career,” Nish told The Island.

“I’ve already got a few tours lined up for next year, so I’m really excited for what’s ahead.”

Fans, no doubt, will remember Nish for her smooth voice and stage presence, and the good news is that she is now ready to chart her own path and bring new music to audiences at home and abroad.

With tours already planned for 2027, the year 2026 promises to be an exciting year for the young artiste as she steps into the spotlight on her own.

We wish Nish every success in this new chapter!

Continue Reading

Trending