Connect with us

Features

New Legal Cases Loom Over Trump’s Campaign Trail Third Party Candidate Democratic Spoiler – Perhaps A Kennedy?

Published

on

by Vijaya Chandrasoma

Democrats have a masochistic tendency for snatching defeat from the jaws of victory . Sometimes they self-destruct all on their own, prematurely conceding elections patently in dispute. Other times, they are given a helping hand from third party candidates contesting a presidency they have no chance of winning, who “’steal” vital votes from the Democratic candidate, in spite of having complementary platforms.

Currently, this tendency seems to be ominously destined for repetition in 2024.

Al Gore in 2000 and Hillary Clinton in 2016 both conceded their elections prematurely, when their elections were either still in dispute (Gore), or provably corrupted by a false statement by the then Attorney General, 11 days before the election, against election laws; and Russian interference conclusively proved by the subsequent Mueller Report (Clinton).

Both these election irregularities could have been disputed with cases filed with the Courts, and either or both had fair chances of winning, with solid evidence. Unlike Trump’s 60+ phony cases filed in 2020, all of which were thrown out by the courts for lack of a shred of evidence.

Both elections were conceded by Gore and Clinton with honorable, patriotic speeches. Predictably, Trump has yet to concede the 2020 election.

Green Party candidates, Ralph Nader in 2000 and Jill Stein in 2016, acted as spoilers for the Democrats, “stealing” votes from the Democrats and probably “helping” them lose both elections.

Politicians/activists who have indicated their intention to run as third party candidates are:

Dr. Cornell West, Harvard educated Professor Emeritus at Princeton University, activist and author, is the declared 2024 presidential nominee of the Green Party. He is running a campaign centered around Medicare for All, public housing, action on climate change and drastically cutting the military budget, policies espoused by the progressive and popular Bernie Sanders wing of the Democratic Party.

Dr West is capable of diverting a significant percentage of the Democratic vote which would compromise the chances of the Party nominee.

So can Robert F. Kennedy Jr., though for totally different reasons. Junior has achieved nothing educationally, politically or in governance. He is best known for his anti-vaccine stance; he has racist, anti-Semitic views and outlandish conspiracy theories. He also hangs out with billionaire Republican donors and shares Republican policies. In fact, Trump’s senior adviser, Steve Bannon, has been floating the idea of a Trump-Kennedy ticket for 2024.

Kennedy’s personal life is a walking tragedy, with a lifetime of drug abuse and an estranged second wife, who bore four of his six children, and committed suicide at age 52. He has been spurned by his famous family for disgracing the family name.

Which is his only qualification, being the son of Attorney General of the 1960s, Robert F. Kennedy, and nephew of President John F. Kennedy and Senator Edward Kennedy.

RFK Jr. is currently running for the Democratic nomination for the presidency. He will not win a single state in the Democratic primaries, for which he may qualify only because of his “Kennedy Privilege”.

The real threat for the Democrats is if he decides to run as a third party candidate. His legendary name alone may garner him around 15% of the Democratic vote, which, coupled with Dr West’s likely 10% or more, could inflict a double whammy spoiler for the Democrats, and hand over the presidency on a platter to the Republicans. As of today, to Trump.

Joe Mancin, Democratic (?) Senator from West Virginia, has previous experience in acting as a spoiler to the Democratic Party in the Senate. Mancin knows he hasn’t a snowball’s chance in hell to win the presidency and has entered the race only to steal a few votes from the party he ostensibly represents.

All elections in the USA and throughout the world are contested on the popular vote system – the person who gets the most votes, wins. Except for the election for the presidency of the USA, which is contested according to the archaic conditions of a system devised 250 years ago, the Electoral College.

In addition to various racial and societal anomalies, the Electoral College makes it possible for a candidate to win the presidency without winning the popular vote. It also enforces the two-party system, which makes it impossible for a third party candidate to succeed.

This archaic electoral process gave us, in this century, two of the worst presidents in US history, who had both lost the popular vote. George Bush lost to Al Gore in 2000 by 543,895 votes and Trump to Clinton in 2016 by 2,865,075 votes.

Bush involved the nation in an illegal war with Iraq, with enormous losses in human lives (American and Iraqi) and property. He transformed a thriving economy and a surplus inherited from Clinton into a near recession and a deficit of over a trillion dollars by 2008.

Trump was the most corrupt president in history. He, his family and his cronies bled the country dry to the tune of billions of dollars. He polarized the country to the point of ethnic violence with his white supremacist, racist, phony evangelist policies, culminating in inciting a violent insurrection which nearly destroyed U.S. democracy and started a second civil war.

The 2024 election may prove to be one of the most divisive contests in US history. Around 60% to 70% of the American electorate do not favor either of the current front-runners, Trump or Biden. Republican support for Trump seems to be thinning as his legal woes keep piling up. Perhaps some Republicans have finally found a cure for the dread disease of white blindness.

It is staggering that the likely candidates for the highest post in the richest and most powerful nation in the world are two old white men, in or nearing their 80s. The incumbent, President Biden, with the achievements of a most successful first term, is sadly showing both physical and mental signs of senility, which will only degenerate during a second term. The challenger, twice impeached former President Trump, is himself approaching 80 years of age. He is a clinical psychopath who has been indicted on a medley of felonies of sexual assault, financial fraud, obstruction of justice, espionage and sedition.

The terrifying fact is, unless the American electorate comes to its senses, and quickly, either of these old fogies will assume the awesome powers of the US presidency, including access to the nuclear codes, for four long years from January 2025.

If Biden wins a second term, he has promised to finish the wonderful job he has been doing in his first term. However, most Democratic voters are of the opinion that he will be too senile to effectively carry out the duties of the presidency in his second term, at the end of which he will be 86.

If Trump wins the election, the New York Times, in a recent editorial, states that “Trump and his backers are planning a sweeping expansion of presidential power over government machinery if voters return him to power in 2024, reshaping the structure of the Executive Branch to concentrate far greater authority in his hands”. A political strategy known in Sri Lanka as “doing a Jayewardene”.

Two weeks ago, Special Counsel, Jack Smith sent a “target letter” to the Trump legal team, indicating that Trump’s indictment for his role in the incitement of the January 6 insurrection is imminent.

The danger of all these legal actions against Trump is that impeachments, indictments, even arrests, only seem to empower him and make him stronger. Republicans seem to be faced with an unenviable dilemma in 2024 – they are damned if Trump wins, they are damned if he doesn’t.

Strangely, even his declared rivals for the 2024 Republican nomination have chosen to turn a blind eye to his culpability of all the crimes he has so evidently committed. They know damned well that Trump is guilty of trying to illegally overturn an election by fraud, witness tampering and intimidation, inciting a violent insurrection and even attempting to have his vice-president, Mike Pence, hanged. After all, they were all present at the Capitol, the scene of the crime, with their own lives in danger.

But, even in their role as Trump’s declared opponents for the presidency, they stay dumb, unwilling to confront him or call him on these crimes. Even Mike Pence, whose life, and the lives of his family, were threatened by the Trump mob, dares not criticize him openly.

How can such cowards aspire to assume the duties of the US presidency, to act without fear or favor on behalf of all the American people? How will they find the courage, as the Leader of the Free World, to stand up to world leaders like Putin and Xi Jinping, who have the power to invade US allies with impunity?

They can’t and they won’t. Which is the reason none of these sycophants will overcome Trump’s stranglehold on the Republican nomination. They have shown their cowardice by their abject fear of standing up to the criminal, because they cower in fear of his vulgar bullying tactics and the violence of his white supremacist base.

They will soon realize the wisdom of the statement made by Presidential Historian, Jon Meacham, “They have sold their souls to Trump for power, and the check has bounced!”

Trump’s acquittal or a mistrial on any of these cases, even one caused by a hung jury, will not only automatically cement his Republican candidature in 2024, it may even help him win the election. Which will give him four more years to complete the job he started in 2016 of destroying democracy in the U.S. and taking America back to the good old days of white supremacy of the Jim Crow era.

One-term presidents are seldom given a second shot. Trump is a three-time Loser, having lost not only the 2020 presidency in a landslide, but the 2018 and 2022 midterms for his Party. Incredibly, he still has the confidence of his Republican base. Obviously, hope springs eternal in the white supremacist breast.

Republican Speaker McCarthy is now trying to muddy the waters with a threat to impeach President Biden for “weaponization of the Justice Department”. A desperate but futile act of revenge, with no evidence at all, which even if passed by the slim Republican majority in the House, will never reach the 2/3 majority required by the Senate.

There are a couple of Republican presidential hopefuls, who refuse to be bullied by Trump, and have no fear of the Trump base. These are former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, who are creeping up the polls as Trump implodes. Florida Governor, Ron DeSantis, who was Trump’s main rival, has blown up his chances with incredibly stupid remarks about education and burning books, the “benefits” of slavery and LGBTQ rights. All these candidates run far behind Trump in current polls. It’s early days, though, anything can happen in 16 months.

There will be many others with presidential aspirations in an election at which anything seems possible. Third party hopefuls have no chance of winning the presidency. Their one intention, besides getting a modest and temporary share of the limelight, is the calculated motive of politicians everywhere in the world – to advance and consolidate their own political and financial futures, with scant regard for the future of the nation they are pledged to serve.

In any event, if Trump is defeated as the Republican candidate in 2024, he will once again call foul, and keep the circus going until 2028, when he will again be seeking that elusive second term at Biden’s age of 82. This could carry on ad nauseam, until the country’s sanity is finally restored by the merciful release of death, his or that of Americans’, whichever comes first. Prayerfully, his.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

US’ anti-migrant stance set to intensify tensions in Western camp

Published

on

Migrant boats land on Western beaches. Credit: PA

The announcement by the US authorities of an anti-migrant stance during a recent commemoration in France of the epochal D-Day Landings of June 6, 1944, ought to strike impartial observers as a supreme irony. Whereas what should have been expected was a vibrant celebration of the beginning of the process of Western Europe freeing itself decisively from Nazi or fascist control during the crucial stages of World War Two, this was not to be.

What the world heard instead was a call to contemporary Western Europe to arm itself against a seemingly rising and threatening migrant presence in the region. In other words, the migrant must be despised and ‘shown the door’.

Instead of a commemoration that rejoiced in the flourishing of liberal democracy and its values what one got was a strong affirmation of fascism and racial chauvinism. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth vented his spleen against the migrant or foreigner presence in Europe reportedly thus: ‘Sadly today different European beaches are stormed by different dangerous ideologies.’ To ‘beaches in Spain and Italy and Greece and Bulgaria, boats and men arrive. When will European capitals do something about that invasion?’

While at the outbreak of World War Two it was Nazi Germany that was doing the invading and bringing some principal European countries under its suzerainty, this time around we are being given to understand that it’s migrants to the West who are seeking to colonize the latter. It goes without saying that such inflammatory rhetoric would have the deleterious effect of keeping racial tensions alive in the West and jeopardize all possibilities of the countries concerned cementing and maintaining social stability.

The Trump administration gives the impression of taking a leaf from the politically underdeveloped regions of the South to keep the US polity stable and united. In South Asia, for instance, we are not short of ambitious demagogues who use what is referred to as the ‘race card’ to gather unto themselves a following and thereby further their political fortunes. By seeking to stir and sustain anti-migrant hysteria, the Trump administration is also essentially replicating Nazi Germany’s policy of anti-Semitism. That is, fascism is very much alive in the US under President Trump.

Such efforts at churning racial hysteria at this juncture in the US should not come as a surprise. For all intents and purposes, the Trump administration is nowhere near achieving its aims in West Asia, for instance, in the short term. It has failed to bring Iran down to its knees, as it hoped to do, but is adopting the expedient of keeping the world guessing and confused on what it is doing in the region, since it cannot withdraw from the theatre in a hurry without losing face.

While perhaps working out an escape strategy the Trump administration it seems, is hoping to maintain its following at home intact and silent by playing on their racial biases and insecurities. Hence, the anti-foreigner campaign.

Simultaneously, the Trump administration will need to keep a close eye on how economic pressures on the domestic front are panning out. Anti-administration sentiments first break to the surface at meal tables. On this score, the news cannot be good because the average US family’s spending power ought to be shrinking on account of rising energy and oil prices. Consequently, it would not be a bad idea to keep the attention of the US consumer diverted by adeptly playing ‘the race card’; once again, lessons from intellectually bankrupt Southern politicians are coming in handy.

To be sure such comparisons many politicians in vibrantly democratic countries would find quite unflattering. But the stark truth is that racism cannot be tolerated in civilized societies and those politicians who resort to it risk being branded as racists of the first degree. In fact they could be seen as being on par with the likes of German dictator Adolph Hitler and his close collaborators.

However, on the question of migrant policy the Trump administration would likely be at polar opposites with the most vibrant of liberal democracies of the West. This will be the case with the UK, France and Italy for instance. The latter continue to keep their doors open to legal migrants and they are likely to view a virtual blanket ban on migrants as reprehensible.

Moreover, in the foremost democracies of the West debates are vibrantly ongoing on the need to keep racism or any hint of it completely outlawed in the public plane. There is the case of the UK, for instance, where the authorities continue to emphatically pinpoint their adherence to the principle of anti-racism in the conduct of public affairs.

One proof of the above was the parliamentary debate relating to the killing of 18-year-old Henry Nowak in Southampton. Police handling of the victim came in for sharp scrutiny by particularly the opposition in the House of Commons but there seemed to be a consensus over the main political divide that the matter should not be politicized.

Moreover, the UK authorities stressed in the House the government’s strict adherence to the policy of non-racism. It was also pointed out that British institutions set up to manage racism at the national, county and neighbourhood levels, for example, were very much intact. In fact, Sri Lanka could gain considerably by studying and implementing locally, legislation modeled on the relevant UK laws if it is in earnest when it speaks of ‘reconciliation’.

Accordingly, it is highly unlikely that Western Europe would ‘cave in’, so to speak, to US pressure on issues related to migration. The liberal democracies of Western Europe in particular would remain for the foreseeable future migrant-welcoming, multi-ethnic and plural democracies.

Nor is it likely that Western Europe would be passively receptive to US demands that it drastically increases its defense spending to meet the latter’s aims. Within the Western fold the EU is remaining committed to backing Ukraine, for instance, in its ongoing armed resistance to the Russian invasion and it is not giving any indication of being deferent to US pressure.

However, although tensions would continue to bristle within US-Western Europe relations on the above and numerous other matters of contention it would be far too premature to announce a parting of company between the two sections of the West. In that sense, the post-World War Two order remains essentially intact. There are still many things in common between the two, particular on the economic plane, that will ensure the continuance of the partnership.

Continue Reading

Features

A decade among Yala’s ghosts of gold

Published

on

YM75 "James" surveys his territory from a tree-top vantage point, demonstrating the leopard's commanding presence in the landscape.

The first rays of dawn creep over the ancient rocks of Yala. The Indian Ocean glimmers in the distance, and the wilderness slowly awakens. Somewhere amid the scrub jungle, a pair of amber eyes scans the landscape.

For wildlife conservationist and leopard researcher Milinda Wattegedara, moments such as these have defined more than a decade of dedication to one of Sri Lanka’s most iconic creatures—the Sri Lankan leopard.

What began as fascination evolved into a remarkable conservation journey that has transformed the understanding of Yala’s leopard population and placed Sri Lanka firmly on the global wildlife research map.

“Long before I ever lifted a camera, leopards had already captured my imagination,” says Wattegedara. “What fascinated me was not merely their beauty but the complexity of their lives—their hunting strategies, movements, reproductive behaviour and their remarkable ability to adapt to changing environments.”

That fascination led to the birth of the Yala Leopard Diary in 2013, an ambitious long-term project dedicated to documenting individual leopards and unraveling the mysteries surrounding their lives.

For many visitors, a leopard sighting is a fleeting thrill. For Wattegedara and his team, every encounter is a chapter in an ongoing scientific story.

“Each photograph was never the end of an encounter,” he explains. “It was the beginning of deeper questions. How did a particular leopard use the landscape? How did its behaviour change with the seasons? What environmental pressures shaped its decisions?”

These questions drove years of meticulous fieldwork. Every sighting was carefully recorded with details including location, habitat, behaviour, date and time. Photographs were analysed to identify individual animals through unique spot patterns, allowing researchers to distinguish one leopard from another with remarkable accuracy.

What followed was groundbreaking.

YF77 “Shelly” pauses in quiet observation, embodying the alertness
and grace that define Yala’s leopard population.

From 2013 to 2026, the Yala Leopard Diary identified an astonishing 189 individual leopards within the Yala Block 1. The research revealed a leopard density of approximately 0.524 leopards per square kilometre, making Yala one of the highest leopard-density landscapes ever recorded anywhere in the world.

Such findings have elevated Yala’s status among global wildlife researchers.

Nestled between the Indian Ocean and a mosaic of habitats, ranging from rocky outcrops to dense scrub forests, Yala offers an ecological stage unlike any other.

Here, leopards are photographed silhouetted against ocean horizons, perched atop ancient granite formations, resting on tree branches and stalking prey across sunlit grasslands.

The images tell stories of extraordinary lives.

There is Haminee, a devoted mother navigating the challenges of raising cubs in a competitive landscape. There is Lucas, one of Yala’s most frequently documented males, striding confidently across the Gonalabba Plains with the vast ocean forming an unforgettable backdrop.

There is Ruki demonstrating the species’ incredible strength by hoisting prey onto branches, and Shelly, quietly surveying her surroundings in a moment of feline vigilance.

Together, these individuals have become familiar characters in a living wilderness drama.

YM31 “Ruki” secures prey on a branch, illustrating the remarkable strength and coordination of the Sri Lankan leopard.

Recognising the immense value of long-term documentation, Wattegedara joined forces with fellow researchers Dushyantha Silva, Raveendra Siriwardana and Mevan Piyasena to establish the Yala Leopard Centre in 2020.

Located at the Palatupana entrance to the Yala National Park, the centre is believed to be the world’s first information facility dedicated exclusively to leopards.

“The centre serves as a repository of knowledge, accumulated through years of observation and research,” Wattegedara says. “Our goal is to connect visitors with the science behind conservation and foster a deeper appreciation of these magnificent animals.”

The project’s impact extends far beyond Sri Lanka’s borders.

Research arising from the Yala Leopard Diary has been published in internationally recognised scientific journals. One study introduced an innovative framework for identifying individual leopards, while another documented an extraordinary and previously unrecorded case of a leopard cub being consecutively adopted by two different adult females—first a relative and later an unrelated leopardess.

The discovery attracted international scientific attention and highlighted the complexity of leopard social behaviour.

Yet for Wattegedara, the most important lesson remains one of humility.

“One conclusion has become increasingly clear,” he reflects. “Our understanding of these leopards remains far from complete. We are only beginning to understand how they live, adapt and persist in one of Sri Lanka’s most dynamic protected landscapes.”

YF15 “Hope” descends Rukvila Rock at dawn, showcasing the agility and adaptability of Yala’s leopards.

His words underscore an essential conservation truth: the more we learn about nature, the more mysteries emerge.

As Sri Lanka navigates growing environmental challenges, the Yala Leopard Diary stands as a shining example of what sustained observation, scientific curiosity and public engagement can achieve.

Beyond the stunning photographs and remarkable sightings lies something even more valuable—a growing body of knowledge capable of informing future conservation decisions and ensuring that future generations inherit a wilderness where leopards continue to roam free.

For more than a decade, Wattegedara and his colleagues have followed the tracks of Yala’s elusive predators through dust, rain and scorching heat.

Their work has revealed that every leopard has a story, every sighting has significance and every photograph can contribute to conservation.

And perhaps, most importantly, it has reminded us that the golden ghosts of Yala still have many secrets left to share.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Features

Glamour, music and community spirit …

Published

on

Sri Lankans are quite active, all around the globe.

News has just come my way, from Glasgow, in Scotland, where the glamour of masks, music, dancing, and community spirit, came together, in spectacular fashion, at Masquerade Night, bringing together members of the Sri Lankan community for an evening filled with music, fashion, food and entertainment.

Organised by Mahesh Balaaratchi (DJ Mowgli) together with Sulochana Asmone, Hiroshini, Prasad, Ashi, and Shawn, the evening provided guests with an opportunity to socialise, enjoy live entertainment, and celebrate in a unique and elegant setting.

Guests arrived from 6:00 pm, dressed in formal attire and decorative masks, creating a colourful and vibrant atmosphere throughout the venue.

DJ Mowgli: The main
organiser of
Masquerade Night

There was a delicious selection of Sri Lankan cuisine and street food, which proved popular throughout the evening.

The buffet offered a variety of traditional favourites, giving attendees a taste of home while adding to the festive atmosphere.

Entertainment was provided by DJ Mowgli, whose performance kept the audience engaged throughout the night. His playlist featured a mixture of popular favourites, dance classics, and cultural music, remixed for a younger generation.

One of the highlights of the evening was the Baila session, which brought a distinctly Sri Lankan flavour to the event.

The Baila segment highlighted the importance of preserving and celebrating cultural traditions, while bringing people together through music and dance.

As familiar rhythms filled the room, guests enthusiastically took to the dance floor, creating one of the most memorable moments of the night.

The crowd was described as lively, energetic, and welcoming, with attendees embracing the spirit of the masquerade theme while enjoying the opportunity to reconnect with friends and meet new people. The family-friendly atmosphere ensured that guests of all ages could take part in the celebrations.

The festivities continued until midnight and included a range of competitions and entertainment.

Children and adults alike participated in fashion shows, while guests competed for awards in several ‘Best Dressed’ categories.

The creativity and effort displayed in both costumes and formal wear added an extra layer of excitement to the evening.

As the final songs played and guests prepared to leave, many were already looking forward to the next Event Night.

The evening’s proceedings were handled by Sam, Mahela and Isuru.

Their enthusiasm reflected the growing popularity of these gatherings and their increasing importance, within the local community calendar.

A series of community events has continued to grow in popularity among the Sri Lankans in Glasgow, with Halloween Night coming up on 31st October.

Continue Reading

Trending