Connect with us

Latest News

New government must uphold press freedom, says press freedom collective

Published

on

In a joint statement addressed to Sri Lanka's newly elected President Anura Kumara Dissanayaka on January 13, seventeen media workers and union organisations call on the National People's Power leadership to continue efforts in protecting media freedoms for Sri Lankan journalists

A coalition of trade unions, media advocacy groups, and journalist representative bodies have urged the newly-elected government of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to uphold press freedom and challenge a culture of impunity for crimes against journalists in Sri Lanka. The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) joins its affiliates, the Federation of Media Employees and Trade Unions (FMETU), the Sri Lanka Working Journalists Association (SLWJA), and the Free Media Movement (FMM), in stressing the historic importance of this transition and urging Dissanayake and the ruling National People’s Power (NPP) coalition to stand by their commitments in service of democracy, the media, and justice.

Following Sri Lanka’s Parliamentary and Presidntial elections in 2024, a coalition of 25 civil society organisations, unions, and media bodies, including the IFJ, FMETU, FMM, and SLWJA, called on the ruling NPP coalition and President Dissanayake to uphold press freedom and human rights in Sri Lanka through their terms in office.

The letter comes as Sri Lanka’s media community commemorates Black January, an annual remembrance of colleagues killed and disappeared between 2004 and 2010, with those responsible escaping with impunity in a vast majority of cases. Other attacks on the press, including harassment, abductions, intimidation, and assault continue to be met with inaction from authorities, if state forces are not directly responsible. In a report from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), a lack of accountability for historic and current human rights violations was identified as a significant impediment to human rights in Sri Lanka.

In the NPP’s election manifesto, the coalition criticised what it described as a partisan mass-media, announcing its plans to safeguard the professional integrity of journalists. In its principles, the coalition committed to remove sections of the controversial 2024 Online Safety Act impacting freedom of expression, while reviewing existing media legislation with a focus on press freedom.

Securing over 70 per cent of seats in November’s parliamentary elections, the NPP campaign promised to deliver sweeping reforms, including the enactment of a new constitution and legal reform amid the ongoing impacts of the country’s worst financial crisis. The election marks a significant departure from Sri Lanka’s recent political history, which has been dominated by the Rajapaksa political dynasty.

In the joint letter, the 25 organisations called on the new government to:

  1. Reopen or initiate impartial and swift investigations to ensure accountability in cases of violence against the press under previous governments;

  2. Ensure that law enforcement agencies end the harassment and intimidation of journalists;

  3. Repeal the Online Safety Act;

  4. Repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act;

  5. Amend the Parliamentary (Powers and Privileges) Act;

  6. Amend the Personal Data Protection Act; and

  7. Establish an independent, self-regulatory media commission.

The FMETU said: “Journalists In Sri Lanka often practice self-censorship due to fear of reprisals. This can lead to underreporting of important stories and a lack of critical coverage of the Government.”

The SLWJA said: “After the current government assumed power, there was widespread hope for a new era of freedom of speech and expression in Sri Lanka. However, these hopes are rapidly diminishing. The SLWJA urges the government to honour its commitments to safeguard media freedom and ensure the protection of journalists. Immediate steps must be taken to repeal oppressive legislation and foster an environment where the fundamental right to freedom of expression is respected and upheld.”

The FMM said: “The Free Media Movement commends President Dissanayake and the National People’s Power for their stated commitment to fostering a free and independent press in Sri Lanka. At this critical juncture, we urge the president to translate these commitments into concrete actions by ensuring justice for crimes against journalists, repealing repressive laws like the Online Safety Act, the draconian Prevention of Terrorism Act, and fostering an environment where journalists can work without fear of harassment or intimidation.”

The IFJ said: The IFJ and its affiliates stand resolute in their defence of press freedom and accountability for Sri Lanka’s media. Justice for the families of colleagues killed, disappeared, or subject to other violence and attacks cannot be delayed any further, and the new Dissanayake government must ensure that it addresses the failings of its predecessors to combat impunity. At the same time, the NPP coalition must uphold democracy and commit to creating a media landscape free of laws affecting the fundamental freedoms of expression and the press.”

[IFJ]



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Putin sets out conditions for Ukraine ceasefire

Published

on

By

[pic BBC]

Russian President Vladimir Putin said he agreed with the idea of a ceasefire in Ukraine, but that “questions” remained about the nature of a truce as he set out a number of tough conditions.

The Russian president was responding to a plan for a 30 day ceasefire, which Ukraine agreed to earlier this week after talks with the US.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky described Putin’s response to the plan as “manipulative” and called for more sanctions on Russia.

Meanwhile, the US placed further sanctions on Russian oil, gas and banking sectors.

Speaking at a news conference in Moscow on Thursday, Putin said of the ceasefire proposal: “The idea is right – and we support it – but there are questions that we need to discuss.”

A ceasefire should lead to “an enduring peace and remove the root causes of this crisis”, Putin said.  “We need to negotiate with our American colleagues and partners,” he said. “Maybe I’ll have a call with Donald Trump.”

Putin added: “It will be good for the Ukrainian side to achieve a 30-day ceasefire. “We are in favour of it, but there are nuances.”

One of the areas of contention is Russia’s Kursk region, Putin said, where Ukraine launched a military incursion last year and captured some territory.

He claimed Russia was fully back in control of Kursk, and said Ukrainian troops there “have been isolated”.

“They are trying to leave, but we are in control. Their equipment has been abandoned.”

“There are two options for Ukrainians in Kursk – surrender or die.”

Outlining some of his questions over how a ceasefire would work, Putin asked: “How will those 30 days be used? For Ukraine to mobilise? Rearm? Train people? Or none of that? Then a question – how will that be controlled?”

“Who will give the order to end the fighting? At what cost? Who decides who has broken any possible ceasefire, over 2,000km? All those questions need meticulous work from both sides. Who polices it?”

Putin “doesn’t say no directly”, Zelensky said in his nightly video address, but “in practice, he’s preparing a rejection”.

“Putin, of course, is afraid to tell President Trump directly that he wants to continue this war, wants to kill Ukrainians.”

The Russian leader had set so many pre-conditions “that nothing will work out at all”, Zelensky said.

After Putin’s remarks and Zelensky’s response, there is now a clear divide between both sides’ positions.

Ukraine wants a two-stage process: a quick ceasefire and then talks about a longer-term settlement.

Russia believes you cannot separate the two processes and all the issues should be decided in a single deal. Both sides seem content to argue their differences.

Ukraine believes it can put pressure on Russia, painting it as a reluctant peacemaker, playing for time. Russia, equally, believes it has a chance now to raise its fundamental concerns, about Nato expansion and Ukraine’s sovereignty.

But this presents a problem for Donald Trump. He has made it clear he wants a quick result, ending the fighting in days.

And right now, Putin does not appear to want to play ball.

Getty Images President Trump wears a blue suit and red tie as he gestures while sat on a chair in the Oval Office at the White House
Donald Trump has said he hopes Russia will “do the right thing” [BBC]

Speaking at the White House following Putin’s remarks, Trump said he would “love” to meet the Russian leader and that he hoped Russia would “do the right thing” and agree to the proposed 30-day truce.

“We’d like to see a ceasefire from Russia,” he said.

Speaking earlier at a meeting in the Oval Office with Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump told reporters he had already discussed specifics with Ukraine.

“We’ve been discussing with Ukraine land and pieces of land that would be kept and lost, and all of the other elements of a final agreement,” Trump said. “A lot of the details of a final agreement have actually been discussed.”

On the subject of Ukraine joining the Nato military alliance, Trump said “everybody knows what the answer to that is”.

The fresh sanctions on Russian oil and gas came as the Trump administration further restricted access to US payment systems, making it harder for other countries to buy Russian oil.

Meanwhile, Putin met US special envoy Steve Witkoff behind closed doors in Moscow.

Earlier in the day, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov rejected the ceasefire proposal put forward by the US.

On Wednesday, Putin visited Russia’s Kursk region, symbolically dressed in military fatigues. Russia later said it recaptured the key town of Sudzha.

More than 95,000 people fighting for Russia’a military have died in the war.

Ukraine last updated its casualty figures in December 2024, when President Volodymyr Zelensky acknowledged 43,000 Ukrainian deaths among soldiers and officers. Western analysts believe this figure to be underestimated.

[BBC]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Sciver-Brunt, Matthews power Mumbai Indians into second WPL final

Published

on

By

Nat Sciver-Brunt struck 77, with ten boundaries and two sixes [BCCI]

Majestic batting from Nat Sciver-Brunt,  middle-overs acceleration from Hayley Matthews, and power-hitting from Harmanpreet Kaur helped Mumbai Indians post a daunting total of 213 in the Eliminator. That proved to be too much to chase down, and Mumbai’s 47-run win extended their head-to-head dominance over Gujarat Giants to 7-0 and powered them into their second WPL final in three years. On Saturday, they will face Delhi Capitals in a repeat of the 2023 finale.

Giants were without Deandra Dottin for their first knockout game in three WPLs after the allrounder hurt herself only five minutes before the toss, and was replaced by England’s Danielle Gibson. Giants didn’t do themselves any favours as they misfielded through the innings and put down four catches that cost them heavily. In the run chase, they lost their three top-scorers this season – Beth Mooney, Harleen Deol and Ashleigh Gardner – in the powerplay as Mumbai held on to their catches and effected run-outs.

Phoebe Litchfield scored a quickfire 31 off 20 balls, but once she was stumped off Amelia Kerr, Giants were all but out of the chase at 107 for 5, with the asking rate above 13 an over.

Put in to bat, Mumbai went back to opening with Yastika Bhatia, but it didn’t change her fortunes. After collecting three boundaries in her 14-ball stay during a sedate powerplay in which MI didn’t take too many risks, Bhatia pulled Gibson to midwicket to fall for 14.

The wicket brought out the in-form Sciver-Brunt, who didn’t bat an eyelid to get going alongside Matthews, who started with only 17 runs off her first 22 balls before taking off. Sciver-Brunt took the aerial route straightaway. She ended the seventh over with consecutive boundaries, which Matthews followed up by smacking three of her own off the next three balls from Priya Mishra to power the run rate past eight an over. Three of those five consecutive fours came off short deliveries, a length the Giants bowlers often bowled and got punished for.

Their sloppy fielding didn’t help either, leading to a number of boundaries. The first came in the ninth over when Sciver-Brunt drove to deep cover, where Simran Shaikh let the ball go through her. Soon after, Sciver-Brunt reverse paddled Gardner for her fifth boundary in 12 balls. Kashvee Gautam then let one through at point when Matthews cut one square. By then, Matthews had started to find her A game, and a six off Tanuja Kanwar’s short ball brought her fifty up off 36 balls, and the team’s 100 in 11 overs.

With Mumbai at 111 for 1 after 12 overs, Meghna Singh and Mishra brought some sort of balance back by conceding only 13 runs in two overs. But from the cushion of 124 for 1 with six overs to go, it was time to floor the pedal.

Harmanpreet already had her helmet on in the dugout, and was shadow-practicing her big swings while waiting for her chance. Sciver-Brunt deposited Gibson over deep midwicket and long-on to raise a 29-ball fifty. Giants, meanwhile, continued their wretched run on the field when the reliable Gardner dropped Matthews on 57 straight down the ground.

Matthews made them pay immediately, hitting Mishra for back-to-back sixes over long-on and cover with deft footwork. Such was Mumbai’s luck that even a top-edge off the next ball went for four. But that luck ran out when Matthews edged Gautam behind for 77 off 50 balls, and Mooney took a sharp catch standing up.

Harmanpreet averaged nearly 79 against Giants before this game, and the number could have fallen had Mishra held on to a catch at midwicket when she was on 1. But Mishra didn’t, and Harmanpreet became Harmonster. She went deep in the crease and opened her stance to cart the ball around, whether it was in the slot or not.

Harmanpreet started the 18th over by hammering Kanwar for 6, 4, 4 – even that sequence included a misfield – before ending the over with her trademark slog-sweep for six. That over went for 22 in all. Sciver-Brunt also got a life in the next over – sandwiched between two boundaries off Gibson – when Kanwar made a mess of a skier. Giants were punished yet again next ball, but finally ended the partnership when Litchfield caught one at deep midwicket, leaving Sciver-Brunt seven short of 500 runs this season, and three short of 1000 in the WPL overall.

Harmanpreet was gifted two balls in the slot at the start of the last over, and she happily collected sixes off both. Meghna, however, finished well, giving away just two off the next three balls before nailing a yorker that led to Harmanpreet being run out for 36.

It took only five balls for the hosts to show their superiority in the field on the night, despite the presence of dew. When Shabnim Ismail drew Mooney’s edge, Matthews leapt to her right from first slip to grab the ball with both hands. When Harleen Deol and Gibson got into a mix-up in the fifth over, 20-year-old Sanskriti Gupta put in a dive at point and hurled the ball quickly to the wicketkeeper to find Deol short. And just before the halfway mark, Gibson also fell short when attempting a second run, and her dive wasn’t enough to beat Amanjot Kaur’s flat throw from the deep.

In between, Gardner lost her off stump against Matthews, which meant Giants were 43 for 3 in the powerplay. Litchfield was their only hope and she used her feet regularly against Kerr and struck two boundaries against Ismail that showed her class on either side of the wicket. But when Litchfield ventured out of the crease against Kerr once again and missed, Bhatia did the rest to
leave Giants 107 for 5.

Giants hardly had any steam left in their tank, and their poor running added to their misery. Next to fall short was Gautam, who was sent back when she hurried out for a quick single after drilling the ball to cover, from where Harmanpreet fired the ball back for the sixth wicket.

With another 102 runs to get from the remaining 42 balls, and their top five back in the hut, Giants’ only hope of getting anywhere close to their target was Bharti Fulmali. She started with a straight six off Amanjot, dispatched Kerr to the leg-side boundary, and flayed Matthews for consecutive boundaries behind square. But when Fulmali backed away looking for a third boundary in a row, Matthews beat her attempted cut and knocked the stumps over.

Mumbai continued their stellar fielding display as Harmanpreet took a diving catch to send Shaikh back, and Sciver-Brunt ran to her left at deep midwicket to seal victory in the last over.

Brief scores:
Mumbai Indians Women 213 for 4 in 20 overs (Nat Sciver-Brunt 77, Hayley Matthews 77, Harmanpreet Kaur 36, Yastika Bhatia 15; Kashvee Gautam 1-30, Danielle  Gibson 2-40) beat Gujarat Giants Women 166 in 19.2 overs  (Danielle Gibson 34, Phoebe Litchfield 31, Bharti Fulmali 30; Simran Shaikh 17, Tanuja Kanwar 16; Shabnim Ismail 1-35, Nat Sciver Brunt 1-31, Hayley Matthews 3-31, Amelia Kerr 2-28) by 47 runs

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Former Superintendent of Prisons [SP] shot dead

Published

on

By

It has been reported that the former Superintendent of the Boossa Prison  S Dhammika has been shot dead by an unidentified gunman in Akmeemana.

Continue Reading

Trending