News
MPs call for abolition of collective agreement
Central Bank pay hike controversy:
By Saman Indrajith
The MPs who met a group of officials from the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL) yesterday found that the controversial salary increments of the CBSL workers had been based on a collective agreement. Some of the MPs argued that the collective agreement should be abolished.
The meeting with CBSL officials was attended by over 50 MPs of both the government and Opposition and commenced around 11.30 am at the Committee Room 2 and continued till 1.30 pm.
The CBSL officials made a presentation and the room was open for MPs to raise questions. They first met the party leaders and then the Committee of Public Finance members and MPs. The second meeting was also attended by officials of the Attorney General’s Department. The Speaker presided over the first meeting.
Chief Opposition Whip Kandy District SJB MP Lakshman Kiriella said. “I asked them to point out the legal provision for what they did and name a section or an Act of Parliament giving powers to them to decide their own salaries. They could not cite such provision,” Kiriella said.
The CBSL salary increments amount to around Rs 232 million a month. “I was the one who first raised this issue in the House. This morning, too, I demanded to know from the government what the standpoint of the Cabinet is because the summoning of CBSL officials to Parliament had been discussed at Monday’s Cabinet meeting.
The Cabinet ministers, too, have expressed their displeasure. At the meeting with CBSL officials, four government MPs spoke, and none of them approved of what the CBSL officials have done,” Kiriella said.
CBSL Governor Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe stated that there were provisions in Sections 5, 8 and 23 of the CBSL Act for the slaries of the CBSL officials to be increased.
Kiriella pointed out those sections expressly made provisions for the expenses of the CBSL but not about salary increases. Section 23 stated about determining the amount of salaries provided that it is approved finally by Parliament.
SLPP dissident MP Gevindu Cumaratunga pointed out that the problem had been created by the government by passing a Bill to make the CBSL independent, but neither the Prime Minister, leader of the House, Chief Government Whip, nor the Finance Minister or State Finance ministers were present at this meeting. “We opposed this Bill and voted against this. Now those who created this mess are not present to question the CBSL officials,” Cumaratunga said.
Kiriella said that the government looked the other way when CBSL officials got their salaries increased. The government did not increase the salaries of professors, doctors, university teachers and other professionals, but kept silent when the CBSL officials got it done for themselves. The government must give answers. One of the CBSL secretaries told me that with the recent increment, she draws a monthly salary equal to ten times of the monthly salary of a ministry secretary. They collected money from tins and distributed it among themselves by barrels, he said.
Cumaratunga pointed out that the money handled by the CBSL officials were public funds therefore they are responsible to Parliament which has supremacy over the matters pertaining to the use of public funds.
TNA MP Sumanthiran, too, expressed the same view. He said that the CBSL did not earn money but uses the public money.
The CBSL officials responded that the salary increment was done as per the provisions of a collective agreement.
Gamapaha District MP Lasantha Alagiyawanna demanded to know from the CBSL officials whether that collective agreement was registered with the Labour Department.
MP Dayasiri Jayasekera said that a collective agreement to be valid should be registered with the Labour Department and became valid only after the Labour Commissioner gazettes it.
The collective agreement in question was neither registered nor gazetted, as such it is not a valid collective agreement, Jayasekera said.
As per Articles 148 and 149 (2) of the Constitution, Parliament had the powers over the use of public funds, he said, adding that the CBSL, too, was coming under that purview despite that there are wrong interpretations of the CBSL Act passed recently to give independence to the Central Bank. It is stated in that Act that money remaining in the Central Bank should be directed to the Consolidated Fund, and that meant the CBSL, too, come under the institutions responsible to Parliament.
Jayasekera said that the operations of collective agreements could be suspended. The operations of collective agreements in the CEB, CPC, and Harbour have been suspended.
News
Review of progress in reforms and modernisation of key state revenue-collecting institutions
A progress review meeting on reforms and modernisation initiatives at Sri Lanka’s key state revenue-collecting institutions was held on Thursday (15) at the Presidential Secretariat, chaired by Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, with the participation of representatives of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and officials of the Revenue Administration, Reform and Modernisation Bureau (RARMB) of the Presidential Secretariat.
At the meeting, the IMF representatives commended the revenue collection efficiency of the Department of Inland Revenue, Sri Lanka Customs and the Department of Excise, the country’s three leading state revenue-collecting institutions. Extensive discussions were also held on the progress of the reform and modernisation programmes being implemented at these institutions.
Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake outlined the progress achieved by the three institutions to date and the reforms planned for implementation in the future.
The IMF representatives also highlighted the importance of strengthening risk management, developing human resources and ensuring the efficient operation of computer systems at the respective institutions.
Senior Additional Secretary to the President Seevali Arukgoda also attended the meeting. The IMF was represented by Cindy Negus, Senior Economist in Revenue Administration for the Asia and Pacific, Europe, Middle East and Central Asia regions; Alison Lister, Revenue Administration Adviser; and Gregory Toppin, Resident Revenue Adviser in Sri Lanka. A group of senior officials from the Revenue Administration, Reform and Modernisation Bureau of the Presidential Secretariat also participated.
(President’s Media Division)
News
Cut power bills by 3-5%, don’t hike them, consumers demand
By Anuradha Hiripitiyage
Electricity tariffs should be reduced by between 3 and 5 percent instead of being increased by 2.88 percent in the fourth quarter, as proposed by the National System Operator (NSO), Electricity Consumers’ Association Secretary Sanjeewa Dhammika said.
Addressing a media briefing in Maradagahamula, Divulapitiya, Gampaha, yesterday (16), Dhammika said a proper assessment of electricity generation costs, including the contribution of hydropower, could justify a reduction in tariffs.
He said the NSO had sought approval from the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for a 2.88 percent tariff increase, which was expected to generate an additional Rs. 4,438 million.
However, the Commission had indicated that an increase of only 1.46 percent was warranted, amounting to Rs. 2,245 million, he said, adding that even this increase was unnecessary.
Dhammika alleged that the proposed revision sought to pass on to electricity consumers the financial burden arising from the non-arrival of five coal shipments and failed tenders.
“The Government had said that the burden of coal-related losses would not be passed on to the public. It is therefore unjust to make consumers bear these costs,” he said.
He pointed out that the PUCSL had forecast that hydropower would account for 32.34 percent of total electricity generation in the coming quarter, while the cost of such generation would represent only 3.45 percent of the overall cost of electricity production.
Consumers should benefit from the lower cost of hydropower generation rather than bear the burden of more expensive thermal power generation, he said.
Dhammika also questioned the inclusion of Rs. 669 million in capacity charges that had not been approved by the PUCSL, as well as a further Rs. 1,069 million to repay loans relating to incomplete projects.
Including such charges in the proposed tariff revision was unjustifiable, he said.
The PUCSL has given the public until October 30 to submit their views on the proposed tariff revision.
Dhammika said the possibility of increased hydropower generation in the coming weeks, as reservoir levels rise, should also be taken into account when determining electricity tariffs.
He maintained that tariffs could be reduced by 3 to 5 percent if hydropower generation was properly assessed and coal-related losses and unapproved charges were excluded from the calculations.
He further claimed that electricity tariffs could be reduced by as much as 10 percent through the promotion of renewable energy and the effective use of solar power and battery storage systems.
The Electricity Consumers’ Association urged the Government to withdraw the proposed tariff increase, insisting that consumers should not be made to bear costs arising from coal supply problems and other disputed charges.
News
Asgiri Mahanayake calls for immediate release of Gnanasara Thera
By S.K. Samaranayake
Most Ven. Warakagoda Sri Gnanaratana Mahanayake Thera of the Asgiri Chapter has called for the immediate release of Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera, who is currently serving a prison sentence, following a court ruling.
The Asgiri Mahanayake made the appeal when a delegation of senior prison officials, including Assistant Commissioner of Prisons and Director of Operations Senaka Pallegedara, called on him on the 16th.
During the meeting, the prelate warned that the continued incarceration of Ven. Gnanasara Thera could lead to a volatile situation and cause public agitation.
Responding to the appeal, the prison officials informed the Mahanayake Thera that the authority to order the release of Ven. Gnanasara Thera did not rest with the Prisons Department but with the President.
Other senior prison officials, including Rajeev Srimal Silva, Sampath Warnakulasooriya and Mangala Welivita, were also present at the meeting.
-
News7 days agoSri Lanka escalates anti-graft drive with Shiranthi’s jailing
-
News7 days agoIranian ships stranded, Lanka fears US sanctions
-
Latest News6 days agoFarhan and Sadaqat help Pakistan seal series in style
-
Latest News4 days agoNissanka’s return headlines Sri Lanka’s Test squad against Pakistan
-
Features6 days agoIntake 16: 45 years of duty and honour
-
News6 days agoMalwathu Chapter issues statement on talks with President over Gnanasara Thera’s robes
-
News7 days agoNavi Pillay’s Lankan affairs in focus as she wins 2026 Nobel Peace Prize
-
News6 days agoCP alleges NPP has taken the blame for illegal US sanctions on Iranian vessels
