News
Lanka’s tax hike could force professionals to migrate – analysts
By SHIHAR ANEEZ
ECONOMYNEXT – Sri Lanka’s proposed tax hikes could force professionals out of the country as they discourage people who want to earn more and expand businesses, analysts say.President Ranil Wickremesinghe, who is also the island nation’s finance minister, through a gazette has proposed new tax rates, which if passed would bring Sri Lanka’s tax structure almost in line with 2019 before former president Gotabaya Rajapaksa removed many taxes in December that year.
The increase of tax revenue has become a must after the island nation declared sovereign debt default in April and as it is seeking a backing from an International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a loan and reforms.Anybody who earns more than 100,000 rupees monthly will have to pay tax in the proposed new tax amendment. That amount is 40 percent of the earlier threshold. The tax slabs of 500,000 rupee is taxed at an incremental 6 percent up to 36 percent.In addition to this, the corporate tax has been increased to 30 percent from a maximum of 24 percent.
However, analysts say the proposed tax hike will be seen as a disincentive because President Wickremesinghe is bringing the 2019 tax rates after an economic crisis and when the inflation is running at 70 percent.
“The sharp increase in personal income tax rates would discourage employment, negatively affect lives of the middle-class families and specially in an environment of high inflation could increase brain drain,” Danushka Samarasinghe, Chief Executive Officer/Director at Nation Lanka Equities (Pvt) Ltd told EconomyNext.
“Employees remain disproportionately affected since taxed at source with a sharp drop in disposable incomes which could also create a problem in personal debt servicing. This will be medium-long term negative for the country. A flat personal tax rate could have been more equitable and not discourage growth in incomes.”
He said the tax proposals “seem to be more of a knee-jerk measure in boosting government revenues” in the short term though it could have negative medium-long term impact.
“The 30% tax rate could be a disincentive for investment and job-creation. Sectors which enjoyed preferential tax treatment would be disproportionately affected though it could be argued as creating a level playing field, which is a positive. Question remains whether this would discourage export-oriented industries and trigger a shift.”
Sri Lanka’s tax to GDP ratio was 12.7 percent in 2019 when Wickremesinghe was ousted as the prime minister after his party lost the elections to former president Gotabaya Rajapaksa.The revenue, however, dropped to 8.7 percent of the GDP in last year after Rajapaksa slashed taxes despite warnings of consequences including a possible debt crisis.President Wickremesinghe has said the tax rates should be raised to 2019 level to increase the revenue.
“The 2019 tax system is not going to be the same now. Those higher tax rates were affordable at that time because the cost of living was lower and the inflation was 6-7 percent,” a financial analysts said asking not to be named.
“The new tax rates will force to reduce people’s disposable income and this will be a huge burden on the people who have been paying tax genuinely. Many professionals who want to stay in Sri Lanka and contribute to the economy will leave the country.”
Already Sri Lanka has seen many professionals leaving the country due to the unprecedented economic crisis and a prolonged political crisis with many uneducated lawmakers have been dictating what educated professionals must do with less participatory decision making, analysts say.They also said with prices of fuel, cooking gas, electricity, and water have been raised along with over 50 percent of depreciation in the rupee, many professionals have adjusted their consumption to suit the shrunk disposable income.
“These new tax hikes without considering the current inflation and cost of living will be the final nail in the coffin of the careers of professionals locally. They will look into migrate at any cost,” another analyst said.
Latest News
New Court of Appeal Judge Sajeewani Dilka Lakmali Sworn In
Ms Sajeewani Dilka Lakmali Karunannayake was sworn in as a Judge of the Court of Appeal before President Anura Kumara Dissanayake at the Presidential Secretariat this afternoon (03).
She previously served as an Additional Solicitor General at the Attorney General’s Department.
The appointment has been made to fill a vacancy on the Court of Appeal.
Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake was also present on the occasion.
(President’s Media Division)
Latest News
Sun directly overhead Madampe, Thorayaya, Thotagamuwa, Rattota and Kalavanchikudy about 12.09 noon today (03)
The sun is going to be directly over the latitudes of Sri Lanka from 28th of August to 07th of September due to its apparent southward relative motion.
The nearest places of Sri Lanka over which the sun is overhead today (03) are Madampe, Thorayaya, Thotagamuwa, Rattota and
Kalavanchikudy about 12.09 noon.
News
22A: SC urged to suspend hearing, appoint full bench
Attorney-at-Law Sugandhika Fernando, on behalf of the Vinivida Foundation, petitioned the Supreme Court yesterday (02), seeking a full bench, excluding Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena, to hear the petitions challenging the 22nd Amendment Bill. She also requested that the hearing be suspended immediately until the matter was fully heard and determined.
Among the respondents are Chief Justice Surasena, the first respondent, and Attorney General Parinda Ranasinghe. Justices Yasantha Kodagoda, Shiran Gooneratne, Achala Wengappuli and Priyantha Fernando have also been named as respondents.
The petitioner has sought to have quashed the decision of the first respondent to appoint a five-member bench, which she alleged was made in violation of the norms of public law. She also sought a bench comprising all Supreme Court judges, excluding those cited as respondents, to hear the special determination applications on the 22nd Amendment.
The petitioner further contended that Chief Justice Surasena, who is due to retire on December 1, 2026, would be the main beneficiary of the 22nd Amendment.
The hearing of the petitions continued for a second day yesterday (02) before a five-member Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena and Justices Achala Wengappuli, Arjuna Obeyesekere, Sampath Abeykoon and Gihan Kulatunga.
The hearing, which commenced on Tuesday morning, continued for nearly 12 hours, until 10:30 p.m.
Solicitor General Viraj Dayaratne, appearing for the Attorney General, submitted yesterday that the Government had presented the 22nd Amendment Bill to the Constitution and the Judicature (Amendment) Bill with the objective of expanding and streamlining the country’s judicial system.
After the Solicitor General’s submissions concluded, counsel representing the petitioners requested an opportunity to respond to the Solicitor General and the intervening petitioners. However, the Chief Justice declined to allow the petitioners’ counsel to make further oral submissions, concluded the determination hearing and directed them to file written submissions instead.
-
News7 days agoEight politicians in drug kingpin probe
-
Features5 days ago“Wrap Me Up in My Blazer”— A Gentlemanly Bradby Reminiscence
-
Business7 days agoSri Lanka opens up: A new season of direct connectivity
-
Features4 days agoWhen Sri Lankan stories find their own voice
-
Features7 days agoRedefining ageing in Sri Lanka
-
Editorial7 days agoThe toxic legacy of two lakes
-
Business7 days agoJaffna Teaching Hospital secures lifeline water supply via ADB-funded Thalaiyadi sea water desalination plant
-
Features5 days agoJVP/NPP government as seen from outside by Lionel Bopage now domiciled in Australia
