Connect with us

Features

ISCARIOT 

Published

on

by Algi Wijewickrema

“What do you want, Iscariot?”, questioned the High Priest, Joseph Caiaphas as Judas Iscariot approached him in his palatial residence. The chief priests and the officers of the temple guard were also there.

“It is not what I want but what I have to give you that I have come to talk about”, was Judas’ reply.

Caiaphas said “Well, well and what can a man like you give us?”

Judas responded “Is that all you have to say. What I have is not to be trifled with. You will have to pay for it”.

The High Priest’s interest was visible in his eyes and when Judas saw that he said “I will give you the person you seek if you pay me for it”.

“Pray tell us, Iscariot, who is this man you think we want, Barabbas perhaps.” laughed Caiaphas.

Once Judas had made it clear that he could help them arrest Jesus, Caiaphas paused. They had tried to have Jesus arrested on more than a few occasions, the last being after the festival of the Tabernacles when they sent guards but failed as they came back and reported that the people believed Jesus was a prophet or teacher, someone to be respected. “No one has spoken like Him” they said.

With that attempt failed, Caiaphas thought perhaps this was the opportunity to have him arrested. Having conferred with the others present, he agreed to pay Judas a sum of thirty pieces of silver, about a month’s wages in those days.

Judas was a confused Apostle, a loner who was more concerned with the money than with the message Jesus was preaching. Unlike most of Jesus’ Apostles who were from Galilee, Judas was from Judea. He led the way when the disciples commented about a woman who had broken an alabaster jar of perfume to anoint Jesus, “Why this waste?” they asked. “This perfume could have been sold at a high price and the money given to the poor.” That speaks about the mind of Judas. Not that he was concerned about the poor, but he was concerned about the money.

He knew about Jesus’ plans to have the Passover meal and His custom to pray afterwards in the garden of Gethsemane. So, he arranged with the High Priests and planned to hand Him over then. Soon after the Passover meal in the upper room at which Jesus had even hinted at His betrayal, Judas left and met the guards.

When he came to the garden of Gethsemane on that fateful Thursday night he was with the soldiers and without any sign of a betrayal he embraced Jesus. At this Jesus asked “Judas, are you betraying the Son of Man with a kiss?” But Judas was past caring for he had already taken blood money, thirty pieces of silver, for it. Judas had done what he had been paid for.

Judas followed the crowds unobtrusively. No one knew he was following them, he made sure of that. He was there hiding when Jesus was taken to the High Priest’s residence which in itself was highly unusual for this was the evening of the Passover meal. Why was the High Priest not readying himself for the festivities thought Judas? Instead of being with his family for the festival and preparing himself for his priestly duties,  here was the High Priest ready to judge a man accused of blasphemy at best. Judas was intrigued that the High Priest should rush through deciding in the night time something he could have dealt with during the next day.

He was there hidden from others when Peter denied knowledge of Jesus three times before the cock crowed to announce the dawn and remembered Jesus’ words to Peter. He saw Jesus glance at Peter but thought there was no bitterness but pity in that look. He saw Peter go outside and weep bitterly.

After seeing Jesus’ look when Peter denied Him and seeing Peter weep afterwards Judas wasn’t sure if he had done the right thing and was a disturbed, more confused man thereafter.

 The next morning Judas was there again. This time in view of the praetorium where Pilate was sitting to give judgement. Judas was following the crowds which had now dwindled. When the trial before Pilate took place, he was with the crowds that, instigated by the Pharisees and High Priests, shouted “crucify him”. Though he himself could not bring himself to shout, he felt safe among the crowds. Safety in numbers for him. He noticed an official handing over to Pilate a note which, after reading he tossed away and saw him wash his hands and pronounce judgement to crucify Jesus. 

As Jesus was led away, Judas snapped. He rushed to the Chief Priests at the Temple and tried to return the thirty pieces of silver he had accepted to betray Jesus and said “I have sinned, I have betrayed innocent blood’ but they refused to accept the money back. It was too late for them to reverse the process. Too later for Jesus and was too late for Judas.

“What is that to us?” they asked seated in their comfortable seats. “That is your responsibility”.

So what was his responsibility? He knew he had to change what he had set in motion but knew he could not. So, what was he to do? His mind was in a whirl. He threw the money down and left the Temple not knowing where to go or what to do.

He remembered how Jesus had said just the previous evening “Truly I tell you one of you will betray me” and walking as in a trance he kept saying to himself “I betrayed innocent blood, I have no forgiveness”. Desperation and despondency took hold of himself. What must he do?

On his way he found a piece of rope and having given up any thought of forgiveness he hanged himself.

The other Apostles when they heard of his suicide remembered Jesus’ words “The Son of Man will go as it is written, but woe unto the man who betrays the Son of Man, it would be better for him if he was not born”.

While hiding for fear of the Jews Peter thought, if only Judas had believed in Jesus’ words “Forgive your enemies, pray for them”. Had he believed, thought Peter, he would have realised that those were not mere words uttered by Jesus but proven by Him on the Cross. Proven to him too when he had denied knowing Jesus.

Judas, having taken his life, despairing of God’s merciful forgiveness, unfortunately, could not include himself among those for whom Jesus prayed from the Cross, “Father forgive them for they do not know what they are doing”.

 



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Recruiting academics to state universities – beset by archaic selection processes?

Published

on

by Kaushalya Perera

Time has, by and large, stood still in the business of academic staff recruitment to state universities. Qualifications have proliferated and evolved to be more interdisciplinary, but our selection processes and evaluation criteria are unchanged since at least the late 1990s. But before I delve into the problems, I will describe the existing processes and schemes of recruitment. The discussion is limited to UGC-governed state universities (and does not include recruitment to medical and engineering sectors) though the problems may be relevant to other higher education institutions (HEIs).

How recruitment happens currently in SL state universities

Academic ranks in Sri Lankan state universities can be divided into three tiers (subdivisions are not discussed).

* Lecturer (Probationary)

recruited with a four-year undergraduate degree. A tiny step higher is the Lecturer (Unconfirmed), recruited with a postgraduate degree but no teaching experience.

* A Senior Lecturer can be recruited with certain postgraduate qualifications and some number of years of teaching and research.

* Above this is the professor (of four types), which can be left out of this discussion since only one of those (Chair Professor) is by application.

State universities cannot hire permanent academic staff as and when they wish. Prior to advertising a vacancy, approval to recruit is obtained through a mind-numbing and time-consuming process (months!) ending at the Department of Management Services. The call for applications must list all ranks up to Senior Lecturer. All eligible candidates for Probationary to Senior Lecturer are interviewed, e.g., if a Department wants someone with a doctoral degree, they must still advertise for and interview candidates for all ranks, not only candidates with a doctoral degree. In the evaluation criteria, the first degree is more important than the doctoral degree (more on this strange phenomenon later). All of this is only possible when universities are not under a ‘hiring freeze’, which governments declare regularly and generally lasts several years.

Problem type 1

Archaic processes and evaluation criteria

Twenty-five years ago, as a probationary lecturer with a first degree, I was a typical hire. We would be recruited, work some years and obtain postgraduate degrees (ideally using the privilege of paid study leave to attend a reputed university in the first world). State universities are primarily undergraduate teaching spaces, and when doctoral degrees were scarce, hiring probationary lecturers may have been a practical solution. The path to a higher degree was through the academic job. Now, due to availability of candidates with postgraduate qualifications and the problems of retaining academics who find foreign postgraduate opportunities, preference for candidates applying with a postgraduate qualification is growing. The evaluation scheme, however, prioritises the first degree over the candidate’s postgraduate education. Were I to apply to a Faculty of Education, despite a PhD on language teaching and research in education, I may not even be interviewed since my undergraduate degree is not in education. The ‘first degree first’ phenomenon shows that universities essentially ignore the intellectual development of a person beyond their early twenties. It also ignores the breadth of disciplines and their overlap with other fields.

This can be helped (not solved) by a simple fix, which can also reduce brain drain: give precedence to the doctoral degree in the required field, regardless of the candidate’s first degree, effected by a UGC circular. The suggestion is not fool-proof. It is a first step, and offered with the understanding that any selection process, however well the evaluation criteria are articulated, will be beset by multiple issues, including that of bias. Like other Sri Lankan institutions, universities, too, have tribal tendencies, surfacing in the form of a preference for one’s own alumni. Nevertheless, there are other problems that are, arguably, more pressing as I discuss next. In relation to the evaluation criteria, a problem is the narrow interpretation of any regulation, e.g., deciding the degree’s suitability based on the title rather than considering courses in the transcript. Despite rhetoric promoting internationalising and inter-disciplinarity, decision-making administrative and academic bodies have very literal expectations of candidates’ qualifications, e.g., a candidate with knowledge of digital literacy should show this through the title of the degree!

Problem type 2 – The mess of badly regulated higher education

A direct consequence of the contemporary expansion of higher education is a large number of applicants with myriad qualifications. The diversity of degree programmes cited makes the responsibility of selecting a suitable candidate for the job a challenging but very important one. After all, the job is for life – it is very difficult to fire a permanent employer in the state sector.

Widely varying undergraduate degree programmes.

At present, Sri Lankan undergraduates bring qualifications (at times more than one) from multiple types of higher education institutions: a degree from a UGC-affiliated state university, a state university external to the UGC, a state institution that is not a university, a foreign university, or a private HEI aka ‘private university’. It could be a degree received by attending on-site, in Sri Lanka or abroad. It could be from a private HEI’s affiliated foreign university or an external degree from a state university or an online only degree from a private HEI that is ‘UGC-approved’ or ‘Ministry of Education approved’, i.e., never studied in a university setting. Needless to say, the diversity (and their differences in quality) are dizzying. Unfortunately, under the evaluation scheme all degrees ‘recognised’ by the UGC are assigned the same marks. The same goes for the candidates’ merits or distinctions, first classes, etc., regardless of how difficult or easy the degree programme may be and even when capabilities, exposure, input, etc are obviously different.

Similar issues are faced when we consider postgraduate qualifications, though to a lesser degree. In my discipline(s), at least, a postgraduate degree obtained on-site from a first-world university is preferable to one from a local university (which usually have weekend or evening classes similar to part-time study) or online from a foreign university. Elitist this may be, but even the best local postgraduate degrees cannot provide the experience and intellectual growth gained by being in a university that gives you access to six million books and teaching and supervision by internationally-recognised scholars. Unfortunately, in the evaluation schemes for recruitment, the worst postgraduate qualification you know of will receive the same marks as one from NUS, Harvard or Leiden.

The problem is clear but what about a solution?

Recruitment to state universities needs to change to meet contemporary needs. We need evaluation criteria that allows us to get rid of the dross as well as a more sophisticated institutional understanding of using them. Recruitment is key if we want our institutions (and our country) to progress. I reiterate here the recommendations proposed in ‘Considerations for Higher Education Reform’ circulated previously by Kuppi Collective:

* Change bond regulations to be more just, in order to retain better qualified academics.

* Update the schemes of recruitment to reflect present-day realities of inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary training in order to recruit suitably qualified candidates.

* Ensure recruitment processes are made transparent by university administrations.

Kaushalya Perera is a senior lecturer at the University of Colombo.

(Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.)

Continue Reading

Features

Talento … oozing with talent

Published

on

Talento: Gained recognition as a leading wedding and dance band

This week, too, the spotlight is on an outfit that has gained popularity, mainly through social media.

Last week we had MISTER Band in our scene, and on 10th February, Yellow Beatz – both social media favourites.

Talento is a seven-piece band that plays all types of music, from the ‘60s to the modern tracks of today.

The band has reached many heights, since its inception in 2012, and has gained recognition as a leading wedding and dance band in the scene here.

The members that makeup the outfit have a solid musical background, which comes through years of hard work and dedication

Their portfolio of music contains a mix of both western and eastern songs and are carefully selected, they say, to match the requirements of the intended audience, occasion, or event.

Although the baila is a specialty, which is inherent to this group, that originates from Moratuwa, their repertoire is made up of a vast collection of love, classic, oldies and modern-day hits.

The musicians, who make up Talento, are:

Prabuddha Geetharuchi:

Geilee Fonseka: Dynamic and charismatic vocalist

Prabuddha Geetharuchi: The main man behind the band Talento

(Vocalist/ Frontman). He is an avid music enthusiast and was mentored by a lot of famous musicians, and trainers, since he was a child. Growing up with them influenced him to take on western songs, as well as other music styles. A Peterite, he is the main man behind the band Talento and is a versatile singer/entertainer who never fails to get the crowd going.

Geilee Fonseka (Vocals):

A dynamic and charismatic vocalist whose vibrant stage presence, and powerful voice, bring a fresh spark to every performance. Young, energetic, and musically refined, she is an artiste who effortlessly blends passion with precision – captivating audiences from the very first note. Blessed with an immense vocal range, Geilee is a truly versatile singer, confidently delivering Western and Eastern music across multiple languages and genres.

Chandana Perera (Drummer):

His expertise and exceptional skills have earned him recognition as one of the finest acoustic drummers in Sri Lanka. With over 40 tours under his belt, Chandana has demonstrated his dedication and passion for music, embodying the essential role of a drummer as the heartbeat of any band.

Harsha Soysa:

(Bassist/Vocalist). He a chorister of the western choir of St. Sebastian’s College, Moratuwa, who began his musical education under famous voice trainers, as well as bass guitar trainers in Sri Lanka. He has also performed at events overseas. He acts as the second singer of the band

Udara Jayakody:

(Keyboardist). He is also a qualified pianist, adding technical flavour to Talento’s music. His singing and harmonising skills are an extra asset to the band. From his childhood he has been a part of a number of orchestras as a pianist. He has also previously performed with several famous western bands.

Aruna Madushanka:

(Saxophonist). His proficiciency in playing various instruments, including the saxophone, soprano saxophone, and western flute, showcases his versatility as a musician, and his musical repertoire is further enhanced by his remarkable singing ability.

Prashan Pramuditha:

(Lead guitar). He has the ability to play different styles, both oriental and western music, and he also creates unique tones and patterns with the guitar..

Continue Reading

Features

Special milestone for JJ Twins

Published

on

Twin brothers Julian and Jason Prins

The JJ Twins, the Sri Lankan musical duo, performing in the Maldives, and known for blending R&B, Hip Hop, and Sri Lankan rhythms, thereby creating a unique sound, have come out with a brand-new single ‘Me Mawathe.’

In fact, it’s a very special milestone for the twin brothers, Julian and Jason Prins, as ‘Me Mawathe’ is their first ever Sinhala song!

‘Me Mawathe’ showcases a fresh new sound, while staying true to the signature harmony and emotion that their fans love.

This heartfelt track captures the beauty of love, journey, and connection, brought to life through powerful vocals and captivating melodies.

It marks an exciting new chapter for the JJ Twins as they expand their musical journey and connect with audiences in a whole new way.

Their recent album, ‘CONCLUDED,’ explores themes of love, heartbreak, and healing, and include hits like ‘Can’t Get You Off My Mind’ and ‘You Left Me Here to Die’ which showcase their emotional intensity.

Readers could stay connected and follow JJ Twins on social media for exclusive updates, behind-the-scenes moments, and upcoming releases:

Instagram: http://instagram.com/jjtwinsofficial

TikTok: http://tiktok.com/@jjtwinsmusic

Facebook: http://facebook.com/jjtwinssingers

YouTube: http://youtube.com/jjtwins

Continue Reading

Trending