Latest News
India’s Modi government rushes to regulate AI ahead of national elections
The Indian government has asked tech companies to seek its explicit nod before publicly launching “unreliable” or “under-tested” generative AI models or tools. It has also warned companies that their AI products should not generate responses that “threaten the integrity of the electoral process” as the country gears up for a national vote.
The Indian government’s efforts to regulate artificial intelligence represent a walk-back from its earlier stance of a hands-off approach when it informed Parliament in April 2023 that it was not eyeing any legislation to regulate AI.
The advisory was issued last week by India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) briefly after Google’s Gemini faced a right-wing backlash for its response over a query: ‘Is Modi a fascist?’
It responded that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi was “accused of implementing policies some experts have characterised as fascist”, citing his government’s “crackdown on dissent and its use of violence against religious minorities”.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, junior information technology minister, responded by accusing Google’s Gemini of violating India’s laws. “‘Sorry ‘unreliable’ does not exempt from the law,” he added. Chandrashekar claimed Google had apologised for the response, saying it was a result of an “unreliable” algorithm. The company responded by saying it was addressing the problem and working to improve the system.
In the West, major tech companies have often faced accusations of a liberal bias. Those allegations of bias have trickled down to generative AI products, including OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot.
In India, meanwhile, the government’s advisory has raised concerns among AI entrepreneurs that their nascent industry could be suffocated by too much regulation. Others worry that with the national election set to be announced soon, the advisory could reflect an attempt by the Modi government to choose which AI applications to allow, and which to bar, effectively giving it control over online spaces where these tools are influential.
The advisory is not legislation that is automatically binding on companies. However, noncompliance can attract prosecution under India’s Information Technology Act, lawyers told Al Jazeera. “This nonbinding advisory seems more political posturing than serious policymaking,” said Mishi Choudhary, founder of India’s Software Freedom Law Center. “We will see much more serious engagement post-elections. This gives us a peek into the thinking of the policymakers.”
Yet already, the advisory sends a signal that could prove stifling for innovation, especially at startups, said Harsh Choudhry, co-founder of Sentra World, a Bengaluru-based AI solutions company. “If every AI product needs approval – it looks like an impossible task for the government as well,” he said. “They might need another GenAI (generative AI) bot to test these models,” he added, laughing.
Several other leaders in the generative AI industry have also criticised the advisory as an example of regulatory overreach. Martin Casado, general partner at the US-based investment firm Andreessen Horowitz, wrote on social media platform X that the move was a “travesty”, was “anti-innovation” and “anti-public”.
Bindu Reddy, CEO of Abacus AI, wrote that, with the new advisory, “India just kissed its future goodbye!”
Amid that backlash, Chandrashekar issued a clarification on X adding that the government would exempt start-ups from seeking prior permission for deployment of generative AI tools on “the Indian internet” and that the advisory only applies to “significant platforms”.
But a cloud of uncertainty remains. “The advisory is full of ambiguous terms like ‘unreliable’, ‘untested’, [and] ‘Indian Internet’. The fact that several clarifications were required to explain scope, application, and intent are tell-tale signs of a rushed job,” said Mishi Choudhary. “The ministers are capable folks but do not have the necessary wherewithal to assess models to issue permissions to operate.”
“No wonder it has invoked the 80s feelings of a licence raj,” she added, referring to the bureaucratic system of requiring government permits for business activities, prevalent until the early 1990s, which stifled economic growth and innovation in India.
At the same time, exemptions from the advisory just for handpicked start-ups could come with their problems — they too are vulnerable to producing politically biased responses, and hallucinations, when AI generates erroneous or fabricated outputs. As a result, the exemption “raises more questions than it answers”, said Mishi.
Harsh Choudhry said he believes that the government’s intention behind the regulation was to hold companies that are monetising AI tools accountable for incorrect responses. “But a permission-first approach might not be the best way to do it,” he added.
India’s move to regulate AI content will also have geopolitical ramifications, argued Shruti Shreya, senior programme manager for platform regulation at The Dialogue, a tech policy think tank.
“With a rapidly growing internet user base, India’s policies can set a precedent for how other nations, especially in the developing world, approach AI content regulation and data governance,” she said.
For the Indian government, dealing with AI regulations is a difficult balancing act, said analysts.
Millions of Indians are scheduled to cast their vote in the national polls likely to be held in April and May. With the rise of easily available, and often free, generative AI tools, India has already become a playground for manipulated media, a scenario that has cast a shadow over election integrity. India’s major political parties continue to deploy deepfakes in campaigns.
Kamesh Shekar, senior programme manager with a focus on data governance and AI at The Dialogue think tank, said the recent advisory should also be seen as a part of the ongoing efforts by the government to now draft comprehensive generative AI regulations.
Earlier, in November and December 2023, the Indian government asked Big Tech firms to take down deep fake items within 24 hours of a complaint, label manipulated media, and make proactive efforts to tackle the misinformation — though it did not mention any explicit penalties for not adhering to the directive.
But Shekar too said a policy under which companies must seek government approvals before launching a product would inhibit innovation. “The government could consider constituting a sandbox – a live-testing environment where AI solutions and participating entities can test the product without a large-scale rollout to determine its reliability,” he said.
Not all experts agree with the criticism of the Indian government, however.
As AI technology continues to evolve at a fast pace, it is often hard for governments to keep up. At the same time, governments do need to step in to regulate, said Hafiz Malik, a professor of computer engineering at the University of Michigan with a specialisation in deepfake detections. Leaving companies to regulate themselves would be foolish, he said, adding that the Indian government’s advisory was a step in the right direction.
“The regulations have to be brought in by the governments,” he said, “but they should not come at the cost of innovation”.
Ultimately, though, Malik added, what is needed is greater public awareness.
“Seeing something and-believing it is now off the table,” said Malik. “Unless the public has awareness, the problem of deepfake cannot be solved. Awareness is the only tool to solve a very complex problem.”
(Aljazeera)
Latest News
Jos Buttler ransacks small chase as England cruise to 3-0 series sweep
Sri Lanka saved their most dismal batting performance of the series for last as they were bowled out for 124, a target which England knocked off in just 9.4 overs. The result secured a 3-0 series sweep, and subjected Sri Lanka to a 15th consecutive loss in T20Is against England, who regained the ICC No. 1 ranking from India in the process.
It was Harry Brook and Jos Buttler once more in the thick of the chase, speeding to an 85-run partnership off just 39 deliveries. It meant that by the end of the powerplay England had comfortably squared away more than half of Sri Lanka’s total, as they surged to 82 for 1. By the end of the eighth over the 100 had come up, and not long after the chase was complete.
Buttler, fresh off reaching 15,000 T20 runs in the second T20I, racked up 62 more – off 32 deliveries – as he saw home the chase with a single-handed six over square leg. It was a fitting end to the series – England could have indeed wrapped this up with one hand behind their back.
Sri Lanka’s only moments of levity were when Aneurin Donald was stumped off Tharindu Ratnayake, and later a direct hit to run out Brook.
The visitors had brought in slinger Nuwan Thushara for Dushmantha Chameera but it made little difference with such a paltry total to defend. In any case he haemorrhaged 29 in a two-over spell, though his seam-bowling partners fared not much better; Eshan Malinga was hit for 34 in his 1.4 overs, while Dilshan Madushanka gave away 23 in two.
It was a display of batting that showcased precisely why this same surface had produced a total of 304 for England batting first against South Africa just last year. It also brought into sharp contrast Sri Lanka’s effort which had seen them plumb to the lowest first-innings T20I total at Old Trafford since 2018.
In the Lankan innings, it was once more Pathum Nissanka that provided any sort of spark during a brisk 36 off 24, and then as wickets fell in clumps Kamindu Mendis matched him with a 28-ball 35. But apart from those two acts of defiance, it was a veritable procession as England locked up run-scoring avenues and picked up wickets with alarming regularity.
With a heavy breeze blowing across the stadium there was considerable incentive to target one side of the ground, but Sri Lanka could only make use of the conditions sporadically. And even on the occasions they did clear the ropes, they were unable to supplement it sufficiently; of the seven sixes scored in the innings only on one occasion was there another boundary scored in that over, while on two occasions a wicket followed shortly after. And of the seven overs in which Sri Lanka scored sixes, only three produced a double-digit scoring rate.
It meant that despite Nissanka’s propulsion at the top, Sri Lanka could never really build any momentum – the most of which was funnelled into a 15-run second over, a tally Sri Lanka barely threatened thereafter.
The wickets were spread fairly evenly, with Sonny Baker, Jofra Archer and Will Jacks picking up two apiece, while there was one each for Liam Dawson and Jamie Overton. Only Adil Rashid went wicketless across a relatively expensive two overs that gave away 21 runs
Scores:
England 126 for 2 in 9.4 overs (Jos Buttler 62*, Aneurin Donald 13, Harry Brook 33; Tharindu Rathnayake 1-33) beat Sri Lanka 124 in 18.5 overs (Pathum Nissanka 36, Lahiru Udara 10, Charith Asalanka 16, Kamindu Mendis 35, Dasun Shanaka 12; Sonny Baker 2-17, Jofra Archer 2-23, Liam Dawson 1-17, Will Jacks 2-31, Jamie Overton 1-15) by eight wickets
(Cricinfo)
Latest News
Charani, Shafali power India past Japan and into Asian Games semi-finals
Defending gold-medal winners India overcame hosts Japan by eight wickets in the fourth quarter-final of the women’s cricket competition at the Asian Games in Nisshin on Friday. India chased down 58 in five overs to comfortably secure their place in the semi-finals. They will now face Bangladesh on September 20.
Japan did not exit the competition empty-handed. Their effort to bat as close to the full 20 overs as possible, their running between the wickets and their fielding effort were big positives. But they were bowled out for 57 in 19.5 overs after a solid start, leaving India with little to chase.
India, who opted to field, made the most of a pitch offering turn and bounce, which made stroke-making difficult for Japan. Shree Charani led the attack with another four-wicket haul, continuing an impressive run after taking 4 for 20 in the Women’s T20 Asia Cup final. She struck twice off consecutive balls in the seventh over, removing opener Haruna Iwasaki for 10 before having captain Mai Yanagida caught behind for a duck, but couldn’t convert it into a hat-trick.
Iwasaki and Ayaka Kato Stafford had put on 24 for the opening wicket, but Japan struggled to build partnerships once the stand was broken. Kato-Stafford top-scored with 25 off 47 balls, while Iwasaki made 10 off 22. Japan lost their last eight wickets for just 33 runs.
Charani finished with 4 for 10 from her four overs, while Shafali Verma took 2 for 13 and Deepti Sharma claimed 1 for 14.
Shrevanka Patil, returning to international cricket for the first time in three months after recovering from an ankle ligament injury suffered during the T20 World Cup in June, took 1 for 8 from 3.5 overs. Japan’s innings ended when Patil bowled Nonoha Yasumoto for a duck.
Chasing 58, Shafali opened the innings aggressively, smashing four boundaries in the first over to immediately put Japan under pressure. G Kamalini, who opened in place of Smriti Mandhana, and No. 3 Bharti Fulmali then threw their wickets away to fielders at long-on and point respectively. Left-arm seamer Yasumoto, who dismissed Kamalini, also delivered a wicket-maiden with the new ball.
Shafali finished the game with a six over long-on, staying unbeaten on 40 off just 15 balls. She struck six fours and two sixes at a strike rate of 266.66, as India won with 15 overs to spare.
Scores:
India Women 59 for 2 in 5 overs (Shafali Verma 40*, Richa Ghosh 12*; Nonoha Yasumoto 1-08, Ayaka Kato-Stafford 1-14) beat Japan Women 57 in 19.5 overs (Haruna Iwasaki 10, Ayaka Kato-Stafford 25; Shree Charani 4-10, Shreyanka Patil 1-08, Deepti Sharma 1-14, Shafali Verma 2-13) by eight wickets
[Cricinfo]
Latest News
Abhishek Sharma hits record T20 ton as India beat Afghanistan by 127 runs
Opener Abhishek Sharma hit a record T20 century off 30 balls to set up a crushing 127 run win for India in the third match against Afghanistan and sweep the series 3-0.
Left-handed Abhishek’s ton on Thursday was the fastest in a T20 international between full Test-playing nations as he guided India to 221-7 at New Delhi’s Arun Jaitley Stadium.
Afghanistan, who were the official hosts for the series, checked the opposition surge after Abhishek departed for 108 off 34 balls and India lost their way from 142-1 in 10 overs.
But the Afghan batters once again disappointed and were bowled out for 94 in 14.1 overs.
Afghanistan had posted 156-8 and 159-8 while batting first in the first two matches.
Left-arm spinner Axar Patel struck twice in his first over to send back Rahmanullah Gurbaz, for 15 and Sediqullah Atal, for one. Afghanistan could never recover from the losses.
Seam bowler Nitish Kumar Reddy also took two wickets in one over to return figures of 3-25.
Leg-spinner Ravi Bishnoi wrapped up the Afghanistan innings with his third strike of the match.
Abhishek stood out with his third T20 century as he surpassed Zimbabwean Sikandar Raza’s ton off 33 balls against Gambia in 2024 and Finn Allen’s effort from the same number of deliveries in New Zealand’s T20 World Cup semi-final win over South Africa earlier this year in India.
The only two faster T20I hundreds came in matches between the lower-tiered associate members of the ICC.
Sahil Chauhan of Estonia holds the overall record of 27 balls after his century against Cyprus two years ago, while Muhammad Fahad needed just 29 balls for his ton for Turkey against Bulgaria in 2025.
Abhishek tore into the Afghanistan bowling attack after India were invited to bat first.
The swashbuckling opener hit a six to reach 99. He completed the hundred with a single and sat in meditation pose to celebrate.
He finally fell for 108 off 34 balls to leg-spinner Rashid Khan. The 26-year-old’s knock was laced with nine fours and 11 sixes.
His opening stand of 142 with Sanju Samson, who hit 50, put India on course for a big total but the Afghan bowlers hit back with regular wickets.
Tilak Varma was run out for two by Rashid and Samson departed after his second successive half-century as he fell to pace bowler Azmatullah Omarzai.
Omarzai struck another blow helped by a stunning catch by Rashid in the deep to send back Shivam Dube for 14.
India raised their 100 in six overs but managed just 79 from the last 60 balls.
India now head to Japan for the Asian Games starting September 19 at Nagoya-Aichi.
Afghanistan will send a largely different team to the Asian Games under Darwish Rasooli.
[Aljazeera]
-
News7 days agoGnanasara Thero absconding after SC ruling
-
Opinion6 days agoFrom Galkissa (Mount Lavinia) to Tambuttegama
-
Business7 days agoHNB Finance strengthens Board with four independent directors
-
News3 days agoUS embassy won’t comment on IGP’s probe into joint drug raid
-
Sports7 days agoCulture within cricket team worrying authorities
-
Features6 days agoSri Lanka’s university crisis: Brain drain and union action demand urgent reform
-
Features5 days agoThe emptying university: why are academics leaving?
-
News7 days agoHouse to debate 22A, Judicature Bill next week
