Features
Harvard University’s President resigns over anti-Semitism problem
The ramifications of the Gaza War are widespread not only geographically and economically, but in areas not thought of as being affected. Consequences are widespread of the conflict created by Hamas entering Israel and carrying away hostages and retaliated most ferociously in blistering war by Israel, backed by the US. One example affecting Sri Lanka is the debate on sending a warship to the Red Sea. The war, declared genocide by some, divided the world when votes were taken in international organizations.
Accusation of not forcefully preventing anti-Semitism
I was stunned when I read in the NYT of the dilemma that Claudine Gay, President of Harvard, had to face at the end of December last year. She was on holiday with family in Rome, as reported by Maureen Farrel and Bob Copeland in the said paper when Penny Pritzker, leader of Harvard University’s governing board called to ask whether “she thought there was a path forward with her as the school’s president.” Dr Gay understood what it meant. Her six month tenure as Harvard’s 30th president was over. She announced her resignation on January 2.
“That marked the end of one of the most tumultuous periods in Harvard’s 387 year history, a controversy that thrust the school into the public debate after Hamas’ October 7 attack. Not only did the president lose her job, but the secretive workings of its board, the Harvard Corporation, were laid bare.” Dr Gay had faced severe criticism of her ‘tepid’ response to antisemitism on campus and her testimony before a House panel. Allegations of plagiarism in her research work and writing had been sounded earlier. Now that too was thrust forward. And thus the resignation under a cloud of this much commented on, lauded, and history making selection of this first Black president to head one of the most prestigious American universities, if not world renowned, centres of academia.
Dr Gay is the daughter of Haitian immigrants. She received her BA in 1992 from Stanford, majoring in economics, and her PhD in government from Harvard in 1998. She was on the Faculty of Stanford and then moved to Harvard in 2006 as a professor in government; the next year in African American Studies. She won many prestigious prizes.
Ms Elizabeth Magill
, Prez of the University of Pennsylvania, had to face questioning and probing by the House Committee of Education on Capitol Hill on the same as posed to Prof Gay. She was further faulted for holding a conference on Palestinian literature just before the Hamas attack.
All the hullabaloo and resignation of yet another woman Prez of a University, started as reported in the articles I read, with Republican Representative Virginia Foxx of North Carolina as Chair of the Education and Workforce Committee, arranging hearings on anti-Semitism in college campuses. The two presidents of Harvard and Penn Universities are said to have given ‘evasive answers’ about whether calls for genocide of Jews violated their schools’ codes of conduct. Then rose the uproar created by Ms Foxx and other House Republicans of expansive investigation into institution of higher education, citing anti-Semitism.
This to me is a genuine witch-hunt. Ms Foxx forwards their reason for investigation thus: “We want students to feel safe in their campuses, that’s our No. 1 issue, and Jewish students have not felt safe.” She said she wanted to broaden the inquiry “to deep dive into the hostile takeover of higher education by partisan administrators and political activists.” As the article I quote noted: “They want to interfere with accreditation and stop federal aid to schools that fail to protect Jewish students from anti-Semitic actions.”
Do we laugh or cry? Both I suppose. And this happening in a country where on Jan 6, 2021, the voted out President of the US, Donald Trump, roused and incited his followers so they attacked US Capitol Building in Washington DC, and ransacked it. And he is stomping around to contest the coming presidential election. Only the soon to be delivered verdict of the Supreme Court can stymie him.
We have grown used to such do good remarks which ultimately cause so much turmoil. We have had our language and religion ‘protected’ by prejudiced politicians and Buddhist monks causing near wars. In our small country an issue like ragging in universities has not been stopped or even given enough attention, though students have committed suicide or died consequent to sadistic, degraded bullying of freshers by senior students.
Women in local academia
We have had many women in very high posts in Academia in our country. Googling, I found these names and wish to record them. Deshabandu Wimala de Silva was Chancellor of the University of Sri Jayawardenapura. Vice Chancellors have been Prof Chandrika N Wijeratne, U of Colombo (2019-22); Prof Kshanika Hirimbuwegama, U of Colombo (2007-13); Emeritus Prof Savitri Goonesekera, U of Colombo (1999-2002); Prof Dr Nilanthi Renuka de Silva, U of Kelaniya (2020, reappointed in 2023).
Personal encounters
I worked in the Centre for the Study of Human Rights (CSHR) within the Law Faculty, University of Colombo, for eight years starting in the 1990s and got to know the Deans of the Faculty well. I was recruited by Dr Deepika Udagama, senior law lecturer, who started the Centre and got it going so successfully that it is now recognized widely and conducts post-graduate diploma courses for international students as well as locals.
A young administrative officer and I were the first two recruits who assisted Dr Udagama. She was dedicated to her lecturing plus advancing the mandate of the Centre. With her support and foreign aid, we set up a very well-stocked library. Her equally high ability in English and Sinhala are remarkable. She had an illustrious career.
Prof Sharya de Soysa Scharenguivel was senior lecturer at the Law Faculty when the CSHR was inaugurated, after having served as its Dean. She appreciated my work as information officer cum librarian and approved my style of warmly welcoming students to use the well-stocked library made comfortable with easy chairs and foreign newspapers and journals subscribed to.
We assisted in the research of faculty and students. When I complained that the shut wooden door was a barrier to students – the library was air-conditioned – she immediately got glass panes for almost three quarters of the door. Her concern for students was immense; she being a totally lovely person and very understanding of people’s problems.
Vidyajothi Prof Lalitha Mendis was Dean of the Faculty of Medicine and was for a while Acting VC of the University of Colombo. This was most fortuitous for me since the VC (male) who was leaving on sabbatical, I presume, summoned me and announced coldly I was being discontinued as information officer of the CSHR and asked to leave in two weeks, yes, in a fortnight. I was on contract basis, but there really seemed no valid reason for my dismissal, which it was.
Prof Sharya was concerned on behalf of the students, and me. When Prof Lalitha Mendis assumed duties as VC, I was advised to phone her. I did. She said she was on her way to a meeting and asked me to phone her the next morning. Imagine my surprise when I received a call from her! She said she would make thorough enquires about my work and decide my fate.
I needed my job but that was not mentioned by me except to the VC who sacked me. He was unperturbed. (Later he was named in a court of law of having assisted in bankrupting Sri Lanka). Result of investigation: lecturers and students approved of me and I was given a further contract. My gratitude to these two academics: Profs Lalitha Mendis and Sharya Scharenguivel was and is still immense. They saved me.
Political interference in Academia?
A scar that ran deep and will never be erased is the hounding out and totally politicized dismissal of the first woman CJ, by parliamentary impeachment when Mahinda Rajapaksa was Prez and Prof G L Peiris in his Cabinet. Prof Peiris was Minster of Justice when Prez CBK first appointed Dr Shirani Bandaranayake, Dean of the Faculty of Law, as a SC judge. He was VC of Colombo Uni when she was Dean.
Politicization may have been present in academia apart from the instance noted above and may still be present. Where in this country is political interference absent? Internal politics too would be present. While working within the University of Colombo, I kept absolutely clear of gossip and rumour. However, one fact I strongly affirm is that I very truly found women lecturers and deans to be fair, committed and always concerned about students and their welfare. That is why I narrated incidents from my working life on the periphery, as it was, of the University of Colombo.
Thus it rightly seems to be that our seats of higher learning are not subject to whims such as the recent dismissal of authorities in the US of American where University Presidents have been removed from office because students gathered together to condemn the atrocities committed by Israel’s Jewish PM and Defence Forces (IDF).
Features
The challenge of being positive about SAARC
It was a few years back that a former President of Sri Lanka took it on himself to pronounce SAARC ‘dead’. Since then there have been other sections of Sri Lankan opinion that have joined the critics of SAARC and taken the solemn stance that SAARC has indeed died what may be called a natural death.
Their fatalism is understandable. SAARC has failed to meet at heads of government or state level for the past several years to take the SAARC process notably forward. Regional cooperation has more or less been only an appealing idea. No substantive concrete projects have taken off to make the idea a hard reality. ‘Inner paralysis’ seems to be SAARC’s lot. Hence the fatalism in these circles.
However, being one of the worst cash-strapped regions of the world and a teemingly populated one with people virtually left to their devices, what choices do the ‘SAARC Eight’ have other than to try their best to band together and continue with their cooperation efforts, however small they may be?
There is no escaping the mounting debt trap for many of these countries and bankrupt Sri Lanka is a glaring example, but ‘throwing in the towel’ and abandoning themselves entirely to the diktats of the strongest economies and their agencies will prove a ‘living death’ for many countries in the SAARC fold.
The gains may be meagre but giving-up on SAARC cooperation in full would prove self-defeating for the organization and South Asia. Right now, the collective intention ought to be to salvage what the region could from the tenuous cooperative efforts. Moreover, such initiatives could go some distance to generate a degree of goodwill among the Eight and help in sustaining a dialogue process.
Given this backdrop it proved ‘a stich in time’ for the Regional Centre for Strategic Studies (RCSS), Colombo, to recently host the SAARC Secretary General Ambassador Md. Golam Sarwar to a round table discussion on the unifying potential of SAARC and its future possibilities, besides other related issue areas.
Held on June 24th and moderated by RCSS Executive Director and former ambassador Ravinatha Aryasinha, the forum brought together a vibrant, wide ranging audience comprising academicians, diplomats, senior public servants, civil society activists and many others. Following the presentation by Ambassador Golam Sarwar titled, ‘Reigniting SAARC: Achievements, Challenges and the Way Ahead’, a lively Q&A followed.
The above forum could be described as an act of lighting the proverbial ‘candle’ rather than ‘cursing the darkness.’ It surely is a ‘darkness’ that could be seen as daunting considering that the region’s pivotal powers, India and Pakistan, are failing to act in a spirit of accord but are engaged in bitter finger-pointing on a number of questions of vital importance to SAARC.
On the other hand, what is the rest of the region doing to bring the above sides together? It is disappointing that to date the rest of SAARC has failed to launch a major diplomatic drive to bring peace between the feuding regional heavyweights. It needs to act without delay and establish its earnestness and this effort would need to prove SAARC’s staying power in the unfolding months and even years.
In assessing SAARC’s seeming failure local opinion in particular has failed to factor in what could be described as weak leadership. Since Sheikh Mujibur Rahman of Bangladesh, the founding father of SAARC, the region has failed to produce a visionary leader who could advance the SAARC cause with charisma and drive.
Among other reasons, weak leadership accounts considerably for the faltering and stuttering status, as it were, of SAARC. Badly needed are leaders who could go the extra mile, think less of narrow national interests and work diligently towards the collective well being of the region but SAARC’s millions of ordinary people have been made to wait in vain for leaders of such stature. Instead, they have been burdened with politicians who seem to be relishing the apparently moribund state of SAARC.
Looking back, it could be said that it was the dynamic leadership factor that led to the launching of the Non-Aligned Movement and for its sustenance for a few decades. True, it could be seen in some quarters that NAM is no more, but as in the case of SAARC, the former too has been unfortunate to be burdened over the years with politicians who lack the vision and drive to unflaggingly advance the fortunes of the South. NAM and SAARC lack the dynamism and vision of leaders of the stature of Jawaharlal Nehru, for example, to give them the required guidance and intellectual depth.
The reasons are complex for there not being among us currently political leaders with the vision and the steadfast commitment to advance the legitimate interests of the South. However, it could be stated with conviction that the majority of Southern leaders have too easily caved in to the demands of the global North and its financial agencies.
These leaders have failed to see, for instance, that the largely market economy oriented Northern governments would not view with favour a centrist economic model that attaches priority to the interests of the dis-empowered publics of the South. This realization ought to have dawned on the current government in Sri Lanka, for instance, some while ago but it has no choice but to abide by IMF dictates since economic survival at present is unthinkable without the latter’s succour.
Accordingly for SAARC this should be the time for some soul-searching. Priority needs to be attached to ending the feuding between India and Pakistan since at present the material fortunes of the region hinge largely on these regional giants giving peaceful relations among them a try. This is no easy challenge to meet but some daring, visionary diplomacy needs to take hold among the rest of SAARC.
There is some sense in SAARC bringing the peoples of the region together through programs that address their best collective interests. A meeting of minds among SAARC nations could enable SAARC and its agencies to build a region-wide people’s movement for progressive political and economic change that could in turn lead to the region’s political leaders sensitizing themselves more to the neglected needs of their publics.
However, the time is ‘now’ for the initiation of these progressive changes and the voice of SAARC well wishers would need to drown out those of their critics.
Features
OPA seminar examines Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, resilience and growth pathways
A seminar, “Sri Lanka’s Economic Crossroads: Navigating Recovery, Resilience and Growth” was recently held by the Organisation of Professional Associations of Sri Lanka (OPA) at the OPA Auditorium, bringing together economists, OPA members, and professionals from diverse fields for an insightful discussion on Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and future growth prospects.
The event was held under the patronage of Jayantha Gallehewa, President of the OPA, and was jointly organised by the National Issues Committee (NIC) and the Seminars, Workshops and Programmes Committee of the OPA. The event reaffirmed the organisation’s commitment to advancing professional excellence, fostering insightful intellectual engagement, facilitating interdisciplinary knowledge exchange and creating a constructive platform for informed dialogue on issues of national importance.
The panel of speakers comprised Dr. Harsha Aturupane, Lead Economist and Programme Leader for Human Development at the World Bank for Sri Lanka and the Maldives; Dr. Achinthya Koswatta, Senior Lecturer in Economics at the Open University of Sri Lanka, and Anushan Kapilan, Lead Economist at Verité Research.
In his welcome address, the President of the OPA emphasised that Sri Lanka was at a critical juncture in its economic recovery journey where sustained reforms, effective implementation, and collective national commitment are essential to achieving long-term stability, resilience and inclusive growth. He noted that the country had experienced one of the most severe economic crises in its history with the economy contracting by 7.8 percent in 2022 and a further 11.5 percent in 2023, resulting in significant economic and social challenges.
Delivering his introductory remarks Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the National Issues Committee, underscored the need to move beyond short-term economic stabilisation towards a comprehensive agenda of structural transformation. He observed that the economic crisis had revealed deep-rooted weaknesses within the economy, including persistent fiscal pressures, rising public debt, foreign exchange limitations, and insufficient diversification of the export base. He stressed that addressing these challenges through strategic reforms, institutional strengthening and long-term economic planning would be essential to establishing a more resilient and competitive economy.
While acknowledging recent positive developments, including improved inflation management, tourism recovery and signs of economic stabilisation, Wijeyaratne stressed the need to advance reforms aimed at strengthening fiscal discipline, enhancing productivity, improving competitiveness, developing human capital and reinforcing governance and institutional effectiveness.
He further highlighted the important role of professionals, businesses, academia and other stakeholders in contributing to evidence-based dialogue and supporting Sri Lanka’s journey towards a resilient, inclusive and sustainable economic future.
Delivering the keynote presentation, Dr. Harsha Aturupane provided a comprehensive assessment of Sri Lanka’s economic prospects within the broader context of global economic transformation. He argued that Sri Lanka functioned as a small open economy whose performance is significantly influenced by developments in the global marketplace. External factors could not be controlled, and the country must strengthen its domestic capacity and resilience to respond effectively to international economic shifts, he noted.
Tracing the evolution of global economic systems, Dr. Aturupane highlighted the transition from ideological divisions between state-controlled and market-oriented economies towards increasingly pragmatic approaches focused on growth, competitiveness and development. He noted that Sri Lanka’s own economic journey reflects a similar evolution, with contemporary policy debates now centred on practical solutions for sustainable economic progress.
The presentation also examined the transformative impact of globalisation. Dr. Aturupane observed that global economic integration had enabled several East Asian economies, including South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong, to achieve remarkable economic advancement through export-led growth strategies. Sri Lanka similarly benefited from this process through the expansion of its apparel industry and increased integration into global value chains.
Turning to Sri Lanka’s recovery programme, Dr. Aturupane emphasised that the ongoing stabilisation process should be viewed as a national programme supported by the International Monetary Fund rather than solely as an IMF initiative. He observed that strong worker remittances, improved tourism earnings, enhanced government revenue mobilisation and prudent import management have contributed significantly to economic stabilisation.
Despite this progress, he cautioned that rebuilding foreign exchange reserves and meeting future debt obligations remain major challenges. He underscored the need to strengthen export performance, attract investment and generate sustainable foreign exchange earnings to ensure long-term economic resilience.
The discussion also focused on monetary stability, inflation management and exchange-rate policy. Dr. Aturupane stressed that maintaining price stability was fundamental to sustainable growth and household welfare, while sound monetary policy remains essential for preserving economic confidence.
Looking beyond stabilisation, he argued that Sri Lanka must transition towards a broader economic transformation agenda. Sustainable growth, he noted, will depend on expanding productive capacity through investment, technological advancement, innovation, skills development and structural reforms.
Among the key constraints identified was the high cost of energy, which continues to affect competitiveness and investment attractiveness. Dr. Aturupane emphasised the importance of improving efficiency and affordability within the energy sector to enhance Sri Lanka’s business environment.
He further highlighted the social dimensions of the crisis, noting the rise in poverty and economic vulnerability among households. Strengthening social protection systems and ensuring inclusive growth, he argued, must remain central components of the national development agenda.
Another critical challenge identified was Sri Lanka’s demographic transition. With an ageing population, outward migration and evolving labour market dynamics, the country is increasingly confronting labour shortages in several sectors. Dr. Aturupane suggested that greater automation, increased labour-force participation and strategic workforce planning would be necessary to address these emerging realities.
Concluding his presentation, he emphasised the need to improve governance, strengthen institutions, enhance competitiveness and create an enabling environment for private sector investment. Sri Lanka’s future success, he noted, will depend on its ability to move decisively beyond crisis management towards a development model founded on resilience, innovation, productivity and inclusive growth.
Dr. Achinthya Koswatta reiterated the importance of policy consistency and predictability in fostering investment and industrial development. She observed that frequent policy changes create uncertainty and discourage long-term investment decisions, whereas stable and coherent policy frameworks build confidence and support sustainable economic transformation.
Meanwhile, Anushan Kapilan highlighted the substantial progress achieved in restoring macroeconomic stability following the recent crisis. He noted significant improvements in fiscal performance, including increased government revenue, reduced reliance on debt financing and a historically low fiscal deficit.
He further observed that public debt levels are declining faster than anticipated, economic growth has exceeded expectations and inflation has been brought under control more rapidly than forecast. Nevertheless, he cautioned that the recovery remains uneven, particularly within the industrial sector and that many households have yet to experience a meaningful improvement in living standards.
The seminar was expertly coordinated by Eng. Chamil Edirimuni, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the Seminars, Workshops and Programmes Committee, while the technical moderation and interactive discussion session were facilitated by Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the National Issues Committee.
The event was attended by Tisara De Silva, President-Elect of the OPA, Eng. Ravi Rupasinghe, General Secretary, Past Presidents, members of the Executive Council, representatives of the General Forum and professionals representing a wide range of disciplines.
The seminar concluded with a vibrant exchange of ideas and perspectives, reaffirming the importance of evidence-based policy dialogue, institutional collaboration and collective national commitment in advancing Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, resilience and sustainable growth.
Features
Her roots run deep in Sri Lanka
Yes, for UK-based presenter and artiste Samantha Kay, home is where the heart – and the roots – are. And her roots run deep in Sri Lanka.
In an exclusive interview with The Island, Samantha says “I’m proud to be Sri Lankan. My mum is from Kandy and my dad is from Colombo, so Sri Lanka has always held a very special place in my heart.
“Whenever I visit Sri Lanka, I love spending time on the beautiful south coast, especially Hikkaduwa and Mirissa. It’s somewhere I always feel connected to my roots and completely at peace.”
Now living in Bournemouth, on the south coast of England, where, she says, she is lucky to be close to some of the UK’s most beautiful beaches, including the iconic Sandbanks, Samantha has built a career that refuses to fit into one box.
She is a radio presenter, podcast host, singer-songwriter, personal trainer and life coach.
“I genuinely love the variety because every role allows me to connect with people and, hopefully, make a positive difference in someone’s day.”
Of course, music has taken her far.
One of her proudest achievements, she says, was releasing a song with 90s music icon Angie Brown, which reached No. 9 in the UK Club Charts.
She also reached the final stages of The X Factor and performed at Wembley Stadium in front of thousands.
Beyond music, Samantha competed in bikini bodybuilding across the UK, winning several titles. “It taught me discipline, resilience and self-belief,” she recalls.
Today, her focus is on radio, podcasting and coaching women. Her podcast encourages people to live life on their own terms rather than feeling pressured to follow society’s expectations.
Says Samantha: “Whether someone is single, changing careers, travelling solo or simply trying to find their purpose, I want them to know that it’s never too late to create a life that feels authentic. If you’ve ever felt like you don’t fit into the box, maybe you were never meant to.”
Samantha Kay also spent a year in Dubai, performing at five-star hotels, including FIVE, and coaching at the iconic outdoor gym on Palm Jumeirah.
“I taught strength and conditioning classes, and hosted wellness retreats, combining my passion for music, health and inspiring others.”
However, with family matters calling her back to the UK, she made the choice to return. “Family comes first,” she says.
Looking ahead, Samantha plans to grow her radio and podcast work, release more music, and expand her wellness retreats.
“My biggest passion is helping people, especially women, build confidence and believe in themselves,” she says.
“Wherever my career takes me, I hope to continue inspiring others to live with courage, kindness and authenticity, while never forgetting my Sri Lankan roots.”
-
News7 days agoHerath warns prospective migrant workers not to get fleeced by racketeers
-
Features5 days agoPrison riots and politics: NPP’s biggest challenge and Sri Lanka’s biggest opportunity
-
Editorial6 days agoWhat’s the world coming to?
-
Foreign News7 days agoTensions erupt in Indian state after 11-year-old raped and murdered
-
Features7 days agoDevanesan Annan – in Memoriam
-
Editorial7 days agoPunishment in hellholes
-
Features2 days agoDirty Money
-
Editorial5 days agoMuch ado about crime: Fish or cut bait

