News
Govt. should obtain support of SL’s natural allies in NAM and Global South who form a majority in UNHRC
While taking action to negate and disprove the charges
The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) has scheduled, at its February/March 2021 Sessions, to take up for discussion the report on Sri Lanka prepared by the High Commissioner, Mrs. Bachelet on human rights.
This is to discuss the implementation of Resolution 30/1 adopted in 2015, and the subsequent resolutions co-sponsored by the previous government on alleged past violations of human rights in Sri Lanka.
The arguments advanced by the High Commissioner are what she uses to justify the imposition of sanctions against Sri Lanka and to take it before the ICC, the International Criminal Court of Justice. There is also provision for legal action to be taken in the courts of any foreign country against individual citizens of Sri Lanka alleged to have committed crimes against humanity, (which are genocide, ethnic cleansing and war crimes).
If we are to counter these sinister moves against Sri Lanka and its citizens, then action must be taken within Sri Lanka to deprive the High Commissioner and the Western Group led by the UK (in the absence of the USA, which has left the UNHRC) of the arguments levelled by the High Commissioner to the extent that they interfere with Sri Lanka’s responsibility under the UN Charter and international human rights conventions.
Action must also be taken by the government to expose the manner in which the Report and its recommendations, should they be endorsed by the Council, will seriously undermine the Charter-based multilateral system, which is the guarantor of state sovereignty and independence established under the multilateral system based on the UN Charter.
Such action will also help to draw in its natural allies in the Global South to extend their own support to Sri Lanka within the UNHRC, and help defeat the sinister moves.
The High Commissioner’s arguments are based on the following six broad areas of concern:
* Militarization of civilian government functions.
* Reversal of Constitutional safeguards, including the passage of the 20th Amendment.
* Political obstruction of accountability for crimes and human rights violations such as the presidential commission of ‘political victimization’, which has intervened on behalf of a number of military officers implicated in gross human rights violations, including the killing of Lasantha Wickrematunga abduction of Prageeth Ekneligoda, and the naval officers implicated in ransom induced abductions and murder of Tamil youth in Trincomalee.
* Majoritarian and exclusionary rhetoric.
* Surveillance and obstruction of civil society and shrinking democratic space.
* New and exacerbated human rights concerns.
These concerns are already being addressed domestically by the people of Sri Lanka themselves, both in the past (LLRC Report) and the present. The UK-led forces backing the UNHRC resolution are well aware of this. It is important that the government should also further intensify its efforts in this direction.
In doing so, the government should fully appreciate the real motivations for these concerns by the High Commissioner. They are to advance the global agenda of the United States to maintain its hegemony and consolidate the unilateral global order that it desires.
Therefore, while taking action to negate and disprove these charges, the government should obtain the support of our natural allies in the Non-aligned Movement and the Global South, like Russia, who form a majority in the UNHRC, so as to counter what is a common threat.
Some sections of the government, including the Secretary to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, are seeking to reach a consensus with the UK-led Western bloc. The danger of trying to reach a consensus with the US and its Western allies is that the negotiations will necessarily be between unequal partners, as a result of our high economic dependence on the very same powerful Western countries that are leading the resolution against us.
Moreover, if there are direct bilateral negotiations, then Sri Lanka’s natural allies in the Global South, which are the majority in the United Nations, will not want to get involved by supporting Sri Lanka, as shown by our own past experience.
A consensus between such unequal partners can only, therefore, result in Sri Lanka having to make compromises and also accommodate America’s global agenda, undermining Sri Lanka’s sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity. We may be even compelled to accept the MCC, SOFA and ACSA agreements that were rejected earlier.
Under these circumstances, the option is to call for a vote in the Council through a friendly nation, such as Cuba, and to work towards obtaining the support of the Council’s majority, who are members of the Non Aligned Movement, and the Global South, including Russia. This option has already proven to be successful in numerous cases where draft resolutions against individual countries by the Western Group have been defeated.
For example, in the specific case of Sri Lanka, in September 2011, we even succeeded, with the support of the Non Aligned Movement and Russia to force the US and Canada to withdraw a draft resolution against Sri Lanka, even before it was tabled.
The support of most, if not all, Non-aligned countries and others like Russia is a certainty provided they are all made aware of the hidden agenda motivating the USA/UK led Western action against Sri Lanka, as well as the precedent that such a resolution would create in the future for the Global South as a whole.
Even if the matter is brought before the Security Council, which alone can take punitive action against a member state, and even then only when there is a threat to international peace and security or a war of aggression, both Russia and China can, and I am sure will, be able to use their veto in our defense.
In the circumstances, Sri Lanka must under no circumstances try to reach a consensus that will necessarily require compromising the multilateral principles of the UN system. If it acts on its own, it will get the necessary support of the Non-aligned countries and the Global South as it is acting on a matter of common concern for a vast majority of the countries. We must follow the successful example of Cuba, which regularly gets the support of all countries, except the USA, and Israel on its General Assembly Resolution condemning the illegal US blockade against Cuba.
Prof. Tissa Vitarana
News
Ex-COPE head questions Prez Secy’s intervention in coal scam probe
“Auditor General’s reports a matter for Legislature not the Executive”
Former Chairman of the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) Charitha Herath has said it is the COPE, and not the Secretary to the President, that should have asked the CID to probe irregularities in the procurement of coal for the Lakvijaya power plant.
Dr. Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, who is the Secretary to the President, lodged a complaint with the CID last week seeking an investigation into coal procurement.
No previous Secretary to a President had done so, the former parliamentarian and the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) Working Committee member said. Herath said so responding to The Island query regarding Kumanayake calling for a probe into coal procurement, since 2009, following the National Audit Office (NAO) report on the controversial procurement process for the 2025/2-26 period.
Herath emphasised that COPE, taking into consideration the growing discontent over coal procurement, especially after the NAO exposed serious irregularities, should have initiated action. Herath cited the National System Operator’s (NSO) seeking an additional electricity tariff increase of 15%, in addition to 10% increase announced on 01 April, for the second quarter, to cover-up Rs 16 bn deficit in power generation, as a matter of grave concern. NSO has cited the prevailing dry weather, the continuing crisis in West Asia, and the low-grade coal that had been procured as primary reasons for the unanticipated shortfall in electricity generation.
Herath said that as the Secretary to the Ministry concerned was the Chief Accounting Officer, the actions of the Secretary to the President caused a technical issue. Prof. Udayanga Hemapala, now under a cloud over the violation of procurement procedures, as confirmed by the NAO, is the Secretary to the Energy Ministry. Herath emphasised the importance of the procedure adopted in appointing a Secretary to a Ministry. “President issues one letter making the appointment. Secretary to the Finance Ministry issues a second letter underscoring the responsibilities of a Ministry Secretary as the Chief Accounting Officer of a particular Ministry,” Herath said.
The second letter emphasised the accountability on the part of the Ministry Secretary regarding public finance and his direct answerability to Parliament.
The ex-COPE Chief pointed out that the Secretary to the President was part of the executive. He was not part of the legislature. If there had been a directive from COPE, that should have been issued to the Secretary to the Energy Ministry, Herath said, emphasising the entire process had to be led by the legislature not the executive. In this instance to make matters worse the finger is also pointed at the executive for being part of the alleged cover up.
The Auditor General, who heads the NAO, is answerable to Parliament, Herath said, pointing out that the AG never sent reports to the Secretary to the President, who, too, comes under the purview of the NAO. The intervention made by the Secretary to the President could set a very bad precedent and it was unfortunate that the NPP, having campaigned on an anti-corruption platform at national elections in 2024 was now struggling to cope up with the major post-Aragalaya coal scandal.
The NAO undertook the examination of the 2025/2-26 coal procurement on a request made by Dr. Nishantha Samaraweera, Galle District lawmaker, representing the ruling NPP.
Lakvijaya, the country’s sole coal power plant, situated at Norochcholai, requires approximately 2.25 mt million annually and is credited with generating 30% to 40% of the overall national electricity requirement.
According to the NAO report, the Energy Ministry had awarded the term tender for the supply of coal to India’s Trident Chemphar Ltd., though it wasn’t properly registered. The NAO also pointed out the failure on the part of the supplier to follow proper procedure in respect of loading and unloading at respective ports.
Herath said that intentionally, or inadvertently, the NPP had erred in handling the investigation. He said after receiving the NAO’s report, COPE could have averted unnecessary controversy by following the laid down procedures. The COPE Chairman could direct the Energy Secretary to inquire into the coal procurement within seven days and submit a report to Parliament. In addition, if there had been any wrongdoing on the part of officials, relevant documents/files should be sent to the CIABOC or the CID.
The COPE, in consultation with the Speaker, could also take up in Parliament as an urgent/emergency issue at the onset of the proceedings, Herath said, adding that an interim report could be presented. On the basis of that report, in terms of the Standing Orders the Parliament could immediately decide to send it to the CID.
In addition to the above mentioned procedures, the COPE could on its own initiate a fresh inquiry and submit a report to Parliament and the country, Herath said. Pointing out that the coal company comes under the purview of the executive and not the legislature, Herath said that actions of the executive could be investigated. Herath explained how the British and the US responded to such situations. Unfortunately, here in Sri Lanka apparently the COPE was being used to clear the Minister concerned while holding the officials responsible for the coal scandal.
In the wake of the NAO report signed by Auditor General Samudrika Jayarathne, the defeat of the no-confidence motion moved against Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody couldn’t be considered a victory for the government, the ex-MP said. In fact, the coal scam has challenged the NPP’s much propagated anti-corruption stance, Herath said, adding that the issue couldn’t be examined without discussing the Energy Minister being indicted over corruption by the Colombo High Court recently.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
News
NJC asks govt. to seek compensation for IRIS Dena sinking
The National Joint Committee (NJC) has urged the government to seek compensation for the environmental damage caused by the US sinking of the unarmed Iranian Frigate IRIS Dena just outside Sri Lanka’s territorial waters and within its Exclusive Economic Zone, on 4 March.
The following is the text of the NJC statement issued jointly by Lt Gen Jagath Dias (Retd) and Dr Anula Wijesundere, co-Presidents of the outfit: Sri Lanka’s economy, political landscape and social fabric was battered for too long due to man-made and natural disasters. This include two southern insurgencies, 30 years of terrorism, tsunami, Covid- 19 pandemic, Easter Sunday terrorist attack-related political instability, 2022 economic collapse, sovereign default announcement in 2022, IMF intervention, Cyclone Ditwah, numerous external shocks, with the latest being the West Asia conflict, could be named a few.
The sinking of the Iranian warship IRIS Dena on March 4, 2026, roughly 19 to 25 nautical miles off the coast of Galle, Sri Lanka, caused severe environmental pollution, and long-term economic concerns for local communities.
Comprehensive Damage Assessment
Cost of the recovery of dead and human casualties: Out of approximately 180 personnel of the Iranian warship, the Sri Lankan Navy recovered 84-87 bodies and rescued 32 survivors, with roughly 60 sailors of the ill-fated naval vessel still missing and/or presumed dead.
As of early April 2026, the total financial damage from the IRIS Dena explosion, and sinking, off Sri Lanka’s southern coast, has not yet been fully quantified, but preliminary assessments indicate severe ecological and socio-economic risks that may have to be borne by the taxpayer.
Environmental Impact Assessments
The Marine Environment Protection Authority (MEPA) and other experts have highlighted several critical concerns:
* Toxic Spills: The vessel released thousands of tonnes of hazardous materials, including heavy fuel oil and potentially specialised military chemicals, into a highly sensitive marine ecosystem.
* Shoreline Contamination: Oil barrels and debris, including burnt parts of support craft, have washed ashore in popular coastal areas like Hikkaduwa and Dodanduwa. Laboratory tests by MEPA confirmed the presence of lubricant oil in these areas.
* Threats to Marine Life: The southern coast is a vital habitat for whales, dolphins, and vibrant coral reefs. Experts warn of a “silent” impact on ichthyoplankton (fish eggs and larvae), which are particularly vulnerable during the March-April period.
Turtle Nesting: The incident coincided with the sea turtle nesting season. Oil spills and debris are expected to increase mortality rates for sea turtle hatchlings and impact adults coming ashore to breathe and feed.
Livelihood and Socio-Economic Damage
The explosion occurred near the international maritime boundary close to Galle, a major hub for tourism and fishing:
Fisheries: Concerned local fishermen were the first to report oil patches. While no immediate mass fish deaths were initially reported, authorities warn that long-term depletion of shallow-water fish stocks is likely with some reports suggesting up to 50% depletion of shallow-water fish in the affected area.
Tourism: Contamination at Hikkaduwa—a key tourist destination—faced disruption /threatened the local hospitality industry with oil staining the shore during the peak tourism season.
Rescue and Recovery: Sri Lanka deployed naval and air force units to rescue 30 out of approximately 180 personnel aboard torpedoed Iranian vessel. The ongoing monitoring and cleanup efforts add a significant administrative and operational burden to the state.
The Damage: While some experts draw parallels to the 2021 MV X-Press Pearl disaster (which cost over $6 billion in environmental damage), the specific “total damage” figure for the IRIS Dena is still being calculated as debris continues to wash ashore
Accountability and Response
Sri Lanka was left to manage the search-and-rescue (SAR) and environmental clean-up at its own cost, sparking debates regarding liability for damages caused to neutral third parties by warring nations.
A 2021 study on the natural resource damage assessment for oil spills in Sri Lanka states that 39 oil spills occurred in Sri Lanka between 1999 and 2021, including the MV X-Press Pearl. A previous study published in 2017 on oil spill events in marine waters in Sri Lanka showed the sea around Sri Lanka being highly vulnerable to oil spills, as approximately 25% of the world’s oil transportation passes through Sri Lanka’s exclusive economic zone.
In August 2025, the Sri Lankan Supreme Court ordered owners of the MV X-Press Pearl to pay $1 billion in compensation for the 2021 sinking that caused the country’s worst maritime pollution disaster.
Applying the “polluter pays principle,” the ruling mandates payments for extensive plastic pellet contamination and ecological damage.
Some experts are of the opinion that once the origin of the current oil spill is determined and is confirmed linking to the sunken Iranian warship, those who carried out the attack should be held responsible for any environmental damage.
“This should be then handled at a diplomatic level. Considering the already ailing economy and the financial burden Sri Lankan taxpayer is likely to bear short, medium and long term:
1. N. J. C urge the government to do a thorough and a comprehensive damage assessment involving appropriate experts in each subject matter. N. J. C also urge the government to make necessary early dialogue with parties / countries responsible for the incident in order to recover damage cost/compensation.
2. In the backdrop of continued global tensions, vulnerability of sea trade and maritime activities in the Indian Ocean, N.J.C urge the government to represent / engage appropriate bilateral / multilateral and world bodies to declare Indian Ocean a zone of peace.
3. N. J. C recognizes the need for the government to take proactive measures joined by other littoral states at international level to devise/project a protective package from likely future disasters in the Indian Ocean.
News
Kathriarachchi arrested
Former MP Chandana Kathriarachchi was arrested yesterday by the Colombo Crimes Division (CCD) at his residence in Piliyandala.
Police said the arrest was made during a search operation carried out under a warrant issued by the Kesbewa Magistrate’s Court.
According to Police Media Spokesman ASP F. U. Wootler, the raid led to the detection of a hand grenade, two T-56 magazines, 221 rounds of T-56 ammunition, 100 .22 calibre rounds, and 30 unidentified rounds.
The suspect was taken into custody yesterday morning (16) and is expected to be produced before court.
Four registered firearms were also taken into custody. Investigations revealed that one firearm was registered under Kathriarachchi’s name, while the remaining three were registered under his wife’s name.
by Norman Palihawadane
-
News5 days agoCEB orders temporary shutdown of large rooftop solar systems
-
Features5 days agoFrom Royal College Platoon to National Cadet Corps: 145 years of discipline, leadership, and modern challenges
-
Latest News4 days agoPNS TAIMUR & ASLAT arrive in Colombo
-
News6 days agoAnura Solomons passes away
-
Features5 days agoCIA’s hidden weapon in Iran
-
Latest News4 days agoPrasidh, Buttler set up comfortable win for Gujarat Titans
-
Business6 days agoSL’s economic outlook for 2026 being shaped by M-E conflict
-
Latest News5 days agoHeat index likely to increase up to ‘Caution level’ at some places in the Northern, North-central, North-western, Western, Sabaragamuwa, Southern and Eastern provinces and Monaragala district
