News
GL questions President’s stand on Oversight Committees
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Pointing out the way the President’s Office offhandedly rejected a report issued by the Sectoral Oversight Committee (SOC) on National Security against the privatization of Sri Lanka Telecom, top SLPP rebel spokesman Prof. G. L. Peiris yesterday (19) questioned the very basis of the role of the Oversight Committees if they were treated that way.
SOC, headed by retired Rear Admiral Sarath Weerasekera, tabled its report in Parliament on 09 June.
Addressing the media at the SLPP office at Nawala, the former External Affairs Minister pointed out how President Ranil Wickremesinghe had disregarded the conclusions made by the vital committee while extolling the importance of the SOC system and the youth participation in them.
Prof. Peiris said that it would be a grave mistake for the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government to think privatisation would be the panacea for the current economic crisis.
Prof. Peiris warned of further deterioration of the ground situation, once the restructuring of domestic debt got underway later this month, in line with an agreement with the IMF.
Prof. Peiris alleged that the proposed Anti-Corruption laws and the Broadcasting Regulatory Commission bill were intended to suppress dissent. Declaring that certain provisions in the Anti-Corruption bill were meant to discourage whistle-blowers, the National List MP claimed that the government seemed to be preparing the ground for robber barons.
Commenting on the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Commission sessions scheduled to begin on Monday (19), Prof. Peiris said that the UN body would definitely look into the recent happenings in Sri Lanka. According to him, the Geneva body would react to suppression of media freedom and other obstacles placed by the government as part of its overall defence against public protests.
“Once domestic restructuring gets underway, countrywide public protests will erupt,” Prof. Peiris predicted, asserting that the Opposition would seek the intervention of the Supreme Court to thwart enactment of a Bill, titled Broadcasting Regulatory Commission.
Citing the Supreme Court ruling, dated 05 May, 1997, given during Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga’s tenure as the President in respect of a Bill very much similar to the ones proposed by the incumbent government, Prof. Peiris explained why they were confident the current SC would block the relevant Bill.
The bottom line is that the Parliament couldn’t enact a law contrary to the Constitution, the former Minister said, recalling the Supreme Court objecting to one-third of the Bill, titled Central Bank of Sri Lanka.
Prof. Peiris said that the Bill, examined by the Supreme Court in 1997 and the one expected to be tabled in Parliament soon, were similar the ruling that the earlier Bill couldn’t be implemented even with a 2/3 majority and should be subjected to a referendum applied in the current context, too, the MP said.
Prof. Peiris especially referred to the large number parate executions carried out by banks to recover bad loans to highlight the plight of small scale businessmen. Declaring that the print media carried an unusual number of parate execution notices in the recent past, Prof. Peiris urged the government to review the situation and take appropriate measures to consolidate the economy or face the consequences.
News
Judicial vacancies: President keeps country guessing
The NPP government has not taken a final decision regarding filling of the vacancies in the judiciary.
A group of Opposition MPs, led by SJB leader Sajith Premadasa, on 12 June, requested Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremeratne to take up the issue of judicial vacancies with President Dissanayake. Opposition sources said that there were four vacancies, each in the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, and the inordinate delay had adversely affected the judiciary.
Government sources indicated that there was no change in the status quo as regards filling of vacancies. Referring to the government proposal to extend the retirement age of judges, authoritative sources said that no final decision had been taken yet.
SJB lawmaker Dayasiri Jayasekera told The Island that they would raise the issue in Parliament this week.
He said that the deliberate delay in making appointments to superior courts and the move to extend the retirement age couldn’t be taken separately.
The MP noted that the Bar Association of Sri Lanka, the Lawyers’ Collective, the Colombo High Court Lawyers’ Association, Colombo Magistrate’s Court Lawyers’ Association and the Bar Association of Badulla had opposed the government move.
There hadn’t been any public statements in support of the government move, MP Jayasekera said, urging the government to end uncertainty in the judiciary.
by Shamindra Ferdinando
News
Sajith calls on Opposition parties to rally around SJB
SJB leader Sajith Premadasa has invited the UNP and other political parties to join his party. Premadasa, who is also the leader of the Opposition, has emphasised that the UNP and the SJB could reach a consensus on policies but his party wouldn’t, under any circumstances, accept whatever formula to share positions. Premadasa said so, speaking to the media over the weekend, after meeting the Mahanayaka Thera of the Malwatta Chapter of the Siyam Nikaya Most Venerable Thibbatuwawe Sri Siddhartha Sumangala Thera.
A statement issued by the Opposition Leader’s Office quoted MP Premadasa as having extended an invitation to all political parties to give up extremist policies and join the SJB.
The SJB leader alleged that the NPP government feared facing elections and that was the reason for the inordinate delay in holding Provincial Council polls. PC polls were last held in 2012, 2013 and 2014, on a staggered basis. Premadasa said that if PC polls were held his party would definitely win the majority of PCs.Premadasa also urged the government to reduce electricity tariffs and fuel prices.
News
Ex-EC Chief slams govt. over PC polls delay
Former Chairman of the Election Commission, Mahinda Deshapriya, on Saturday, strongly criticised the continued postponement of local government elections, declaring that every day without elections constitutes a violation of both the Constitution and democratic principles.
Speaking during an interview with journalist Bhanuka Rajapaksa, on Hiru TV, on Saturday, Deshapriya described the current administration of local government institutions by unelected officials as fundamentally undemocratic and contrary to the spirit of representative governance.
Deshapriya said local authorities, across the country, are presently being managed by secretaries and bureaucrats rather than elected representatives, depriving citizens of their democratic right to be governed by individuals, chosen through the electoral process.
“If the Constitution recognises and provides for local government institutions, then it is the responsibility of the State to ensure that elections are held and that these bodies are administered by representatives, elected by the people,” he said.
Deshapriya rejected attempts to justify the prolonged delay, arguing that responsibility for the situation rests with the government.
He noted that while various political parties have publicly stated their readiness to face elections, the ruling administration possesses the authority to resolve any issues relating to the electoral system.
The former Election Commission chief pointed out that the government enjoyed a two-thirds majority in Parliament, enabling it to enact any legislative amendments required to facilitate the conduct of elections. Instead, he said, successive committees and review processes had been used to postpone a final decision.
He also referred to efforts by opposition legislators who have moved motions seeking to address concerns relating to the electoral framework and expedite the holding of local government polls.
Deshapriya warned that any attempt to appoint a fresh delimitation committee could further delay the electoral process, making it unlikely that local government elections would be held within the current year.
He also dismissed claims that financial constraints have prevented the conduct of elections. Expressing surprise at such assertions, he questioned how funding shortages could be cited as a reason for postponement while expenditure continues in other sectors.
According to Deshapriya, the existence of laws establishing local government institutions imposes an obligation on the State to ensure that those institutions are populated through democratic means.
“The legal framework exists. If elected representatives are not appointed through elections and institutions continue to function under unelected administrators, that is a failure of the State,” he said.
-
News6 days agoBeijing Capital Airlines to resume flights to Colombo signalling boost to tourism
-
Features5 days agoKilling of Colombo’s ancient trees — a warning on UN’s World Desertification Day – 17 June
-
News2 days agoCreditor not yet paid
-
News3 days agoCreditor receives USD 2.5 mn as Lankan public bears loss from theft of Treasury funds
-
News2 days agoConsumers bearing 22% tax burden despite 18% VAT claim: Dr. Harsha de Silva
-
Opinion4 days agoBeyond diagnosis: A strategic design for 7% growth by 2029 (Part I)
-
Opinion6 days agoFifty years after Soweto uprising
-
News5 days agoIndia provides military stores worth USD 5.5 mn to SL
