Connect with us

News

Be more conciliatory in addressing grievances: FUTA

Published

on

The Federation of University Teachers’ Associations (FUTA) Friday called upon the government to respect the democratic rights of various stakeholders in the university system and to adopt a more conciliatory approach to addressing grievances.

Issuing a statement signed by its general secretary Dr. Athulasiri Samarakoon to condemn the police attacks on a protest march organized by university non-academic staff members on Thursday (18) near the University of Sri Jayewardenepura, FUTA reminded the government that the right to protest is a fundamental right well recognized by the constitution of Sri Lanka.

Full text of the statement:

“The Federation of University Teachers’ Associations (FUTA) is deeply concerned about the attack the police carried out against the protest march organized by university’s non-academic staff members on Jan.18. During the protest march held near the University of Sri Jayewardenepura, the police fired tear gas at protesting non-academic employees, forcing the protesters to disperse. This was done amidst the one-day token strike declared by non-academic staff members demanding an increase in their allowances.

“Non-academic staff members are an inseparable part of the university system, and the government has a responsibility to consider their grievances. Instead of conciliation, the use of force to suppress their demands risks creating an unstable situation at universities. At a time of unprecedented economic burden, it is needless to remind that all academic and non-academic staff perform a commendable task in keeping our universities functioning. In such a situation, the FUTA considers it unacceptable to use force against such employees who are raising their concerns and grievances.

“FUTA would like to remind the government that the right to protest is a fundamental right, well recognized by the constitution of Sri Lanka. Regardless of this protection, in the recent past, we have seen an alarming tendency where the state uses force to disperse peaceful demonstrations that do not cause any disturbance to public peace.

“FUTA was prevented from conducting a street demonstration in March 2022, against which we have filed a Fundamental Rights application. Furthermore, in many instances, students’ demonstrations were dispersed with the use of force. It is disappointing to see that the same repressive measures are applied against non-academic employees.

“While condemning this act in the strongest terms, FUTA calls upon the government to respect the democratic rights of various stakeholders in the university system and to adopt a more conciliatory approach to addressing grievances.”



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

PAFFREL raises concerns over Anti-Corruption (Amendment) Bill

Published

on

Anura and Rohana

Executive Director of People’s Action for Free and Fair Elections (PAFFREL) Rohana Hettiarachchi yesterday (28) said that there were three major concerns regarding the Anti-Corruption (Amendment) Bill 2026. Acknowledging the recent Supreme Court determination, in respect of the above-mentioned Bill, that three of the provisions were not consistent with the Constitution, requiring a special majority in Parliament, with one clause requiring approval by the people at a Referendum, Hettiarachchi said nonetheless PAFFREL had decided to bring their concerns to the notice of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake.

Responding to The Island queries, Hettiarachchci said that PAFFREL sent a letter, dated 24 Sept., to President Dissanayake, regarding the issue at hand.

Petitions against the Bill was heard before a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justices Shiran Gooneratne, Mahinda Samayawardena and Sampath Wijeratne.

PAFFREL and Transparency International Sri Lanka (TISL) were among the petitioners who challenged the proposed amendments to the Anti-Corruption Act No. 9 of 2023. “We did so in public interest,” Hettiarachchchi said, adding that three major concerns were (i) the breadth of the proposed redaction power and the proposed criminalisation of certain uses of publicly accessible redacted asset declarations, particularly in relation to freedom of expression, and the public’s right to meaningfully receive and impart information (ii) raising of the State or public-corporation shareholding threshold for certain asset declaration obligations from 25% to 50%, as this could exclude officers of State-linked entities in which the State holds less than 50%, in spite of such entities exercising public functions and managing public resources and (iii)role of the Director General Ranga Dissanayake.

Hettiarachchchi emphasised that though the PARREL appreciated the way CIABOC DG handled his responsibilities, centreing of power on one person was not acceptable.

Hettiarachchi urged President Dissanayake and the 159-member government parliamentary group to pay attention to concerns raised by those who moved court against the controversial Bill and address their concerns though the Parliament received the SC determination.

An International Monetary Fund mission that visited Colombo recently warned that the proposed amendments could weaken the country’s anti-corruption framework.

The mission, led by Evan Papageorgiou, was in the country from 10 to 23 September for discussions on the seventh review of the Extended Fund Facility and the 2026 Article IV consultation. (SF)

Continue Reading

News

First cases taken up by SC after enactment of 22A dismissed

Published

on

The Supreme Court yesterday (28) dismissed two petitions filed by retired Flight Lieutenant Shantha Jayathilake against Deputy Inspector General of Police of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Shani Abeysekara and Secretary to the Ministry of Public Security Ravi Seneviratne, and Rev. Father Cyril Gamini, alleging them of committing contempt of court.

They were the first cases dealt by the Supreme Court after the enactment of the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution.

The recipient of gallantry medal alleged that contempt of court had been committed through an affidavit previously submitted to the Supreme Court by Shani Abeysekara and Ravi Seneviratne.

The other petition alleged that contempt of court had been committed through the contents of a complaint submitted to the Criminal Investigation Department by Rev. Father Cyril Gamini.

The Supreme Court ordered that both petitions be dismissed without being taken up for hearing.

Continue Reading

News

Now NR named 4th suspect in Krrish case

Published

on

Namal

The Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) yesterday (28) named former Minister and leader of the SLPP parliamentary group Namal Rajapaksa as the fourth suspect in the Krrish case before the Colombo Chief Magistrate’s Court.

The MP was named as the fourth suspect in the wake of the arrest and remanding of former Executive Officer and Director of the Krrish Group, Janaki Siriwardena, regarding the payment of Rs. 70 mn to Namal Rajapaksa to facilitate the land transaction. Police arrested Ms. Siriwardena on 24 September and she was remanded till 6 Oct. pending investigations.

The investigation focuses on 4.3 acre land development in the Fort area that began in the 2013-2014 period. Investigations were launched in 2016 by the Yahapalana government, following a complaint lodged by Wasantha Samarasinghe, now a Minister in the current Cabinet.

The Indian company in this controversy is Krrish Transworks Colombo (Pvt.) Ltd .

The CIABOC named Namal Rajapaksa as a suspect in the Krrish case while he was remanded over two cases in respect of Airbus bribery probe. (SF)

Continue Reading

Trending