Connect with us

News

Frontline Socialist Party condemns proposed Fisheries Amendment Bill as threat to public ownership of Lankan waters

Published

on

Education Secretary of the Frontline Socialist Party, Pubudu Jayagoda, (right) addressing a press conference held at the Center for Society and Religion in Colombo last Wednesday, Warnakulasuriyage Jude Namal Fernando, Convener of the Fishers Collective, looks on.

Education Secretary of the Frontline Socialist Party, Pubudu Jayagoda, last Wednesday said that the government is poised to introduce new legislation amending the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Act No 2 of 1996, effectively terminating public ownership of the country’s seas.

Addressing a press conference held at the Center for Society and Religion in Colombo, Jayagoda warned that the proposed changes could undermine the fundamental principle of public ownership, a cornerstone of existing laws governing the seas.

He said that the current legal framework’s core premise establishes the sea surrounding the nation as a resource owned by the people, forming the basis for the regulations stipulated in the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Act No 2 of 1996.

Jayagoda said that Section 35 of the draft bill grants extensive powers to the Director General of Fisheries to issue licenses. Unlike the previous approach where fishermen were not required to obtain licenses but registered their boats or vessels, the proposed amendment introduces a licensing system with limited quotas to prevent fishermen from surpassing these allocations.

Jayagoda pointed out Section 6(e) of the draft bill, allowing foreigners to acquire fishing licenses, a move unprecedented in the context of Lankan waters. The amendment seeks to segment Lankan waters into zones, leasing these areas to multinational corporations from Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, and China.

“The Section 8 of the new bill grants the Director General authority to restrict local fishermen from accessing these leased zones,” Jayagoda said adding that the Sections 155 and 144 exempt foreign fishermen from Lankan jurisdiction, unless a bilateral agreement exists, making it challenging for the country to penalize foreign poachers.

Jayagoda said that the amendment bill is a strategic maneuver to commercialize and privatize fishing rights in Lankan waters.

Jayagoda said that the FSP would oppose the proposed legislation and would join other progressive forces against what they perceive as a threat to the people’s rights and interests. He urged the public to unite in thwarting the passage of this bill, emphasizing the imperative need to prevent the potential privatization of the nation’s seas.

Warnakulasuriyage Jude Namal Fernando, Convener of the Fishers Collective, said that they would aunch a campaign involving fishermen from both the North and the South against the draft bill. Fernando demanded the government withdraw the bill and cautioned government officials against seeking votes from villages without addressing this attempt to strip them of centuries-old rights.



News

Showers about 100 mm are likely at some places in the Western, Sabaragamuwa, Central, Uva, Southern, North-western, Northern and North-central provinces and in Trincomalee district.

Published

on

By

WEATHER FORECAST FOR 11 MAY 2026
Issued at 05.30 a.m. on 11 May 2026 by the Department of Meteorology

 

The low-level atmospheric disturbance in the vicinity of Sri Lanka is likely to develop into a low-pressure area around the next 36 hours. Therefore, the prevailing showery conditions over the island are expected to continue during the next few days.

Showers or thundershowers will occur at times in most parts of the island and Cloudy skies are expected, under the influence of the aforementioned system. Heavy showers about 100 mm are likely at some places in the Western, Sabaragamuwa, Central, Uva, Southern, North-western, Northern and North-central provinces and in Trincomalee district.

The general public is kindly requested to take adequate precautions to minimize damage caused by temporary localized strong winds and lightning during thundershowers.

Continue Reading

News

Treasury theft: Speaker’s conduct brought to IPU’s attention: SJB  

Published

on

Dayasiri

SJB MP Dayasiri Jayasekera has sought the intervention of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) to pressure the JVP-NPP government to respect the rights of the Opposition.

MP Jayasekera told The Island that they wouldn’t allow the NPP to suppress the truth regarding the theft of Treasury funds amounting to USD 2.5 million. He accused Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne of depriving the Opposition of its legitimate rights, at the behest of the government.

Jayasekera said that the Speaker’s conduct regarding the action taken against Deputy Secretary General of Parliament Chaminda Kularatne, too, had been brought to the notice of IPU and other international associations.

The text of MP Jayasekera’s letter to the Secretary general of IPU: “I respectfully submit this petition seeking the attention and intervention of the Inter-Parliamentary Union concerning a matter affecting parliamentary accountability, the rights of elected representatives, and the proper functioning of constitutional oversight within the Parliament of Sri Lanka.

On 06 May 2026, I Dayasiri Jayasekara MP submitted a formal request to the Hon. Speaker of Parliament seeking permission, under the Parliament (Powers and Privileges) Act No. 21 of 1953 and Standing Order 29(1), to raise a question of privilege regarding alleged constitutional and parliamentary violations by Mr. Harshana Suriyapperuma, Secretary to the Treasury of Sri Lanka.

The proposed privilege motion raised matters including:

1. Alleged violations of Articles 148, 149, and 150 of the Constitution of Sri Lanka concerning parliamentary control over public finance;

2. Alleged failure to report to Parliament concerning a controversial and unlawful transfer of approximately USD 2.5 million from the Treasury;

3. Alleged non-compliance with parliamentary committee procedures under the Standing Orders of Parliament;

4. Questions relating to constitutional eligibility under Article 91(1)(d)(xiii) of the Constitution concerning dual citizenship and qualification to sit and vote in Parliament;

5. A request that the matter be referred to the Parliamentary Ethics and Privileges Committee established under Standing Order 118.

 Despite the seriousness of the constitutional and parliamentary issues raised, the Hon. Speaker declined permission for the privilege issue to be raised in Parliament.

It is respectfully submitted that this refusal has the effect of:

•  Preventing an elected Member of Parliament from exercising his parliamentary oversight function;

• Restricting parliamentary scrutiny over matters involving public finance and constitutional accountability;

•  Undermining the privileges of Members of Parliament to raise matters of urgent public importance;

•  Limiting institutional transparency concerning allegations involving senior state officials.

The right of parliamentarians to raise questions of privilege and matters relating to constitutional governance is an essential component of parliamentary democracy and legislative independence. The refusal to permit even the presentation or preliminary consideration of such a matter raises serious concerns regarding parliamentary accountability mechanisms in Sri Lanka.

Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Inter-Parliamentary Union:

1.Take cognizance of this matter as one affecting the rights and functions of Members of Parliament;

2.Seek clarification from the relevant parliamentary authorities in Sri Lanka regarding the grounds upon which the privilege motion was disallowed;

3.Consider whether the refusal is compatible with internationally recognised principles of parliamentary democracy, accountability, and freedom of parliamentary speech;

4. Encourage the Parliament of Sri Lanka to ensure fair and transparent procedures governing parliamentary privilege motions and constitutional oversight.

I further request that this communication be placed before the appropriate committee or mechanism within the IPU dealing with the rights and duties of parliamentarians.”

Continue Reading

News

Navin calls for formal alliance between UNP and SJB

Published

on

UNP Vice President and Kandy District Leader, Navin Dissanayake, on Saturday, stressed that any proposed merger between the UNP and the SJB must be carried out formally rather than in an ad hoc manner.

Addressing a media briefing in Kandy, Dissanayake said a structured framework was essential to ensure the successful reunification of the two parties ahead of future elections.

“A formal mechanism must be established for the unification of the UNP and the SJB. This process cannot be confined to personal verbal assurances given to suit individual interests. We must build a strong framework to contest future elections as a united force,” he said.

He added that the UNP could only regain political strength by reuniting with factions that had broken away from the party.

Dissanayake also claimed that the Government would be compelled to hold Provincial Council elections amid mounting international and domestic pressure.

“India is exerting pressure to conduct these elections, while the people in the North are also demanding governance under the Provincial Council system. They are awaiting the polls,” he said.

Announcing his own political intentions, Dissanayake said he hoped to contest as the Chief Ministerial candidate for the Central Province at the next Provincial Council election.

“I intend to contest as the Chief Ministerial candidate for the Central Province. Having served as a Governor, I understand the extent of service that can be delivered to the people through a Provincial Council,” he said.

Recalling the history of constitutional devolution, Dissanayake said his late father, Gamini Dissanayake, had played a significant role in the introduction of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka.

by SK Samaranayake

Continue Reading

Trending