Connect with us

Features

China’s Xi Jinping hosts a Summit of leaders of half the world, with a spectacular display of military force

Published

on

Putin, Modi and Xi

On September 1, The International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) based in The Hague, Netherlands, passed a resolution that “legal criteria have been met to establish Israel is committing genocide in Gaza”.

Israel’s conduct also meets the legal definition as laid out in the 1948 United Nations convention on genocide, which was adopted following the mass murder of Jews by Nazi Germany. The convention defines genocide as “crimes committed with intent to destroy, in whole or part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group”.

The IAGS recognize that while the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others taken hostage, was itself a war crime, “Israel’s response has not only been directed towards Hamas but has targeted Gaza’s entire (Palestinian) population”.

The IAGS note statements made by Israeli leaders, notably Prime Minister Netanyahu dehumanizing Palestinians in Gaza, “characterizing them all as the enemy”, with threats to “flatten Gaza and turn it into hell”. In fact, Netanyahu, in a recent interview with Fox News, stated that he intends to take full control of Gaza City immediately.

The Israeli Foreign Ministry has denied charges of genocide, stating that the IAGS report was based on lies and propaganda spread by Hamas and poor research, calling it an “embarrassment to the legal profession”; that Israel’s actions are justified as a means of self-defense, and Israel itself was the victim of genocide.

Since the end of World War II, Western Powers, notably the United Kingdom and the United States of America, have been rewriting history, using various artifices like the Balfour Declaration, the Nakba (catastrophe) of 1948, and a series of one-sided wars, which have led to the displacement and dispossession of millions of Palestinian people, and the creation of the land of Israel.

The ownership of this land is based on a divine promise made a few thousand years ago. Questions then arose about the identity of the God who made the promise, to which tribe/ethnic or religious group the promise was made, and even where the Promised Land was to be located.

The ownership of the Holy Land is the most disputed real estate on earth, where the ownership credentials of the occupants, the Palestinian people, are no longer even considered to be a part of the equation.

For example, Mormons, who categorize themselves as Christians, view the Salt Lake City Valley in Utah as a Promised Land (New Zion), promised to them by the reincarnation of Jesus Christ, Joseph Smith who organized The Church of Latter-day Saints in 1830. Even Jehovah’s Witnesses who delight us by knocking on our front door while we are watching our favourite TV program, sing the praises of an Earthly Paradise as their Promised Land, promised by their only God, Jehovah.

The name of the one and true God of Judaism and the Israelites is Yahweh, a variation of the spelling of Jehovah. The many Gods, worshiped by Christianity, therefore may be the same Almighty.

In fact, there are over 5,000 Gods or Groups of Gods worshiped by humanity. But be assured that the one or several Gods in your belief system is the Genuine Article.

The claim to the ownership of Israel by the Jewish people has the acceptance of all the Christian powers in the world. After all, the Jews were the sole occupants of the land millennia ago, when their God, who is the One and True God according to the First Christian Commandment, gave them the exclusive ownership of the land, as recorded in the Bible, the only Land Registry recognized throughout the western world, whose word is Universal Law. Today.

According to Genesis 15:18 and Joshua 1:4, “the land God gave to Israel included everything from the Nile River in Egypt to Lebanon (south to north) and everything from the Mediterranean Sea to the Euphrates River (west to east)”. According to this divine covenant, Israel is the legal owner, in addition to the land they presently occupy, of the West Bank and Gaza (occupied by the Palestinians and now under siege by the marauding Israel Defense Force), plus some of Egypt and Syria, plus all of Jordan, plus some of Saudi Arabia and Iraq. “God has given His Word that the nation of Israel will never cease as long as the sun still shines by the day and the moon and stars still shine by night”. (Jeremiah 31:35-37). An inviolable law, as He alone has control of the light switch.

Thus, in the eyes of the Jewish God, and those of the Israeli radical right, led by war criminal Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, “Israel currently possesses only a fraction of the land that God has promised; the rest of their inheritance awaits the return of the Messiah, Jesus Christ”.

Or the successful conclusion of the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people, Whoever or whichever comes first.

The genocide of the Palestinian people has been a long and cruelly arduous process since World War II. Although Palestinians have been the occupants of the land of Palestine in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip for centuries, the land has been under the stewardship of the Ottoman Empire since 1516. The Ottoman Empire was dismantled during World War I, and in 1920, the League of Nations granted the administration of Palestine to the British government.

In 1947, the British handed over the Palestine question to the United Nations. The UN proposed the termination of the British mandate for Palestine and recommended the partition of Palestine into two states, one Arab, the other Jewish. The Plan was heavily weighted in favour of the Jews, and was rejected by the Palestinians who owned more than 70% of the land at the time.

The failure of the UN resolution led to the Palestinian War of Independence, the Nakba (catastrophe), which had decimated the Palestinian population by 1948. The Jews had the complete support of the western powers, especially the United States of America, who were desperate to salve their guilty conscience resulting in the holocaust, the Nazi extermination of six million Jews and six million more of people of “impure” blood, and to provide a permanent home for the Jews.

Of course, the persecution and extermination of Jews, through Pogroms, had been the national sport, though on a smaller scale, of many European nations for centuries. Hitler just took this hatred of “the Jewish vermin” to its logical conclusion. There was also a major political movement in the United States in the 1930s, led by celebrities like Charles Lindbergh and Henry Ford, which supported the anti-Semitic policies of Hitler, and privately shared Hitler’s concept of the Final Solution, the extermination of the Jewish race.

The Hitler-friendly Republican Party even fielded a lifelong Democrat, Wendell Willkie as its candidate in the 1940 US presidential election. Willkie was persuaded that the US should stay out of the war against fascism, under the now famous Republican banner, “America First”. He was thankfully defeated by Franklin D. Roosevelt, who embarked on an unprecedented third presidential term. The United States entered the war against the Axis Powers of Germany, Italy and Japan, which was crucial to the victory of the Allies.

After decades of confrontation, the Palestinians find themselves today as a slave state, completely besieged by the Israelis, supported with almost limitless financial and military aid from the United States of America, including, as is an open secret, nuclear weaponry. In fact, the genocide and/or the displacement of the Palestinian people are foregone conclusions, and have been since 1948.

Two war criminals have similar dreams of territorial expansion, one fully backed by the United States of America. Netanyahu dreams of God’s original promise, as listed above, of a Greater Israel, “the land God gave to Israel included everything from the Nile River in Egypt to Lebanon (south to north) and everything from the Mediterranean Sea to the Euphrates River (west to east)”.

And murderous Russian dictator, Vladimir Putin, President Trump’s erstwhile best buddy, has dreams of the resumption of the old Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics as, once again, a World Superpower. The invasion and annexation of Ukraine is but the first step towards the fruition of that dream.

And Donald Trump looks on, lying to himself and fooling no one else bar his fast dwindling “base”, that neither of these wars would have started had he been president.

These were Biden’s wars. It was Biden who rushed to Israel directly after the Hamas atrocities of October 7, 2023, hugged Netanyahu and assured him that Israel will never be alone. Since then, the Biden administration has been continuing to supply Israel with financial and military aid to slake Netanyahu’s unquenchable thirst for revenge after the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks.

There has been no change in US financial and military aid with the Trump administration. In fact, Trump is encouraging the “ethnic cleansing” of the Gaza Strip, so that the United States could acquire the land and transform it into a coastal resort on the lines of the French Riviera.

And Putin would never have dared to invade Ukraine had he been president. He had too much respect, even admiration, for Trump. It was entirely Biden’s weakness that encouraged Putin to invade Ukraine.

After all, during his eight months of presidency, Trump has already mediated and brought peace to at least seven wars, even in countries whose names he couldn’t pronounce and was totally unaware as to where they were located. Wars in countries where wars are still in progress, others where peace had been negotiated without any mediation from Trump.

The crucial “war” he stopped was the dispute between India and Pakistan, which Trump says could easily have led to World War III, as both nations had nuclear capability, had he not taken immediate mediatory action.

A spokesman for the Prime Minister of India immediately issued a statement that the Indian government had no communication with President Trump or any US official before, during or after the four-day dispute with Pakistan in Kashmir, which was settled by mutual mediation by the combatants.

Two weeks ago, Trump made a last-minute attempt to mediate in the continuing Russian invasion of Ukraine, when he convened a lavish Red-Carpet Summit with Putin in Alaska. A Summit which did not include Ukraine’s President Zelensky, the victim of Russian aggression. Trump gave Putin the Royal treatment on his first visit to US soil in seven years, in spite of the fact that Putin had completely ignored Trump’s earlier ultimatums for the cessation of hostilities against Ukraine. Ultimatums which came and went with no action against Russia but words of “disappointment” about his friend.

In Alaska, Trump gave another ultimatum to Putin, that unless Putin calls for a ceasefire meeting with President Zelensky within two weeks, he will take serious economic action and secondary sanctions against Russia.

Putin’s response was predictable to everyone but Trump. He unleashed a flurry of bombs on Kiev on his return to Moscow. The September 5 ultimatum came and went with not even a comment from Trump, perhaps more “disappointment”.

Putin showed his utter contempt for Trump when he gave Trump the giant middle finger by attending a Summit of the leaders of half the population of the world, convened in the port city of Yianjin by Chinese leader, Xi Jinping. Putin was the Chief Guest and Xi Jinping had invited Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, North Korean strongman Kim and most of the other leaders of the world. The Summit was followed by a spectacular display of Chinese military power, which made Trump’s parade in Washington DC on his birthday in June look like a drill of the Royal College Cadet Troop!

Trump, furious that the strongmen friends of his delusional imagination, Putin and Kim, were playing footsie with Xi, posted this petulant message on Truth Social:

“Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against the United States of America”.

The conspiracy was never against the United States of America. These hardened, ruthless tyrants were just completing the job God started of making a monkey out of Trump. Everyone in the United States of America, indeed the world, were perfectly aware that strongmen like Putin, Xi and Kim, with decades of experience of political repression, were playing Trump like a fiddle.

President Xi’s Summit was a personal affront to Trump, with a public display of unity of all the adversaries of the United States. The Summit also underscored the narcissistic futility of Trump’s attempts to subject professional autocrats to his phony art-of-the deal charms with the object of achieving any kind of diplomatic success.

Most significantly, the Summit and military parade provided a showcase of the ascendancy of China as a Superpower, propelled by Trump’s inept diplomacy and President Xi’s astute statecraft.

But in his heart of hearts, Trump would have given up the Epstein files to have been included as a participant in the Summit of this Dream Team of Dictators. In his insane mind, this is the world of his wildest hallucinations.

by Vijaya Chandrasoma ✍️



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Cinnamon Tea Stick project aims to reprice Lanka’s tea economy 

Published

on

On a humid tea-growing slope in Sri Lanka’s south-western highlands, where mist drifts over the edges of the Sinharaja Forest Reserve, a quiet experiment is attempting to reimagine one of the country’s most enduring export lifelines.

For generations, tea has been both livelihood and legacy for thousands of smallholders across Sri Lanka. Yet beneath the global reputation of Ceylon Tea lies a persistent grievance. Growers say their earnings have remained largely stagnant even as value-added tea products fetch premium prices in overseas markets.

It is against this backdrop that entrepreneur Sarathchandra Ramanayake is promoting a new product he believes could shift more value back to the farmer. The product is called the Cinnamon Green Tea Stick, designed as a portable, bag-free infusion format aimed at premium and health-conscious consumers.

Sarathchandra Ramanayake

World Tea Day, observed on the 21st of this month, adds context to a wider debate about who benefits most from the global tea economy, the planter or the processor.

Ramanayake’s proposal is ambitious. He argues that while tea leaves currently fetch modest farm-gate prices, a redesigned value chain built around specialty processing could generate significantly higher returns. In his model, a kilo of finished product could translate into substantially improved earnings for growers, particularly through export-oriented niche markets.

He said the aim is to move away from bulk commodity pricing and toward value-driven tea consumption. The concept replaces conventional tea bags with a solid stick format infused with cinnamon, sourced from Sri Lanka’s spice-growing regions.

The Kalawana area in the Ratnapura District, where small tea holdings dominate the agricultural landscape, has been identified as a potential production base. In these communities, tea remains the backbone of rural livelihoods and sustains entire families.

Ramanayake said the initiative is not intended to replace traditional supply chains but to complement them. Farmers would continue supplying factories while also contributing selected high-quality leaves for the new production process.

Regulatory approval has been obtained under handmade tea production guidelines from the Tea Board, and a patent application has been submitted under intellectual property provisions.

Early signs of commercial interest are emerging. According to Ramanayake, small export orders have already been received from markets including the United Kingdom, suggesting tentative international interest in the product’s positioning.

The project also highlights long-standing structural issues within Sri Lanka’s tea economy, where value addition, branding and export margins are often concentrated far away from the farmer who produces the leaf.

Ramanayake’s pitch is both economic and social. By incorporating cinnamon, another of Sri Lanka’s globally recognised agricultural exports, the product also seeks to strengthen rural spice growers and diversify farm-level income.

Still, questions remain over whether such boutique innovations can meaningfully shift earnings at scale in an industry shaped by established auction systems and large processors.

For now, the Cinnamon Green Tea Stick sits at the intersection of tradition and innovation, carrying an ambition to reprice the leaf, reframe the farmer’s role and reimagine Sri Lanka’s iconic tea industry for a changing global market.

Text and Pix By Upendra Priyankara Jathungama ✍️

Continue Reading

Features

Admitting a New Investor – Lessons from Dankotuwa – Episode 5

Published

on

LESSONS FROM MY CAREER: SYNTHESISING MANAGEMENT THEORY WITH PRACTICE – PART 37

In today’s episode, I will relate several incidents from my final years at Dankotuwa Porcelain and the lessons I learned from them. Looking back now, I realise that these years taught me not only about management, finance, labour relations, and corporate survival, but also about human emotions, loyalty, fear, stubbornness, and resilience. They also marked the gradual end of a very long line of executive appointments that had consumed most of my adult life.

The contract labour issue

Because of the uncertainty of export demand, we had adopted a flexible system of recruiting some employees on fixed-term contracts or through labour suppliers. However, unlike many organisations, we took great care to ensure that these employees were not treated as second-class workers. In practice, they enjoyed almost all the benefits of permanent employees. If they served beyond a stipulated period, they were entitled to gratuity as well. We also had to comply with stringent labour and ethical compliance standards imposed by our foreign buyers, many of whom conducted regular audits.

A group of these employees had completed their two-year fixed-term contracts. Due to the uncertain external environment and fluctuating orders, we were unable to offer permanency. Instead, we offered another fixed-term contract for two years.

To our surprise, all of them refused and wanted permanent jobs which were too risky to offer in a volatile environment.

Despite repeated discussions and assurances from the Head of Human Resources, they insisted on nothing short of permanency. They would not budge. Finally, and very reluctantly, I instructed security not to permit them into the premises from the following day, because technically their contracts had expired.

The next morning, the entire group gathered outside the gate. They remained there until around ten o’clock before dispersing. Later, I heard that they were gathering at the residence of a Member of Parliament who lived nearby. This continued for several days.

The MP telephoned me repeatedly and urged me to make them permanent. I refused. The company simply could not absorb that level of rigidity at such an uncertain time. Then matters took an ugly turn.

One morning, some members of the group harassed the Chief Operating Officer while he was entering the premises. They sat on the bonnet of his car and forcibly opened the door. Security identified the main culprits immediately. I made up my mind that, regardless of future developments, those directly involved in intimidation and misconduct would never be taken back.

After nearly a month, the MP contacted me again. He said the matter had become a stalemate and that the group was now willing to accept the original contract terms. I replied immediately: “We now have only one-year contracts available. Anyone interested may report for work.” Some accepted. Others stubbornly refused.

Later, a few of those who had not been re-employed met me privately. They admitted they had been inexperienced young men and women who had merely followed the advice of union leaders. They confessed that it was the unions that had encouraged them to reject the original offer and even urged them to obstruct the COO’s vehicle. They pleaded with me to show mercy, saying they had been misled.

I genuinely felt sorry for them. But I stood firm.

Management sometimes requires compassion, but it also requires consistency. If discipline collapses, organisations collapse soon after.

The incident reinforced one of the most important lessons I learned in labour relations: leaders must distinguish between firmness and cruelty. A manager who constantly bends under pressure may temporarily avoid conflict, but in the long run loses credibility and control.

Thoughts of Retirement

By this time, I was just past 60 years of age. The stress of corporate life had begun taking a visible toll on my health. I often recalled my earlier days at the Employees’ Trust Fund under President Ranasinghe Premadasa, when relentless pressure had caused severe gastritis and ulcers. I still remember how those symptoms vanished within days of leaving the ETF.

I began dreaming of retirement, peace, and perhaps a quieter life devoted to agriculture, which had always fascinated me. But the Japanese directors would hear none of it.

They told me that in Japan, life begins at sixty. They pointed out that many Chairmen—Kaicho, as they are called in Japan—continue well into their seventies. One of the local directors was even sent to meet me personally and persuade me to abandon thoughts of retirement.

So I remained. The COLA problem

One of our biggest internal challenges was the Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) system that had been introduced years earlier. During periods of high inflation, it spiralled out of control. In some months, increases amounted to nearly one thousand rupees—a very substantial figure at that time.

No other industry was granting such increases monthly.

The situation became unsustainable. Worse still, the COLA had been incorporated into calculations for overtime, provident fund contributions, and other benefits. The compounding effect was enormous. We were unable to correct this mistake at the current time.

After prolonged discussions with the unions, we finally managed to restructure the arrangement. The frozen COLA and increases were consolidated into the basic salary structure.

I regarded this as a major breakthrough.

The Labour Department admitted privately that mistakes had been made by the company when the scheme was originally designed, but said nothing could legally be altered retrospectively.

This episode taught me another important lesson: poorly designed compensation systems can haunt organisations for decades. A Board and Chairman must examine compensation schemes very carefully before implementation. A benefit introduced during prosperous times may become a crushing burden during difficult periods.

The search for a new investor

The Japanese shareholders eventually made it clear that they were unwilling to invest further funds into the company. A new investor had to be found if the company was to survive.

Once again, my retirement plans were postponed. The Board insisted that I remain until a suitable investor was secured.

One prospective investor came close to finalising a deal but withdrew suddenly due to uncertainty surrounding the GSP+ concession. Another investor emerged later, but with very strict conditions. One of their key demands was a freeze on salaries and allowances for three years. Negotiations with the unions dragged on for days and weeks. At times, it appeared we were on the verge of success. Then suddenly the unions would withdraw cooperation.

Meanwhile, our financial position was deteriorating rapidly. The Head of Finance confirmed in writing that we could no longer meet obligations as they fell due.

I realised we had reached a dangerous legal and ethical point.

Under the Companies Act, if directors continue operating while knowing the company is insolvent, they may become personally liable for further erosion of assets. This was no longer merely a corporate issue—it threatened my own personal assets accumulated over a lifetime.

I informed the Board that we had no option but to seriously consider winding up the company. The local directors agreed. The Japanese directors requested one week to obtain instructions from Tokyo.

Because of Stock Exchange requirements, we made a disclosure to the Colombo Stock Exchange regarding the possible winding up.

That announcement changed everything.

Copies were displayed throughout the factory and office. Over the weekend, I was inundated with telephone calls from employees.

Some pleaded emotionally with me to save the company. Many had spent their entire working lives there and felt deeply attached to the factory. One group telephoned to say they were conducting a Bodhi pooja at a temple for the company’s survival. Another group called from a church where special prayers were being offered.

Those calls affected me deeply. To all of them, however, I gave the same answer:

“The future of the company is in your hands. If the investor’s conditions are accepted, the company can survive.”

The Minister’s intervention

On Sunday, I received a call from Minister Anura Priyadarshana Yapa asking me to come to his residence immediately.

I went with the COO and found that he had also summoned the General Manager of Noritake Porcelain, whom he knew personally. After hearing my explanation, the Minister called for the union representatives as well.

We waited several hours for them to arrive. During that waiting period, the Minister spoke candidly about politics, privatisation, nationalisation, and the mistakes successive governments had made. It was an unexpectedly educational afternoon.

When the unions finally arrived, the Minister was direct and blunt.

He told them that many workers came from his electorate and that if the factory closed, they should not expect him to find employment for them elsewhere.

The mood changed.

After lengthy discussion, the unions agreed in principle, though they requested a small amendment to the proposed terms. The Minister supported their request.

I said I could not promise anything but would speak to the investor. Fortunately, after difficult negotiations, the investor agreed.

On Tuesday, we met at the Labour Department and signed the settlement. We then informed the stock exchange that an agreement had been successfully reached.

The sense of relief was immense.

The SEC hearing

Even after securing the investor, another obstacle remained. Since the investment involved a fresh issue of shares, approval from the Securities and Exchange Commission of Sri Lanka was required.

That process became another nightmare.

The agreed share price had been based on the prevailing market price, but speculation had driven the market upward rapidly. During the hearing, I faced intense questioning regarding the pricing.

I explained that we could not ethically change the agreed terms after giving our word. More importantly, I stressed that this was the only serious investor available. Losing them could doom the company.

I made a detailed presentation supported by charts and figures. I also spoke frankly.

I admitted that I was suffering sleepless nights worrying about the company’s future.

After the hearing, I stepped outside exhausted and had barely begun packing my laptop when I was summoned back in.

As I entered, the Chairman smiled and said: “Mr. Wijesinha, you can sleep tonight. We have approved your proposal.”

And indeed, that night, I slept peacefully.

Retirement at last

The new investors eventually assumed control. Initially there were difficulties because they came from strong financial and investment backgrounds and required time to understand manufacturing operations and export markets. I personally introduced them to foreign buyers to help them understand the realities of the industry.

The Japanese shareholders became minority stakeholders.

At last, I felt the time had truly come to retire. The new investors requested that I remain for another year to help stabilise the transition. I agreed.

Finally, on June 30, 2012, I retired with mixed feelings.

I had enjoyed the challenges enormously, but they had undeniably affected my health. Yet the experiences proved invaluable later when I served on many Boards. I realised that Dankotuwa had excellent systems, disciplined processes, and an outstanding product. The difficulty was not inefficiency. It was surviving intense global competition in a highly unforgiving industry.

Looking back now, I realise that management theories often sound neat and logical in classrooms and seminars. Real life is rarely so tidy. In practice, leadership involves balancing compassion with discipline, ethics with survival, and long-term strategy with short-term crises.

Perhaps the greatest lesson I learned at Dankotuwa was this: organisations are not saved by systems alone. They are saved by people—their sacrifices, emotions, loyalty, courage, and sometimes even their prayers.

More lessons from my Board experiences will follow in future episodes.

(Sunil G. Wijesinha is a Consultant on Productivity and Japanese Management Techniques

Former Chairman / Director of several listed and unlisted companies

Recipient of the APO Regional Award for Promoting Productivity in the Asia-Pacific Region

Recipient of the Order of the Rising Sun, Gold and Silver Rays – Government of Japan

Email: bizex.seminarsandconsulting@gmail.com)

By Sunil G. Wijesinha ✍️

Continue Reading

Features

A Journey Through Time: The Dilmah Tea & Cinnamon Experience at Genesis

Published

on

Expert-led Dilmah tea tasting

At Dilmah, we believe that every cup of tea and every hint of cinnamon carries a story worth telling. The Dilmah Tea & Cinnamon Experience was created to share that story, inviting visitors to discover the heritage, craftsmanship, and culture behind two of Sri Lanka’s most treasured gifts to the world.

Located at Genesis, the original Dilmah office in Maligawatte, the Experience is designed not as a traditional museum, but as a journey. From the moment guests step in, they are guided through an engaging narrative that brings together history, people, and place in a way that is both simple and meaningful.

Discover how tea is manufactured

The journey begins with the origins of tea and cinnamon. Many visitors are surprised to learn about Ceylon Cinnamon, known as true cinnamon, which is native to Sri Lanka and very different from the more common cassia found elsewhere. Its history dates back over 2500 years, and it was highly prized by ancient civilisations such as the Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans, at times valued even more than gold. Its extraordinary worth also drew colonial powers to the island, with the Portuguese and later the Dutch seeking control of Ceylon largely to dominate the lucrative cinnamon trade. It is often a fascinating discovery that transforms how one views a familiar spice.

Savour 11 unique tea varieties

Tea’s story stretches back to ancient China, where it was first discovered and cherished, before making its way to Europe and Britain, where it grew immensely popular. It was this rising demand in Britain that ultimately paved the way for tea to be introduced to Ceylon. The British had established coffee on the island, even as they were introducing tea in India, and Ceylon soon became a globally renowned coffee producer. This success, however, was short lived, as a devastating leaf disease destroyed the crop, bringing widespread economic hardship. From this period of uncertainty emerged tea, with the pioneering work of James Taylor laying the foundation for what would become one of the world’s most celebrated teas.

To bring this history to life, the Experience includes a short and informative video that sets the stage for what follows. Guests are then taken through the tea manufacturing process using miniature factory equipment, allowing them to clearly visualise each step from leaf to cup. A highlight for many is the opportunity to participate in a guided tea tasting and grading session. This hands-on experience introduces guests to the nuances of aroma, colour, and flavour, offering insight into the skill required to assess fine tea. The journey continues with a curated sampling of Ceylon Tea across Sri Lanka’s diverse elevations, from low grown to mid grown and high grown teas, each with its own unique character.

Guided walkthrough on Ceylon Tea

Ceylon Cinnamon harvesting process image wall

Explore Ceylon Cinnamon with a live display

Artistic showcase with the story and value of Ceylon Tea & Cinnamon

The Experience is further enriched by a thoughtfully designed food pairing. Guests are invited to enjoy a selection of savoury and sweet items, each paired with a specific tea to highlight complementary flavours. It is a simple yet refined way to appreciate tea in a new context.

Importantly, the Dilmah Tea & Cinnamon Experience also answers a growing need among Destination Management Companies (DMCs) and inbound travel specialists seeking authentic, meaningful, and accessible experiences within Colombo for their guests. In a city where many itineraries are limited to short sightseeing stops or shopping visits, the Experience offers something far more enriching, an immersive journey into Sri Lanka’s heritage, flavour, and craftsmanship, conveniently located within the city itself. Whether for leisure travellers, special interest groups, cruise passengers, corporate delegations, or high-value FIT travellers, the Experience provides a thoughtfully curated cultural encounter that combines storytelling, sensory engagement, culinary pairing, retail, and hospitality in one destination. Its central location at Genesis by Dilmah also makes it an ideal addition to Colombo itineraries for guests looking to experience the essence of Sri Lanka beyond the conventional

Throughout the Experience, sensory elements play an important role. The gentle aromas of tea and spice, the textures, and the visual storytelling combine to create an immersive and memorable visit. At the same time, the narrative highlights the importance of sustainability and respect for nature, as well as the communities that sustain these industries.

The Experience is curated by David Colin Thomé, Editor of the highly acclaimed Dilmah History of Ceylon Tea website, (www.historyofceylontea.com), one of the largest single industry websites in the world, together with veteran tea planter and former head of Kahawatte Plantations PLC, Anura Gunasekera. David was also among Dilmah’s original tea tasters at the time of the brand’s launch and trained under our founder Merrill J Fernando, bringing rare depth, authenticity, and first hand experience to the Experience.

Designed to be accessible to all, the Experience uses clear and simple language, ensuring that both enthusiasts and newcomers can engage with and enjoy the journey. It is an invitation to explore, learn, and appreciate.

In a rapidly changing world, the Dilmah Tea & Cinnamon Experience offers a moment to pause and reconnect with what truly matters, heritage, craftsmanship, and identity. It is a celebration of Sri Lanka’s legacy and a tribute to the stories behind every cup of tea and every touch of cinnamon.

We invite travellers, tour operators, and hospitality partners alike to discover a uniquely Sri Lankan experience in the heart of Colombo, for inquires please call +94 71 217 2238 (News release from Dilmah)

Continue Reading

Trending