Connect with us

News

‘Living with Omicron does not mean doing nothing about Omicron’- WHO official

Published

on

Booster- hesitancy is largely due to misinformation and disinformation that has been floated

Sri Lankan adverse event monitoring system is a regional model

Vaccine hesitancy is a serious threat to global health

The world still ‘has a job to finish’ in terms of bridging vaccine inequality – WHO special envoys

BY RANDIMA ATTYGALLE

Despite the availability of an abundant vaccine supply against COVID-19, less than 35% of Sri Lankans over 12 years have taken the booster dose. Health officials are concerned about this low level of booster intake in a context where more than 95% Lankans over 12 years have received the first dose and nearly 80% of them have also received the second jab.

The floating of misinformation and disinformation both through mainstream and social media is largely attributed to this. Speaking to the Sunday Island, Dr. Palitha Abeykoon, WHO Director-General’s Special Envoy (for South East Asian region for COVID-19) said that Sri Lanka has been one of the most ‘vaccine-compliant countries’ and therefore the vaccine hesitancy which is encountered right now comes as a surprise.

“Even before the advent of the COVID pandemic, in 2019 WHO ranked vaccine hesitancy (which is either the delay in the acceptance or refusal to vaccinate despite the availability of vaccine services) as a serious threat to global health.”

Omicron variant is far more transmissible than the earlier variants and therefore its spread is very rapid. “With the evidence that we have where the vaccine effectiveness seeming to wane slowly over a few months, getting a booster dose makes perfect scientific sense, particularly to prevent serious illness and death. Still many people do not seem to understand the difference between getting infected and the consequences,” remarked Dr. Abeykoon.

The vaccines as the public health official explained, does not prevent infection per se directly and even a vaccinated person can become COVID positive. “But the big difference is that if one has taken two doses and a booster at the correct time one will have the confidence that serious illness will not follow. The growing global evidence is supporting this position of the effectiveness of the vaccines and the booster taken after a certain interval from the second dose.”

The belief that Omicron variant is mild and therefore it is perhaps better to have Omicron and develop natural immunity than getting vaccinated is a risky attitude to have warns Dr. Abeykoon.

“The evidence is Omicron is possibly less severe than Delta but its higher transmissibility will give larger numbers of infections. This would lead to larger numbers getting serious illness and the pressure on health systems will increase. The number of deaths will also increase. Now the evidence that WHO has is that the numbers getting complications and dying are significantly higher for those who did not have at least two doses of vaccine. In Sri Lanka too there has been a near 30% increase in the deaths in the past weeks. Therefore still vaccination is a primary need along with the basic public health and social protection measures.”

Living with Omicron does not mean doing nothing about Omicron, reiterates the WHO official. Since people seem to get infected even after the booster, many question the need for it which is unwise thinking he said. “Getting infected per se is not as the same as getting seriously ill or dying.”

Another myth to be debunked is that the booster has many side effects and results in death. “The risk assessments done have given no such evidence to prove this. The Sri Lankan adverse event monitoring system is excellent; it is in fact a regional model and this too has no evidence to support this misconception.

“Some say that they are being used as guinea pigs here to test these vaccines. The vaccine trials and the follow-up have been going on for a couple of years for most vaccines and therefore this allegation is baseless. Of course being newer vaccines the WHO has advised close monitoring of the post vaccination situation globally,” Dr. Abeykoon remarked.

The fear of infertility is another major misconception to be debunked said the Consultant. There are also certain cultural and religious beliefs which preclude some wanting to take injections. “Getting vaccinated is a choice one makes but we have situations when there is a conflict of personal choice and public good. There are technical and ethical issues contained in this situation.”

In the region Sri Lanka already stands out as a leader in COVID-19 vaccination programme which further consolidates our ‘vaccination tradition’ Dr. Abeykoon pointed out. “There are a few countries that have not been able to cover 40% of the population with two doses, mainly due to supply and delivery issues. In fact we have already surpassed the WHO June global target of 60%.”

To date, and despite WHO’s endless efforts with Member States to deliver lifesaving COVID-19 vaccines to the world’s least-developed countries, through COVAX, particularly, as well as other facilities, there are still 83 Member States which did not reach the target of vaccinating 40% of their populations by the end of 2021.

The latest communiqué by the WHO Director General Dr. Tedros’s Special Envoys for COIVD-19 notes ‘a persistent lack of solidarity accentuating the inequities and unfairness. And this means that even more countries are likely to fall short of the goal of vaccinating 70% of their population by mid-2022.’

On a positive note, Sri Lankan management of the pandemic and people’s compliance with public health measures have been laudable in contrast with some of the Western countries, pointed out the WHO official. “We also recognize the advent of COVID-19 fatigue among many groups and the social and economic implications that have hurt most groups. But the fact that they still, by and large, adhere to the basic prevention measure is heartening.”



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Pakistan naval trio arrives at Colombo Port

Published

on

By

In a display of naval tradition, the Sri Lanka Navy formally welcomed the Pakistan Navy Ships ‘PNS Taimur’ and ‘PNS Aslat’, alongside the submarine ‘PNS/M Hangor’, arrived at the Port of Colombo on 01 Jun 26.

The Pakistan naval units made port in Sri Lanka for a goodwill visit as well as replenishment.

The visiting naval assets are commanded by a lineup of naval officers, with Captain Niamat Saeed Khan (‘PNS Taimur’), Captain Nadir Mateen Afridi (‘PNS Aslat’), and Captain Uzair Farooq (‘PNS/M Hangor’).

During their stay in Sri Lanka, the crew members of the visiting ships and submarine are scheduled to tour several key locations across the country.

Concluding the visit, the Pakistan naval units will engage in a Passage Exercise (PASSEX) with the Sri Lanka Navy off the west coast.

Continue Reading

News

IMF turning a blind eye to NPP corruption: Opp.

Published

on

Patali / G. L. Peiris

The People’s United Opposition yesterday (01) alleged that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) had turned a blind eye to serious corruption allegations against the NPP government and was going ahead with the USD 2.9 bn loan in terms of the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) programme, finalised in 2023.

Addressing the regular weekly media briefing at the Flower Road Office of former President Ranil Wickremesinghe, former Ministers Prof. G. L. Peiris and Patali Champika Ranawaka questioned the failure on the part of the IMF to act in spite of the NPP government engaging in open corrupt practices, contrary to the terms and conditions of the agreement/understanding with the lending agency.

The media was told that the IMF couldn’t absolve itself of the responsibility for the actions of the government, especially because Sri Lanka, experiencing severe economic difficulties, was receiving loans from IMF at over 8%. Ex-parliamentarian Ranawaka pointed out that what Sri Lanka received from the IMF was not JAICA-type soft loans and the country was further burdened.

Prof. Peiris and Ranawaka alleged that the IMF appeared to have chosen not to take up the serious and growing accusations, particularly over coal and fuel scams that caused massive losses. They claimed the government had taken decisions at the expense of the country but for the benefit of certain businessmen close to them.

Both Prof. Peiris and Ranawaka explained the circumstances under which certain persons and companies received privileged status to import very costly vehicles and even helicopters and aircraft as the government

wasted precious foreign reserves for the benefit of friends. Ranawaka named two companies that benefited from government actions while alleging that those engaged in lucrative coal and fuel business made a killing.

They pointed out that the IMF released the latest USD 695 mn amidst stepped up serious allegations against the government. (SF)

Continue Reading

News

Shavendra tells Beijing meet Sri Lanka should not become an arena for geopolitical rivalry among major powers

Published

on

Shavendra Silva

Former Commander of Sri Lanka Army with possibly the best battlefield record, having recovered the most amount of enemy occupied territory by troops he led from the front in the Vanni theatre of operations (2007-2009), General Shavendra Silva recently discussed growing challenges faced by smaller countries, like Sri Lanka, in what he called the evolving global environment.

Stressing that responsibilities must be shared across all states, the former Commander of the Sri Lanka Army told the 5th edition of the Wanshou Dialogue on Global Security in Beijing: “Major powers bear a special responsibility to exercise strategic restraint, avoid coercive practices, uphold international law, and contribute toward global stability rather than fragmentation.

Emerging and middle powers have an increasingly important role as bridge builders promoting dialogue, cooperation, and institutional reform.

For countries such as Sri Lanka, the path forward lies in principled and balanced diplomacy.

This requires maintaining constructive relations with all nations while safeguarding sovereignty, strategic independence, and national interests.

Sri Lanka has consistently maintained that its territory should not become an arena for geopolitical rivalry or military confrontation among larger powers.

Instead, our focus remains on strengthening national resilience through economic development, institutional stability, maritime awareness, modern defence capabilities, and agile diplomacy.

Credible domestic institutions, accountable governance, and national cohesion ultimately strengthen sovereignty while reducing opportunities for external interference.”

Referring to his service as Ambassador and Deputy Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the UN in New York, General Silva said that his engagements at the UN and other international forums reinforced the importance of defending national interests while remaining committed to reconciliation, development, and peaceful coexistence.

The celebrated battlefield commander discussed the transformation of global security, the future direction of the international order and the responsibilities of states in this transitional era. Silva said: “Today, security threats extend far beyond conventional warfare.

Cyber threats, terrorism, disinformation, economic coercion, artificial intelligence, and the weaponisation of technology increasingly influence global stability. At the same time, climate change, pandemics, food insecurity, and economic disruptions have demonstrated how closely national security and human security are now interconnected.

For Sri Lanka, located at the centre of the Indian Ocean along one of the world’s most important maritime trade routes, these developments carry direct strategic significance. Sri Lanka’s own experience offers valuable lessons.

The defeat of the LTTE, in 2009 demonstrated the importance of decisive state action against terrorism, while also revealing how modern conflicts become internationalised through financing networks, propaganda, illicit arms flows, and external geopolitical pressures.

The post-conflict period further reinforced the importance of reconciliation, economic recovery, institutional rebuilding, and long-term national resilience.

Smaller states increasingly face pressures arising from great-power rivalry, economic dependency, and strategic competition.

Sri Lanka has, therefore, consistently sought to maintain strategic balance while safeguarding sovereignty and constructive engagement with all partners.

China has remained an important development and economic partner for Sri Lanka over many decades. The relationship, strengthened through the 1952 Rubber-Rice Pact, expanded significantly in the post-war period through cooperation in infrastructure, connectivity, logistics, energy, and economic recovery. Projects associated with the Belt and Road Initiative have contributed to Sri Lanka’s development, regional connectivity, and post-crisis resilience. China also extended support during the COVID-19 pandemic and Sri Lanka’s recent economic stabilisation efforts.

The future international order must be shaped not by confrontation or exclusive blocs, but through pragmatic cooperation, institutional reform, and balanced multilateral engagement.

International institutions, particularly the United Nations system, must evolve to better reflect contemporary geopolitical realities and the growing voice of the Global South.

Without greater inclusivity and legitimacy, multilateral institutions risk losing effectiveness in addressing increasingly complex global challenges.

Equally important is preserving a rules based maritime order grounded in international law, particularly the principles of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

The international community must also establish clearer norms governing emerging technologies, cyber operations, artificial intelligence, autonomous weapons systems, and outer space security.

Sri Lanka’s recent economic stabilisation efforts further demonstrated that internal resilience is essential for maintaining strategic autonomy and an independent foreign policy.

It is also an opportunity to build a more inclusive, balanced, and resilient international order capable of responding to the realities of the 21st century.

Continue Reading

Trending