News
PSM raises concerns over Indian involvement in Lanka’s digital identity card project
The Peoples Struggle Movement has issued an open letter to all Members of Parliament, urging them to reconsider the government’s decision to allow an Indian company to take charge of issuing Sri Lanka’s new digital identity cards.
The letter, signed by Wasantha Mudalige, Member of the National Executive Committee of the People’s Struggle Movement, expresses serious concerns about the implications for democratic rights, national security, and sovereignty.
The letter references a statement made by Minister Vijitha Herath, revealing that the Sri Lankan government is finalizing an agreement with India that would entrust the power to issue digital identity cards to an Indian company. This agreement is expected to be formalized in January 2025. The Peoples Struggle Movement warns that this deal poses significant risks, including potential threats to the nation’s security and the privacy of its citizens.
A key point raised in the letter is the historical context of biometric data collection in Sri Lanka. The current national identity card system, which includes basic information like name, address, and date of birth, was amended in 2015 to incorporate biometric data, including fingerprints, facial recognition, and retinal scans. This move, according to the letter, marks a significant shift in the treatment of personal data, a matter that has long been protected by democratic principles and human rights.
The Peoples Struggle Movement highlights the legal and ethical concerns surrounding the collection and storage of biometric data, noting that under Sri Lanka’s existing laws, the government can only collect such data with explicit court approval. The letter argues that handing over the responsibility of managing such sensitive information to a foreign entity could lead to severe consequences, including potential misuse and breaches of privacy.
Additionally, the letter points to the role of Indian companies in the tender process for the digital identity project. Despite objections, the government has continued to push for Indian companies to handle the biometric data, with an initial tender issued in May 2023 that restricted applications to Indian firms. Two Indian companies, Madras Security Printers and Protein Technologies, have been shortlisted, despite concerns over the former’s past controversies. The project is expected to cost around 41.09 billion Sri Lankan rupees, with India contributing 22.33 billion rupees.
The letter also draws attention to statements made by India’s High Commissioner in Sri Lanka, Santosh Jha, who indicated that an Indian company would be awarded the tender, despite setbacks in the previous tender process. This has raised questions about India’s influence on Sri Lanka’s decision-making regarding its national identity system.
The Peoples Struggle Movement stresses that no other country has allowed a foreign nation to control its citizens’ personal data to this extent. The group warns that this could undermine Sri Lanka’s sovereignty and public safety, with the potential for data manipulation or misuse by foreign powers.
In closing, the Peoples Struggle Movement calls on Members of Parliament to take immediate action to revoke the decision and ensure that any new identity card system respects the democratic rights and privacy of the Sri Lankan people. They urge lawmakers to consider alternatives that safeguard national security while embracing technological advancements.
News
NMRA laboratory lacks SLAB accreditation
Drug controversy:
“Setting up state-of-the-art drug testing facility will cost Rs 5 billion”
Activists call for legal action against politicians, bureaucrats
Serious questions have been raised over Sri Lanka’s drug regulatory system following revelations that the National Medicines Regulatory Authority’s (NMRA) quality control laboratory is not accredited by the Sri Lanka Accreditation Board (SLAB), casting doubt on both the reliability of local test results and the adequacy of oversight of imported medicines.
Medical and civil rights groups warn that the issue points to a systemic regulatory failure rather than an isolated lapse, with potential political and financial consequences for the State.
Chairman of the Federation of Medical and Civil Rights Professional Associations, Specialist Dr. Chamal Sanjeewa, said the controversy surrounding the Ondansetron injection, which was later found to be contaminated, had exposed deep weaknesses in drug regulation and quality assurance.
Dr. Sanjeewa said that the manufacturer had confirmed that the drug had been imported into Sri Lanka on four occasions this year, despite later being temporarily withdrawn from use. The drug was manufactured in India in November 2024 and in May and August 2025, and imported to Sri Lanka in February, July and September. On each occasion, 67,600 phials were procured.
Dr. Sanjeewa said the company had informed the NMRA that the drug was tested in Indian laboratories, prior to shipment, and passed all required quality checks. The manufacturer reportedly tested the injections against 10 parameters, including basic quality standards,
pH value, visual appearance, component composition, quantity per phial, sterility levels, presence of other substances, bacterial toxin levels and spectral variations.
According to documents submitted to the NMRA, no bacterial toxins were detected in the original samples, and the reported toxin levels were within European safety limits of less than 9.9 international units per milligram.
Dr. Sanjeewa said the credibility of local regulatory oversight had come under scrutiny, noting that the NMRA’s quality control laboratory was not SLAB-accredited. He said establishing a fully equipped, internationally accredited laboratory would cost nearly Rs. 5 billion.
He warned that the failure to invest in such a facility could have grave consequences, including continued loss of life due to substandard medicines and the inability of the State to recover large sums of public funds paid to pharmaceutical companies for defective drugs.
“If urgent steps are not taken, public money will continue to be lost and accountability will remain elusive,” Dr. Sanjeewa said.
He added that if it was ultimately confirmed that the drug did not contain bacterial toxins at the time it entered Sri Lanka, the fallout would be even more damaging, severely undermining the credibility of the country’s health system and exposing weaknesses in health administration.
Dr. Sanjeewa said public trust in the health sector had already been eroded and called for legal action against all politicians and public officials responsible for regulatory failures linked to the incident.
by Chaminda Silva ✍️
News
Air quality deteriorating in Sri Lanka
Air quality in Sri Lanka has deteriorated in recent days, with Air Quality Index (AQI) levels rising, particularly in the Northern, North Central, North Western and Western Provinces, the Central Environmental Authority (CEA) said.
CEA Media Spokesman Dr. Ajith Gunawardena said a noticeable decline in air quality had been recorded, with AQI values ranging between 150 and 200.
Attributing the situation to transboundary air movement, combined with the activation of the Northeast Monsoon, Dr. Gunawardena noted that similar conditions had been observed during the same period in previous years.
The CEA is continuing to closely monitor air quality and atmospheric conditions across the country, he said.
Dr. Gunawardena warned that individuals sensitive to poor air quality might experience adverse health effects and advised them to seek medical attention if necessary.He added that the situation was expected to ease after yesterday.
By Pradeep Prasanna Samarakoon ✍️
News
Cardinal urges govt. not to weaken key socio-cultural institutions
Educational Reforms:
Archbishop of Colombo His Eminence Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith on Saturday accused the government of pursuing education reforms undermining parental rights and Sri Lanka’s cultural and religious values.
Speaking at a ceremony at St. Joseph’s Church, in Hanwella, the Cardinal said several programmes, currently being implemented, were weakening key socio-cultural institutions such as marriage and family. He took exception to the government’s decision to introduce sex education to the school curriculum.
Cardinal Ranjith said Sri Lanka’s civilisation had been shaped over generations by religious traditions, including Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam and Christianity, particularly in relation to marriage, child-rearing and sexuality. He warned against abandoning these values in favour of, what he described as, foreign influences tied to external funding.
“No government has the right to interfere with the nation’s cultural heritage,” he said, urging political leaders to act within their mandate.
The Archbishop further alleged that ideas promoted alongside funding from United Nations agencies and other international bodies were eroding cultural and religious foundations, contributing to family breakdown and weakening respect between parents and children.
While affirming that children have human rights, he stressed that such rights should not be interpreted in a way that turned children against their parents. “What should exist between parents and children is a foundation of love,” he said.
by Norman Palihawadane ✍️
-
Midweek Review5 days agoHow massive Akuregoda defence complex was built with proceeds from sale of Galle Face land to Shangri-La
-
News4 days agoPope fires broadside: ‘The Holy See won’t be a silent bystander to the grave disparities, injustices, and fundamental human rights violations’
-
News4 days agoPakistan hands over 200 tonnes of humanitarian aid to Lanka
-
News5 days agoBurnt elephant dies after delayed rescue; activists demand arrests
-
Business3 days agoUnlocking Sri Lanka’s hidden wealth: A $2 billion mineral opportunity awaits
-
Editorial5 days agoColombo Port facing strategic neglect
-
News3 days agoArmy engineers set up new Nayaru emergency bridge
-
News5 days agoSri Lanka, Romania discuss illegal recruitment, etc.
