Features
DEFIANT HALEY SPINS DOUBLE-DIGIT LOSS AS A WIN, TAUNTS TRUMP “COME ON DONALD, SHOW US WHAT YOU GOT”
TRUMP WINS WEST HAMPSHIRE PRIMARY
by Vijaya Chandrasoma
Florida Governor, Ron DeSantis dropped out of the presidential race before the New Hampshire primary on Tuesday, January 23, after an unexpectedly poor showing in the Iowa caucus and a subsequent drop in national polls. He made the announcement of the suspension of his campaign with a stirring quote he mistakenly attributed to Winston Churchill: “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts”. Words Churchill never spoke, but did appear, strangely enough, in a 1938 Budweiser beer commercial.
DeSantis joined other Republican challengers like Senator Tim Scott and Indian descent entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, who also suspended their campaigns and immediately endorsed Trump for the Republican nomination.
This is Trump’s Superpower. He has lost every election since the 2016 presidential election. His Party lost the House and the Senate in the 2018 midterms. He lost the 2020 presidential election to President Biden by a record seven million votes and an Electoral College landslide. The Party again lost the Senate and suffered a setback in the House in the 2022 midterms, which they had expected to win big in a Red Tsunami, but finally held with a wafer-thin majority. Almost every candidate endorsed by Trump for either House has been defeated. In spite of all these losses, Trump remains the undisputed leader of the Republican Party.
The Superpower transforms previous Republican rivals with leadership aspirations, who had excoriated Trump in the past and had in turn been roundly insulted, even humiliated by him – the classic example being Senator Ted Cruz, the 2016 presidential hopeful, whose wife was described by Trump as being “ugly” and his father falsely accused of involvement in the JFK assassination – into the most unctuous of Trump sycophants.
This Superpower also amazingly empowers him to commit the most heinous of crimes – sexual, fraudulent, seditious, even treasonous, with his guilt beyond doubt – and still ensures that no damage is caused to the loyalty of his Party, and even provides an enhancement in his poll numbers and fundraising capabilities.
The Kryptonite, the ultimate weapon against this Superpower, is the Truth. The Republicans’ refusal to acknowledge and accept the truth staring them in the face indicates that Trump has not changed the Party, he has merely revealed its seething underbelly of white supremacism and authoritarianism. A cult immune to Kryptonite.
The most significant and unexpected Republican to withdraw his candidacy last week and endorse Trump was Tim Scott, the “nice guy” moderate Senator from South Carolina. African-American Scott was appointed to the Senate in 2015 by then South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, Trump’s only remaining challenger for the 2024 Republican nomination.
At an interview at CNN’s The State of the Union with Dana Bash last Sunday, Scott said, “All I want is four more years of Donald Trump”, who “does not see White from Black!” and “will unite the country”. At a time that the country has been polarized as never before, entirely by Trump’s racist, anti-immigrant policies and rants about vermin poisoning the pure white blood of America.
Asked why he endorsed Trump for the nomination, instead of his erstwhile South Carolina sponsor, Nikki Haley, Scott said he was thinking of the country as a whole and not just his home state. He danced around several issues, shamelessly twisting his earlier criticisms of Trump playing the permanent victim and whining about grievances and witch hunts. He said what he really meant was that Trump had indeed been “aggrieved” by the Biden administration, which had “weaponized the Department of Justice” to unfairly prosecute him. A blatant lie, the Trump Superpower in action.
Scott refused to answer Dana Bash’s question whether he agreed with Trump’s description of those domestic terrorists convicted and imprisoned for their part in the January 6 insurrection as “hostages”. He said he would rather let “Lady Justice get back her blindfolds”. A performance of brown-nosing (metaphorically, for a black man), reminiscent of the glory lickspittle days of Ted Cruz and Lindsay Graham.
The campaign slogan of the last woman, Nikki Haley, standing between Trump and the Republican nomination was: “I am the last best hope of avoiding a rematch between two old men, a contest 75% of Americans don’t want”. She has, on the advice of her powerful sponsor, West Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu, finally stepped up from her previously tepid rebukes of Trump to a tougher approach, calling him a bully and a liar, and going after him for his disastrous first term, his electoral losses since his election to the presidency in 2016 and his criminal behavior after his electoral defeat in 2020.
At recent campaign speeches, Trump has continued to make even more outrageously false statements than usual. He said that he beat President Obama in a landslide in 2016, when his presidential rival was Hillary Clinton. He complained that it was Nikki Haley (repeating her name numerous times), who was in charge of security during January 6, 2021 and had failed to summon federal troops to quell the insurrection, confusing Nikki Haley with Speaker Nancy Pelosi. A trifecta of hallucinations. Only Trump had the power to summon federal troops, which he chose to ignore as he was rooting for the insurrectionists in their violent attempt to prevent the constitutional transfer of presidential power. An insurrection he had planned and incited. And Nikki Haley was a private citizen who was not even in Washington D.C. on that day of infamy.
There are numerous recent gaffes and losses of memory which indicate that Trump’s mind has turned into a cesspit of hallucinatory delusion. The fact that he still brags about acing a test designed to identify incipient dementia, as he did during his presidency, is proof that he is on the cusp of that disease, which is becoming more transparent at every passing rant.
New Hampshire is a more liberal, New England state, which, unlike Iowa, where only registered Republicans have the right to vote, allows Independents to vote in its Republican primary.
Trump went on to register a win over Haley by double digits, finally garnering 54.5% of the votes to Haley’s 43.2%. Trump won by 11% points, when the polls had projected that he would win by over 30%. The New Hampshire primary showed that the polls, which projected a huge win for Trump, were highly exaggerated, and sowed doubt about the authenticity of even the national polls.
Trump was at his usual ego maniacal worst during his victory speech, flanked by his brand-new sycophants, Tim Scott and Vivek Ramaswamy, who made worshipful speeches about “the greatest American leader in history”. He showed his ire at Haley for refusing to suspend her campaign, and even showed his complete lack of class, even insulting the beautiful dress she wore.
Haley made a gracious but defiant concession speech, congratulating Trump on his victory. However, she did say that she had no intention of dropping out of the race. The best lines in her speech were that “Trump was the right president at the right time….not any more”, “Chaos follows Donald Trump” and “New Hampshire is the first in the nation. It is not the last in the nation. This race is far from over”.
Nikki Haley acted as if she had won the primary, which drove Trump crazy. He was expecting Haley, like DeSantis and the other sycophants, to fold her tent, bow out of the race, kiss the ring and beg for the Vice-President position.
Haley proved she has more balls than all the Republicans who had vied for the Republican nomination, only to tamely and prematurely throw in the towel. She will be in Trump’s face at least till the primary in her home state of South Carolina, in a month. She is gaining more support from Independents and moderate Republicans, who are getting sick and tired of his mean-spirited, mendacious, and whining “permanent victim” posture.
At her announcement that she was staying in the race, Haley said, “What a great night. God is so good. Donald Trump just threw a temper tantrum. He pitched a fit. He was insulting, but I know that’s what he does when he is insecure”. She ended her speech, taunting Trump: “Come on, Donald. Show us what you got!”
Perhaps she has little chance of winning the nomination, but she certainly has got under Trump’s skin, by refusing to quit the campaign and preventing him from claiming the Republican nomination outright after New Hampshire.
Trump was also too obtuse to understand the irony when he branded Haley “an impostor” because she did not concede that she had lost the fight (in his opinion) for the Republican nomination. Strange comment from a man who hasn’t yet conceded an election he lost over three years ago. He has stated that “anybody who contributes to the Haley campaign will be permanently banned from the MAGA camp” (cult?).
Trump may have won the Republican New Hampshire primary, but the real winners last Tuesday were the Democrats, who saw Independent voters, exasperated with the chaos that accompanies Trump, turning up in droves to vote against him. And Independents hold the key to electoral victory in November.
There is a chance that the course of Republican leadership, indeed the whole national election storyline, might undergo an upheaval if one or both of these two protagonist octogenarians suffer mental or physical breakdowns, or worse, before November. Not as unlikely an event as you might think. Believe me, ten months represent a long time in the life of old folks who have long passed the BEST BY date. Especially as both the current principal presidential candidates are already showing distinct signs of decrepitude, with a series of stumbles, falls, gaffes and losses of memory. Aneurysms, dementia, even death can’t be too far away on the horizon.
Also, in an already confused election scenario, the likely entry of Third-Party candidate/s into the presidential race will further complicate calculations to an extent where anything would be possible. Add to this Pandora’s Box the global problems caused by the Israel/Palestine and Russia/Ukraine wars, and we are surely looking at a most unpredictable, even cataclysmic, 2024.
The 2024 Oscar nominations were announced last Tuesday. As expected, Trump secured a nomination in the Best Actor category for his sterling performance as James Bond in the remake of Ian Flemings’s classic, From Russia With Love.
Asked for comment, Trump said, “I am not surprised. That role was made for me. I already have a License to Kill, we call it Presidential Immunity. Besides, I make a much better-looking Bond than the late Sean Connery. My friend, Vladimir Putin, was an excellent Director of the movie. We will do many more great things together in the future”.
Features
A long-running identity conflict flares into full-blown war
It was Iran’s first spiritual head of state, the late Ayatollah Khomeini, who singled out and castigated the US as the ‘Great Satan’ in the revolutionary turmoil of the late seventies of the last century that ushered in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The core issue driving the long-running confrontation between Islamic Iran and the West has been religious identity and the seasoned observer cannot be faulted for seeing the explosive emergence of the current war in the Middle East as having the elements of a religious conflict.
The current crisis in the Middle East which was triggered off by the recent killing of Iranian spiritual head of state Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a combined US-Israel military strike is multi-dimensional and highly complex in nature but when the history of relations between Islamic Iran and the West, read the US, is focused on the religious substratum in the conflict cannot be glossed over.
In fact it is not by accident that US President Donald Trump resorts to Biblical language when describing Iran in his denunciations of the latter. Iran, from Trump’s viewpoint, is a primordial source of ‘evil’ and if the Middle East has collapsed into a full-blown regional war today it is because of the ‘evil’ influence and doings of Iran; so runs Trump’s narrative. It is a language that stands on par with that used by the architects of the Iranian revolution in the crucial seventies decade.
In other words, it is a conflict between ‘good’ and ‘evil’ and who is ‘good’ and who is ‘evil’ in the confrontation is determined mainly by the observer’s partialities and loyalties which may not be entirely political in kind. It should not be forgotten that one of President Trump’s support bases is the Christian Right in the US and in the rest of the West and the Trump administration’s policy outlook and actions should not be divorced from the needs of this segment of supporters to be fully made sense of.
The reasons for the strong policy tie-up between Rightist administrations in the US in particular and Israel could be better comprehended when the above religious backdrop is taken into consideration. Israel is the principal actor in the ‘Old Testament’ of the Bible and is seen as ‘the Chosen People of God’ and this characterization of Israel ought to explain the partialities of the Republican Right in particular towards Israel. Among other things, this partiality accounts for the strong defence of Israel by the US.
For the purposes of clarity it needs to be mentioned here that the Bible consists of two parts, an ‘Old’ and ‘New Testament’ , and that the ‘New Testament’ or ‘Message’ embodies the teachings of Jesus Christ and the latter teachings are seen as completing and in a sense giving greater substance to the ‘Old Testament’. However, Judaism is based mainly on ‘Old Testament’ teachings and Judaism is distinct from Christianity.
To be sure, the above theological explanation does not exhaust all the reasons for the war in the Middle East but the observer will be allowing an important dimension to the war to slip past if its importance is underestimated.
It is not sufficiently realized that the Iranian Islamic Revolution of 1979 utterly changed international politics and re-wrote as it were the basic parameters that must be brought to bear in understanding it. So important is the Islamic factor in contemporary world politics that it helped define to a considerable degree the new international political order that came into existence with the collapsing of the Cold War and the disintegration of the USSR .
Since the latter developments ‘political Islam’ could be seen as a chief shaping influence of international politics. For example, it accounts considerably for the 9/11 calamity that led to the emergence of fresh polarities in world politics and ushered in political terrorism of a most destructive kind that is today disquietingly visible the world over.
It does not follow from the foregoing that Islam, correctly understood, inspires terrorism of any kind. Islam proclaims peace but some of its adherents with political aims interpret the religion in misleading, divisive ways that run contrary to the peaceful intents of the faith. This is a matter of the first importance that sincere adherents of the faith need to address.
However, there is no denying that the Islamic Revolution in Iran of 1979 has been over the past decades a great shaper of international politics and needs to be seen as such by those sections that are desirous of changing the course of the world for the better. The revolution’s importance is such that it led to US political scientist Dr. Samuel P. Huntingdon to formulate his historic thesis that a ‘Clash of Civilizations’ is upon the world currently.
If the above thesis is to be adopted in comprehending the principal trends in contemporary world politics it could be said that Islam, misleadingly interpreted by some, is pitting a good part of the Southern hemisphere against the West, which is also misleadingly seen by some, as homogeneously Christian in orientation. Whereas, the truth is otherwise. The West is not necessarily entirely synonymous with Christianity, correctly understood.
Right now, what is immediately needed in the Middle East is a ceasefire, followed up by a negotiated peace based on humanistic principles. Turning ‘Spears into Ploughshares’ is a long gestation project but the warring sides should pay considerable attention to former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami’s memorable thesis that the world needs to transition from a ‘Clash of Civilizations’ to a ‘Dialogue of Civilizations’. Hopefully, there would emerge from the main divides leaders who could courageously take up the latter challenge.
It ought to be plain to see that the current regional war in the Middle East is jeopardising the best interests of the totality of publics. Those Americans who are for peace need to not only stand up and be counted but bring pressure on the Trump administration to make peace and not continue on the present destructive course that will render the world a far more dangerous place than it is now.
In the Middle East region a durable peace could be ushered if only the just needs of all sides to the conflict are constructively considered. The Palestinians and Arabs have their needs, so does Israel. It cannot be stressed enough that unless and until the security needs of the latter are met there could be no enduring peace in the Middle East.
Features
The art and science of communicating with your little child
The two input gateways of communication, sight and sound, are quite well developed at birth. In fact, the auditory system becomes functional around 24 weeks in the womb, and the normal newborn can hear quite well after birth. However, the newborn’s vision is a little blurry at birth, and the baby sees the world in shades of grey, while being able only to focus on things 20 to 30 cm (8–12 inches) away. Coincidentally, this is perhaps the exact distance to a mother’s face during breastfeeding. By 2-3 months, there are colour vision capabilities and the ability to track. By 5-8 months, there is depth perception, and by 12 months, there is adult clarity of vision.
By the time a child turns five, his or her brain has already reached 90% of its adult size. This astonishing physical growth is not just happening on its own; it is, to a certain extent, fuelled by experience, and the most vital experience a young child can have is communication with his or her parents.
Modern developmental neuroscience has shifted our understanding of how children learn. We used to think babies were passive sponges, slowly absorbing the world. We now know they are active characters from day one, constantly seeking interaction to build the architecture of their minds. This architecture is not built by apps, vocabulary flashcards, or educational television. It is built through simple, loving, back-and-forth interactions with anyone they come across, but mostly their parents.
The Foundation: Serve and Return (0–12 Months)
Communication with an infant from birth to one year of age begins long before they speak their first word. In the first year, the goal is to master a phenomenon called Serve and Return. This is a basic scenario picked up from the game of tennis. At the start of each game of a set in tennis, a player serves, and the opponent returns the serve. Just imagine a tennis match, where a baby “serves” by making a sound, making eye contact, reaching for a toy, or crying. The job of anyone in the vicinity, who very often are the parents of the baby, is to “return” the ball. If they babble, you babble back. If they point at a cat, you look and say, “Yes, that’s a furry cat!” This simple act does two things. The first is Brain Building, which creates and strengthens neural pathways in the language and emotional centres of the brain. The other is Emotional Security, a thing which teaches a baby that he or she has some help in the learning processes. The baby absorbs the notion that when he or she signals a need, his or her world will respond. This forms the basis of a secure attachment. Scientists have advocated that during this stage, people, especially the parents of a baby, should embrace what is called ‘parentese’. It is the use of a somewhat high-pitched, exaggerated voice. Research has shown that babies pay more attention to parentese than to regular adult speech, helping them to map the sounds of their native language more quickly.
The Language Explosion: Toddlers (1–3 Years)
When a child starts speaking words, the game changes considerably and quite profoundly. This period is defined by a rapid increase in his or her vocabulary and the beginning of grammar. It is very important to narrate everything. The people around, especially the parents, need to become kind of sports commentators for your life. While dressing them, one could say, “First we put on the red sock. After that, we put the other red sock on your left foot.” What we are doing by this is to give them the labels for the world they see.
It is also important to expand, but not truly correct, whatever the child says. If a toddler points to a car and says “Car!”, don’t just say “Yes.” Expand on it: “Yes, that is a big, fast, red car!” You are adding a new vocabulary and grammatical structure through a natural process. If the child says “Me go,” respond with, “Yes, you are going!” rather than correcting and saying “No…, you should say ‘I am going’.”
Toddlers love reading the same book, even one hundred times. While it may be tedious for those around the baby, it is important to realise that such repetition is vital for their learning. They are predicting what comes next, which is a core cognitive skill.
The Preschooler: Building Stories and Logic (3–5 Years)
By age three, the focus shifts from “what” to “why.” Preschoolers are beginning to understand complex emotions, time, and causality. This is the age at which it is best to ask questions which require thought and understanding. Such indirect open-ended questions would sound like “What was the best part of the park today?” or “How do you think that character in the story is feeling?“
A preschooler’s world is full of “big feelings” they cannot yet manage. When they are upset because they cannot have a cookie, avoid saying “Don’t cry over nothing.” Instead, name the emotion: “Don’t cry, you can have a cookie after dinner“. This teaches them emotional literacy. Parents and others around in the home could share stories about when they were little, or make up fantasy tales together. Storytelling teaches sequential logic (beginning, middle, end) and strengthens their imagination.
The Absolute Master Class: Learning Through Play
If communication is the fuel for brain development, play is the engine. For a child under five, play is not a break from learning; play is learning. It is how they explore physics (stacking blocks), mathematics (sorting shapes), social dynamics (sharing toys), and language (pretend play). We can boost their development exponentially by weaving communication into their play.
When a child is playing with blocks, dough, or puzzles, they are building fine motor skills and spatial awareness. It is also useful to use three-dimensional words: “Can you put the blue block on top of the red one?” “The puzzle piece is next to your knee.” One could also ask them to describe the texture: “Is the dough soft or hard?“
Pretend play, such as acting as a doctor, an engineer, a chef, or a superhero, is one of the most cognitively demanding things a child can do. It requires them to understand symbolic thought and to take on another person’s perspective. Join their world as a supporting character, not the director. If they are the doctor, ask, “Doctor, my teddy bear’s tummy hurts. What should I do?” This encourages them to use vocabulary relevant to the scenario and practice complex social problem-solving.
Playing with water, sand, slime, or safe food products allows children to process sensory information. This is the perfect time for descriptive vocabulary. Use contrasting words: wet/dry, hot/cold, sticky/smooth, loud/quiet.
A few special words for parents. You do not need an expensive degree or specialised toys to build your child’s brain. The most powerful tool you have is your own responsiveness. Modern science tells us that the basic recipe for a thriving child is simple: Look at them when they signal you. Respond with warmth and words. Narrate their world and Join their play.
You are not just talking to your child; you are building his or her future, even via just one conversation at a time. So, go on talking to your child and even make him or her a real-life chatterbox.
Dr B. J. C. Perera
MBBS(Cey), DCH(Cey), DCH(Eng), MD(Paediatrics), MRCP(UK), FRCP(Edin), FRCP(Lond), FRCPCH(UK), FSLCPaed, FCCP, Hony. FRCPCH(UK), Hony. FCGP(SL)
Specialist Consultant Paediatrician and Honorary Senior Fellow, Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Features
Promoting our beauty and culture to the world
Tourism is very much in the news these days and it’s certainly a good sign to see lots of foreigners checking out Sri Lanka.
With this in mind, Ruki’s Model Academy & Agency recently had a spectacular event to select Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka in order to promote Sri Lanka in the international scene.
Nimesha Premachandra was crowned Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka 2026.
She says she owes her success to Ruki (Rukmal Senanayake), the National Director and model trainer, and personality and advocacy trainer Tharaka Gurukanda.
Nimesha is a school teacher by profession, an actress and TV presenter by passion, and an entrepreneur by spirit.
She believes in balancing grace with purpose, and using her platform to inspire women, while promoting the beauty and culture of Sri Lanka to the world. And this is how our Chit-Chat went:

Nimesha Premachandra: Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka 2026
01. How would you describe yourself?
I am a passionate, disciplined, and people-oriented person. I love learning, performing, and guiding others, especially young minds, through education.
02. If you could change one thing about yourself, what would it be?
I would probably try to be less self-critical and allow myself to celebrate achievements more often.
03. If you could change one thing about your family, what would it be?
Nothing major. I am grateful for my family’s love and support, which has shaped who I am today.
04. Is Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka your very first pageant?
No. I have been part of pageants before, but Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka is very special because it represents purpose, culture, and global representation.
05. What made you take part in this contest?
I wanted to represent Sri Lanka internationally and use this platform to promote tourism, culture, and women’s empowerment.
06. Obviously, you must be excited about participating in the grand finale, in Vietnam; any special plans for this big event?
Yes, I am extremely excited. My focus is to showcase Sri Lankan elegance, hospitality, and authenticity, while building meaningful connections with participants from around the world.
07. How do you intend promoting tourism, in Sri Lanka, during your rein?
I plan to highlight Sri Lanka’s diverse experiences in culture, heritage, wellness, nature, and local hospitality through media appearances, digital storytelling, and tourism collaborations.
08. School?
Kaluthara Balika. School life played a big role in shaping me. I actively participated in sports and performing arts, which later helped me build confidence as an actress and presenter.
09. Happiest moment?
Being crowned Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka 2026 and seeing the pride in my family’s eyes – definitely one of my happiest moments.
10. What is your idea of perfect happiness?
Peace of mind, good health, and being surrounded by the people I love while doing work that has meaning.
11. Which living person do you most admire?
I most admire Angelina Jolie because she beautifully balances her work as an actress with meaningful humanitarian efforts. She uses her global platform to support refugees, advocate for human rights, and inspire women to be strong, compassionate, and independent.
12. Which is your most treasured possession?
My memories and experiences because they remind me how far I’ve come, and keep me grounded.
13. Your most embarrassing moment?
Like everyone, I’ve had small on-stage mishaps, but they always taught me to laugh at myself and move forward confidently.
14. Done anything daring?
Participating in pageants while balancing teaching, media work, and family life has been one of the boldest and most rewarding decisions I’ve made.

Keen to use her title to promote Sri Lanka globally
15. Your ideal vacation?
A peaceful destination surrounded by nature; somewhere I can relax, reconnect, and experience local culture.
16. What kind of music are you into?
I enjoy soft, soulful music because it helps me relax and stay inspired.
17. Favourite radio station:
I enjoy stations that blend good music with meaningful conversation and positive energy.
18. Favourite TV station:
Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corporation. It’s where it all began for me. It played a significant role in my journey as a TV presenter and helped shape my confidence and passion for media.
19 What would you like to be born as in your next life?
Someone who continues to inspire others because making a positive impact is what matters most.
20. Any major plans for the future?
I hope to expand my work in media and entrepreneurship while continuing my role as an educator and using my title to promote Sri Lanka globally.
-
Features3 days agoBrilliant Navy officer no more
-
Opinion6 days agoJamming and re-setting the world: What is the role of Donald Trump?
-
Features6 days agoAn innocent bystander or a passive onlooker?
-
Opinion3 days agoSri Lanka – world’s worst facilities for cricket fans
-
Business6 days agoAn efficacious strategy to boost exports of Sri Lanka in medium term
-
Features4 days agoOverseas visits to drum up foreign assistance for Sri Lanka
-
Features4 days agoSri Lanka to Host First-Ever World Congress on Snakes in Landmark Scientific Milestone
-
Features3 days agoA life in colour and song: Rajika Gamage’s new bird guide captures Sri Lanka’s avian soul
