Connect with us

Midweek Review

Would Chidambaram reveal his stance on the Sri Lanka destabilisation project?

Published

on

Congress senior faults Indira over ‘Operation Blue Star’

General Arunkumar Shridhar Vaidya, who served as the 12th Chief of Staff of the Indian Army, from 1983 to 1986, was assassinated in August, 1986, by Sikh terrorists, for his role in ‘Operation Blue Star’ in 1984. Vaidya was 60-years-old.

He was shot dead on August 10, 1986, on Rajendrasinhji Marg, in Pune. His killers, namely Harjinder Singh, aka Jinda, and Sukhdev Singh, came parallel to Vaidya’s car, on motor scooters, and fired several shots at him. They were apprehended, following an accident, and sentenced to death on Oct. 21, 1989, and hanged at Yerwada jail on October 9, 1992.

On the orders of the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, troops of ‘Operation Blue Star’ flushed out terrorists from Amritsar. That operation, carried out between June 1 and June 10, 1984, was meant to remove Khalistan terrorist Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and his band of armed followers from the Harminder Sahib complex, in Amritsar.

Former Union Home and Finance Minister P Chidambaram recently found fault with Premier Gandhi for ordering ‘Operation Blue Star.’ Declaring that the operation had been a mistake, the senior Congress leader pointed out that Premier Indira Gandhi had to pay with her life for that decision. Indira Gandhi was killed by her Sikh bodyguards at her New Delhi residence on Oct 31, 1984. Her assassination triggered unprecedented violence.

Rajya Sabha member Chidambaram went a step further when he emphasised that the Army, the Police, the intelligence and civil service had been collectively responsible for that decision.

Although the NDTV report, headlined “Indira Gandhi paid with her life for Op Blue Star mistake: P Chidambaram” posted on Oct 12, hadn’t made any reference to the high profile assassination of General Vaidya, obviously the Congress senior also found fault with Vaidya. The slain General is widely believed to be one of the architects of the operation. Chidambaram asserted that the Premier couldn’t be held solely responsible for that decision.

Chidambaram made the explosive comments while moderating a discussion on ‘They Will Shoot You, Madam’, a book by journalist Harinder Baweja, at the Khushwant Singh Literature Festival in Himachal Pradesh’s Kasauli on Oct. 11. What made Chidambaram say so after so many years? What really prompted him?

Union Minister Kiren Rijiu declared, in a social media post: “Chidambaram Ji admits the Congress blunders too late!”

BJP national spokesperson R.P. Singh attacked the Congress party. Singh said; “History must record the truth. ‘Operation Blue Star’ was not a national necessity; it was a political misadventure, he charged. “As a nationalist, I strongly believe that ‘Operation Blue Star’ was completely avoidable, as rightly mentioned by former Home Minister P. Chidambaram.”

Chidambaram’s comments can be compared with what one-time Indian High Commissioner J.N. Dixit, who later served as its Foreign Secretary and National Security Advisor’s own assessment of Indira Gandhi. With the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) pushing Sri Lanka to introduce an Independent Prosecutor’s Office (IPO), on a priority basis, at the expense of the Attorney General’s Department, perhaps re-examination of India’s accountability may be necessary.

No less a person than J.N. Dixit, in his memoirs ‘Makers of India’s Foreign Policy: Raja Ram Mohun Roy to Yashwant Sinha’, launched, in 2004, admitted the destabilisation project undertaken under Indira Gandhi’s leadership. Dixit didn’t mince his words when he blamed Indira Gandhi for the Indian intervention. Dixit found fault with Indira Gandhi for two foreign policy-related decisions – direct involvement in the terrorist project in Sri Lanka and remaining silent over the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in Dec. 1979.

A collective decision

Obviously, Indira Gandhi couldn’t have taken the utterly irresponsible decision to launch the Sri Lanka terrorist project on her own. As Chidambaram pointed out that the Army, the Police, and the intelligence and civil service had been collectively responsible for deciding on ‘Operation Blue Star,’ Sri Lanka’s destabilisation project must have been another collective decision of the Congress government. It would be pertinent to mention that Congress mounted ‘Operation Blue Star’ after having destabilised India’s hapless neighbour Sri Lanka and terrorized the country with threat of invasion, Colombo had no option but to accept the deployment of the Indian Army.

Sri Lanka exploded in July, 1983, after Indian-trained terrorists killed 13 soldiers in Jaffna. That would never have happened if not for the direct involvement of India, a fact that the UNHRC chose to conveniently forget while demanding accountability on the part of Sri Lanka.

Would Chidambaram accept that like Indira Gandhi her son Rajiv, too, had to pay with his life for taking a wrong decision with regard to Sri Lanka. Premier Gandhi extended his mother’s terror project and created an environment in Sri Lanka that facilitated the deployment of his Army.

Having first entered the Lok Sabha (Lower House) from Tamil Nadu, at the 1984 parliamentary election, Chidambaram must have been among those who promoted stepped-up Indian intervention here.

The Congress party certainly owed Sri Lanka an apology for what it did in the ’80s to destabilise this country by backing various separatist groups here. We, however, also concede that the then Sri Lankan government’s overtly pro-Western stands, like President JRJ (dubbed the Yankee Dickie) offering Trincomalee to the USA, helped to fan paranoia in New Delhi. Would it be possible for the IPO to proceed, turning a blind eye to the accountability on the part of India. Chidambaram is now on record as having asserted that Indira Gandhi should have handled the security challenge, posed by Sikh terrorists, differently. Does he believe India shouldn’t have directly got involved in a terrorist campaign in Sri Lanka that caused the deaths of nearly 1,500 Indian military officers, and men, and also resulted in the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, just over a year after India withdrew its Army from here, conveniently dubbed the Indian Peace Keeping Force.

The Congressman’s frank comments on ‘Operation Blue Star’ must influence a fresh study on the Congress decision to destabilise Sri Lanka. Regardless of Western powers pursuing a politically motivated campaign against Sri Lanka, demanding justice for those who perished, wounded and disappeared during the war, they are silent on the Indian role.

Judicial examination of the Sri Lanka war cannot be undertaken, leaving out India. The UNHRC and the National People’s Power (NPP) government must explain whether they intended to establish a set up to cover the initiation of the New Delhi’s terror project here in the early ’80s, the deployment of the Indian Army (1987-1990), the PLOTE (People’s Liberation Organisation of Tamil Eelam) raid on the Maldives, in 1988, and the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, in May 1991.

Sri Lanka should seek an explanation from the UNHRC regarding the IPO’s mandate without further delay. Let me remind you that a report on the situation in Sri Lanka, released at the commencement of the recently-concluded Geneva sessions, revealed the existence of, what they called, a secure repository that so far consisted of over 105,000 items. Of them, 75,800 items had been collected consequent to the 2015 investigation, approximately 2,000 from initiatives before 2015 and about 34,000 collected by the external evidence gathering mechanism over the past four years.

The report also made reference to, what it called, violations affecting children. Perhaps another clarification is necessary as there is no indication reference to children, meant mass scale forced recruitment of children by the LTTE during the conflict. A UN investigation, headed by one-time Indonesian Attorney General Marzuki Darusman, admitted that the LTTE tried to forcibly recruit children, even in 2009, after the combined armed forces completely cut them off.

Did any of the items in the so-called secure repository included items that implicated India? In the absence of a cohesive action plan, Sri Lankan military has increasingly come under pressure from the UNHRC that sought to appease the Western powers, Tamil Diaspora and the LTTE rump.

Those who routinely found fault with Mahinda Rajapaksa for not implementing his own LLRC (Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission) report must realise that the West wanted to punish Sri Lanka for eradicating the LTTE which they considered invincible until it was militarily wiped out in the battlefield by our security forces at Kilinochchi, in January 2009, against their wishful thinking.

Despicable dual strategy

In the run up to the Indian Army deployment in Northern and Eastern Sri Lanka, Indira Gandhi, and then Rajiv Gandhi, followed a despicable dual strategy. On one hand, New Delhi sponsored scores of terrorist groups here and on the other hand arranged talks intended to find consensus among the groups and the government.

When did India exactly decide to train Sri Lankan terrorists? Indira Gandhi served as Prime Minister from 1966 to 1977 and again from 1980 until her assassination on Oct. 31, 1994. If Indira Gandhi’s government decided to arm Sri Lankan Tamil groups at the onset of the 1980 administration, their intervention in Sri Lanka, until the signing of the Indo-Lanka Peace Accord, in July, 1987, caused a significant number of deaths and destruction.

Now that Chidambaram has faulted Indira Gandhi for ‘Operation Blue Star,’ he shouldn’t hesitate to reveal what he felt about Indian misadventure in Sri Lanka that resulted in Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination. The issue at hand is whether New Delhi could have played a role in Sri Lanka without arming Tamil groups that forced Sri Lanka to transform its ceremonial Army to a lethal fighting force.

According to Dixit, Indira Gandhi feared that serious trouble may erupt in Tamil Nadu if India didn’t throw its weight behind Sri Lanka’s terrorist groups. Can the world accept destabilisation of a country, in this case Sri Lanka, to appease Tamil Nadu? We cannot forget that India went to the extent of assassinating former members of the then dominant Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF). The killing of M Alalasundaram (Kopay) and V. Dharmalingam (Manipay) in early Sept, 1985, by TELO (Tamil Eelam Liberation Organization) at the behest of Indian Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) as alleged by lawmaker Dharmalingham Siddharthan (V. Dharmalingham’s son), underscored the gravity of the situation.

The UN turned a blind eye to what was going on in Sri Lanka. The global body suddenly took a real interest only when Sri Lanka evicted the LTTE from Kilinochchi, cleared the Kandy-Jaffna A 9 stretch between Kilinochchi and Elephant Pass and set the stage for the clearing of the Vanni east sector. Obviously, the UN bodies primarily acted on signals given by the West.

After having failed to reach a consensus with the LTTE, in spite of decades of negotiations, sometimes facilitated by external players, such as India and Norway, President Mahinda Rajapaksa, in 2006, decided to eradicate the LTTE. The President obviously had no other alternative after the LTTE launched abortive suicide attacks on Army commander Lt. Gen. Sarath Fonseka and Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa in April and October 2006, respectively.

Against that backdrop of Field Marshal Fonseka repeatedly alleging President Mahinda Rajapaksa, in consultation with some external powers, declared a two-day ceasefire between Jan. 31 and Feb. 1, 2009, to allow LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran to escape, it would be pertinent to ask whether the war-winning General is playing post-war politics with the issues at hand, obviously to make a political success out of it. He, without a doubt, is the type of an exceptional General that a country gets in about several thousand years, But we feel Fonseka is no comeback kid when it comes to politics, but would only be a disaster. Remember he wants to be “the benevolent dictator that the country needs”, according to his own words.

Even after Sri Lanka became a key subject at the annual UNHRC sessions, none of the governments, including the incumbent NPP administration, dared to mention the destructive Indian role. Those demanding payment of compensation by Sri Lanka never bothered to ask the same from India. The truth is that if India didn’t train terrorists here (Tamil terrorist groups received exceptionally good training, the LTTE killed hundreds of Indians in combat and wounded over 2,000), the Nanthikadal wouldn’t have happened.

Sri Lanka wiped out Prabhakaran’s group on the banks of the Nanthikadal lagoon on May 19, 2009, while approximately 12,000 LTTE combatants surrendered/captured on the Vanni east front.

Chidambaram’s last appeal

On behalf of the government of India and the Congress party, Chidambaram, in his capacity as Home Minister, in the first week of February 2009, made a last ditch attempt to halt the offensive against the LTTE.

The Indian media quoted Chidambaram as having said, after a Cabinet meeting, both the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE should heed their appeal to stop fighting. The timing of Chidambaram’s statement is decisive.

The Home Minister was further quoted as having said: “The central government is deeply concerned over the situation in Sri Lanka. Chidambaram said India was “able to prevail on the Sri Lankan government to pause military operations for 48 hours”. The Minister revealed that there was no response from the LTTE.

“The operations have resumed. Even today, there is no response from the LTTE.”

“Both sides should heed our appeal. The LTTE must lay down their arms. Similarly, Sri Lanka must suspend the hostilities. Only when both hands come together can you clap.”

“All of us are deeply anguished when lives are lost. We will do and will do what is in our capacity to do (to restore peace).”

Asked if LTTE cadres could slip into Tamil Nadu along with Tamil refugees, he replied: “We have sensitized the state government. The LTTE is a banned organisation in India.”

Obviously, Field Marshal Fonseka was referring to the ceasefire declared at India’s behest, though he tried to stick it as an act of betrayal by the then Rajapaksa government. The LTTE may have ignored the Indian intervention at such a late stage and pinned hopes on the US evacuating its top leadership and their families, using the American might. The LTTE lasted less than four months after India’s last ditch attempt to arrange a ceasefire.

Wartime Navy Commander Vice Admiral Wasantha Karannagoda, in his memoirs, disclosed the planned US intervention.

As a man from Tamil Nadu, Chidambaram has been involved in the Eelam issue right throughout the period, both pre and post 2009. It was Chidambaram who told DMK Chief M. Karunanidhi, in July 2012, not to pass a resolution to demand Tamil Eelam at a meeting of Tamil Eelam supporters Organization (TESO) on August 12. Chidambaram is one of those who grossly played politics with the Sri Lanka issue, knowing the responsibility of his party that claimed thousands of lives. Congress never accepted responsibility for what it did to Sri Lanka.

When BJP abstained from voting on the Resolution on Sri Lanka in the UNHRC in March 2021, on behalf of Congress party Chidambaram sought to take advantage of the situation ahead of the state assembly election. The Congress senior urged the Tamil Nadu electorate to punish the AIADMK-BJP alliance at the state assembly elections. This is a gross betrayal of the Tamil people and their unanimous sentiment and desire, Chidambaram said on Twitter. Chidambaram further said that if External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar “was forced to instruct India’s representative to abstain from voting on the Sri Lanka Resolution in the UN Human Rights Council, he should resign in protest against the betrayal of Tamil interests.”

That resolution gave the UN body a mandate to establish an external evidence gathering mechanism. Now the UNHRC is on record as having disclosed that there was a repository of over 105,000 items. Let the UN release a breakdown of items and categorise them according to the different phases of the Eelam war, including the time the Indian Army waged war against the LTTE.

Against the backdrop of BJP’s furious reaction to Chidambaram faulting Indira Gandhi, perhaps the Indian ruling party should reveal what its stand on the Sri Lanka destabilisation project that earned the country status as a state sponsor of terrorism!



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Midweek Review

Year ends with the NPP govt. on the back foot

Published

on

President Dissanayake addresses Parliament as PM Dr. Harini Amarasuriya looks on. Dissanayake is the leader of both the JVP and NPP

The failure on the part of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) government to fulfil a plethora of promises given in the run up to the last presidential election, in September, 2024, and a series of incidents, including cases of corruption, and embarrassing failure to act on a specific weather alert, ahead of Cyclone Ditwah, had undermined the administration beyond measure.

Ditwah dealt a knockout blow to the arrogant and cocky NPP. If the ruling party consented to the Opposition proposal for a Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) to probe the events leading to the November 27 cyclone, the disclosure would be catastrophic, even for the all-powerful Executive President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, as responsible government bodies, like the Disaster Management Centre that horribly failed in its duty, and the Met Department that alerted about the developing storm, but the government did not heed its timely warnings, directly come under his purview.

The NPP is on the back foot and struggling to cope up with the rapidly developing situation. In spite of having both executive presidency and an overwhelming 2/3 majority in Parliament, the government seems to be weak and in total disarray.

The regular appearance of President Dissanayake in Parliament, who usually respond deftly to criticism, thereby defending his parliamentary group, obviously failed to make an impression. Overall, the top NPP leadership appeared to have caused irreparable damage to the NPP and taken the shine out of two glorious electoral victories at the last presidential and parliamentary polls held in September and November 2024 respectively.

The NPP has deteriorated, both in and out of Parliament. The performance of the 159-member NPP parliamentary group, led by Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, doesn’t reflect the actual situation on the ground or the developing political environment.

Having repeatedly boasted of its commitment to bring about good governance and accountability, the current dispensation proved in style that it is definitely not different from the previous lots or even worse. (The recent arrest of a policeman who claimed of being assaulted by a gang, led by an NPP MP, emphasised that so-called system change is nothing but a farce) In the run-up to the November, 2024, parliamentary polls, President Dissanayake, who is the leader of both the JVP and NPP, declared that the House should be filled with only NPPers as other political parties were corrupt. Dissanayake cited the Parliament defeating the no-confidence motions filed against Ravi Karunanayake (2016/over Treasury Bond scams) and Keheliya Rambukwella (2023/against health sector corruption) to promote his argument. However, recently the ongoing controversy over patient deaths, allegedly blamed on the administration of Ondansetron injections, exposed the government.

Mounting concerns over drug safety and regulatory oversight triggered strong calls from medical professionals, and trade unions, for the resignation of senior officials at the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) and the State Pharmaceutical Corporation (SPC).

Medical and civil rights groups declared that the incident exposed deep systemic failures in Sri Lanka’s drug regulatory framework, with critics warning that the collapse of quality assurance mechanisms is placing patients’ lives at grave risk.

The Medical and Civil Rights Professional Association of Doctors (MCRPA), and allied trade unions, accused health authorities of gross negligence and demanded the immediate resignation of senior NMRA and SPC officials.

MCRPA President Dr. Chamal Sanjeewa is on record as having said that the Health Ministry, NMRA and SPC had collectively failed to ensure patient safety, citing, what he described as, a failed drug regulatory system.

The controversy has taken an unexpected turn with some alleging that the NPP government, on behalf of Sri Lanka and India, in April this year, entered into an agreement whereby the former agreed to lower quality/standards of medicine imports.

Trouble begins with Ranwala’s resignation

The NPP suffered a humiliating setback when its National List MP Asoka Ranwala had to resign from the post of Speaker on 13 December, 2024, following intense controversy over his educational qualification. The petroleum sector trade union leader served as the Speaker for a period of three weeks and his resignation shook the party. Ranwala, first time entrant to Parliament was one of the 18 NPP National List appointees out of a total of 29. The Parliament consists of 196 elected and 29 appointed members. Since the introduction of the National List, in 1989, there had never been an occasion where one party secured 18 slots.

The JVP/NPP made an initial bid to defend Ranwala but quickly gave it up and got him to resign amidst media furor. Ranwala dominated the social media as political rivals exploited the controversy over his claimed doctorate from the Waseda University of Japan, which he has failed to prove to this day. But, the JVP/NPP had to suffer a second time as a result of Ranwala’s antics when he caused injuries to three persons, including a child, on 11 December, in the Sapugaskanda police area.

The NPP made a pathetic, UNP and SLFP style effort to save the parliamentarian by blaming the Sapugaskanda police for not promptly subjecting him for a drunk driving test. The declaration made by the Government Analyst Department that the parliamentarian hadn’t been drunk at the time of the accident, several days after the accident, does not make any difference. Having experienced the wrongdoing of successive previous governments, the public, regardless of what various interested parties propagated on social media, realise that the government is making a disgraceful bid to cover-up.

No less a person than President Dissanayake is on record as having said that their members do not consume liquor. Let us wait for the outcome of the internal investigation into the lapses on the part of the Sapugaskanda police with regard to the accident that happened near Denimulla Junction, in Sapugaskanda.

JVP/NPP bigwigs obviously hadn’t learnt from the Weligama W 15 hotel attack in December, 2023, that ruined President Ranil Wickremeinghe’s administration. That incident exposed the direct nexus between the government and the police in carrying out Mafia-style operations. Although the two incidents cannot be compared as the circumstances differ, there is a similarity. Initially, police headquarters represented the interests of the wrongdoers, while President Wickremesinghe bent over backwards to retain the man who dispatched the CCD (Colombo Crime Division) team to Weligama, as the IGP. The UNP leader went to the extent of speaking to Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, and Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena to push his agenda. There is no dispute the then Public Security Minister Tiran Alles wanted Deshabandu Tennakoon as IGP, regardless of a spate of accusations against him, in addition to him being faulted by the Supreme Court in a high-profile fundamental rights application.

The JVP/NPP must have realised that though the Opposition remained disorganised and ineffective, thanks to the media, particularly social media, a case of transgression, if not addressed swiftly and properly, can develop into a crisis. Action taken by the government to protect Ranwala is a case in point. Government leaders must have heaved a sigh of relief as Ranwala is no longer the Speaker when he drove a jeep recklessly and collided with a motorcycle and a car.

Major cases, key developments

Instead of addressing public concerns, the government sought to suppress the truth by manipulating and exploiting developments

* The release of 323 containers from the Colombo Port, in January 2025, is a case in point. The issue at hand is whether the powers that be took advantage of the port congestion to clear ‘red-flagged’ containers.

Although the Customs repeatedly declared that they did nothing wrong and such releases were resorted even during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency (July 2022 to September 2024), the public won’t buy that. Container issue remains a mystery. That controversy eroded public confidence in the NPP that vowed 100 percent transparency in all its dealings. But the way the current dispensation handled the Port congestion proved that transparency must be the last thing in the minds of the JVPers/NPPers holding office.

* The JVP/NPP’s much touted all-out anti-corruption stand suffered a debilitating blow over their failure to finalise the appointment of a new Auditor General. In spite of the Opposition, the civil society, and the media, vigorously taking up this issue, the government continued to hold up the appointment by irresponsibly pushing for an appointment acceptable to President Dissanayake. The JVP/NPP is certainly pursuing a strategy contrary to what it preached while in the Opposition and found fault with successive governments for trying to manipulate the AG. It would be pertinent to mention that President Dissanayake should accept the responsibility for the inordinate delay in proposing a suitable person to that position. The government failed to get the approval of the Constitutional Council more than once to install a favourite of theirs in it, thanks to the forthright position taken by its civil society representatives.

The government should be ashamed of its disgraceful effort to bring the Office of the Auditor General under its thumb:

* The JVP/NPP government’s hotly disputed decision to procure 1,775 brand-new double cab pickup trucks, at a staggering cost exceeding Rs. 12,500 mn, under controversial circumstances, exposed the duplicity of that party that painted all other political parties black. Would the government rethink the double cab deal, especially in the wake of economic ruination caused by Cyclone Ditwah? The top leadership seems to be determined to proceed with their original plans, regardless of immeasurable losses caused by Cyclone Ditwah. Post-cyclone efforts still remain at a nascent stage with the government putting on a brave face. The top leadership has turned a blind eye to the overwhelming challenge in getting the country back on track especially against the backdrop of its agreement with the IMF.

Post-Cyclone Ditwah recovery process is going to be slow and extremely painful. Unfortunately, both the government and the Opposition are hell-bent on exploiting the miserable conditions experienced by its hapless victims. The government is yet to acknowledge that it could have faced the crisis much better if it acted on the warning issued by Met Department Chief Athula Karunanayake on 12 November, two weeks before the cyclone struck.

Foreign policy dilemma

Sri Lanka moved further closer to India and the US this year as President Dissanayake entered into several new agreements with them. In spite of criticism, seven Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs), including one on defence, remains confidential. What are they hiding?

Within weeks after signing of the seven MoUs, India bought the controlling interests in the Colombo Dockyard Limited for USD 52 mn.

Although some Opposition members, representing the SJB, raised the issue, their leader Sajith Premadasa, during a subsequent visit to New Delhi, indicated he wouldn’t, under any circumstances, raise such a contentious issue.

Premadasa went a step further. The SJB leader assured his unwavering commitment to the full implementation of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution that was forced on Sri Lanka during President JRJ’s administration, under the highly questionable Indo-Lanka Accord of July, 1987, after the infamous parippu drop by Indian military aircraft over Jaffna, their version of the old gunboat diplomacy practiced by the West.

Both India and the US consolidated their position here further in the post-Aragalaya period. Those who felt that the JVP would be in a collision course with them must have been quite surprised by the turn of events and the way post-Aragalaya Sri Lanka leaned towards the US-India combine with not a hum from our carboard revolutionaries now installed in power. They certainly know which side of the bread is buttered. Sri Lanka’s economic deterioration, and the 2023 agreement with the IMF, had tied up the country with the US-led bloc.

In spite of India still procuring large quantities of Russian crude oil and its refusal to condemn Russia over the conflict in Ukraine, New Delhi has obviously reached consensus with the US on a long-term partnership to meet the formidable Chinese challenge. Both countries feel each other’s support is incalculably vital and indispensable.

Sri Lanka, India, and Japan, in May 2019, signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) to jointly develop the East Container Terminal (ECT) at the Colombo Port. That was during the tail end of the Yahapalana administration. The Gotabaya Rajapaksa administration wanted to take that project forward. But trade unions, spearheaded by the JVP/NPP combine, thwarted a tripartite agreement on the basis that they opposed privatisation of the Colombo Port at any level.

But, the Colombo West International Terminal (CWIT) project, that was launched in November, 2022, during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency, became fully operational in April this year. The JVP revolutionary tiger has completely changed its stripes regarding foreign investments and privatisation. If the JVP remained committed to its previous strategies, India taking over CDL or CWIT would have been unrealistic.

The failure on the part of the government to reveal its stand on visits by foreign research vessels to ports here underscored the intensity of US and Indian pressure. Hope our readers remember how US and India compelled the then President Wickremesinghe to announce a one-year moratorium on such visits. In line with that decision Sri Lanka declared research vessels wouldn’t be allowed here during 2024. The NPP that succeeded Wickremesinghe’s administration in September, 2024, is yet to take a decision on foreign research vessels. What a pity?

The NPP ends the year on the back foot, struggling to cope up with daunting challenges, both domestic and external. The recent revelation of direct Indian intervention in the 2022 regime change project here along with the US underscored the gravity of the situation and developing challenges. Post-cyclone period will facilitate further Indian and US interventions for obvious reasons.

****

Perhaps one of the most debated events in 2025 was the opening of ‘City of Dreams Sri Lanka’ that included, what the investors called, a world-class casino. In spite of mega Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan’s unexpected decision to pull out of the grand opening on 02 August, the investors went ahead with the restricted event. The Chief Guest was President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who is also the Finance Minister, in addition to being the Defence Minister. Among the other notable invitees were Dissanayake’s predecessor Ranil Wickremesinghe, whose administration gave critical support to the high-profile project, worth over USD 1.2 bn. John Keells Holdings PLC (JKH) and Melco Resorts & Entertainment (Melco) invested in the project that also consist of the luxurious Nüwa hotel and a premium shopping mall. Who would have thought President Dissanayake’s participation, even remotely, possible, against the backdrop of his strong past public opposition to gambling of any kind?

Don’t forget ‘City of Dreams’ received a license to operate for a period of 20 years. Definitely an unprecedented situation. Although that license had been issued by the Wickremesinghe administration, the NPP, or any other political party represented in Parliament, didn’t speak publicly about that matter. Interesting, isn’t it, coming from people, still referred by influential sections of the Western media, as avowed Marxists?

 

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

Midweek Review

The Aesthetics and the Visual Politics of an Artisanal Community

Published

on

Through the Eyes of the Patua:

Organised by the Colombo Institute for Human Sciences in collaboration with Millennium Art Contemporary, an interesting and unique exhibition got underway in the latter’s gallery in Millennium City, Oruwala on 21 December 2025. The exhibition is titled, ‘Through the Eyes of the Patua: Ramayana Paintings of an Artisanal Community’ and was organized in parallel with the conference that was held on 20 December 2025 under the theme, ‘Move Your Shadow: Rediscovering Ravana, Forms of Resistance and Alternative Universes in the Tellings of the Ramayana.’ The scrolls on display at the gallery are part of the over 100 scrolls in the collection of Colombo Institute’s ‘Roma Chatterji Patua Scroll Collection.’ Prof Chatterji, who taught Sociology at University of Delhi and at present teaches at Shiv Nadar University donated the scrolls to the Colombo Institute in 2024.

The paintings on display are what might be called narrative scrolls that are often over ten feet long. Each scroll narrates a story, with separate panels pictorially depicting one component of a story. The Patuas or the Chitrakars, as they are also known, are traditionally bards. A bard will sing the story that is depicted by each scroll which is simultaneously unfurled. For Sri Lankan viewers for whom the paintings and their contexts of production and use would be unusual and unfamiliar, the best way to understand them is to consider them as a comic strip. In the case of the ongoing exhibition, since the bards or the live songs are not a part of it, the word and voice elements are missing. However, the curators have endeavoured to address this gap by displaying a series of video presentations of the songs, how they are performed and the history of the Patuas as part of the exhibition itself.

The unfamiliarity of the art on display and their histories, necessitates broader explanation. The Patua hail from Medinipur District of West Bengal in India. Essentially, this community of artisans are traditional painters and singers who compose stories based on sacred texts such as the Ramayana or Mahabharata as well as secular events that can vary from the bombing of the Twin Towers in New York in 2001 to the Indian Ocean Tsunami of 2004. Even though painted storytelling is done by a number of traditional artisan groups in India, the Patua is the only community where performers and artists belong to the same group. Hence, Professor Chatterji, in her curatorial note for the exhibition calls them “the original multi-media performers in Bengal.”

‘The story of the Patuas’ also is an account of what happens to such artisanal communities in contemporary times in South Asia more broadly even though this specific story is from India. There was a time before the 21st century when such communities were living and working across a large part of eastern India – each group with a claim to their recognizably unique style of painting. However, at the present time, this community and their vocation is limited to areas such as Medinipur, Birbhum, Purulia in West Bengal and Dumka in Jharkhand.

A pertinent question is how the scroll painters from Medinipur have survived the vagaries of time when others have not. Professor Chatterji provides an important clue when she notes that these painters, “unlike their counterparts elsewhere, are also extremely responsive to political events.” As such, “apart from a rich repertoire of stories based on myth and folklore, including the Ramayana and other epics, they have, over many years, also composed on themes that range from events of local or national significance such as boat accidents and communal violence to global events such as the tsunami and the attack on the World Trade Centre.”

There is another interesting aspect that becomes evident when one looks into the socio-cultural background of this community. As Professor Chatterji writes, “one significant feature that gives a distinct flavour to their stories is the fact that a majority of Chitrakars consider themselves to be Muslims but perform stories based largely on Hindu myths.” In this sense, their story complicates the tension-ridden dichotomies between ethno-cultural and religious groups typical of relations between groups in India as well as more broadly in South Asia, including in Sri Lanka. Prof Chatterji suggests this positionality allows the Patua to have “a truly secular voice so vital in the world that we live in today.”

As a result, she notes, contemporary Patuas “have propagated the message of communal harmony in their compositions in the context of the recent riots in India and the Gulf War. Their commentaries couched in the language of myth are profoundly symbolic and draw on a rich oral tradition of storytelling.” What is even more important is their “engagement with contemporary issues also inflects their aesthetics” because many of these painters also “experiment with novel painterly values inspired by recent interaction with new media such as comic books and with folk art forms from other parts of the country.”

From this varied repertoire of the Patuas’ painterly tradition, this exhibition focusses on scrolls portraying different aspects of the Ramayana. In North Indian and the more dominant renditions of the Ramayana, the focus is on Rama while in many alternate renditions this shifts to Ravana as typified by versions popular among the Sinhalas and Tamils in Sri Lanka as well as in some areas in several Indian states. Compared to this, the Patua renditions in the exhibition mostly illustrate the abduction of Sita with a pronounced focus on Sita and not on Ravana, the conventional antagonist or on Rama, the conventional protagonist. As a result, these two traditional male colossuses are distant. Moreover, with the focus on Sita, these folk renditions also bring to the fore other figures directly associated with her such as her sons Luv and Kush in the act of capturing Rama’s victory horse as well as Lakshmana.

Interestingly, almost as a counter narrative, which also serves as a comparison to these Ramayana scrolls, the exhibition also presents three scrolls known as ‘bin-Laden Patas’ depicting different renditions on the attack on New York’s Twin Towers.

While the painted scrolls in this collection have been exhibited thrice in India, this is the first time they are being exhibited in Sri Lanka, and it is quite likely such paintings from any community beyond Sri Lanka’s shores were not available for viewing in the country before this. Organised with no diplomatic or political affiliation and purely as a Sri Lankan cultural effort with broader South Asian interest, it is definitely worth a visit. The exhibition will run until 10 January 2026.

Continue Reading

Midweek Review

Spoils of Power

Published

on

Power comes like a demonic spell,

To restless humans constantly in chains,

And unless kept under a tight leash,

It drives them from one ill deed to another,

And among the legacies they thus deride,

Are those timeless truths lucidly proclaimed,

By prophets, sages and scribes down the ages,

Hailing from Bethlehem, Athens, Isipathana,

And other such places of hallowed renown,

Thus plunging themselves into darker despair.

By Lynn Ockersz

Continue Reading

Trending