Connect with us

Opinion

What should one do when scientists differ on safety of glyphosate?

Published

on

by Chandre Dharmawardana,
chandre.dharma@yahoo.ca

Ravindra Jayananda (RJ), has written to The Island (18-10-2022) expressing concern on my article (14-10-22, The Island) entitled “Toxin gonibillas cry wolf again, wanting agrochemical ban”. I thank him for raising these concerns, although I myself, and previous writers like Dr. Waidyanatha, Dr. Illeperuma, Dr. C. S. Weeraratne, Dr. Buddhi Marambe and many others have also addressed them from time to time, in previous newspaper articles.For instance, Jayananda (who I believe is an engineering academic), has raises the following issues.

(a) He (i.e., Professor Dharmawardana) claims that Glyphosate is not a toxin and goes to say that, even 300 mg of vitamin A is a toxin…(then)…everything is toxic depending on the dose.

Exactly. This was stated six centuries ago by Paracelsus, the father of toxicology, with his famous dictum, “What is there that is not poison? All things are poison and nothing is without poison. Solely the dose determines that a thing is not a poison.”

There are basically two extremes of toxicity, known as “acute toxicity” and “chronic toxicity”. The relevant dosages are quite different, and it is very important to distinguish between them. Acute toxicity is the immediate toxicity if you ingest a large amount of the substance at once, either orally, via the skin, or by inhalation. The lethal dose for oral, dermal, or inhalation toxicity are widely different even for once substance. For oral acute toxicity to kill 50% of the rats in a sample, approximately 4-5 grams of glyphosate per kilo of body weight are needed. Animal and human data suggest that a 60 kg human would be at extreme risk if he/she were to drink a cup (200 ml) of full-strength glyphosate. So, it is much safer than many common pharmaceuticals and household cleaners as far as acute toxicity is concerned. A safety factor of 100 is applied to results based on animal experiments in extrapolating to humans.

However, what is important is the chronic toxicity of any substance. This results from prolonged intake of very small quantities over a long time. The Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) is an expert ad hoc body of the FAO and WHO for the purpose of risk assessments of pesticide residues and their long-term effects. A press statement by the JMPR, May 16th 2016 in Geneva, states that no significant chronic toxicity has been found for glyphosate. This is definitely the case for all higher animals. This assessment was re-confirmed by the “Giant Study” published in 2018 on glyphoaste toxicity to humans conducted by the US government Dept. of health using some 54,000 farmers and their families (amounting to over 90,000 people) who regularly used commercial glyphosate formulations (containing adjuvants), over a period of 23 years (see: http://www.dailynews.lk/2018/04/19/features/148615/glyphosate-ban-has-gmoa-studied-research/ ) . No unusual increased risk of cancer among them was found, when compared to the general population that does NOT use agrochemicals.

However, a controversy has been launched, mainly by the opponents of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods who also oppose glyphosate for its key role in GM agriculture, based on the fact that glyphosate is toxic to some micro-organisms and hence they argue, invoking the so-called “precautionary principle” that the glyphosate should be banned. Furthermore, based on such observations, the International Agency for Research into Cancer (IARC) ruled in 2014 that glyphosate may probably be carcinogenic to humans although not established to be so. This was prior to the 2018 Giant Study by the US Dept. of health. Hence at that time it was classified as a class-II carcinogen, unlike tobacco, wine or red meat which are established carcinogens and hence classified as class-I.

The anti-Glyhosate and anti-GM lobby continue to quote the IARC classification of 2018, while ignoring the JMPR press release of 2016, or the Giant US Dept. study released in 2018. When litigation is made against glyphosate, the jurors selected from the general public are already frightened by the fear-mongering that has gone on for decades against glyphosate, and court verdicts are invariably against the use of glyphosate.

Environmental organisations like the so-called “Friends of the earth”, Greenpeace, etc were warned by a joint press statement signed by 107 Nobel laureates (carried by, e.g., The Washington Post, July 2016 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/06/29/more-than-100-nobel-laureates-take-on-greenpeace-over-gmo-stance/ ), inviting those “environmental organizations” to not to propagate false information or back so-called “research” which is “setup” to give results against agrochemicals and GM foods.

(b) The ban of Glyphosate by advanced countries is a strong indication that there is a problem with the use of Glyphosate.

This shows the political power of fear mongering against agrochemicals that started in the advanced countries. The legitimate cry of warning against the misuse of agrochemicals initiated in the 1970s by writers like Rachel Carson was used by Richard Nixon, a cunning US politician to win the Green vote in California by banning DDT, and imposing punitive sanctions on countries that use DDT. However, in 2006 the Pasteur Institute in France showed that the domestic use of DDT for the control of mosquitoes was completely safe, while its use in agriculture is not. The US still prevents the export of DDT to African countries where it is badly needed.

Most bans of glyphosate are “paper legislation”. Various politicians campaign to ban glyphosate, and even pass legislation, but remain without being gazetted or applied in practice, or the ban is lifted when farm incomes collapse, as in Sri Lanka. In Lichtenstein, the legislation contravenes EU rules and is under a Court Injunction. In France, President Macron promised to ban Gylphosate, but delayed its application indefinitely. In Macron’s new second term too, practical reality has displaced electoral polemics (see the review in the French newspaper Le Mond, 19-Oct-2022). Health Canada, US Dept. of Health, and similar agencies in the UK, Japan, China, India, and News Zealand have upheld the safety of glyphosate.

(c) There are numerous research articles by scientists on this topic… and that they emphasize the negative effects of the use of Glyphosate.

Indeed, when scientists differ, the public (as well as scientists who are not directly in research on the topic) should follow the mainstream point of view. Google, Scopus etc., should be used for an initial search and only peer-reviewed publications or symposia sponsored by learned societies should be used. The WHO, FAO and their offshoots like IARC, JMPR etc., provide the main-stream scientific view on pesticide usage.

The “numerous research articles” against glyphosate may quote reviews articles, e.g., by Mayers et al (2016, Environmental Health, DOI 10.1186/s12940-016-0117-0) or that by Vandenberg (2017), “Is it time to assess current safety standards for glyphosate-based herbicides? However, such reassessments, even those published since the 2018 completely and conveniently ignore the Giant Study by the US Dept. of health and similar studies in their so-called “reassessments! The EU will make a new official reassessment in December 2022, and most probably re-affirm its usage for another four years.

(d) We should not forget that the multinationals are famous for influencing even the scientific researchers by providing grants for research and PhD degrees. So, if such contrary results can be found … the scientific community has not conclusively given their verdict on this issue

This is precisely why we should follow the UN-based international organisations like the WHO, FAO etc. rather than individual Ph.D studies. The influence-peddling multinationals are not just agrochemical companies, but also foreign-funded NGOs and political operators and organic-food lobby group wanting to capture a larger share of the food market. At present they cater merely to the elite strata, and provide less than 2% of the world’s food needs. In spite of their efforts, many large chains of organic food in Europe have filed bankruptcy in the inflationary aftermath of Covid.

An Engineer launching a building project follows the accepted Building code rather than the ancient “Mayaamatha” building manual based on astrology used medieval ancient Sri Lanka.

The views on agriculture expressed by “Friends of the Earth” groups, self-styled “Environmental Justice” activists, the likes of Vanadana Shiva in India, Ven Ratana, or Ven SamanthaBadhra of the Umandawa project, (or the views of Prof. Nalin de Silva who rejects modern science as a fallacious Western tool for domination), or those who push the teachings of “traditional hela agriculture”, are inconsistent with main-stream science.

While Taiwan, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore and many other countries that lagged behind Sri Lanka in the 1960s are now advanced countries with high standards of living, Sri Lanka has failed due to continued experiments with its destiny by implementing ideology-based developmental policies inspired by jingoism and “revolution”, rather than depending on evidence-based technology-inspired policies.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

South Asian Regional Conference on State of Higher Education 2026 and Education Diplomacy

Published

on

Committee engaged in preparation of Dhaka Higher Education Declaration 2026 (Source Dhaka Tribune 27/1/2026)

On the 15January 2026, the ‘Dhaka Declaration’ was adopted with eight strategic commitments, aimed at building a stable, inclusive, innovative and globally acceptable higher education system in the South Asian region at the third South Asian Regional Conference on State of Higher Education (SARCHE), 2026.

Advisors of the interim government, vice-chancellors of different public and private universities, scholars, researchers and diplomats were present at the third SARCHE 2026 Conference in Dhaka, emphasising the paramount importance of Education diplomacy.

The Nobel Laureate, Chief Adviser of the government, Professor Muhammad Yunus on 12th January 2026 inaugurated a three-day South Asian regional conference on higher education in Dhaka. The conference titled “South Asian Regional Conference on State of Higher Education and Future Pathway (SARCHE 2026)” organised by the Bangladesh government and World Bank funded Higher Education Acceleration and Transformation (HEAT) Project of the University Grants Commission (UGC) of Bangladesh.

Prof. Yunus’s call

Chief Adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus, has called upon the academics to align the education system with the youths’ expectations and aspirations and stressed on revival of the SAARC to enhance regional academic cooperation. “Today, I feel very excited that academics at the highest level could get together in Dhaka. It’s important that this is Dhaka. I hope you will have a chance to kind of review of the things that have happened in Dhaka in the past few months,” he said, referring to post-2024 July Uprising events in Bangladesh. Prof Yunus said review of those events will clarify what university education and education as a whole are really about, adding, this should be the core subject of discussion at the gathering.Highlighting the role of students in the 2024 uprising, he said, “Who are these young people that we are dealing with? They have their own mind. They stood up and raised their voices and brought down the ugliest fascist regime you could ever think of given their lives”.The Chief Adviser made the remarks while addressing the inaugural ceremony of the three-day “South Asian Regional Conference on State of Higher Education and Future Pathway (SARCHE 2026)” at a city hotel in Dhaka, Bangladesh. A total of 30 international representatives, including delegates from the United Kingdom, the Maldives, Malaysia, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka as well as representatives from the World Bank were represented in the event.”It would be a missed opportunity if you don’t spend some time on understanding what they did a few months back in this very city. What was their expectation? What was their aspiration? Why did they stand up in front of guns and give their lives knowingly it will happen,” the Chief Adviser said.To reflect the students’ motivation behind joining the uprising, he referred to school student Shaheed Shahriar Khan Anas’s letter, which he wrote to his mother before embracing the martyrdom, stating that it was his duty to take to the street with his friends, who were subjected to state-sponsored crackdown.Noting that the event was not a sudden outburst, Prof Yunus said it happened in Sri Lanka and in Nepal too, but it happened in a bigger way in Dhaka.

WB thanked for organisng event

He thanked the World Bank for organizing the conference, saying, “This was our responsibility to organize, but we failed. The World Bank has to step into make it happen”.Organizing such gatherings was part of the responsibility under the South Asian Association for Region-al Cooperation (SAARC), the Chief Adviser said, adding, but the SAARC as a word has been forgotten and “that’s a shame on us”. “This was supposed to be the idea of SAARC that we get together and make exchanges and learn from each other,” he said, noting his efforts since he has taken the responsibility as the Chief Adviser to revive the SAARC. “I am repeatedly reminding that we must get back to SAARC. That’s where our family belongs to. And I will not give up repeating that appeal to the governments of the region,” Prof Yunus said,Speaking about the forthcoming national elections and the referendum on February 12, he said the uprising tore everything apart and that the young people created their own July Charter to undo what the country was stuck with.

Referendum on Constitution

Chief Adviser said there would be a referendum to decide what the future constitution of Bangladesh should be, because they believed the root of the problems lay in the constitution. He said those issues were not taught in classrooms and questioned where universities stood in this reality. Noting that the young people have now formed their own political party, Prof Yunus said, “I’m sure some of them will get elected. “He called on educators to reflect on what education and university education should be in this very different world, warning that old ways of doing things are self-destructing and that change must happen quickly, just as the youth acted quickly during the July and August uprising.”So this is one issue, I hope this will be taken up seriously in this gathering where we are, what is being missed, how we can run and be in the front, rather than falling behind,” the Chief Adviser said.

He then said that the education system was not appropriate because it is job-oriented, adding, the system is designed around the idea that students must become suitable for jobs, and “If he or she fails to take a job, we think failure on the part of that student, not us”.Prof Yunus questioned whether the purpose of education is to prepare people for the job market. Human beings are not born as slaves and that each human being is a free person, he said, adding, jobs come from the tradition of slavery, where people work under orders for pay, which he equated with slavery.Stating that the young people who marched on the state refused to be slaves, he said, “So, what kind of education that you will be giving? This is a question I raise with you. You may dismiss it. You may pause for a while. But this is my point. Should we continue this education to create slaves? Turning creative beings into slaves, that’s a criminal job”. Prof Yunus said he translated creativity into entrepreneurship and argued that education should teach young people to be entrepreneurs rather than job seekers. He said young people should be told they are job creators and agents of change, driven by imagination, adding that imagination is the essence of human beings, and that people are born with enormous imagi-native power, which drove the youth to give their lives for the vision of a new Bangladesh.

Besides, representatives of UGCs and higher education commissions from SAARC member countries, vice-chancellors of universities from different countries, academicians and researchers took part in the conference.

Aim of the conference

According to the UGC, Bangladesh the conference has been organised aimed at elevating higher education in Bangladesh to a new height and further strengthen the UGC network among SAARC countries.

A total of eight sessions were held over the three-day conference. Emphasizing on “The Current State of Higher Education in South Asia: Governance, Quality and Inclusion” and “Research, Innovation, Sustainability and Social Engagement, Artificial Intelligence (AI) Integration, Digital Transformation and Smart Learning Ecosystems”, “Increasing Employment for Graduates and Industry–Academia collaboration”, “Future Pathways of Higher Education: Cooperation, Solidarity and Networking, “Stakeholder Dialogue on Higher Education Transformation: Voices of Civil Society”, and “Dialogue with Vice-Chancellors: the Context of the HEAT Project, gender issues in higher education will be held while the conference l ended following the adoption of the “Dhaka Higher Education Declaration”.

UGC, Bangladesh warns against fake foreign university branches in Bangladesh. Reports in various media outlets have highlighted several foreign universities, institutes are running unauthorized branch campuses, tutorial centers, and study centers across the country. The University Grants Commission (UGC) has cautioned students and parents against enrolling in three unauthorized foreign universities reportedly operating branch campuses in Bangladesh. According to the commission, American World University, USA; Trinity University, USA; and the Spiritual Institute of New York (State University) have no government or UGC approval to conduct academic activities in the country.

On the other hand, higher education has considered as a strategic necessity for the Maldives and called for enhanced regional cooperation, industry – academia collaboration, and impact – oriented research to support inclusive growth and resilience across the region.

While Pakistan has reached its greater heights in implementation of their AI policy, World bank is acting as a strong partner in developing these endeavors of regional partners.

Lessons to be learnt

We as a country has spent huge amount of expenditure in higher education, grants and research endeavors where majority of them have took place in western academic scenario. Our attitude as Sri Lankans do not wish to learn from regional partners and we highly embrace western based cultures and their development, while regional partners have emerged beyond Sri Lanka. Very few academia is passionately engaged in development initiatives while majority have violated bonds and residing in overseas lavishly having used government expenditure which should have spent on the public wellbeing of this Country. I wonder how many governments should take control of this paradise isle to understand this reality, still we are grappling with 17 universities under the Universities act with very few international student recruitments. The case of other State Universities cannot cater the increasing local demand as they need to keep their standards. In such a scenario admission of international students and their increasing demands are questionable? Our immigration do not facilitate as a separate compartment to facilitate international student recruitment like in Malaysia.

The government enacted the Private University Act in Bangladesh in 1992 and replaced in 2010. These laws were enacted to enable private universities to supplement the governments efforts in meeting the growing demand for higher education. Under the Act, private individuals, groups and philanthropic organizations are permitted to establish and operate self -financed, degree-awarding universities by fulfilling prescribed conditions. Due to rapid increase, the 2010 Act introduced Stricker provisions focused on quality assurance, accountability and good governance. It mandates statutory bodies such as Board of trustees, Syndicate and Academic Council and clearly defines their roles and responsibilities. The Vice chancellor serves as the chief executive and academic officer of the university and is the ex-officio member the Board of Trustees. The honorable president of Bangladesh act as the chancellor of all private universities and appoint key officials upon recommendations of the Board of trustees. The Act also mandates establishment of an accreditations council to ensure quality assurance UGC supervises and monitors private universities on behalf of the Ministry of Education, approves academic programs, curricula, prescribe minimum faculty qualifications and requires transparency through annual audited financial reporting.

However, many decades have gone and the Transnational education specifically in higher education in Sri Lanka is a struggle of Authority and Power. Many of the view that the Ministry of Higher Education does not cater the entire gamut of private Higher Education Institutes operating in Sri Lanka and do not address public issues. While UGC alone handles many of the public issues even in the transnational education with no authority in non-state sector. Hence, proper enactments under one umbrella need to be empowered for the sake of public. Sri Lankan practice is the Committees appointed to address public issues does not have genuine interest or knowledge to serve this sector rather depend on benefits derived.

Therefore, SARCHE 2026 has opened eyes of Sri Lanka on how the private sector should have healthy competition with public sector, while contributing massively to strengthen the economy.

Transnational Education in Sri Lanka

According to British Council reports on transnational Education,20224 and the SAARC regional Coordinator for the British Council was of the view that Sri Lanaka does not maintain a official repository for transnational education. The Company registrar or the Board of investment do not have a official repository which serves only for higher education purpose. There is no regulatory authority to address the agency problem engaged in transnational education where finally many have reported as unethical business practices.

While India, Pakistan, Maldives and Bangladesh massively invest on Transnational education to strengthen their economies we still do not have a national plan to address this with a regulatory mechanism with proper licensing, listing for Agents to operate in Sri Lanka in order to mitigate Education fraud.

Conclusion

There was a time when students who could not secure admissions to public universities turned to private universities as a last option. That really has changed significantly. Today, many students who qualify for public universities still choose private universities because they do not get admission to their preferred subjects. The primary reason is the freedom to study the subject of their choice. However, in Sri Lanka very few private entities provides a truly a university experience. While regional partners have improved beyond 100 in establishing private universities, still private public partnership in those countries are very best examples for Sri Lanka. According to the UGC,2023 Annual report there were 341,000 students enrolled across 110 private universities in Bangladesh, now has increased to 170 according to SARCHE,2026.

Pakistan maintains best examples of Artificial Intelligence models with World Bank Funding to their University System. University Business linkages in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh provide strong examples in Transfer of Technology. While Maldives will cater for the next round of SAARC conference on the state of higher education. They invite Sri Lanka along with regional partners for preparation of qualification framework with mutual recognition of qualifications with credit transfer facility. The “Dhaka declaration of Higher Education “was adopted at the SARCHE 2026, It intend to cooperate with regional partners in many aspects in Higher Education. With these concluding remarks it is high time to consider different aspects of higher education in the proposed reforms.

By Dr. Janadari Wijesinghe

Continue Reading

Opinion

English as used in scientific report writing

Published

on

The scientific community in the English-speaking world publishes its research findings using technical and scientific English (naturally!). It has its own particular vocabulary. Many words are exclusive for a particular technology as they are specialised technical terms. Also, the inclusion in research papers of mathematical and statistical terms and calculations is important where they support the overall findings.

There is a whole array of specialist publications, journals, papers and letters serving the scientific community world-wide.  These publications are by subscription only but can easily be found in university libraries upon request.

Academics quote the number of their research papers published with pride. They are the status symbols of personal achievement par excellence!  And most importantly, these are used to help justify the continuation of funding for the upcoming academic year.

Such writings are carefully crafted works of precision and clarity. Not a word is out of place. All words used are nuanced to fit exactly the meaning of what the authors of the paper wish to convey. No word is superfluous (= extra, not needed); all is well manicured to convey the message accurately to a knowledgeable, receptive reader. As a result, people from all around the world are using the Internet to access these research findings thus establishing the English language as a major form of information dissemination.

Reporting is best when it is measurable and can be quantified. Figures mean a lot in the scientific world. Sizes, quantities, ranges of acceptance, figures of probability, etc., all are used to lend authority to the research findings.

Before a paper can be accepted for publication it must be submitted to a panel for peer review. This is where several experts in the subject or speciality form a panel to assess the work and approve or reject it. Careers depend on well-presented reports.

Preparation Before Starting Research

There is a standard procedure for a researcher to follow before any practical work is done. It is necessary to evaluate the current status of work in this subject. This requires reading all the relevant, available literature, books, papers, etc., on this subject. This is done for the student to get ‘up to speed’ and in tune with the preceding research work in this field. During this process new avenues for research and investigation may open up for investigation.

Much research is done incorporating the ‘design of experiments’ statistical approach. Research these days rely heavily on statistics to prove an argument and the researcher has to be familiar and conversant with these statistical techniques of inquiry and evaluation to add weight to his or her findings.

We are all much richer due to the investigations done in the English-speaking world by the investigative scientific community using English as a tool of communication. In scientific research, the best progress in innovation, it seems, is when students can all collaborate. Then the best ideas develop and come out.

Sri Lankans should not exclude themselves from this process of knowledge creation and dissemination. Sri Lanka needs to enter this scientific world and issue its own publications in good English. Sri Lanka needs experts who have mastered this form of scientific communication and who can participate in the progress of science!

The most wonderful opportunities open up from time to time for graduates of the STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) mainly in companies using modern technology. The reputation of Sri Lanka depends on having a horse in this race – quite apart from the need to provide suitable careers for its own population. People have ambitions and need to be able rise up intellectually and get ahead. Therefore, students in the STEM subjects need to be able to read, analyse and compare several different research papers, i.e., students need to have critical thinking skills – in English. Often, these skills have to be communicated. Students need to be able to write to this high standard of English.

Students need to be able to put their thoughts on paper in a logical, meaningful way, their thoughts backed up by facts and figures according to the principles of the academic, research world. But natural speakers of English have difficulties in mastering this type of English and doing analyses and critical thinking – therefore, it must be multiple times more difficult for Sri Lankans to master this specialised form if English. Therefore, special attention needs to be paid to overcoming this disadvantage.

In addition, the researcher needs to have knowledge of the “design of experiments,” and be familiar with everyday statistics, e.g., the bell curve, ranges of probability, etc.

How can this high-quality English (and basic stats) possibly be taught in Sri Lanka when most campuses focus on the simple passing of grammar exams?

Sri Lanka needs teachers with knowledge of this advanced, specialist form of English supported with statistical “design of experiments” knowledge. Secondly, this knowledge has to be organised and systematized and imparted over a sufficient time period to students with ability and maturity. Over to you NIE, Maharagama!

by Priyantha Hettige

Continue Reading

Opinion

Sri Lanka, the Stars,and statesmen

Published

on

JRJ with President Ronald Reagan at the White House

When President J. R. Jayewardene stood at the White House in 1981 at the invitation of U.S. President Ronald Reagan, he did more than conduct diplomacy; he reminded his audience that Sri Lanka’s engagement with the wider world stretches back nearly two thousand years. In his remarks, Jayewardene referred to ancient explorers and scholars who had written about the island, noting that figures such as Pliny the Elder had already described Sri Lanka, then known as Taprobane, in the first century AD.

Pliny the Elder (c. AD 23–79), writing his Naturalis Historia around AD 77, drew on accounts from Indo-Roman trade during the reign of Emperor Claudius (AD 41–54) and recorded observations about Sri Lanka’s stars, shadows, and natural wealth, making his work one of the earliest Roman sources to place the island clearly within the tropical world. About a century later, Claudius Ptolemy (c. AD 100–170), working in Alexandria, transformed such descriptive knowledge into mathematical geography in his Geographia (c. AD 150), assigning latitudes and longitudes to Taprobane and firmly embedding Sri Lanka within a global coordinate system, even if his estimates exaggerated the island’s size.

These early timelines matter because they show continuity rather than coincidence: Sri Lanka was already known to the classical world when much of Europe remained unmapped. The data preserved by Pliny and systematised by Ptolemy did not fade with the Roman Empire; from the seventh century onward, Arab and Persian geographers, who knew the island as Serendib, refined these earlier measurements using stellar altitudes and navigational instruments such as the astrolabe, passing this accumulated knowledge to later European explorers. By the time the Portuguese reached Sri Lanka in the early sixteenth century, they sailed not into ignorance but into a space long defined by ancient texts, stars, winds, and inherited coordinates.

 Jayewardene, widely regarded as a walking library, understood this intellectual inheritance instinctively; his reading spanned Sri Lankan chronicles, British constitutional history, and American political traditions, allowing him to speak of his country not as a small postcolonial state but as a civilisation long present in global history. The contrast with the present is difficult to ignore. In an era when leadership is often reduced to sound bites, the absence of such historically grounded voices is keenly felt. Jayewardene’s 1981 remarks stand as a reminder that knowledge of history, especially deep, comparative history, is not an academic indulgence but a source of authority, confidence, and national dignity on the world stage.  Ultimately, the absence of such leaders today underscores the importance of teaching our youth history deeply and critically, for without historical understanding, both leadership and citizenship are reduced to the present moment alone.

Anura Samantilleke

Continue Reading

Trending