Connect with us

Midweek Review

War against separatist terrorism: Gen. Daya Rathnayake’s narrative

Published

on

General (retd) Daya Rathnayake presents a copy of ‘Sri Lankawe Bedumwadi Thrasthawadaya 1975-2009’ to Army Commander Lieutenant General Lasantha Rodrigo at the SLF recently.

‘Sri Lankawe Bedumwadi Thrasthawadaya 1975-2009’

(Separatist Terrorism in Sri Lanka 1975 to 2009) made reference to major military operations conducted against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). A very interesting point made was the absence of major military operations after the disastrous Agni Keela (Anvil of Fire) offensive launched on April 24, 2001, in the Jaffna peninsula. That offensive had been aimed at regaining Elephant Pass that was abandoned in April 2000. The Agni Keela debacle stunned the military. That was the last major action undertaken by the military before the People’s Alliance defeat at the 2001 general election leading to the signing of the Norwegian arranged one-sided Ceasefire Agreement (CFA) advantageous to the LTTE. The military remained passive until the LTTE initiated offensive action in the second week of August 2006. The 2001-2006 period saw massive expansion of the LTTE as the southern political leadership pulled in different directions, thereby giving the LTTE a sense of certain victory. Resumption of large scale hostilities, simultaneously in both eastern and northern theaters in August 2006, underscored the level of the LTTE preparedness.

The war against separatist terrorism could have been brought to a successful conclusion much earlier if not for utterly irresponsible, foolish, politically motivated and treacherous actions of successive governments.

President Ranasinghe Premadasa’s handling of the war (January 1989-May 1993) is a glaring case in point. Premadasa’s ill-conceived political strategies that had caused so much destruction at the onset of Eelam War IV, in June 1990, demoralised the armed forces and resulted in debilitating setbacks. Premadasa prolonged the war that lasted two decades (From Eelam War II to IV/ 1990 to 2009).

Former Army Commander General Daya Rathnayake, in his recently launched memoirs ‘Sri Lankawe Bedumwadi Thrasthawadaya 1975-2009’ (Separatist Terrorism in Sri Lanka 1975 to 2009) briefly dealt with Premadasa’s handling of the war, after becoming the President on January 02, 1989. Perhaps, Rathnayake should have elaborated on Premadasa’s period, as the LTTE underwent a drastic transformation during Premadasa’s time. Premadasa not only directed the military to fully cooperate with the LTTE, the group was also provided with both arms, ammunition and finance, at the taxpayers’ expense.

Rathnayake, nor the previous ex-military officers who authored books on the conflict, never really bothered to examine this aspect. Premadasa ordered the disbursement of funds to the LTTE, just months after he took office as the President. There is irrefutable evidence that Premadasa had the then Finance Secretary, R. Paskaralingam, release to the Tigers Rs 5 mn each time, on August 09, September 15, 27, November 11, 30, and December 13, 1989. In the following year, again Rs 5 mn each were released to the LTTE on January 08, 30, February 20, March 02, 21, April 19, 20, and June 06 and 08. Premadasa’s decision to release Rs 50 mn on November 05, 1990, is a mystery as, by then, the LTTE had taken the upper hand in the Eelam War II. Why did Premadasa release Rs 50 mn about five months after the resumption of fighting and the strategic loss of the Kandy-Jaffna A9 road, north of Vavuniya? That foolish action had never been explained and no one in authority bothered to examine Premadasa’s action.

The 21st Commander of the Army Rathnayake (August 1, 2013, to February 21, 2015) succeeded General Jagath Jayasuriya (July 15, 2009, to July 31, 2013), the man who earned the wrath of war-winning Army commander, General Sarath Fonseka, for obvious reasons. President Mahinda Rajapaksa brought in Jayasuriya as Fonseka’s successor, amidst developing turmoil over his decision to replace Fonseka.

Dispute between the Rajapaksas and Fonseka

The unprecedented dispute between the Rajapaksas and Fonseka, over the latter’s entry into politics, seeking the highest office in 2010, threw the country into political turmoil as never before. That undermined the post-war defence of armed forces in the face of war crimes accusations, propagated by Western powers. The election of Maithripala Sirisena as President, in January 2015, paved the way for Fonseka to receive the coveted Field Marshal’s appointment in May 2015. In Oct ober, the same year, just two months after the parliamentary polls, the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government treacherously co-sponsored an accountability resolution against its own war-winning armed forces. Rathnayake relinquished command a couple of weeks before Fonseka’s appointment as Field Marshal.

One-time Rajapaksa loyalist Rathnayake teamed-up with experienced writer Major Sarath Jayawardena to author a highly readable book that explained the conflict lucidly. The book launch took place amidst the ongoing controversy over the National People’s Power (NPP) government’s handling of the 16th Anniversary of the crushing defeat rendered to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in the battlefield. Rathnayake received appointment as Secretary to the Ministry of Industries in July 2021. Previously he served as Chairman of the Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA,) but quit amidst controversy. In the run-up to the last presidential election, Rathnayake pledged his support to presidential candidate Sajith Premadasa.

People found fault with the government over President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s decision not to attend the May 19 event. But, the President, who is also the Defence Minister and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces ,at the last moment, fortunately, changed his mind, thereby averting a major blunder.

Let me get back to the work of the two authors.

They dealt with the beginning on a low intensity conflict, the gradual development of hostilities, to a full scale conventional war, the Indian military deployment here (August 1987 to March 1990), resumption of war between the government and the LTTE, in June 1990, on and off peace negotiations, and the collapse of the Norwegian peace initiative, finally leading to the destruction of the group whose military prowess surprised the world. But, as the authors pointed out, Sri Lanka, too, contributed to the enemy’s battlefield success. Rathnayake explained one major blunder caused by Premadasa at the onset of Eelam War II.

The then Major Rathnayake had been at the Joint Operations Headquarters (JOH), Colombo, when fighting raged in the East, in the second week of June 1990. The senior author had been the duty officer at the JOH. Rathnayake is, perhaps, one of the few military personnel to observe the then State Defence Minister, the late Ranjan Wijeratne, Defence Secretary the late General Cyril Ranatunga, and then IGP the late Ernest Perera, issuing orders for the armed forces, and police, to surrender to the LTTE.

Rathnayake names the then Lt. Colonel Hiran Halangoda, the Commanding Officer of the first battalion of Gemunu Watch (1GW), as the one who refused to heed the treacherous directive issued by the JOH. Sri Lanka never bothered to examine the conduct of political and military leadership during the conflict. Even 17 years after the conclusion of the war, no government took tangible measures to conduct a thorough examination of the conflict.

Although several senior retired officers had written about the conflict, in addition to wartime Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who himself served the celebrated Gajaba Regiment, the armed forces hadn’t made a collective effort to record the conflict. Co-author Maj. Jayawardena, in his brief but quite useful narrative, explained the overall shortcomings in the armed forces’ efforts. Jayawardena pointed out how Mahavamsa, too, failed to receive the confidence of all.

In spite of the discrepancy in the number of police deaths, as a result of the treacherous directive issued by the UNP government, the Police Department, according to Rathnayake and Jayawardena, definitely lost more than 600 officers and men.

Pooneryn debacle

Rathnayake and Jayawardena discussed the Pooneryn debacle and the subsequent pullout from the area. The losses suffered by the Army as a result of the multi-pronged attack on the Pooneryn-Nagathevanthurai naval detachment, in early November 1993, underscored the failure on the part of the command structure.

The writer was surprised the authors failed to mention the then Army Commander Cecil Waidyaratne acceptance of responsibility for the Pooneryn debacle and resigned on December 31, 1993. During the 30-year conflict, Waidyaratne was the only service chief to relinquish command following a debacle. The authors also depend on the memoirs of Sivakamy Sivasubramaniyam, alias Thamilini, the LTTE’s Women’s Wing leader whose memoirs were launched after the conclusion of the conflict and attracted much public attention. Thamilini’s THIYUNU ASIPATHAKA SEWANA YATA received appreciation from many, though some of those who still cannot stomach the LTTE’s defeat found fault with her for obvious reasons.

Thamilini died of cancer in October 2015, seven years after she surrendered to the Army on the Vanni east front.

The latest book from an ex-Army commander can influence the Sinhala readers, especially at a time when a concentrated attempt was being made to downplay the bloody conflict, ignoring innumerable sacrifices made by the armed forces to preserve the country’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. Regardless of the strategic political-military blunders and battlefield miscalculations, the armed forces ultimately brought the war to a successful conclusion.

Rathnayake explained the loss of the Kandy-Jaffna A9 road at the onset of the Eelam War II, on June 11, 1990, soon after the LTTE broke the14-month honeymoon with Premadasa. That stretch of road, north of Vavuniya, remained under LTTE control till the armed forces regained the area in the first week of January 2009.

The authors referred to memoirs of several retired officers, including the late Maj. General Sarath Munasinghe, the late Maj. Gen. Cyril Ranatunga (he was one of those shortsighted persons who, at the behest of Premadasa, ordered the police and the military to surrender), Maj General Wasantha Perera, General Gerry de Silva, General Kamal Gunaratne and Admiral of the Fleet Wasantha Karannagoda. However, the authors should have paid attention to Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka’s memoirs ‘The Army Commander’s Promise to the Nation’, as well as Special Forces veteran Dhammi Hewage ‘Fighting on Two Fronts’ and armourd corps veteran Ranjan Wijedasa’s ‘Unburied Man.’

Rathnayake and his co-author also left out wartime Defence Secretary Lt. Colonel Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s autobiography ‘Gota’s War.’ Authored by political analyst and Sri Lanka’s former Permanent Representative in Geneva C.A. Chandraprema. ‘Gota’s War’, whatever the criticism directed at its author, is the most comprehensive post-war work on the conflict.

Post-war failure

All those who authored books on the conflict, so far, failed pathetically to build a strong defence of war-winning armed forces against wild war crimes allegations, especially emanating from the West. Sri Lanka’s failure to counter unsubstantiated war crimes allegations propagated by interested parties, including those represented in Parliament, is a mystery. Seventeen years after the successful conclusion of the conflict, the country is in a deepening political-economic-social crisis. The absence of long queues for essentials, as in 2022, does not mean we are out of the woods. In spite of national elections that paved the way for the NPP to secure both the presidency and 2/3 majority in Parliament, the country is certainly not out of the woods yet.

The current armed forces leadership, in consultation with the NPP government, should at least now establish an expert team, consisting of wartime GoCs of the fighting Divisions and Task Forces, or their senior representatives, and other key officers, now retired, to formulate a strategy that would go beyond memoirs of any particular officer. The inclusion of Gajaba Regiment veteran Chagi Gallage, who played a significant role in military operations that cleared the Eastern theatre of operations (2006-2007), and then contributed immensely to the success in the Vanni theatre (2007-2009). Gallage, who had been the then Lt. Gen. Sarath Fonseka’s original choice to command Task Force 1, subsequently named 58 Division, the celebrated formation that figured prominently in the destruction of the LTTE. General Shavendra Silva, who retired on January 01, 2025, gave unparalleled leadership to that division after Chagi Gallage suffered a sudden heart attack, is credited with causing massive losses on the enemy, both in terms of territory, men and material.

Sri Lanka’s failure to counter unsubstantiated war crimes accusations, even 17 years after the emphatic defeat of the LTTE, cannot be discussed without taking into consideration Sarath Fonseka switching allegiance to the UNP in 2009. Fonseka’s political move wrong-footed the war-winning military. UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe ensnared the Sinha Regiment veteran who had no option but to join an unholy alliance that included the Illankai Thamil Arasu Kadchi (ITAK) led Tamil National Alliance (TNA).

The man, who was supposed to lead Sri Lanka’s defence against war crimes accusations, himself contributed to the Geneva plot by alleging Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa ordered the 58 Division to execute those who surrendered on the Vanni east front. Fonseka’s declarations in the run-up to the 2010 presidential election undermined the country in no small measure.

As to why Fonseka got on the same political platform with the TNA that had recognised the LTTE as the sole representative of Tamil speaking people, way back in 2001, is still a mystery. Fonseka’s contentious move divided the war-winning Army and repercussions are still being felt, that being the worst type of treachery. Although retired officer’s right to enter active politics cannot be challenged under any circumstances, Fonseka’s alliance with those who relentlessly pursued hostile campaigns against the military during the conflict, caused immense damage.

The US, the UK and Canada have taken specific punitive measures against selected officers, while the UN held Sri Lanka responsible for over 40,000 civilian deaths out of thin air. But none of them ever sanctioned Fonseka over accusations though the world accepted he spearheaded the successful ground offensive from Colombo as he knew the terrain like the back of his hand.

The ex-top brass must contribute to a collective effort to set the record straight. The country cannot any further delay a cohesive bid to counter the Geneva challenge and action taken by individual countries as part of their overall political strategy to cultivate voters of Sri Lankan origin. There cannot be a better example than Canada that relentlessly pursued Sri Lanka. The appointment of Gary Anandasangaree as their Public Safety Minister recently highlighted the danger the Canadian strategy posed as Sri Lanka still remained ignorant of the developing scenario.

The Tamil Guardian recently declared moves to establish a second Tamil genocide monument, close on the heels of one put up in Brampton, Ontario. Naïve Sri Lankan leadership seems to be struggling to cope up with the Canadian onslaught.

By Shamindra Ferdinando



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Midweek Review

Year ends with the NPP govt. on the back foot

Published

on

President Dissanayake addresses Parliament as PM Dr. Harini Amarasuriya looks on. Dissanayake is the leader of both the JVP and NPP

The failure on the part of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) government to fulfil a plethora of promises given in the run up to the last presidential election, in September, 2024, and a series of incidents, including cases of corruption, and embarrassing failure to act on a specific weather alert, ahead of Cyclone Ditwah, had undermined the administration beyond measure.

Ditwah dealt a knockout blow to the arrogant and cocky NPP. If the ruling party consented to the Opposition proposal for a Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) to probe the events leading to the November 27 cyclone, the disclosure would be catastrophic, even for the all-powerful Executive President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, as responsible government bodies, like the Disaster Management Centre that horribly failed in its duty, and the Met Department that alerted about the developing storm, but the government did not heed its timely warnings, directly come under his purview.

The NPP is on the back foot and struggling to cope up with the rapidly developing situation. In spite of having both executive presidency and an overwhelming 2/3 majority in Parliament, the government seems to be weak and in total disarray.

The regular appearance of President Dissanayake in Parliament, who usually respond deftly to criticism, thereby defending his parliamentary group, obviously failed to make an impression. Overall, the top NPP leadership appeared to have caused irreparable damage to the NPP and taken the shine out of two glorious electoral victories at the last presidential and parliamentary polls held in September and November 2024 respectively.

The NPP has deteriorated, both in and out of Parliament. The performance of the 159-member NPP parliamentary group, led by Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, doesn’t reflect the actual situation on the ground or the developing political environment.

Having repeatedly boasted of its commitment to bring about good governance and accountability, the current dispensation proved in style that it is definitely not different from the previous lots or even worse. (The recent arrest of a policeman who claimed of being assaulted by a gang, led by an NPP MP, emphasised that so-called system change is nothing but a farce) In the run-up to the November, 2024, parliamentary polls, President Dissanayake, who is the leader of both the JVP and NPP, declared that the House should be filled with only NPPers as other political parties were corrupt. Dissanayake cited the Parliament defeating the no-confidence motions filed against Ravi Karunanayake (2016/over Treasury Bond scams) and Keheliya Rambukwella (2023/against health sector corruption) to promote his argument. However, recently the ongoing controversy over patient deaths, allegedly blamed on the administration of Ondansetron injections, exposed the government.

Mounting concerns over drug safety and regulatory oversight triggered strong calls from medical professionals, and trade unions, for the resignation of senior officials at the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) and the State Pharmaceutical Corporation (SPC).

Medical and civil rights groups declared that the incident exposed deep systemic failures in Sri Lanka’s drug regulatory framework, with critics warning that the collapse of quality assurance mechanisms is placing patients’ lives at grave risk.

The Medical and Civil Rights Professional Association of Doctors (MCRPA), and allied trade unions, accused health authorities of gross negligence and demanded the immediate resignation of senior NMRA and SPC officials.

MCRPA President Dr. Chamal Sanjeewa is on record as having said that the Health Ministry, NMRA and SPC had collectively failed to ensure patient safety, citing, what he described as, a failed drug regulatory system.

The controversy has taken an unexpected turn with some alleging that the NPP government, on behalf of Sri Lanka and India, in April this year, entered into an agreement whereby the former agreed to lower quality/standards of medicine imports.

Trouble begins with Ranwala’s resignation

The NPP suffered a humiliating setback when its National List MP Asoka Ranwala had to resign from the post of Speaker on 13 December, 2024, following intense controversy over his educational qualification. The petroleum sector trade union leader served as the Speaker for a period of three weeks and his resignation shook the party. Ranwala, first time entrant to Parliament was one of the 18 NPP National List appointees out of a total of 29. The Parliament consists of 196 elected and 29 appointed members. Since the introduction of the National List, in 1989, there had never been an occasion where one party secured 18 slots.

The JVP/NPP made an initial bid to defend Ranwala but quickly gave it up and got him to resign amidst media furor. Ranwala dominated the social media as political rivals exploited the controversy over his claimed doctorate from the Waseda University of Japan, which he has failed to prove to this day. But, the JVP/NPP had to suffer a second time as a result of Ranwala’s antics when he caused injuries to three persons, including a child, on 11 December, in the Sapugaskanda police area.

The NPP made a pathetic, UNP and SLFP style effort to save the parliamentarian by blaming the Sapugaskanda police for not promptly subjecting him for a drunk driving test. The declaration made by the Government Analyst Department that the parliamentarian hadn’t been drunk at the time of the accident, several days after the accident, does not make any difference. Having experienced the wrongdoing of successive previous governments, the public, regardless of what various interested parties propagated on social media, realise that the government is making a disgraceful bid to cover-up.

No less a person than President Dissanayake is on record as having said that their members do not consume liquor. Let us wait for the outcome of the internal investigation into the lapses on the part of the Sapugaskanda police with regard to the accident that happened near Denimulla Junction, in Sapugaskanda.

JVP/NPP bigwigs obviously hadn’t learnt from the Weligama W 15 hotel attack in December, 2023, that ruined President Ranil Wickremeinghe’s administration. That incident exposed the direct nexus between the government and the police in carrying out Mafia-style operations. Although the two incidents cannot be compared as the circumstances differ, there is a similarity. Initially, police headquarters represented the interests of the wrongdoers, while President Wickremesinghe bent over backwards to retain the man who dispatched the CCD (Colombo Crime Division) team to Weligama, as the IGP. The UNP leader went to the extent of speaking to Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, and Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena to push his agenda. There is no dispute the then Public Security Minister Tiran Alles wanted Deshabandu Tennakoon as IGP, regardless of a spate of accusations against him, in addition to him being faulted by the Supreme Court in a high-profile fundamental rights application.

The JVP/NPP must have realised that though the Opposition remained disorganised and ineffective, thanks to the media, particularly social media, a case of transgression, if not addressed swiftly and properly, can develop into a crisis. Action taken by the government to protect Ranwala is a case in point. Government leaders must have heaved a sigh of relief as Ranwala is no longer the Speaker when he drove a jeep recklessly and collided with a motorcycle and a car.

Major cases, key developments

Instead of addressing public concerns, the government sought to suppress the truth by manipulating and exploiting developments

* The release of 323 containers from the Colombo Port, in January 2025, is a case in point. The issue at hand is whether the powers that be took advantage of the port congestion to clear ‘red-flagged’ containers.

Although the Customs repeatedly declared that they did nothing wrong and such releases were resorted even during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency (July 2022 to September 2024), the public won’t buy that. Container issue remains a mystery. That controversy eroded public confidence in the NPP that vowed 100 percent transparency in all its dealings. But the way the current dispensation handled the Port congestion proved that transparency must be the last thing in the minds of the JVPers/NPPers holding office.

* The JVP/NPP’s much touted all-out anti-corruption stand suffered a debilitating blow over their failure to finalise the appointment of a new Auditor General. In spite of the Opposition, the civil society, and the media, vigorously taking up this issue, the government continued to hold up the appointment by irresponsibly pushing for an appointment acceptable to President Dissanayake. The JVP/NPP is certainly pursuing a strategy contrary to what it preached while in the Opposition and found fault with successive governments for trying to manipulate the AG. It would be pertinent to mention that President Dissanayake should accept the responsibility for the inordinate delay in proposing a suitable person to that position. The government failed to get the approval of the Constitutional Council more than once to install a favourite of theirs in it, thanks to the forthright position taken by its civil society representatives.

The government should be ashamed of its disgraceful effort to bring the Office of the Auditor General under its thumb:

* The JVP/NPP government’s hotly disputed decision to procure 1,775 brand-new double cab pickup trucks, at a staggering cost exceeding Rs. 12,500 mn, under controversial circumstances, exposed the duplicity of that party that painted all other political parties black. Would the government rethink the double cab deal, especially in the wake of economic ruination caused by Cyclone Ditwah? The top leadership seems to be determined to proceed with their original plans, regardless of immeasurable losses caused by Cyclone Ditwah. Post-cyclone efforts still remain at a nascent stage with the government putting on a brave face. The top leadership has turned a blind eye to the overwhelming challenge in getting the country back on track especially against the backdrop of its agreement with the IMF.

Post-Cyclone Ditwah recovery process is going to be slow and extremely painful. Unfortunately, both the government and the Opposition are hell-bent on exploiting the miserable conditions experienced by its hapless victims. The government is yet to acknowledge that it could have faced the crisis much better if it acted on the warning issued by Met Department Chief Athula Karunanayake on 12 November, two weeks before the cyclone struck.

Foreign policy dilemma

Sri Lanka moved further closer to India and the US this year as President Dissanayake entered into several new agreements with them. In spite of criticism, seven Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs), including one on defence, remains confidential. What are they hiding?

Within weeks after signing of the seven MoUs, India bought the controlling interests in the Colombo Dockyard Limited for USD 52 mn.

Although some Opposition members, representing the SJB, raised the issue, their leader Sajith Premadasa, during a subsequent visit to New Delhi, indicated he wouldn’t, under any circumstances, raise such a contentious issue.

Premadasa went a step further. The SJB leader assured his unwavering commitment to the full implementation of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution that was forced on Sri Lanka during President JRJ’s administration, under the highly questionable Indo-Lanka Accord of July, 1987, after the infamous parippu drop by Indian military aircraft over Jaffna, their version of the old gunboat diplomacy practiced by the West.

Both India and the US consolidated their position here further in the post-Aragalaya period. Those who felt that the JVP would be in a collision course with them must have been quite surprised by the turn of events and the way post-Aragalaya Sri Lanka leaned towards the US-India combine with not a hum from our carboard revolutionaries now installed in power. They certainly know which side of the bread is buttered. Sri Lanka’s economic deterioration, and the 2023 agreement with the IMF, had tied up the country with the US-led bloc.

In spite of India still procuring large quantities of Russian crude oil and its refusal to condemn Russia over the conflict in Ukraine, New Delhi has obviously reached consensus with the US on a long-term partnership to meet the formidable Chinese challenge. Both countries feel each other’s support is incalculably vital and indispensable.

Sri Lanka, India, and Japan, in May 2019, signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) to jointly develop the East Container Terminal (ECT) at the Colombo Port. That was during the tail end of the Yahapalana administration. The Gotabaya Rajapaksa administration wanted to take that project forward. But trade unions, spearheaded by the JVP/NPP combine, thwarted a tripartite agreement on the basis that they opposed privatisation of the Colombo Port at any level.

But, the Colombo West International Terminal (CWIT) project, that was launched in November, 2022, during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency, became fully operational in April this year. The JVP revolutionary tiger has completely changed its stripes regarding foreign investments and privatisation. If the JVP remained committed to its previous strategies, India taking over CDL or CWIT would have been unrealistic.

The failure on the part of the government to reveal its stand on visits by foreign research vessels to ports here underscored the intensity of US and Indian pressure. Hope our readers remember how US and India compelled the then President Wickremesinghe to announce a one-year moratorium on such visits. In line with that decision Sri Lanka declared research vessels wouldn’t be allowed here during 2024. The NPP that succeeded Wickremesinghe’s administration in September, 2024, is yet to take a decision on foreign research vessels. What a pity?

The NPP ends the year on the back foot, struggling to cope up with daunting challenges, both domestic and external. The recent revelation of direct Indian intervention in the 2022 regime change project here along with the US underscored the gravity of the situation and developing challenges. Post-cyclone period will facilitate further Indian and US interventions for obvious reasons.

****

Perhaps one of the most debated events in 2025 was the opening of ‘City of Dreams Sri Lanka’ that included, what the investors called, a world-class casino. In spite of mega Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan’s unexpected decision to pull out of the grand opening on 02 August, the investors went ahead with the restricted event. The Chief Guest was President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who is also the Finance Minister, in addition to being the Defence Minister. Among the other notable invitees were Dissanayake’s predecessor Ranil Wickremesinghe, whose administration gave critical support to the high-profile project, worth over USD 1.2 bn. John Keells Holdings PLC (JKH) and Melco Resorts & Entertainment (Melco) invested in the project that also consist of the luxurious Nüwa hotel and a premium shopping mall. Who would have thought President Dissanayake’s participation, even remotely, possible, against the backdrop of his strong past public opposition to gambling of any kind?

Don’t forget ‘City of Dreams’ received a license to operate for a period of 20 years. Definitely an unprecedented situation. Although that license had been issued by the Wickremesinghe administration, the NPP, or any other political party represented in Parliament, didn’t speak publicly about that matter. Interesting, isn’t it, coming from people, still referred by influential sections of the Western media, as avowed Marxists?

 

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

Midweek Review

The Aesthetics and the Visual Politics of an Artisanal Community

Published

on

Through the Eyes of the Patua:

Organised by the Colombo Institute for Human Sciences in collaboration with Millennium Art Contemporary, an interesting and unique exhibition got underway in the latter’s gallery in Millennium City, Oruwala on 21 December 2025. The exhibition is titled, ‘Through the Eyes of the Patua: Ramayana Paintings of an Artisanal Community’ and was organized in parallel with the conference that was held on 20 December 2025 under the theme, ‘Move Your Shadow: Rediscovering Ravana, Forms of Resistance and Alternative Universes in the Tellings of the Ramayana.’ The scrolls on display at the gallery are part of the over 100 scrolls in the collection of Colombo Institute’s ‘Roma Chatterji Patua Scroll Collection.’ Prof Chatterji, who taught Sociology at University of Delhi and at present teaches at Shiv Nadar University donated the scrolls to the Colombo Institute in 2024.

The paintings on display are what might be called narrative scrolls that are often over ten feet long. Each scroll narrates a story, with separate panels pictorially depicting one component of a story. The Patuas or the Chitrakars, as they are also known, are traditionally bards. A bard will sing the story that is depicted by each scroll which is simultaneously unfurled. For Sri Lankan viewers for whom the paintings and their contexts of production and use would be unusual and unfamiliar, the best way to understand them is to consider them as a comic strip. In the case of the ongoing exhibition, since the bards or the live songs are not a part of it, the word and voice elements are missing. However, the curators have endeavoured to address this gap by displaying a series of video presentations of the songs, how they are performed and the history of the Patuas as part of the exhibition itself.

The unfamiliarity of the art on display and their histories, necessitates broader explanation. The Patua hail from Medinipur District of West Bengal in India. Essentially, this community of artisans are traditional painters and singers who compose stories based on sacred texts such as the Ramayana or Mahabharata as well as secular events that can vary from the bombing of the Twin Towers in New York in 2001 to the Indian Ocean Tsunami of 2004. Even though painted storytelling is done by a number of traditional artisan groups in India, the Patua is the only community where performers and artists belong to the same group. Hence, Professor Chatterji, in her curatorial note for the exhibition calls them “the original multi-media performers in Bengal.”

‘The story of the Patuas’ also is an account of what happens to such artisanal communities in contemporary times in South Asia more broadly even though this specific story is from India. There was a time before the 21st century when such communities were living and working across a large part of eastern India – each group with a claim to their recognizably unique style of painting. However, at the present time, this community and their vocation is limited to areas such as Medinipur, Birbhum, Purulia in West Bengal and Dumka in Jharkhand.

A pertinent question is how the scroll painters from Medinipur have survived the vagaries of time when others have not. Professor Chatterji provides an important clue when she notes that these painters, “unlike their counterparts elsewhere, are also extremely responsive to political events.” As such, “apart from a rich repertoire of stories based on myth and folklore, including the Ramayana and other epics, they have, over many years, also composed on themes that range from events of local or national significance such as boat accidents and communal violence to global events such as the tsunami and the attack on the World Trade Centre.”

There is another interesting aspect that becomes evident when one looks into the socio-cultural background of this community. As Professor Chatterji writes, “one significant feature that gives a distinct flavour to their stories is the fact that a majority of Chitrakars consider themselves to be Muslims but perform stories based largely on Hindu myths.” In this sense, their story complicates the tension-ridden dichotomies between ethno-cultural and religious groups typical of relations between groups in India as well as more broadly in South Asia, including in Sri Lanka. Prof Chatterji suggests this positionality allows the Patua to have “a truly secular voice so vital in the world that we live in today.”

As a result, she notes, contemporary Patuas “have propagated the message of communal harmony in their compositions in the context of the recent riots in India and the Gulf War. Their commentaries couched in the language of myth are profoundly symbolic and draw on a rich oral tradition of storytelling.” What is even more important is their “engagement with contemporary issues also inflects their aesthetics” because many of these painters also “experiment with novel painterly values inspired by recent interaction with new media such as comic books and with folk art forms from other parts of the country.”

From this varied repertoire of the Patuas’ painterly tradition, this exhibition focusses on scrolls portraying different aspects of the Ramayana. In North Indian and the more dominant renditions of the Ramayana, the focus is on Rama while in many alternate renditions this shifts to Ravana as typified by versions popular among the Sinhalas and Tamils in Sri Lanka as well as in some areas in several Indian states. Compared to this, the Patua renditions in the exhibition mostly illustrate the abduction of Sita with a pronounced focus on Sita and not on Ravana, the conventional antagonist or on Rama, the conventional protagonist. As a result, these two traditional male colossuses are distant. Moreover, with the focus on Sita, these folk renditions also bring to the fore other figures directly associated with her such as her sons Luv and Kush in the act of capturing Rama’s victory horse as well as Lakshmana.

Interestingly, almost as a counter narrative, which also serves as a comparison to these Ramayana scrolls, the exhibition also presents three scrolls known as ‘bin-Laden Patas’ depicting different renditions on the attack on New York’s Twin Towers.

While the painted scrolls in this collection have been exhibited thrice in India, this is the first time they are being exhibited in Sri Lanka, and it is quite likely such paintings from any community beyond Sri Lanka’s shores were not available for viewing in the country before this. Organised with no diplomatic or political affiliation and purely as a Sri Lankan cultural effort with broader South Asian interest, it is definitely worth a visit. The exhibition will run until 10 January 2026.

Continue Reading

Midweek Review

Spoils of Power

Published

on

Power comes like a demonic spell,

To restless humans constantly in chains,

And unless kept under a tight leash,

It drives them from one ill deed to another,

And among the legacies they thus deride,

Are those timeless truths lucidly proclaimed,

By prophets, sages and scribes down the ages,

Hailing from Bethlehem, Athens, Isipathana,

And other such places of hallowed renown,

Thus plunging themselves into darker despair.

By Lynn Ockersz

Continue Reading

Trending