Connect with us

Features

Tuk-tuk tourism truths: Cutting through the lies with honest replies

Published

on

If tourist safety were the true priority, the campaign against self-drive tuk-tuks would be in favour of the real dangers. Data shows that for visitors to Sri Lanka, walking or riding a motorcycle carries a significantly higher risk than driving a low-speed, enclosed three-wheeler. Therefore, opposing a regulated self-drive model for tourists who are rigorously licensed and hold a valid International Driving Permit (IDP) is irrational. This stance ignores comparative safety data to block a form of tourism that offers profound economic benefits, all while permitting statistically more dangerous activities. There is no justification for obstructing well-trained, IDP-holding tourists when the alternatives we allow are far more hazardous.

Yet this very scene of organic tourism is what a powerful lobby in Sri Lanka seems determined to prevent, based on a narrative not of fact, but of fiction.

The myth, pushed relentlessly by segments of the informal tourism transport sector, is as pervasive as it is unfounded: that allowing tourists to drive tuk-tuks is an inherent safety risk. This claim, echoed in the ears of policymakers, has risked a modern, inclusive, and globally aligned tourism model. The truth, however, tells a different story – one where safety is a shared responsibility requiring holistic solutions, not a ‘weaponised excuse’ to eliminate competition and stifle innovation.

The safety smokescreen: A closer look at the data

Research by Prof. Niranga Amarasingha (2021) : specializing in Transportation Engineering reveals that motorcycles are involved in over half of all road fatalities in Sri Lanka. If safety were truly the concern, motorcycles – not tuk-tuks, which are limited to 40km/h – would be the focus of these attacks. So why, then, is there no lobby to restrict motorcycles?

According to data from the Ministry of Transport, Highways and Urban Development, road fatalities in 2022 comprised 33.2% motorcycles, 31.1% pedestrians, 8.5% bicyclists, 7.3% motor cars and dual-purpose vehicles, 7.3% rear riders, 4.7% lorries, 4.2% three-wheelers, 3.5% buses, and 0.2% other. With around 1.18 million registered three-wheelers compared to 900,000 cars, Sri Lanka has more three-wheelers on the road yet they account for a smaller share of fatalities.

A frequent criticism is that Sri Lanka’s roads are too hazardous for foreign drivers. But the data tell a different story. As Ms. Amarasingha notes, Sri Lanka’s fatality rate in 2013 was about 11 per 100,000, well below the 20.1 per 100,000 average for middle-income countries. In reality, Sri Lanka’s roads are no more dangerous, and in many cases safer than those in Thailand, Indonesian, Vietnam, Malaysia, or South Africa, all of which thrive on self-drive tourism

Are tourists unsafe drivers?

Let’s address the central allegation head-on: are foreign drivers with International Driving Permits (IDPs) a menace on Sri Lankan roads?

The argument collapses under the weight of its own logic. Tourists arriving in Sri Lanka with a valid driving license have already undergone rigorous licensing procedures in their home countries. Nations like the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia have some of the most demanding driving tests in the world, often requiring over 200 hours of supervised practice hours, hazard perception tests, and stringent theory exams. To suggest that a driver licensed in such a system is inherently unqualified is to disregard international standards that Sri Lanka itself benefits from when its citizens drive abroad.

A senior road safety expert, who wished to remain anonymous due to the political sensitivity of the topic put it plainly: “Our road safety problems aren’t caused by tourists; they’re built into the system — weak infrastructure, chaotic traffic flow, and inconsistent rule enforcement. Isolating a few tourist-driven tuk-tuks, a fraction of a fraction of total users and presenting them as the primary safety concern is absurd. It’s not a safety strategy; it’s a smokescreen. A solution searching for a problem.

There is no evidence to indicate that tourists in self-drive tuk-tuks are involved in a disproportionate number of accidents. The ‘dangerous tourist driver’ is a spectre, a convenient phantom invoked to protect a vested interest.

The real agenda: Protectionism masquerading as prudence

Beneath the veneer of safety concerns lies a stark truth: fear of competition. The self-drive model empowers the tourist to choose. It breaks their dependence on pre-arranged, often overpriced, hired vehicles that operate on commissions, funnelling tourists through the same gem shops, spice gardens, tea outlets, and hotel chains. Instead of concentrating profits in a few well-trodden hotspots, self-drive tourism disperses income to rural villages and small businesses along the road less travelled.

This democratisation of travel directly challenges the monopoly held by some informal operators. This is not about safety; it’s about revenue. It’s a classic case of an incumbent industry seeking regulatory protection to shut out a new, consumer-friendly model. More than just a new model, it shuts out a completely new demographic of tourists who wish to enter the country. While the predominant tourist markets that Sri Lanka has attracted over the last two decades have been Russian, Indian and Chinese. The new self-drive market is dominated by tourists from Europe, America and Australia – generating a whole new revenue stream, marketing and advertising for the country. Self-drive tuktuk tourism even features on the Australian edition of the Amazing Race: Celebrity Edition (still being aired).

By lobbying against clear regulations for self-drive tuk-tuks, they are not protecting Sri Lanka’s roads; they are protecting their own profit margins at the cost of Sri Lanka’s overall tourism economy and access to the growing adventure travel market.

The impact of this protectionism is twofold. First, it stifles the growth of a high-value tourism segment that, as SLTDA highlighted, encourages longer stays and disperses spending deep into rural economies. Second, it blocks a revolutionary stream of passive income for thousands of Sri Lankans from women like Marie in Bandarawela to pensioners and micro-entrepreneurs who have found financial stability by renting their humble tuk-tuk asset to this new market.

The question for policymakers is this: should national tourism policy be shaped by the innovative potential of a new model that grows the global Sri Lankan tourism market, benefiting a diverse, often rural cross-section of citizens, or by the protectionist demands of a few?

The high cost of regulatory ambiguity

Sri Lanka’s laws already recognise the International Driving Permit (IDP) as a valid licence for tourists renting and driving tuk-tuks. The problem isn’t the law, it’s the lack of consistent enforcement and communication. Tourists arrive well-informed, having seen the country promoted as an adventure destination and knowing that Sri Lanka is a signatory to the 1949 Geneva Convention on Road Traffic. Yet on arrival, they face contradictory advice at airport counters, confusion among rental companies, and the risk of being stopped by police officers unaware of the law. The result is a damaging disconnect between what the law guarantees and what travellers experience on the ground.

Industry sources indicate that up to 10 such ‘harassment’ incidents are reported across the country each day. In the age of social media, each incident is a potential crisis and damaging to the overall tourism revenue of the country. A tourist blogger with thousands of followers, detained by the roadside over a document that is valid under international law, does not post a story about Sri Lanka’s beautiful beaches. They post a video about bureaucratic inefficiency and a nation that is unwelcoming. This ‘unofficial’ barrier actively undermines the millions spent by Sri Lanka Tourism on global promotional campaigns, creating a damaging dissonance between the brand promise and the on-ground reality.

Conversely, as we have seen with the global exposure from figures like Jonty Rhodes, when the experience is seamless, it generates a torrent of free, authentic, and overwhelmingly positive marketing. So, the choice is between fostering ambassadors or creating critics.

A path forward: Clarity, courage, and modernization

Sri Lanka doesn’t face real barriers to self drive tuk-tuk tourism — only imagined ones. The obstacles are not in safety nor in legalities. They are narratives shaped by fear and protectionism. The truth is simple: self-drive tuk-tuk tourism is legal, safe, empowering, and transformative. It brings income to rural families, connection to travellers, and authenticity to the nation’s tourism story. What’s holding us back isn’t danger — it’s fear. It’s time to cut through the myths, trust the data, and let Sri Lanka move forward freely, fearlessly, and on its own terms. Sri Lanka, with its compact diversity and iconic tuk-tuk, is perfectly poised to be a global leader in experiential travel.

By Calistas Wijesooriya



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Recruiting academics to state universities – beset by archaic selection processes?

Published

on

by Kaushalya Perera

Time has, by and large, stood still in the business of academic staff recruitment to state universities. Qualifications have proliferated and evolved to be more interdisciplinary, but our selection processes and evaluation criteria are unchanged since at least the late 1990s. But before I delve into the problems, I will describe the existing processes and schemes of recruitment. The discussion is limited to UGC-governed state universities (and does not include recruitment to medical and engineering sectors) though the problems may be relevant to other higher education institutions (HEIs).

How recruitment happens currently in SL state universities

Academic ranks in Sri Lankan state universities can be divided into three tiers (subdivisions are not discussed).

* Lecturer (Probationary)

recruited with a four-year undergraduate degree. A tiny step higher is the Lecturer (Unconfirmed), recruited with a postgraduate degree but no teaching experience.

* A Senior Lecturer can be recruited with certain postgraduate qualifications and some number of years of teaching and research.

* Above this is the professor (of four types), which can be left out of this discussion since only one of those (Chair Professor) is by application.

State universities cannot hire permanent academic staff as and when they wish. Prior to advertising a vacancy, approval to recruit is obtained through a mind-numbing and time-consuming process (months!) ending at the Department of Management Services. The call for applications must list all ranks up to Senior Lecturer. All eligible candidates for Probationary to Senior Lecturer are interviewed, e.g., if a Department wants someone with a doctoral degree, they must still advertise for and interview candidates for all ranks, not only candidates with a doctoral degree. In the evaluation criteria, the first degree is more important than the doctoral degree (more on this strange phenomenon later). All of this is only possible when universities are not under a ‘hiring freeze’, which governments declare regularly and generally lasts several years.

Problem type 1

Archaic processes and evaluation criteria

Twenty-five years ago, as a probationary lecturer with a first degree, I was a typical hire. We would be recruited, work some years and obtain postgraduate degrees (ideally using the privilege of paid study leave to attend a reputed university in the first world). State universities are primarily undergraduate teaching spaces, and when doctoral degrees were scarce, hiring probationary lecturers may have been a practical solution. The path to a higher degree was through the academic job. Now, due to availability of candidates with postgraduate qualifications and the problems of retaining academics who find foreign postgraduate opportunities, preference for candidates applying with a postgraduate qualification is growing. The evaluation scheme, however, prioritises the first degree over the candidate’s postgraduate education. Were I to apply to a Faculty of Education, despite a PhD on language teaching and research in education, I may not even be interviewed since my undergraduate degree is not in education. The ‘first degree first’ phenomenon shows that universities essentially ignore the intellectual development of a person beyond their early twenties. It also ignores the breadth of disciplines and their overlap with other fields.

This can be helped (not solved) by a simple fix, which can also reduce brain drain: give precedence to the doctoral degree in the required field, regardless of the candidate’s first degree, effected by a UGC circular. The suggestion is not fool-proof. It is a first step, and offered with the understanding that any selection process, however well the evaluation criteria are articulated, will be beset by multiple issues, including that of bias. Like other Sri Lankan institutions, universities, too, have tribal tendencies, surfacing in the form of a preference for one’s own alumni. Nevertheless, there are other problems that are, arguably, more pressing as I discuss next. In relation to the evaluation criteria, a problem is the narrow interpretation of any regulation, e.g., deciding the degree’s suitability based on the title rather than considering courses in the transcript. Despite rhetoric promoting internationalising and inter-disciplinarity, decision-making administrative and academic bodies have very literal expectations of candidates’ qualifications, e.g., a candidate with knowledge of digital literacy should show this through the title of the degree!

Problem type 2 – The mess of badly regulated higher education

A direct consequence of the contemporary expansion of higher education is a large number of applicants with myriad qualifications. The diversity of degree programmes cited makes the responsibility of selecting a suitable candidate for the job a challenging but very important one. After all, the job is for life – it is very difficult to fire a permanent employer in the state sector.

Widely varying undergraduate degree programmes.

At present, Sri Lankan undergraduates bring qualifications (at times more than one) from multiple types of higher education institutions: a degree from a UGC-affiliated state university, a state university external to the UGC, a state institution that is not a university, a foreign university, or a private HEI aka ‘private university’. It could be a degree received by attending on-site, in Sri Lanka or abroad. It could be from a private HEI’s affiliated foreign university or an external degree from a state university or an online only degree from a private HEI that is ‘UGC-approved’ or ‘Ministry of Education approved’, i.e., never studied in a university setting. Needless to say, the diversity (and their differences in quality) are dizzying. Unfortunately, under the evaluation scheme all degrees ‘recognised’ by the UGC are assigned the same marks. The same goes for the candidates’ merits or distinctions, first classes, etc., regardless of how difficult or easy the degree programme may be and even when capabilities, exposure, input, etc are obviously different.

Similar issues are faced when we consider postgraduate qualifications, though to a lesser degree. In my discipline(s), at least, a postgraduate degree obtained on-site from a first-world university is preferable to one from a local university (which usually have weekend or evening classes similar to part-time study) or online from a foreign university. Elitist this may be, but even the best local postgraduate degrees cannot provide the experience and intellectual growth gained by being in a university that gives you access to six million books and teaching and supervision by internationally-recognised scholars. Unfortunately, in the evaluation schemes for recruitment, the worst postgraduate qualification you know of will receive the same marks as one from NUS, Harvard or Leiden.

The problem is clear but what about a solution?

Recruitment to state universities needs to change to meet contemporary needs. We need evaluation criteria that allows us to get rid of the dross as well as a more sophisticated institutional understanding of using them. Recruitment is key if we want our institutions (and our country) to progress. I reiterate here the recommendations proposed in ‘Considerations for Higher Education Reform’ circulated previously by Kuppi Collective:

* Change bond regulations to be more just, in order to retain better qualified academics.

* Update the schemes of recruitment to reflect present-day realities of inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary training in order to recruit suitably qualified candidates.

* Ensure recruitment processes are made transparent by university administrations.

Kaushalya Perera is a senior lecturer at the University of Colombo.

(Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.)

Continue Reading

Features

Talento … oozing with talent

Published

on

Talento: Gained recognition as a leading wedding and dance band

This week, too, the spotlight is on an outfit that has gained popularity, mainly through social media.

Last week we had MISTER Band in our scene, and on 10th February, Yellow Beatz – both social media favourites.

Talento is a seven-piece band that plays all types of music, from the ‘60s to the modern tracks of today.

The band has reached many heights, since its inception in 2012, and has gained recognition as a leading wedding and dance band in the scene here.

The members that makeup the outfit have a solid musical background, which comes through years of hard work and dedication

Their portfolio of music contains a mix of both western and eastern songs and are carefully selected, they say, to match the requirements of the intended audience, occasion, or event.

Although the baila is a specialty, which is inherent to this group, that originates from Moratuwa, their repertoire is made up of a vast collection of love, classic, oldies and modern-day hits.

The musicians, who make up Talento, are:

Prabuddha Geetharuchi:

Geilee Fonseka: Dynamic and charismatic vocalist

Prabuddha Geetharuchi: The main man behind the band Talento

(Vocalist/ Frontman). He is an avid music enthusiast and was mentored by a lot of famous musicians, and trainers, since he was a child. Growing up with them influenced him to take on western songs, as well as other music styles. A Peterite, he is the main man behind the band Talento and is a versatile singer/entertainer who never fails to get the crowd going.

Geilee Fonseka (Vocals):

A dynamic and charismatic vocalist whose vibrant stage presence, and powerful voice, bring a fresh spark to every performance. Young, energetic, and musically refined, she is an artiste who effortlessly blends passion with precision – captivating audiences from the very first note. Blessed with an immense vocal range, Geilee is a truly versatile singer, confidently delivering Western and Eastern music across multiple languages and genres.

Chandana Perera (Drummer):

His expertise and exceptional skills have earned him recognition as one of the finest acoustic drummers in Sri Lanka. With over 40 tours under his belt, Chandana has demonstrated his dedication and passion for music, embodying the essential role of a drummer as the heartbeat of any band.

Harsha Soysa:

(Bassist/Vocalist). He a chorister of the western choir of St. Sebastian’s College, Moratuwa, who began his musical education under famous voice trainers, as well as bass guitar trainers in Sri Lanka. He has also performed at events overseas. He acts as the second singer of the band

Udara Jayakody:

(Keyboardist). He is also a qualified pianist, adding technical flavour to Talento’s music. His singing and harmonising skills are an extra asset to the band. From his childhood he has been a part of a number of orchestras as a pianist. He has also previously performed with several famous western bands.

Aruna Madushanka:

(Saxophonist). His proficiciency in playing various instruments, including the saxophone, soprano saxophone, and western flute, showcases his versatility as a musician, and his musical repertoire is further enhanced by his remarkable singing ability.

Prashan Pramuditha:

(Lead guitar). He has the ability to play different styles, both oriental and western music, and he also creates unique tones and patterns with the guitar..

Continue Reading

Features

Special milestone for JJ Twins

Published

on

Twin brothers Julian and Jason Prins

The JJ Twins, the Sri Lankan musical duo, performing in the Maldives, and known for blending R&B, Hip Hop, and Sri Lankan rhythms, thereby creating a unique sound, have come out with a brand-new single ‘Me Mawathe.’

In fact, it’s a very special milestone for the twin brothers, Julian and Jason Prins, as ‘Me Mawathe’ is their first ever Sinhala song!

‘Me Mawathe’ showcases a fresh new sound, while staying true to the signature harmony and emotion that their fans love.

This heartfelt track captures the beauty of love, journey, and connection, brought to life through powerful vocals and captivating melodies.

It marks an exciting new chapter for the JJ Twins as they expand their musical journey and connect with audiences in a whole new way.

Their recent album, ‘CONCLUDED,’ explores themes of love, heartbreak, and healing, and include hits like ‘Can’t Get You Off My Mind’ and ‘You Left Me Here to Die’ which showcase their emotional intensity.

Readers could stay connected and follow JJ Twins on social media for exclusive updates, behind-the-scenes moments, and upcoming releases:

Instagram: http://instagram.com/jjtwinsofficial

TikTok: http://tiktok.com/@jjtwinsmusic

Facebook: http://facebook.com/jjtwinssingers

YouTube: http://youtube.com/jjtwins

Continue Reading

Trending