Connect with us

News

Treasury bond scam case: Controversy over flawed indictments that caused dismissal of some charges against Ravi, Mahendran, PTL, others

Published

on

Trial-at-Bar highlights major flaw in Offences against Public Property Act, AG Dept.’s failure

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The Colombo High Court Trial-at-Bar had dismissed some of the charges filed against former Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake, fugitive ex-Central Bank Governor Arjuna Mahendran and nine others in respect of Treasury bond scam perpetrated on 29 March 2016, due to the flawed indictments, legal sources told The Island yesterday (5).

Former President of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL), who is also the advisor to the Justice Ministry U. R. de Silva, PC, confirmed the issue at hand.

The Trial-at-Bar comprising Damith Thotawatte (Chairman), Manjula Thilakaratne and M. Izzadeen by a majority decision dismissed the relevant charges.

The court turned down a plea by State Counsel Lakmini Girihagama to alter the charge sheet last Friday (4). Karunanayake’s Counsel, Shavendra Fernando, PC, objected to the request made on behalf of the Attorney General. Judge Issadeen stated that charges could be maintained.Responding to The Island query, U.R. de Silva explained that under the Public Property Act (1982) only individuals could be indicted. But in the case of Treasury bond scam both individuals and Perpetual Treasuries (PTL) had been indicted, the President’s Counsel said, acknowledging it was a matter for serious concern. The first accused was the PTL, and other individuals.

The court was told the word ‘person’ hadn’t been interpreted in the Public Property Act hence the dispute. The Trial-at-Bar also held that though the interpretation in respect of ‘person’ in Penal Code could have been used but the Public Property Act didn’t make any reference to in this regard. The Trial-at-Bar, pointed out a major flaw in filing of the charges.

The incumbent President of BASL Saliya Peiris, PC, was not available for comment.

The indictments were filed during Dappula de Livera’s tenure as the AG. Sanjay Rajaratnam succeeded de Livera in May last year.

Attorney-at-Law and civil society activist Nagananda Kodituwakku said Friday’s discharge of Treasury bond scam suspects had prompted him to make inquiries from relevant parties.

Lawyer Kodituwakku said that those charged for Treasury bond scam had been discharged by the HC Trial-at-Bar only from some of the charges on the basis that only natural persons could be charged for robbing public funds and not companies such as the Perpetual Properties under the Public Property Act.  There had been a similar judgment given by the HC in the recent past and that decision had been challenged by the Attorney General and the matter was still pending, the lawyer said.

Earlier, on 30 December 2017, a Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI) headed by Justice K T Chitrasiri, had probed the Treasury bond scams, identified these suspects as being responsible for the fraud, and directed the Attorney General to initiate criminal proceedings against them, Kodituwakku said. Therefore, there was no truth in what was being circulated in the public domain that all suspects have been discharged by the judiciary, the lawyer said.

The PCoI consisted of Chairman Justice K.T. Chitrasiri, the late Justice P S Jayawardene and retired Deputy Auditor General, V Kandasamy.

Earlier, on 06 Dec., 2021, 11 persons including former MP Karunanayake and Arjuna Mahendran were indicted.

The three-judge Trial at Bar declared that as the 11 charges filed against the suspects couldn’t be sustained, they were dismissed.

The AG filed indictments against the suspects for conspiracy to commit criminal misappropriation in respect of Treasury bonds to the face value of Rs 36.98 billion on March 29, 2016.

The first Treasury bond scam was perpetrated on 27 Feb. 2015. The suspects are Ravi Karunanayaka, Arjuna Mahendran, Arjun Aloysius, Kasun Palisena, Jeffrey Joseph Aloysius, Chitta Ranjan Hulugalle, Muthuraja Surendran, Ajahn Gardige Punchihewea and Batugoda Hewa Indika Saman Kumara.

Kodituwakku pointed out that the dismissal of some of the charges in respect of the high-profile Treasury bond scam should be examined against the backdrop of the AG and the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) withdrawing over 50 cases since the last presidential election.

The competence of the AG’s Department was raised in the Colombo High Court rulings given in respect of former Defence Secretary Hemasiri Fernando and ex-IGP Pujith Jayasundera in the Easter Sunday case.



News

PSTA worse than PTA: FSP

Published

on

The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) yesterday accused the government of seeking to use the proposed Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PSTA) to suppress popular political activity, claiming that some of its provisions were more repressive than those of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).

FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jayagoda told a media briefing, in Nugegoda, that the definition of terrorism in the Bill was so broad that it could be used to label almost any form of popular political activity as terrorism.

He said the Bill’s approach to defining terrorism was based largely on attempts to compel a government, or an international organisation, to do, or refrain from doing something, rather than on internationally recognised criteria, such as killings, causing serious bodily harm, kidnapping or acts intended to spread terror among the public.

Jayagoda also alleged that the Bill transferred substantial powers from the judiciary to the executive, while extending powers of arrest, investigation and detention to the armed forces, in addition to the police.

He claimed that the government had sought to portray the Bill as a replacement for the PTA while retaining or introducing provisions that could facilitate political victimisation and repression.

The FSP also questioned the government’s decision to proceed with the Bill, despite having previously sought public views on an earlier draft.

Jayagoda said a draft had been published earlier this year, with the period for public submissions ending on February 28, but the Bill subsequently gazetted was essentially the same draft with some provisions rearranged.

Jayagoda also referred to a letter reportedly sent by Attorney-at-Law Saliya Peiris, a member of a Committee, chaired by President’s Counsel Rienzie Arsecularatne, that had been appointed to draft the legislation. He said Peiris had stated, in the October 06 letter, that changes had been made to the draft prepared by the Committee.

“This means that even the Committee, appointed to prepare the Bill, was a deception,” Jayagoda alleged.

He said that the PSTA was fundamentally similar to the Anti-Terrorism Bill introduced by the previous government, in 2023, which the National People’s Power (NPP) opposed and challenged in court.

“If the NPP opposed that Bill then and is now bringing the same legislation before Parliament, the government must explain its position,” he said.

Jayagoda called on NPP MPs to oppose the PSTA in Parliament and urged trade unions and other groups to build a broad public movement against the legislation.

He challenged the government to an open debate on the Bill.

Continue Reading

News

Shiranthi R remanded until 13 Oct.

Published

on

Former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa was yesterday remanded until 13 October after being produced before the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following her arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).

Shiranthi, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, was arrested at her residence on Poorwarama Road, Kirulapone, after CIABOC officers recorded a statement from her for nearly two hours.

According to the CIABOC, the arrest was made over allegations that Rs. 10 million obtained from the National Savings Bank through the Siriliya Saviya organisation was misappropriated.

The money was allegedly obtained to provide a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner to the children’s hospital. Investigators allege that the scanner was not provided and that the funds were instead unlawfully used.

CIABOC is investigating alleged offences under the Public Property Act and corruption-related provisions in connection with the transaction and other financial activities involving Siriliya Saviya, which was headed by Rajapaksa.

Rajapaksa returned to Sri Lanka on Monday night on a flight from Malaysia after travelling overseas for medical treatment. She left for Singapore on 16 September after being admitted to a private hospital in Colombo on 15 September following an illness.

She had been due to appear before the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) on 13 October in connection with its investigation into the financial affairs of Siriliya Saviya.

Meanwhile, her lawyers filed an anticipatory bail application before the Maligakanda Magistrate’s Court on Monday, seeking an order preventing her arrest in connection with the FCID investigation.

Continue Reading

News

Former NSB Chairman Kariyawasam granted bail

Published

on

Former National Savings Bank (NSB) Chairman Pradeep Kariyawasam was yesterday granted bail by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following his arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).

Kariyawasam, husband of former Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, was arrested in connection with the Bribery Commission’s investigation into the ‘Siriliya Saviya’ account linked to former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa.

The investigation concerns financial activities involving the Siriliya Saviya initiative, which was headed by Rajapaksa, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

CIABOC is continuing investigations into the alleged financial irregularities relating to the account.

Continue Reading

Trending