Connect with us

Features

The SJB unveils its Economic Blueprint

Published

on

By Uditha Devapriya

Given the scale of the crisis, it’s natural that political parties in Sri Lanka are focusing on the economy. Even if the March elections will theoretically not impact parliamentary numbers, there is bound to be a massive electoral backlash against the current government, which is led by an unelected President on the backing of a party headed by a much-reviled political dynasty. Against such a backdrop, the Opposition, especially the more left-wing and radical sections, is bound to bring about some pressure on the government to shift from its current economic policies. However, whether these tactics succeed will depend on the policies that these outfits parade as alternatives to the current setup.

The Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB) is Sri Lanka’s main Opposition party. Its leader, Sajith Premadasa, is the country’s Leader of the Opposition. As such what the party says and what its party MPs say in public, on the business of governance and on economic policy, is rather important. The SJB can be described as an offshoot of the United National Party (UNP), but this would be to overlook the many convulsions, not to mention ideological disagreements, within the party. These divisions have surfaced in recent months, particularly over issues like IMF reforms and financial austerity, with the party’s neoliberal right-wing flank arguing that there is no alternative to them, and its centrist and populist flanks – the latter hosting none less than the party leader – advocating a reassessment of such policies.

Weeks after the JVP-led National People’s Power (NPP) held an Economic Forum at the Galadari, the SJB unveiled what it calls an Economic Blueprint at the Hilton. Titled “Out of the Debt Trap and towards Sustainable, Inclusive Development”, the document, which was part of a wider Economic Summit that saw the participation of diplomats and policymakers, and academics, is self-explanatory: it focuses on the ways and means by which the SJB intends to salvage the economy from the present debt crisis. It focuses on 10 areas: these include not just economic policies like revenue collection, energy and utilities reform, and factor market reform, but also political issues like transparency and accountability. The Summit was basically a roadmap put together by the SJB’s Economic Policy Unit (EPU), led by its economic troika: Harsha de Silva, Eran Wickramaratne, Kabir Hashim.

The Summit began by laying the blame for the current crisis on two things: “leftism” and “popularism.” I am not sure whether they meant to say “populism.” It then went on to laud the economic reforms of the J. R. Jayewardene regime and the reforms proposed by Ranil Wickremesinghe at the 2004 election, implicitly bemoaning the latter’s defeat to populist forces. Speaking at a press conference days after the NPP unveiled its Summit, Kabir Hashim had argued that the JVP, in urging Mahinda Rajapaksa to reverse these policies, contributed to the present debt situation. At the Summit these points were reiterated, defiantly, with Harsha de Silva advocating an IMF-centric solution. Whatever election posturing that SJB MPs indulged in over the last few weeks, including Eran Wickramaratne’s proposal to up the taxable income from Rs 100,000 to Rs 250,000, were forgotten.

The event won praise from those who are broadly supportive of Ranil Wickremesinghe’s economic reforms, even if they do not like Ranil Wickremesinghe. Economic commentators and academics who had earlier castigated the SJB’s populist posturing applauded the EPU on the grounds that a mainstream party had finally given them the solutions they wanted to hear. They had reason to be jubilant. From beginning to end, the Economic Blueprint carries forward the yahapalanist rhetoric of a social market economy and advocates liberalisation, while criticising tax holidays and calling for the restructuring of State-Owned Enterprises and greater flexibility in factor markets. On all these issues the party’s EPU toes a neoliberal line: for instance, it notes that the country’s labour market is notoriously inefficient, in large part because “public sector recruitment is excessive.”

The audience at the Economic Summit, as I wrote above, consisted of those who support the President’s reforms though they oppose the President politically. These are the people who claim that the President has to go, but his policies have to remain, because, to bring up that oft-quoted neoliberal quip, “there is no alternative.” The Economic Blueprint does not, hence, dwell on manufacturing and industrialisation, but instead contents itself on linking Sri Lanka to what it calls Global Production Networks. To its credit, it also dwells on graphite and the importance of securing it as a crucial foreign exchange earner. Indeed, three years ago Harsha de Silva contended that, should the SJB be the party in power, he would “bring in a bill” to protect its supply. Yet such proposals are few and far between, and for the most are consigned to boxes, footnotes, and endnotes.

Talking of footnotes and endnotes, the document makes absolutely no mention of the development paradigms pursued, and put into effect, by Ranasinghe Premadasa: what Dayan Jayatilleka describes as “growth with equity.” It was in Premadasa’s presidency that Sri Lanka embarked on a radical garment factories programme, implementing policies that Communist Vietnam was implementing at the same time. Today Vietnam has gone beyond being a manufacturer for Global Production Networks, and we have lagged. The document does not mention why this was so, but the facts speak for themselves: after Premadasa’s assassination, the government which succeeded him went on liberalising and foreignizing, reversing four years of development and promoting a policy of capitulation to global finance that every government since 1994 have been unreservedly pursuing.

If the SJB has not forgotten the Ranasinghe Premadasa factor, it is only because its leader happens to be Ranasinghe Premadasa’s son. At one point in the Summit the moderator, the ever-eloquent Kusum Wijetilleke, queried Sajith on what his party would do vis-à-vis IMF reforms. Sajith was blunt: he invoked his father, and correctly pointed out that negotiations are a two-way street. This is in stark contrast to those who tout IMF reforms as the only way forward and imply that the present administration, far from enforcing IMF dicta on SOEs and public sector recruitment, is not enforcing them enough. However, though Kusum’s question was posed to clear doubts about the SJB’s contradictory rhetoric on economic reforms, Sajith’s response only reinforced those contradictions: between his “negotiating better” approach and the EPU’s “IMF-centrism”, there is a palpable gap.

The reforms that the SJB’s Economic Blueprint advocates also raises important, thought-provoking questions about the practicality of the SJB’s programme. Against a backdrop of widespread discontent at the present regime’s policies,

how pragmatic would it be for the Opposition to blame the country’s problems on public sector recruitment, and how well received would policies aimed at making the labour market more “flexible” – doublespeak for making workers easier to fire and hire – be? Trade unionisation in this country is centred in the public sector, and unions are important ideological levers as far as the bureaucracy in Sri Lanka is concerned. No party here won power, or stayed in power, by alienating them. Besides, the SJB faces a strong opponent in the JVP-NPP. From a practical perspective, does it make sense to antagonise the latter’s most powerful urban constituency?

The SJB’s response to the JVP-NPP has been to conduct a McCarthyite campaign against their policies on social media. Prominent SJB activists, who were seen as progressive once upon a time, have wholeheartedly joined these efforts: one of them has gone as far as to imply that a vote for the JVP-NPP would be a vote for socialism and thereby a vote for the destruction of the economy. Such logic befuddles me, not least because it begs the question as to how exactly the economy has benefited from decades of divestment, privatisation, and untrammelled capitulation to global finance. The SJB probably knows that it cannot in all good faith answer these questions. Fear is a convenient ploy for a political party when there’s nothing else to resort to. The SLPP lavishly indulged in it against the UNP four years ago: that a section of the SJB is indulging in it speaks volumes about its values.

The tragedy in all this is that the SJB, as the country’s main Opposition, does have an answer to these issues: Ranasinghe Premadasa’s policies. Those policies, as Dayan Jayatilleka pointed out many years ago, need not be the preserve of the Premadasa family or parties associated with them. It can be enforced by anyone, by any outfit.

The Premadasa government was linked to some of the most respectable economic minds of the day, and many of them found a home at the Institute of Policy Studies: an organisation that, once upon a time, concerned itself with industrialisation-led development strategies. These economists and academics included Howard Nicholas, who has never even once been consulted by the SJB’s “Brains Trust.” This is not to say that the Premadasa administration was perfect, because it was not. Yet Jana Saviya, the 200 Garment Factories Programme, the peoplisation of the bus service, and the pragmatic, gradual privatisation of the plantations, all formed part of a wider strategy to combine growth with equity. It is this philosophy that the SJB must imbibe. But perhaps this is asking for too much.

The writer is an international relations analyst, researcher, and columnist who can be reached at udakdev1@gmail.com.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Wishes, Resolutions and Climate Change

Published

on

Exchanging greetings and resolving to do something positive in the coming year certainly create an uplifting atmosphere. Unfortunately, their effects wear off within the first couple of weeks, and most of the resolutions are forgotten for good. However, this time around, we must be different, because the nation is coming out of the most devastating natural disaster ever faced, the results of which will impact everyone for many years to come. Let us wish that we as a nation will have the courage and wisdom to resolve to do the right things that will make a difference in our lives now and prepare for the future. The truth is that future is going to be challenging for tropical islands like ours.

We must not have any doubts about global warming phenomenon and its impact on local weather patterns. Over its 4.5-billion-year history, the earth has experienced drastic climate changes, but it has settled into a somewhat moderate condition characterised by periods of glaciation and retreat over the last million years. Note that anatomically modern Homo sapiens have been around only for two to three hundred thousand years, and it is reasoned that this stable climate may have helped their civilisation. There have been five glaciation periods over the last five hundred thousand years, and these roughly hundred-thousand-year cycles are explained by the astronomical phenomenon known as the Milankovitch Cycle (the lows marked with stars in Figure 1). At present, the earth is in an inter glacial period and the next glaciation period will be in about eighty thousand years.

(See Figure 1. Glaciation Cycles)

During these cycles, the global mean temperature has changed by about 7-8 degrees Centigrade. In contrast to this natural variation, earth has been experiencing a rapid temperature increase over the past hundred years. There is ample scientific evidence from multiple sources that this is caused by the increase in carbon dioxide gas in the atmosphere, which has seen a 50% increase over the historical levels in just hundred years (Figure 2). Carbon dioxide is one of the greenhouse gases which traps heat from the sun and slows the natural cooling process of the earth. This increase of carbon dioxide is due to human activities: fossil fuel burning, industrial processes, deforestation, and agricultural practices. Ironically, those who suffer from the consequences did not contribute to these changes; those who did contribute are trying their best to convince the world that the temperature changes we see are natural, and nothing should be done. We must have no illusions that global warming is a human-caused phenomenon, and it has serious repercussions.

(See Figure 2. Global Temperature and Carbon Dioxide Levels)

Why should we care about global warming? Well, there are many reasons, but let us focus on earth’s water cycle. Middle schoolers know that water evaporates from the oceans, rises into the atmosphere where it cools, condenses, and falls back onto earth as rain or snow. When the oceans warm, the evaporation increases, and the warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapour. Water laden atmosphere results in severe and erratic weather. Ironically, water vapour is also a greenhouse gas, and this has a snowballing effect. The increased ocean temperature also disrupts ocean currents that influence the weather on land. The combined result is extreme and severe weather: violent storms and droughts depending on the geographic location. What is happening on the West coast of the USA is an example. The net result will be major departures from what is considered normal weather over millennia.

International organisations have been talking for 30 years about limiting global temperature increase to 1.5oC above pre-industrial levels by curtailing greenhouse gas emissions. But not much has been done and the temperature has risen by 1.2oC already. The challenge is that even if we can stop greenhouse gas emissions completely, right now, we have the problem of removing already existing 2,500 billion tons of carbon from the atmosphere, for which there are no practical solutions yet. Scientists worry about the consequences of runaway temperature increase and its effect on human life, which are many. It is not a doomsday prediction of life disappearing from earth, but a warning that life will be quite different from what humans are used to. All small tropical nations like ours are burdened with mitigating the consequences; in other words, get ready for more Ditwahs, do not wait for the twelve-day forecast.

Some opined that not enough warning was given regarding Ditwah; the truth is that the tools available for long-term prediction of the path or severity of a weather event (cyclone, typhoon, hurricane, tornado) are not perfect. There are multitude of rapidly changing factors contributing to the behavior of weather events. Meteorologists feed most up to date data to different computer models and try to identify the prediction with the highest probability. The multiple predictions for the same weather event are represented by what is known as spaghetti plots. Figure 3 shows the forecasted paths of a 2019 Atlantic hurricane five days ahead on the right and the actual path it followed on the left. While the long-term prediction of the path of a cyclone remains less accurate, its strength can vary within hours. There are several Indian ocean cyclones tracking sites online accessible to the public.

Figure 3. Forecasting vs Reality

There is no argument that short-term forecasts of this nature are valuable in saving lives and movable assets, but having long term plans in place to mitigate the effects of natural disasters is much more important than that. If a sizable section of the population must start over their lives from ground zero after every storm, how can a country economically develop?

The degree of our unpreparedness came to light during Ditwah disaster. It is not for lack of awareness; judging by the deluge of newspaper articles, blogs, vlogs, and speeches made, there is no shortage of knowledge and technical expertise to meet the challenge. The government has assured the necessary resources, and there is good reason to trust that the funds will be spent properly and not to line the pockets as happened during previous disasters. However, history tells us that despite the right conditions and good intentions, we could miss the opportunity again. Reasons for such skepticisms emerged during the few meetings the President held with the bureaucrats while visiting effected areas. Also, the COPE committee meetings plainly display the inherent inefficiencies and irregularities of our system and the absence of work ethics among all levels of the bureaucracy.

What it tells us is that we as a nation have an attitude problem. There are ample scholarly analyses by local as well as international researchers on this aspect of Sri Lankan psyche, and they label it as either island or colonial mentality. The first refers to the notion of isolated communities perceiving themselves as exceptional or superior to the rest of the world, and that the world is hell-bent on destroying or acquiring what they have. This attitude is exacerbated by the colonial mentality that promoted the divide and conquer rules and applied it to every societal characteristic imaginable; and plundered natural resources. As a result, now we are divided along ethnic, linguistic, religious, political, class, caste, geography, wealth, and many more real and imagined lines. Sadly, politicians, some religious leaders, and other opportunists keep inflaming these sentiments for their benefit when most of the population is willing to move on.

The first wish, therefore, is to get the strength, courage, and wisdom to think rationally, and discard outdated and outmoded belief systems that hinder our progress as a nation. May we get the courage to stop venerating elite who got there by exploiting the masses and the country’s wealth. More importantly, may we get the wisdom to educate the next generation to be free thinkers, give them the power and freedom to reject fabrications, myths, and beliefs that are not based on objective facts.

This necessitates altering our attitude towards many aspects of life. There is no doubt that free thinking does not come easily, it involves the proverbial ‘exterminating the consecrated bull.’ We are rightfully proud about our resplendent past. It is true that hydraulic engineering, art, and architecture flourished during the Anuradhapura period.

However, for one reason or another, we have lost those skills. Nowadays, all irrigation projects are done with foreign aid and assistance. The numerous replicas of the Avukana statue made with the help of modern technology, for example, cannot hold a candle to the real one. The fabled flying machine of Ravana is a figment of marvelous imagination of a skilled poet. Reality is that today we are a nation struggling with both natural and human-caused disasters, and dependent on the generosity of other nations, especially our gracious neighbor. Past glory is of little help in solving today’s problems.

Next comes national unity. Our society is so fragmented that no matter how beneficial a policy or an idea for the nation could be, some factions will oppose it, not based on facts, but by giving into propaganda created for selfish purposes. The island mentality is so pervasive, we fail to trust and respect fellow citizens, not to mention the government. The result is absence of long-term planning and stability. May we get the insight to separate policy from politics; to put nation first instead of our own little clan, or personal gains.

With increasing population and decreasing livable and arable land area, a national land management system becomes crucial. We must have an intelligent zoning system to prevent uncontrolled development. Should we allow building along waterways, on wetlands, and road easements? Should we not put the burden of risk on the risk takers using an insurance system instead of perpetual public aid programs? We have lost over 95% of the forest cover we had before European occupation. Forests function as water reservoirs that release rainwater gradually while reducing soil erosion and stabilizing land, unlike monocultures covering the hill country, the catchments of many rivers. Should we continue to allow uncontrolled encroachment of forests for tourism, religious, or industrial purposes, not to mention personal enjoyment of the elite? Is our use of land for agricultural purposes in keeping with changing global markets and local labor demands? Is haphazard subsistence farming viable? What would be the impact of sea level rising on waterways in low lying areas?

These are only a few aspects that future generations will have to grapple with in mitigating the consequences of worsening climate conditions. We cannot ignore the fact that weather patterns will be erratic and severe, and that will be the new normal. Survival under such conditions involves rational thinking, objective fact based planning, and systematic execution with long term nation interests in mind. That cannot be achieved with hanging onto outdated and outmoded beliefs, rituals, and traditions. Weather changes are not caused by divine interventions or planetary alignments as claimed by astrologers. Let us resolve to lay the foundation for bringing up the next generation that is capable of rational thinking and be different from their predecessors, in a better way.

by Geewananda Gunawardana

Continue Reading

Features

From Diyabariya to Duberria: Lanka’s Forgotten Footprint in Global Science

Published

on

Snakes and their name origins in Sinhala

For centuries, Sri Lanka’s biological knowledge travelled the world — anonymously. Embedded deep within the pages of European natural history books, Sinhala words were copied, distorted and repurposed, eventually fossilising into Latinised scientific names of snakes, bats and crops found thousands of kilometres away.

Africa’s reptiles, Europe’s taxonomic catalogues and global field guides still carry those echoes, largely unnoticed and uncredited.

Now, a Sri Lankan herpetologist is tracing those forgotten linguistic footprints back to their source.

Through painstaking archival research into 17th- and 18th-century zoological texts, herpetologist and taxonomic researcher Sanjaya Bandara has uncovered compelling evidence that several globally recognised scientific names — long assumed to be derived from Greek or Latin — are in fact rooted in Sinhala vernacular terms used by villagers, farmers and hunters in pre-colonial Sri Lanka.

“Scientific names are not just labels. They are stories,” Bandara told The Island. “And in many cases, those stories begin right here in Sri Lanka.”

Sanjaya Bandara

At the heart of Bandara’s work is etymology — the study of word origins — a field that plays a crucial role in zoology and taxonomy.

While classical languages dominate scientific nomenclature, his findings reveal that Sinhala words were quietly embedded in the foundations of modern biological classification as early as the 1700s.

One of the most striking examples is Ahaetulla, the genus name for Asian vine snakes. “The word Ahaetulla is not Greek or Latin at all,” Bandara explained. “It comes directly from the Sinhala vernacular used by locals for the Green Vine Snake.” Remarkably, the term was adopted by Carl Linnaeus himself, the father of modern taxonomy.

Another example lies in the vespertilionid bat genus Kerivoula, described by British zoologist John Edward Gray. Bandara notes that the name is a combination of the Sinhala words kiri (milky) and voula (bat). Even the scientific name of finger millet, Eleusine coracana, carries linguistic traces of the Sinhala word kurakkan, a cereal cultivated in Sri Lanka for centuries.

Yet Bandara’s most intriguing discoveries extend far beyond the island — all the way to Africa and the Mediterranean.

In a research paper recently published in the journal Bionomina, Bandara presented evidence that two well-known snake genera, Duberria and Malpolon, both described in 1826 by Austrian zoologist Leopold Fitzinger, likely originated from Sinhala words.

The name Duberria first appeared in Robert Knox’s 1681 account of Ceylon, where Knox refers to harmless water snakes called “Duberria” by locals. According to Bandara, this was a mispronunciation of Diyabariya, the Sinhala term for water snakes.

“Mispronunciations are common in Knox’s writings,” Bandara said. “English authors of the time struggled with Sinhala phonetics, and distorted versions of local names entered European literature.”

Over time, these distortions became formalised. Today, Duberria refers to African slug-eating snakes — a genus geographically distant, yet linguistically tethered to Sri Lanka.

Bandara’s study also proposes the long-overdue designation of a type species for the genus, reviving a 222-year-old scientific name in the process.

Equally compelling is the case of Malpolon, the genus of Montpellier snakes found across North Africa, the Middle East and southern Europe. Bandara traced the word back to a 1693 work by English zoologist John Ray, which catalogued snakes from Dutch India — including Sri Lanka.

“The term Malpolon appears alongside Sinhala vernacular names,” Bandara noted. “It is highly likely derived from Mal Polonga, meaning ‘flowery viper’.” Even today, some Sri Lankan communities use Mal Polonga to describe patterned snakes such as the Russell’s Wolf Snake.

Bandara’s research further reveals Sinhala roots in the African Red-lipped Herald Snake (Crotaphopeltis hotamboeia), whose species name likely stems from Hothambaya, a regional Sinhala term for mongooses and palm civets.

“These findings collectively show that Sri Lanka was not just a source of specimens, but a source of knowledge,” Bandara said. “Early European naturalists relied heavily on local names, local guides and local ecological understanding.”

Perhaps the most frequently asked question Bandara encounters concerns the mighty Anaconda. While not a scientific name, the word itself is widely believed to be a corruption of the Sinhala Henakandaya, another snake name recorded in Ray’s listings of Sri Lankan reptiles.

“What is remarkable,” Bandara reflected, “is that these words travelled across continents, entered global usage, and remained there — often stripped of their original meanings.”

For Bandara, restoring those meanings is about more than taxonomy. It is about reclaiming Sri Lanka’s rightful place in the history of science.

“With this study, three more Sinhala words formally join scientific nomenclature,” he said.

“Who would have imagined that a Sinhala word would be used to name a snake in Africa?”

Long before biodiversity hotspots became buzzwords and conservation turned global, Sri Lanka’s language was already speaking through science — quietly, persistently, and across continents.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Features

Children first – even after a disaster

Published

on

However, the children and their needs may be forgotten after a disaster.

Do not forget that children will also experience fear and distress although they may not have the capacity to express their emotions verbally. It is essential to create child-friendly spaces that allow them to cope through play, draw, and engage in supportive activities that help them process their experiences in a healthy manner.

The Institute for Research & Development in Health & Social Care (IRD), Sri Lanka launched the campaign, titled “Children first,” after the 2004 Tsunami, based on the fundamental principle of not to medicalise the distress but help to normalise it.

The Island picture page

The IRD distributed drawing material and play material to children in makeshift shelters. Some children grabbed drawing material, but some took away play material. Those who choose drawing material, drew in different camps, remarkably similar pictures; “how the tidal wave came”.

The Island” supported the campaign generously, realising the potential impact of it.

The campaign became a popular and effective public health intervention.

“A public health intervention (PHI) is any action, policy, or programme designed to improve health outcomes at the population level. These interventions focus on preventing disease, promoting health, and protecting communities from health threats. Unlike individual healthcare interventions (treating individuals), which target personal health issues, public health interventions address collective health challenges and aim to create healthier environments for all.”

The campaign attracted highest attention of state and politicians.

The IRD continued this intervention throughout the protracted war, and during COVID-19.

The IRD quick to relaunch the “children first” campaign which once again have received proper attention by the public.

While promoting a public health approach to handling the situation, we would also like to note that there will be a significant smaller percentage of children and adolescents will develop mental health disorders or a psychiatric diagnosis.

We would like to share the scientific evidence for that, revealed through; the islandwide school survey carried out by the IRD in 2007.

During the survey, it was found that the prevalence of emotional disorder was 2.7%, conduct disorder 5.8%, hyperactivity disorder was 0.6%, and 8.5% were identified as having other psychiatric disorders. Absenteeism was present in 26.8%. Overall, previous exposure to was significantly associated with absenteeism whereas exposure to conflict was not, although some specific conflict-related exposures were significant risk factors. Mental disorder was strongly associated with absenteeism but did not account for its association with tsunami or conflict exposure.

The authors concluded that exposure to traumatic events may have a detrimental effect on subsequent school attendance. This may give rise to perpetuating socioeconomic inequality and needs further research to inform policy and intervention.

Even though, this small but significant percentage of children with psychiatric disorders will need specialist interventions, psychological treatment more than medication. Some of these children may complain of abdominal pain and headaches or other physical symptoms for which doctors will not be able to find a diagnosable medical cause. They are called “medically unexplained symptoms” or “somatization” or “bodily distress disorder”.

Sri Lanka has only a handful of specialists in child and adolescent psychiatric disorders but have adult psychiatrists who have enough experience in supervising care for such needy children. Compared to tsunami, the numbers have gone higher from around 20 to over 100 psychiatrists.

Most importantly, children absent from schools will need more close attention by the education authorities.

In conclusion, going by the principles of research dissemination sciences, it is extremely important that the public, including teachers and others providing social care, should be aware that the impact of Cyclone Ditwah, which was followed by major floods and landslides, which is a complex emergency impact, will range from normal human emotional behavioural responses to psychiatric illnesses. We should be careful not to medicalise this normal distress.

It’s crucial to recall an important statement made by the World Health Organisation following the Tsunam

Prof. Sumapthipala MBBS, DFM, MD Family Medicine, FSLCFP (SL), FRCPsych, CCST (UK), PhD (Lon)]

Director, Institute for Research and Development in Health and Social Care, Sri Lanka

Emeritus Professor of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Keele University, UK

Emeritus Professor of Global Mental Health, Kings College London

Secretary General, International society for Twin Studies 

Visiting Professor in Psychiatry and Biomedical Research at the Faculty of Medicine, Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka

Associate Editor, British Journal Psychiatry

Co-editor Ceylon Medical Journal.

Prof. Athula Sumathipala

Continue Reading

Trending