Connect with us

Opinion

Sri Lanka has policy, but where is the data?

Published

on

In recent months, President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has repeatedly expressed a concern that the government does not have the accurate data it needs to make good decisions.

At meetings with senior officials from ministries ranging from health and agriculture to education and infrastructure, the President has reportedly lamented that the government often lacks reliable information on what its projects are achieving, how funds are being spent, and whether public investments are producing results. The meeting on December 6th at the Matale District Secretariat was a case in point. The President emphasised the need for most accurate data to award compensation for damaged agricultural lands before the month’s end. He recalled that the Department of Agriculture’s data showed an excess of rice in the country, but the nation has faced a rice shortage.

For a country attempting economic recovery after the most severe crisis in its post-independence history, absence of accurate data is a dangerous position to be in.

Without data, decisions become guesswork. Without evidence, policy becomes speculation.

Ironically, Sri Lanka already possesses the policy architecture required to solve this problem. The National Evaluation Policy (2018) and the National Evaluation Policy Implementation Framework (2023) were created precisely to ensure that public spending is guided by evidence, results, and accountability. Yet today, despite these policies and the presence of a dedicated government agency tasked with monitoring development projects, the country still lacks the integrated digital monitoring and evaluation system needed to turn policy into practice. Until that gap is closed, Sri Lanka will continue to struggle with inefficient public investment, delayed projects, and policy decisions made without reliable evidence.

The scale of the problem

The Department of Project Management and Monitoring (DPMM), operating under the Ministry of Finance, is the central institution responsible for overseeing development projects implemented by government ministries. According to its 2024 Annual Performance Report, the department monitored 226 large-scale development projects across various ministries during the year. These projects collectively had an allocated budget of LKR 705 billion, but the actual expenditure amounted to only LKR 401.96 billion, representing about 56.9% utilization of the allocated funds.

In other words, nearly half of the planned development spending did not materialize.

While fiscal constraints and external factors contributed to this outcome, the data nevertheless highlights a deeper systemic issue: weak monitoring and decision-making structures that fail to identify and resolve implementation problems early.

The report also indicates that many projects face delays due to procurement issues, coordination failures, cost escalations, and operational bottlenecks. What makes the situation more troubling is that information about these problems is often fragmented and slow to reach decision-makers.

The government does monitor projects through reports and field visits, but the information flow remains largely manual and scattered across ministries. In the digital age, such a system is simply inadequate.

A policy that already foresaw the solution

Sri Lanka’s National Evaluation Policy (NEP), approved by the Cabinet in 2018, recognised this problem years ago. The policy aims to ensure that public investment decisions are guided by reliable evidence, efficiency, and measurable development results.

The NEP outlines several key goals:

· strengthening evidence-based decision making,

· improving efficiency in resource utilisation,

· ensuring transparency and accountability in public expenditure,

· promoting learning from successes and failures of past projects, and

· creating a national culture of evaluation.

To operationalise the policy, the government introduced the National Evaluation Policy Implementation Framework (NEPIF) in 2023. This framework explicitly calls for the creation of integrated information systems capable of gathering and analyzing data across the project cycle—from planning and budgeting to implementation and evaluation. In fact, NEPIF specifically proposes the establishment of a web-based integrated public investment management and evaluation information system to store project data and evaluation reports.

Such a system would allow decision-makers to access reliable information quickly, improving accountability and policy planning. Unfortunately, despite the clarity of this vision, the digital infrastructure necessary to implement it at a national scale is still largely absent.

A revealing moment at a Colombo seminar

The urgency of this gap became strikingly clear at a recent seminar in Colombo organized by a national NGO. The organization demonstrated its cloud-based monitoring and evaluation system which was comprehensive and updated by multiple layers of personnel, to a group of university students. On a large screen, a dashboard displayed real-time information on the organization’s twenty development projects across the country. Each project appeared as a branch of a digital tree, connected to activities, budgets, locations, and beneficiaries. With a few clicks, staff could generate reports showing the status of any project at national, district, or local levels, both of data and graphics. Updated data was available up to the previous day.

What would normally take weeks of manual compilation could be done in less than a minute.

Among the audience was a university academic who observed something obvious but powerful. ‘If a small NGO can run a system like this,’ he asked, ‘why can’t the Government?’ Another participant responded and told that the non-introduction of a digitalized Monitoring and Evaluation mechanism was due to some bureaucrats’ resistance. ‘I heard the Evaluation Reports of several projects of the government was not published because the respective Project Managers had opposed, fearing their failure would be exposed’, another academic commented. Those comments deserve serious reflection on the situation, I believe.

The digital revolution in monitoring and evaluation

Around the world, governments are increasingly adopting digital monitoring and evaluation platforms to track public investments in real time. These systems combine several elements:

· project databases

· geospatial mapping

· financial monitoring tools

· citizen feedback mechanisms

· performance dashboards for decision-makers.

Countries such as Estonia, South Korea, Rwanda, and Chile have integrated such systems into national governance structures. In these systems, ministers and senior officials can see instantly:

· which projects are progressing

· which projects are delayed

· how funds are being spent

· whether outputs and outcomes are being achieved.

More importantly, such platforms enable early intervention. Problems can be identified before they become crises. For Sri Lanka, which must now manage scarce fiscal resources with extreme care, such tools are no longer optional luxuries.

They are necessities.

The cost of not knowing

The absence of integrated data systems carries real economic consequences. Public investment decisions affect everything from roads and irrigation schemes to hospitals and schools. When these investments fail or underperform, the cost is not merely financial. It affects the daily lives of citizens.

A hospital without doctors. An irrigation scheme without water. A school building without teachers.

These are not simply implementation failures; they are information failures.

Without reliable monitoring systems, governments often learn about problems too late. By the time corrective action is taken, budgets have been spent and opportunities lost.

The NEPIF recognises precisely this challenge. It emphasises that evaluation should be an integral part of the entire development cycle—from project design to implementation and feedback for future planning.

But such evaluation cannot occur without reliable data systems.

Building an evaluation culture

Another important goal of the National Evaluation Policy is to create a culture of evaluation within the public sector. This requires a shift in mindset. Evaluation should not be seen as a fault-finding exercise. Instead, it should function as a learning mechanism that helps improve policy design and implementation.

The NEPIF stresses that evaluation findings should inform planning, budgeting, and future project selection. However, without systematic information systems, evaluation results often remain scattered across reports that few decision-makers read. Digital platforms can transform this situation by making information visible, accessible, and actionable. They turn data into knowledge. And knowledge into better decisions.

What a national digital system could look like

Sri Lanka does not need to start from scratch. The institutional building blocks already exist:

· the Department of Project Management and Monitoring (DPPM)

· the National Evaluation Policy

· the National Evaluation Policy Implementation Framework

· various sector-specific monitoring systems across ministries.

What is missing is integration.

A national digital monitoring and evaluation platform could include:

1. A centralised project database:

All government development projects recorded with budgets, timelines, outputs, and implementing agencies.

2. Real-time progress dashboards:

Accessible to the President, Cabinet, ministry secretaries, and provincial administrators.

3. Geographic mapping:

Showing where projects are located and how they benefit communities.

4. Automated reporting:

Reducing paperwork and enabling faster decision-making.

5. Citizen transparency portals:

Allowing the public to see how public funds are used.

Such a system would dramatically strengthen transparency, accountability, and efficiency.

The opportunity before Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka today has a rare opportunity. Economic crises often force governments to rethink outdated systems. The country cannot afford inefficient public investments any longer. Every rupee spent must produce measurable results. The National Evaluation Policy and its implementation framework already provide the intellectual foundation for this transformation. What remains is political commitment. A bold decision to build the digital infrastructure of evidence-based governance.

A call to action

The President’s concern about the lack of reliable data in government is both accurate and urgent. But the solution does not require new policies. The policies already exist. What Sri Lanka needs now is implementation. A national digital monitoring and evaluation system would give policymakers something they currently lack: a clear, real-time picture of the country’s development efforts. Such a system would empower leaders to identify problems early, allocate resources wisely, save billions of rupees from wasting and ensure that development projects truly benefit citizens.

In short, it would give Sri Lanka what every modern state needs: a digital nervous system connecting policy, data, and decision-making. The question is no longer whether the country needs such a system.

The question is simply this: how soon Sri Lanka is willing to build it.

by Tilak W. Karunaratne



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Beware of Yanks bearing gifts

Published

on

Helicopters from the US. (Pic courtesy SLAF)

The US Government has gifted 10 Bell 206, Sea Ranger Helicopters to the SLAF for Training and Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) purposes. The full specifications are as follows.

Contractor:

Bell Helicopter Textron
Date Deployed: First flight: 1961; Operational: 1968
Propulsion: One Allison 250-C20BJ turbofan engine
Length: Fuselage – 31 feet (9.44 meters); Rotors turning – 39 feet (11.9 meters)
Height: 10 feet (3.04 meters)
Rotor Diameter: 35 feet 4 inches (10.78 meters)
Weight: 1595 pounds (725kg) empty, 3200 pounds (1455 kg) maximum take-off
Airspeed: 138 miles (222 km) per hour maximum; 117 miles (188 km) per hour cruising
Ceiling: 18,900 feet (5,761 meters)
Range: 368 nautical miles (420 statute miles, 676 km)
Crew: One pilot, four students

While they are good for training, I have my serious doubts whether these helicopters are ideal for HADR. As they have only a single engine and They can’t even operate into high rise helipads in hospitals and hotels in Colombo. The law requires twin engine helicopters! What happens if there is an engine failure while operating over the sea or in a mountainous area? There will be hell to pay!

Three twin engine versions would have been better.

How many helicopter pilots does the SLAF require anyway?

Will we be stuck with junk? Like two Russian KA -26’s during the Sirimavo Government and French Aerospatiale Dauphins SLAF acquired. which were not ‘tropicalised’, during the JRJ Government.

Will the Sea Ranger Spares support be available, free of charge?

I doubt it.

There will also be other Geopolitical strings attached. There is no such thing as a free lunch.

Guwan Seeya

Continue Reading

Opinion

Will AI kill solar and wind energy?

Published

on

Global warming policies were expected to drive a rapid shift toward a renewables-based energy system dominated by wind and solar. While growth in these sources did occur, it has not matched the pace that was widely anticipated. In the United States, the rise of cheap and abundant shale natural gas significantly reshaped the energy mix, displacing coal and limiting the relative share of wind and solar in electricity generation. In China and India, the situation has been different.

Coal remains dominant because it is widely available domestically, while natural gas is more limited or expensive to secure at scale. As a result, coal has retained its central role in both countries’ power systems. Solar and wind always provide intermittent, variable power. It was widely assumed that a cost-effective, utility-scale electricity storage solution would emerge to solve this problem, but that has not yet happened at the scale originally expected. In the pre-AI era, solar and wind were typically integrated into power systems alongside more reliable sources such as coal, natural gas, and nuclear energy.

For example, if the sun was shining on a Monday, electricity demand could be met largely by solar power during the day. At night, coal, natural gas, or nuclear plants would supply the required electricity. If the following Tuesday was cloudy or gloomy, generation would shift back toward coal, gas, or nuclear to maintain supply. AI introduces a new and more demanding challenge. AI data centers require continuous, high-quality, always-on electricity, which solar and wind alone struggle to guarantee without large-scale storage or back-up systems. In addition, they require very large amounts of power.

As a result, the AI industry is now actively searching for new and expanded sources of reliable electricity. One of the major challenges in powering AI systems is electricity transmission. High-voltage transmission lines are expensive, slow to build, and often face regulatory and land-use constraints. As a result, some companies are exploring more localized power solutions, sometimes referred to as microgrids. These are self-contained energy systems that can operate independently from the main electricity grid. Technologies such as small modular nuclear reactors are an example of such microgrids.

In such isolated systems, the focus is on highly reliable, always available power generated close to the point of use. In this context, solar and wind are expected to play a limited role because their output is variable and depends on weather conditions, making them less suited as primary sources in fully self-contained AI-focused microgrids. The pace of AI infrastructure development is extremely rapid in both the United States and China. AI systems are widely seen as transformative technologies that promise significant new wealth creation, which is driving aggressive and sustained investment. As a result, development is moving quickly, without waiting for long-term solutions such as large-scale energy storage to mature alongside renewable energy systems.

In this environment, electricity demand is rising faster than new infrastructure can be built. In the United States, this reinforces the role of natural gas as the dominant source of reliable power. In China and India, where coal remains more established and readily available, it is likely to continue playing a central role in meeting growing demand. In India, AI data centers have not yet been built at the scale seen in the United States and China. When India does reach that stage, it will need to supply large amounts of reliable electricity. India has placed strong emphasis on solar energy in particular and has had some success in meeting the needs of ordinary consumers through renewable expansion. However, the key question is what choices will be made when large-scale AI data centers begin to arrive.

Will India rely more on coal generation, which is relatively cheap, widely available, and highly reliable, or on solar power, which is intermittent, variable, and often more expensive when reliability is taken into account? My view is that India is more likely to turn to coal to meet this demand, given its existing infrastructure and the need for dependable electricity supply. Then there is an overall question. Solar and wind were already struggling in the pre-AI days to displace coal and natural gas at the system level, despite strong expectations that they would become dominant sources of electricity. Now that AI is here and electricity demand is rising rapidly, will they push solar and wind further behind in the energy mix? (The Statesman)

(The writer is an expert on energy and contributes regularly to publications in India and overseas.)

by SUNIL SHARAN

Continue Reading

Opinion

An Adulation to a Titan of Humanity

Published

on

Dr. Neomal Gunaratna

Celebrating the Life and Legacy of Dr Naomal P. S. Gunaratna 10 January 1931 – 07 May 2026

When a colossus of human virtue departs this earthly theatre, the silence left in its wake is not merely the absence of sound, but a profound, resonant reverberation that echoes through the very corridors of our souls. On that most distressing 07 of May, 2026, the mortal final curtain fell upon the magnificent, multi-faceted tapestry of a life lived to its exquisite pinnacle. Dr Naomal P. S. Gunaratna, having completed a glorious earthly sojourn of ninety-five years, surrendered his gentle spirit to the infinite, leaving behind a world demonstrably poorer for his departure.

To speak of him is to speak of an absolute gem of humanity, a mortal who walked among us with the quiet majesty of a king, the tender heart of a saint, and the flawless grace of a true nobleman. He was a Consultant Paediatrician of peerless distinction. Yet for all that, well above and beyond the glittering accolades of his noble vocation, he was, in the truest and most sublime sense of the phrase, a human being par excellence.

In attempting to encapsulate the vast depth of Naomal’s character, even the richness of the English language feels frustratingly inadequate, compelling one to search for words forged in the fires of profoundest reverence. He was a grandee possessed of sterling qualities so rare in this modern transactional era that his presence felt like an exquisite anachronism; a beautiful remainder of an age when honour was a man’s sanctuary, and integrity was his unwavering Northern Star. His uniqueness did not stem from an assertive, ostentatious display of superiority. It blossomed from the quiet, luminous radiance of an authentic soul. To have been counted among his close friends is a privilege of such monumental proportions that it stands as one of the most radiant blessings of my own life. Our bond was not woven from the fragile threads of casual acquaintance, but forged in the durable crucible of mutual respect, shared ideals, and a deep, unspoken understanding of the beauty inherent in lives dedicated to the service of others.

In an age where the ethical landscape is all too often obscured by the shifting mists of compromise and moral ambivalence, Naomal stood like an unyielding granite cliff against the turbulent seas of opportunism. His rectitude was absolute, non-negotiable, and entirely independent of an audience. He did what was right, not for the fleeting warmth of public adulation, but because his internal moral compass was tuned to an otherworldly frequency. His word was a sacred covenant, an unbreakable bond that required no legal seal or written witness. In his professional life as a Consultant Paediatrician, this supreme integrity manifested as an unswerving commitment to the highest principles of Hippocratic devotion. He was a healer who could neither be bought nor swayed by the seductive allure of material gain or institutional politics. He wielded his stethoscope not as an instrument of commerce, but as a sacred conduit of compassion, bridging the divide between clinical expertise and the tender vulnerabilities of human suffering.

How can one adequately depict the soft, enveloping warmth of a heart that beats in perpetual symphony with the distress of others? Naomal’s benevolence was not a performative gesture, nor was it a duty executed with cold, clinical precision. It was an effusive, spontaneous overflow of pure, unadulterated love. It was a kindness that possessed its own unique atmosphere, a soothing gentleness that disarmed fear and banished despair. When he entered a room, the emotional temperature invariably rose, thawed by the genuine, sparkling warmth of his magnificent smile. His eyes, windows to a soul completely devoid of malice, mirrored a profound empathy that could diagnose a broken spirit as swiftly as a physical ailment.

He was brought up in his early days at De Mazenod College in Kandana, St Peter’s College Colombo, Royal College Colombo, and during the period of World War II, in Glendale College, Bandarawela. In a glittering career that followed specialisation in paediatrics, he has worked in the Government Hospital in Gampaha and Kuliyapitiya, the Department of Paediatrics of the University of Peradeniya, North Colombo Medical College in Ragama and then at the Department of Paediatrics of the University of Kelaniya. To the thousands of children who passed through his healing hands across the decades, he was not merely a doctor in a sterile white coat; he was a grand, benevolent guardian angel, a comforting presence whose very touch possessed an alchemy that turned terror into tranquillity and tears into triumphant laughter. To scores of his students, he was a father figure, a mentor and a brilliant teacher. In the years gone by, he was the President of the Sri Lanka Paediatric Association, which is now the Sri Lanka College of Paediatricians, President of the Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Forum of Sri Lanka and a much-valued Council Member of the Independent Medical Practitioners Association (IMPA). The unblemished finesse that he exhibited in these positions is indeed an abiding lesson to all and sundry.

As a Consultant Paediatrician, Naomal’s brilliance was legendary, a beacon of excellence that illuminated the medical fraternity. Yet, his profound intellect was beautifully balanced by an equal measure of humility. He possessed the rare ability to untangle the most knotty, complex medical conundrums with a swift, intuitive diagnostic precision, all while maintaining a bedside manner that was as gentle as a summer breeze. He understood, with a depth that bypassed mere textbook knowledge, that a sick child is a fragile ecosystem, intertwined with the agonising anxieties of distraught parents. Consequently, his consultations were masterclasses in holistic healing. He did not merely treat a disease; he cradled a family. He would spend hours patiently explaining clinical intricacies to frightened mothers, his voice a calm, reassuring anchor in the midst of their emotional storms. He treated the children of royalty and the children of peasants, with the same meticulous care, the same overflowing affection, and the same absolute dedication, recognising the identical, priceless spark of divinity within each innocent soul.

A personal anecdote goes to show the most admirable and true spirit of the man. I did not know Naomal from Adam till 1990. In January of 1990, following my tenure of office in General Hospital Badulla, General Hospital Ratnapura and General Hospital Kurunegala, I was posted as the Consultant Paediatrician to Kalubowila Hospital by the Ministry of Health. Both Naomal and I did our Private Consultations at Asiri Medical Hospital. We worked on the same floor and became really close friends. He had loads of patients, while I had extremely few, as I was totally unknown. Most of the time, I was seated in my Consulting Room, twiddling my thumbs and waiting for some tangible work with children.

Then one day, Naomal came to my room and said that he needed to go abroad for an extended period of about six to eight months and asked me whether I could look after his patients. I was very happy to do it as at that time, as it was like ‘manna from heaven’ for me. So, it went on, I looked after his little patients, and I was financially the richer for it.

Then, when Naomal came back after all those months, I told all his patients that I was only covering up his work and that they should go back to him. However, some of them wanted to stay with me. I told them that the only way in which I would continue to look after their children was for them to get a note to that effect from Dr Naomal Gunaratna. I was quite sure that it would not come to pass that way. They went to him and told him what I said, and Naomal, most nonchalantly, graciously and with the greatest pleasure, issued a little note to each of them in which he had written “My dear BJC, please be kind enough to take over the care of this child“. Need I say more? What a man? What a fantastic person who showed by his quiet deeds that his values transcended petty considerations and monetary reflections?

The longevity of ninety-five years is a milestone granted only to a few. For Naomal, these nine decades plus were not merely a passive accumulation of days but a grand, purposeful march through time. He aged with an unparalleled, majestic dignity, his wisdom deepening like a fine vintage, while his youthful enthusiasm for life remained entirely unextinguished by the passing years. Even as his physical frame grew frail under the inevitable weight of time, his mind remained a brilliant, caerulean laboratory of thought, and his spirit retained its effervescent, childlike joy. He never allowed the cynicism of an evolving world to pollute the pristine waters of his optimism. To sit with him in his twilight years was to drink from a fountain of pure, unvarnished wisdom. He looked back upon his long journey not with the wistful regrets of a man mourning, but with the serene, tranquil satisfaction of an accomplished master craftsman who looks upon a masterpiece and knows he has given it his all, in the finest sense of the phrase.

We must also celebrate the quiet, understated grandeur of his private universe. Naomal was a man of exquisite tastes, an intellectual who found solace in the harmony of great literature, the majesty of classical arts, and the quiet contemplation of nature’s wonders. Yet, his greatest joy was found in the warmth of human connections. He was a loyal, fiercely protective friend, a steadfast pillar of strength upon whom one could lean with absolute confidence, even during life’s most turbulent seasons. In an era dominated by superficial relationships and digital illusions, his friendship was a solid, tangible sanctuary. His conversations were never trivial; they were rich and multi-layered tapestries woven with historical anecdotes, medical philosophies, gentle humour, and profound spiritual insights. To converse with him was to be elevated, and to be challenged to think more deeply, love more expansively, and live more honourably.

On that day of his departure from this mortal world, the world lost an exceptional treasure. The medical profession lost one of its most venerable elder statesmen, humanity lost an exemplary ambassador, and I lost a cherished brother of the heart. The grief we feel is heavy, a dark and suffocating shroud that threatens to overwhelm us. Yet, as we stand in the shadow of this monumental loss, we must not weep as those who have no hope. Naomal’s demise is not an absolute end but a glorious transition. It is the triumphant homecoming of a soul that has magnificently fulfilled its earthly mandate. The physical vessel which carried his inner being may return to the dust from which it came, but the essence of who he was, the kindness he disseminated, the lives he saved, the love he kindled, and the pristine integrity he modelled remain forever immortalised in the fabric of our realities.

He has crossed the ultimate horizon, entering that everlasting realm where pain is obsolete, and peace reigns eternal. We can almost see him now, walking through fields of everlasting light, his countenance radiant, his step light and free, greeted by a chorus of godly beings and even the grateful souls of the children he mended but who preceded him into eternity. The man has fought the good fight, he has finished the race, he has kept the faith with absolute, unyielding fidelity. His life was a beautiful, symphonic ensemble dedicated to the upliftment of humans, and its final stanza, though hushed in death, is an abiding opus which leaves an eternal melody playing in our hearts.

Farewell, my dearly beloved friend; goodbye, Dr Naomal P. S. Gunaratna. You were an absolute gem of a person, a human being par excellence, and a star that burned with a brilliant, comforting light in our earthly sky. Though you have gone away from our sight, your luminescence will continue to guide our steps through the gathering shadows until that glorious dawn when we shall meet again on the farther shore.

May your most beautiful, noble soul rest in eternal, serene, and uninterrupted peace. May you attain eternal bliss!

I conclude with the immortal words, as depicted by the great bard William Shakespeare in Julius Caesar (Act V, Scene 5) “His life was gentle, and the elements so mixed in him that nature might stand up and say to all the world, This was a man.”

By Dr B. J. C. Perera
Specialist Consultant Paediatrician

Continue Reading

Trending