Opinion
Speaker’s Wig : Why split hairs over a piece of horsehair?
By Gomi Senadhira
I was surprised to read a few comments published in the newspapers and social media about the way the Speaker Ashoka Ranwala wore his speaker’s wig at the ceremonial opening of the parliament. Some of which were extremely unwise, for example, one such comment was, “This shows how stupid the entire parliament is. Please teach the Speaker to wear the wig properly. Looks like he just got off from a motorbike. Has he not seen a Speaker before in his life?”
On ceremonial occasions, the Speaker of Sri Lanka’s parliament wears a black robe trimmed with gold lace and a full bottomed wig. This is a practice we have copied from the British House of Commons where the Speaker wore a black and gold robe over court dress with a white waterfall cravat and a full bottomed wig. In addition to the speaker the clerks, who are the senior officials in the House of Commons, also wore bob wigs and long gowns. Fortunately, we did not adopt that dress code for the officials. Unfortunately, the speaker copied this British fashion from the seventeenth century and continues to follow it.
In 1992, the Speaker Betty Boothroyd, the first female speaker of the British House of Commons, ditched the wig because she “…couldn’t have a good laugh disguised in something so imperious.” Since then her successors too have followed her style and have further simplified other aspects of their costume and started to wear plain black gowns over lounge suits. Furthermore, in 2017 the UK parliament’s Speaker John Bercow ruled that wigs and formal dress will no longer be worn by parliamentary officials in the Commons, ending a 300-year-old practice.
However, the current Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle, who was elected to the post in 2019, decided to go back to the old tradition and wear his full ceremonial attire for the State Opening of Parliament by the queen. He also had also directed the Clerks of the House of Commons to wear their bob wigs. So, the Clerks have once again started to wear their wigs. But when it came to the Speakers own wig there was a slight hitch. The horsehair ceremonial hair piece which was last worn by Speaker Bernard Weatherill before his retirement in 1992 had gone missing and the House of Commons officers failed to find it even after an extensive search within the Palace of Westminster. A new wig would have cost over one thousand pounds (£1,320 plus VAT to be exact) to British tax payers. So, if one Googles Lindsay Hoyle, it is possible to find a picture of him walking through the Members’ Lobby in the House of Commons during the State Opening of the Parliament by the Queen, wearing the formal Speaker of the House of Commons regalia, a black and gold robe over court dress with a white waterfall cravat…. but no wig!
That means, it has been three decades since the speaker of the UK’s House of Commons last wore this “imperious” piece of horsehair. In our neighbourhood, the Speakers of the India’s Central Legislative Assembly used to wear robes and wigs while presiding over the meetings of the Assembly from 1921 to 1946. But in 1946 Speaker G.V. Mavalankar stopped that practice. In Australia, the traditional outfit of the Speaker of the House of Representatives included a black academic gown, a jacket, a lace collar and a full wig. But the last time an Australian Speaker wore the full ceremonial outfit was in 1983. The Speaker’s wig, I understand it is on a “loan” to a museum, where it really belongs.
So, isn’t this the proper time to stop splitting hairs over how to wear this ceremonial piece of horsehair and ask why the speaker should continue to wear this glaring symbol of colonial inheritance?
(The writer, a retired public servant and a diplomat, can be reached at senadhiragomi@gmail.com)
Opinion
Boxing day tsunami:Unforgettable experience
The first and only tsunami that Sri Lanka experienced was on Boxing Day(26th) of December 2004. My wife and I, as usual, went down to Modara in Moratuwa to purchase our seafood requirements of seafood from our familiar fishmonger, Siltin, from whom we had been buying fish for a long time. Sometimes we used to take a couple of friends of ours. But on this day, it was only both of us that went on this trip.
We made our purchases and were returning home and when we came up to the Dehiwala bridge, many people were looking down at the canal from both sides of the bridge. This was strange, as normally if there was something unusual, it would be on one side.
Anyway, we came home unaware of anything that had happened. A school friend of mine (sadly he is no longer with us) telephoned me and asked whether I was aware of what had happened. When I answered him in the negative, he told me to switch on the TV and watch. Then when I did so and saw what was happening, I was shocked. But still I did not know that we had just managed to escape being swept away by the tsunami.
Later, when I telephoned Siltin and asked him, he said that both of us had a narrow escape. Soon after we had left in our car, the tsunami had invaded the shore with a terrifying wave and taken away everything of the fishmongers, including their stalls, the fish, weighing scales and money. The fishmongers had managed to run to safety.
This had been about five minutes after we had left. So, it was a narrow shave to have escaped the wrath of the demining tsunami( the name many Sri Lankans came to know after it hit our island very badly}
HM NISSANKA WARAKAULLE
Opinion
Shocking jumbo deaths
Sri Lanka has recorded a staggering 375 elephant deaths in the past eleven and a half months due to a multitude of causes, according to the Department of Wildlife Conservation. U. L Thaufeeq, Deputy Director – Elephant Conservation said the deaths include 74 from gunshots, 53 from electrocution, 49 from hakka patas (explosive devices hidden in food), seven from poisoning, 10 from train accidents, three from a road accident, and six by drowning. It makes such diabolical reading!
“The causes of other deaths are due to natural causes or causes that could not be identified. Most of the elephants that died were young,” the official said.
Meanwhile, the human-elephant conflict has also taken a toll on people, with 149 human deaths reported this year.
Accordingly, human-elephant conflict has resulted in 524 deaths of both elephants and humans in 2024.
In 2023, a total of 488 elephants and 184 people have died consequent to the conflict, according to Wildlife Department statistics.
The human-elephant conflict in Sri Lanka has escalated to unprecedented levels with reasons like habitat destruction, encroachment, and the lack of sustainable coexistence measures contributing to the issue.
This is an indictment of the Wildlife Department for just giving the sad yearly statistics of shocking losses of our National treasures !
Given the fact that Sri Lanka boasts of 29.9% of the country declared as protected forests, Sri Lanka is a haven for nature lovers. Boasting 26 national parks, 10 nature reserves including 3 strict nature reserves, and 61 sanctuaries, the national parks in Sri Lanka offer an incredible variety of wildlife experiences.
Taken in that context, the million dollar question is why on earth the Wildlife Department is not being proactive to capture these magnificent animals and transport them into protected sanctuaries, thus effectively minimising dangers to villagers ?
Being a Buddhist country primarily, to turn a blind eye to these avoidable tragic deaths to mankind and wild elephants, we should be ashamed !
As a practising Buddhist myself, I think our clergy could play a major part in calling upon the Wildlife Department to get their act together sooner rather than later to protect human elephant conflicts !
Sri Lanka being a favourite destination amongst foreign tourists, they are bound to take a dim view of what is happening on the ground!
If the top brass in the responsible department are not doing their job properly, may be there is a case for the new President to intervene before it gets worse!
All animal lovers hope and pray the New Year will usher in a well coordinated plan of action put in place to ensure the well being of wildlife and villagers !
Sunil Dharmabandhu
Wales, UK
Opinion
Laws and regulations pertaining to civil aviation in SL, CAASL
This has reference to the article from the Aircraft Owners and Operators Sri Lanka, titled ‘Closer look at regulatory oversight and its impact on Tourism’, published on Tuesday, 24th December 2024.To explain further, in the beginning there was the Air Navigation Act No 15 of 1950 which was followed by the Air Navigation Regulations (ANR) of 1955. This was long before the national airline had acquired pressurised aircraft, intercontinental jets, sophisticated navigation equipment, satellite communication and automatic landing systems, and ‘glass’ flight-deck instrumentation.
Today, civil aviation in Sri Lanka is governed by Civil Aviation Act Number 14 of 2010. Yet the Air Navigation Regulations (ANR) promulgated back in 1955 remain in force.
These outdated regulations still stipulate rules forbidding the carriage of passengers on the airplane’s wings or undercarriage (landing gear). In short, they are neither practical nor user-friendly. In contrast, the Air Navigation Regulations of other countries have progressed and are easy to read, understand, and implement.
To overcome the problem of outdated regulations, as an interim measure in 1969 the then Minister of Communications and Transport, Mr E.L.B. Hurulle issued a Government Gazette notification declaring that the Standard and Recommended Procedures (SARPs) in Annexes to the ICAO Convention signed by Ceylon in 1944 shall be made law.
Even so, nothing much was done to move with the times until updating of the Civil Aviation Act 14 of 2010, while the Air Navigation Regulations remained unchanged since 1955. However, these regulations were modified from time to time by the promulgation of Implementing Standards (IS) and General Directives (GDs) which were blindly ‘cut and pasted’ by the Civil Aviation Authority of Sri Lanka (CAASL), from the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organisation) Annexe ‘SARPS’ without much thought given. To date there are literally 99 IS’s starting from 2010.
The currently effective air navigation regulations are not in one document like the rest of the world, but all over the place and difficult for the flying public to follow as they are not regularly updated. This sad situation seems to have been noticed by the current regime.
The National Tourism Policy of the ruling NPP states, “Domestic air operations are currently limited due to high cost and regulatory restrictions. The current regulatory and operational environment will be reviewed to ensure domestic air connectivity to major tourist destinations. The potential of operating a domestic air schedule with multiple operators is proposed. Additionally, domestic airports and water aerodromes in potential key areas will be further developed, for high-end tourism growth.”
“The tourism policy recognises Sri Lanka’s potential to develop Sri Lanka’s aviation-based specialised tourism products, including fun flying, hot air ballooning, paragliding, parachuting and skydiving, and scenic seaplane operations. To facilitate the growth of these niche markets, existing regulations will be reviewed with the aim of attracting capable investors to develop and operate these offerings.”
It remains to be seen whether the NPP government lives up to those promises.
Note:
That OPA report talks of two funds: ‘Connectivity’ and ‘Viability’ for a limited period like three or five years to help jump-start the domestic aviation industry.
The ‘Connectivity Fund’ will cap the seat price for local passengers to a more affordable value to destinations while the ‘Viability Fund’ will assume that all seats are occupied and compensate the operator for any unutilised seat. The intention is to popularise domestic aviation as a safe, quick and convenient mode of transport.
Capt. Gihan A Fernando
RCyAF/ SLAF, Air Ceylon, Air Lanka, Singapore Airlines and Sri Lankan Airlines.
Now A Fun Flier
-
Sports6 days ago
Pathirana set to sling his way into Kiwi hearts
-
News4 days ago
Office of CDS likely to be scrapped; top defence changes on the cards
-
Editorial6 days ago
The games they play
-
Features4 days ago
An Absurd play in Parliament: Qualifications versus education
-
Opinion5 days ago
What AKD and NPP should bear in mind
-
Midweek Review3 days ago
Ex-SLN seniors focus on seabed mining and Sri Lanka’s claim for the delimitation of the Outer Continental Margin
-
Features6 days ago
The Government’s Term Tests & Results: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
-
Editorial5 days ago
Seeyanomics, rhetoric and reality