News
SLPP MPs urged not to protect Health Minister
By Shamindra Ferdinando
The rebel SLPP group yesterday (04) urged the ruling SLPP not to protect Health Minister Keheliya Rambukwella at the vote on no-faith motion against the Kandy District lawmaker.
Secretary General of Parliament Kushani Rohanadeera said the vote would be held on Friday (08) following a three-day debate, commencing on Wednesday (06).
SLPP National List MP Prof. G. L. Peiris, on behalf of the dissident group, warned that those who voted against the motion would have to face drastic consequences.
The rebel group consists of 12 MPs.
The main Opposition Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) moved the no-confidence motion against the failure on the part of Minister Rambukwella to halt the deterioration of the public health sector. The SJB won 54 seats at the last general election, though about four switched their allegiance to the government since then.
Addressing the media at the Nawala Office of Nidahasa Janatha Sabhawa, Prof. Peiris said the motion couldn’t be carried through without the backing of the SLPP parliamentary group, still the largest in Parliament, regardless of over 20 members quitting the government.
Rambukwella contested the Kandy electoral district on the SLPP ticket. Pointing out that the head of the National Medical Regulatory Authority (NMRA) Prof. Jayaratne publicly acknowledged the continuing crisis in the health sector, including the importation of inferior quality medicines, the former External Affairs Minister asked whether the SLPP was ready to pay the price for Minister Rambukwella’s misdeeds.
Prof. Peiris dealt with several other issues, including the possibility of the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa contemplating putting off presidential elections that are statutorily due October next year and pressure being exerted on the judiciary.
At the commencement of the briefing, the academic asserted that President Ranil Wickremesinghe couldn’t put off the presidential election, too, the way he deferred both Provincial Councils and Local Government polls. Referring to concerns expressed over the Referendum called by the then President J.R. Jayewardene soon after winning the 1982 presidential election, Prof. Peiris explained that was to ask the electorate whether to extend the life of Parliament by six more years.
Prof. Peiris said that by late July or early Aug., 2024, the presidential election process should get underway leading to nominations in Sept., elections in Oct., and new President in office in early Nov.
The SLPP elected UNP leader Wickremesinghe in July last year to complete the remainder of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s five-year term, secured at the Nov. 2019 presidential election.
Regardless of bombastic declarations made by President Wickremesinghe and some members of his government, they feared the electorate, Prof Peiris said. There couldn’t be any other explanation for refusal to conduct Local Government polls months after the Supreme Court issued specific instructions to the relevant authorities in that regard.
Prof. Peiris explained how President Wickremesinghe relentlessly put pressure on the judiciary to reign in judges while issuing warnings to those who declined to toe the government line. The former Law Professor alleged that Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena played a central role in the despicable government project, directed at the judiciary. During the briefing, Prof. Peiris made reference to instances of controversial statements made by the President at Nuwara Eliya and at the Sri Lanka Foundation to justify criticism of Wickremesinghe’s actions.
Condemning the sharp increase of both petrol and diesel prices from Aug. 31 at a time the CPC was making huge profits, Prof. Peiris said that the increase of LP gas on Monday (04) would drive up the cost of living further. Accusing the government of being insensitive to the public woes, the former minister said that waste, corruption, irregularities and mismanagement continued unabated at every level.
There couldn’t be a better example than the crisis in the health sector to prove how corruption could destroy a vital service, Prof. Peiris said, pointing out the government never inquired about a spate of serious allegations made by the health professionals. Interested parties exploited the procurement process to their heart’s content while low quality medicine, discarded drugs and continuing shortage of life-saving drugs plunged the health sector to an unprecedented crisis situation.
The ex-minister declared that the damages caused to the public health sector were irreparable and those responsible should be punished, regardless of their social standing. Declaring that food security was cause for serious concern, Prof. Peiris said that the health crisis was far worse as unlike food, people couldn’t forgo medicine.
News
INS Airavat makes port call in Colombo
The Indian Naval Ship (INS) Airavat arrived at the Port of Colombo for Operational Turnaround on 01 Jun 26. The visiting ship was welcomed by the Sri Lanka Navy (SLN) in compliance with time-noured naval traditions.
INS Airavat is a Landing Ship Tank, commanded by Commander IP Patil.
During their stay in the island, the ship’s crew is scheduled to take part in a series of professionally enriching events and camaraderie-building programmes organised by the Sri Lanka Navy.
The Indian naval personnel will also tour several historic and prominent tourist attractions across the country before the ship concludes her deployment.
News
BASL asks govt. to abandon plan to raise retirement ages of CA and SC judges
… tells Prez such arbitrary change neither necessary nor desirable
The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has urged President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to abandon the controversial plan to increase the retirement age of the judiciary, including the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.
In a statement issued by the BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya and its Secretary Nalin de Silva, the BASL pointed out that the proposed increase of the retirement age of the judiciary would undermine the independence, integrity, dignity, and public confidence in the Judiciary, which is essential for the maintenance of the Rule of Law and democratic governance in Sri Lanka.
The text of the BASL statement: “The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (hereinafter referred to as “BASL”) notes with grave concern reports in the public domain that the Government is considering the introduction of an amendment to the Constitution to increase the age of retirement of Judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.
It is the considered view of the BASL that the age of retirement of the judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court which has stood at 63 years and 65 years respectively from the promulgation of the 1978 Constitution, should not be changed arbitrarily and that such a change is neither necessary nor desirable.
To do so will result in the loss of public confidence in the integrity of the legal system and of the Government’s commitment to preserve and protect the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary. Members of the public are likely to question the motives of the Government in bringing in a Constitutional amendment solely for this purpose.
Your Excellency is no doubt aware that the cadre of the Judges of the Court of Appeal was increased from 12 to 20 Judges (including the President of the Court of Appeal) and that of the Supreme Court from 11 to 17 Judges (including the Chief Justice) by the 20th Amendment to the constitution certified on 29th of October 2020. With such enhancement, workwise, there cannot be a real requirement to extend the retirement ages of these judges.
Your Excellency is aware that altering the retirement age of judges of the apex courts would have to be done through a Constitutional amendment. For many years Sri Lanka’s Constitution has been subject to ad hoc amendments, sometimes in order to cater to the political needs of the government in power and often contrary to the interests of the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary and the judiciary.
Extending the retirement age of the sitting Judges of these Courts at this point of time is likely to be viewed by the public as a blatant attempt to interfere with the judiciary. We believe that to go ahead with such an ad hoc move will also be an affront to the Honourable Judges of those courts.
If the Government goes ahead with such a move it will set a dangerous precedent for future Governments too to introduce ad hoc amendments to the Constitution in respect of the functions of the Judiciary.
The independence of the Judiciary and the public confidence reposed in it, are indispensable pillars of the Rule of Law and the democratic framework of our Republic. In that regard, it is of paramount importance that the Judiciary must not only remain independent in fact, but must also be seen by the public to be wholly independent, impartial, and free from even the slightest perception of influence, favour, accommodation, or impropriety.
The Bar Association of Sri Lanka is therefore constrained, in the discharge of its duty to uphold and safeguard the Rule of Law and the independence of the Judiciary, to respectfully express its serious concern regarding any such proposed amendment, which is neither in the interests of the Judiciary and nor of the people.
In the circumstances, the BASL respectfully urges Your Excellency not to proceed with any proposed constitutional amendment seeking to increase the retirement age of the members of the Judiciary including Judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.
We remain confident that Your Excellency will give due consideration to the importance of preserving and protecting the independence, integrity, dignity, and public confidence in the Judiciary, which is essential to the maintenance of the Rule of Law and democratic governance in Sri Lanka.”
Govt. declines to respond
A member of the Cabinet yesterday declined to comment on the BASL’s letter to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake. The Minister said that he wouldn’t comment for the time being.
News
New US tariffs proposed on 60 countries, including Sri Lanka
12.5% additional duties on goods imported from Colombo
The US has proposed additional duties of 10% or 12.5% on imports from 60 economies, including Sri Lanka, over their alleged failure to curb trade in goods made with forced labour.
The proposal made by US Trade Representative’s (USTR) office in terms of Section 301 unfair trade practices investigation to be released, news agencies reported, pointing out that the Trump administration was seeking to rebuild its emergency tariffs, which were struck down by a US Supreme Court decision in February.
The USTR said it determined that it would impose 10% duties related to the forced labour investigation on imports from Canada, Ecuador, the European Union, Indonesia, Mexico, Pakistan, Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan and Britain.
The trade agency said it would impose additional duties of 12.5% on the remaining 45 countries that were investigated.
“The failure of our most important trading partners to address the importation of goods made with forced labour is unacceptable,” US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement. “This creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field.”
According to the trade agency, the USTR found that Sri Lanka has failed to impose and effectively enforce a forced labour import prohibition.
The USTR noted that the results of its investigation indicate that the acts, policies and practices of Sri Lanka related to the failure to impose and effectively enforce a forced labour import prohibition are unreasonable and burden or restrict US commerce.
Accordingly, it has proposed to impose 12.5% additional duties on goods imported from Sri Lanka.
The USTR said it also was proposing a textile mechanism that would allow for a certain volume of apparel and textile imports to enter the US at a reduced tariff rate, though the duties and volumes were not disclosed.
The announcement comes ahead of the July 24 expiration of a 10% temporary tariff imposed by the Trump administration on February 20, the day the Supreme Court struck down US President Donald Trump’s tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
On Monday, the USTR proposed a 25% duty on many Brazilian goods as a result of a Section 301 investigation into the country’s digital trade practices and preferential tariffs. The trade agency is also expected to soon unveil the findings of another major Section 301 probe into the buildup of excess industrial capacity in 16 trading partners, including China.
In the forced labour findings, the USTR said it would exempt from the tariffs a number of products, including energy, rare earths and certain other metals, beef, coffee, certain fruits and vegetables, pharmaceuticals, organic chemicals and aircraft parts.
The USTR said it would accept public comments on the proposed tariffs and other remedies through July 6, with a public hearing scheduled for July 7.
-
News6 days agoIMF urges Lanka not to meddle with exchange rate
-
News3 days agoLankan duo emerge winners in Latin dance championship held in Blackpool, UK
-
Business7 days agoSri Lanka’s construction industry losing ground while no one watches
-
Business4 days agoIMF’s unstated rate:Sri Lanka’s $695m loan costs about 5.33% per annum
-
News6 days agoState of emergency extended
-
Features7 days agoThe Division Bell Mystery
-
Features5 days agoAre threats to Buddha Sasana external or from within?
-
News4 days agoUNP challenges NPP move to amend Vihara – Devalagam Act
