News
Sajith reiterates need for resumption of capital punishment
By Saman Indrajith
Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa told Parliament yesterday that the SJB was of the view that the capital punishment should be re-implemented.
Participating in the second reading debate on the draft 20th Amendment, the Opposition leader said that drafting laws for implementing the death penalty was an urgent need.
Justice Minister Ali Sabry asked him whether it was his personal standpoint or the position of his party.
Opposition Leader Premadasa:
We do not have a personal standpoint. We have party standpoints.
Justice Minister Sabry:
That is good now we know that your party’s position is to implement the death penalty.
Opposition Leader Premadasa:
I do not know why the Justice Minister opposes the re-implementation of death penalty against terrorists and drug dealers.
Justice Minister Sabry: That is fine because your own party men have gone before the Supreme Court against the reimplementation of the capital punishment.
Opposition Leader Premadasa said that SJB stood for power sharing and not to concentrate power in one organ of the government.
The Opposition Leader said that the U.S. President Abraham Lincoln had defined democracy as the government of the people, by the people, for the people which meant it was a social contract between the public and the rulers. Montesquieu argued that the tripartite system should be practised to maintain checks and balances among the executive, legislative, and judicial functions of the government in order to prevent one organ of the government dominating others.
He said that the clauses of the draft 20th amendment to the Constitution would destroy the checks and balances that had been introduced earlier. “When the power to make appointments to top posts is vested in a single person the checks and balances suffer a setback. Those who protested against the executive presidency have forgotten their own protests.
“Why do you fear the mechanism that was introduced under the 19th Amendment to the Constitution to bring about a just society?
“But this is a struggle for power between the President and Prime Minister. But what is correct is to bring checks and balances between the two institutions.”
He said that the 20th Amendment to the Constitution was not for the betterment of the public. “What we have got to do is to set up a National Security Council a new Health Act. The death penalty should be brought as regards those who engage in terrorist activities and those who engage in drug trafficking and that is the stance of the SJB”.
“I request you to listen to the public,” the Opposition Leader said. “I request you to listen to Ven Elle Gunawansa Thera and Ven Muruththettuwe Ananda Thera, who associated with my late father, President Ranasinghe Premadasa closely.”
News
CEB seeking tariff hike while making huge profits, says opposition trade union leader
Convenor of the Samagi Joint Trade Union Alliance affiliated with the Samagi Jana Balawegaya, Ananda Palitha, yesterday (16) said that the Ceylon Electricity Board was seeking to raise electricity tariffs by 13.56% percent although it had earned a profit of more than Rs 22,000 mn.
The CEB recently submitted its proposal to the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for an electricity tariff revision for the second quarter of this year – the period effective from April 1 to June 30.
Palitha alleged that the PUCSL, in spite of knowing the massive profit earned by the CEB, at the expense of the hapless public, had chosen to allow the state enterprise to propose an additional burden.
The economic, technical and safety regulator of the electricity industry, and the designated regulator for petroleum and water services industries, should exercise its powers in terms of the PUCSL Act No. 35 of 2002 and the Sri Lanka Electricity Act No. 20 of 2009 to provide relief, the veteran trade unionist said.
Palitha emphasised that the PUCSL had the right to intervene on behalf of electricity consumers but, unfortunately, chose to facilitate the CEB’s despicable strategy. “The proposal to increase tariffs by 13.56% was meant to divert attention. The real issue at hand is the percentage of electricity tariff reduction,” Palitha said. The former UNPer found fault with the Opposition for failing to expose the CEB.
Taking into consideration the Rs 22,000 millionplus profit, the PUCSL could order the CEB to grant relief to consumers, Palitha said, adding that the CEB and PUCSL, together, deprived electricity consumers tariff reduction in the first quarter of this year, too.
In January this year, the CEB asked for a 11.59% tariff increase though it was enjoying Rs 22,000 mn profit at that time, the trade unionist said.
Palitha said that as the PUCSL received all data available to the CEB it was fully aware of the finances of the state enterprise.
In January, 2025, regardless of the NPP government floating the idea regarding as much as a 37% tariff increase, the PUCSL granted a 20% tariff reduction (25% of Rs 22,000 mn profit), Palitha said.
According to him, as a result of relief granted to the consumers, the profits had been reduced to Rs 16,000 mn but by June 2025 profits had increased to Rs 18,000 mn and there was a need to grant tariff reduction. But, the NPP, having always lashed out at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in the run up to the presidential election, held in September 2024, started playing a different tune.
Responding to The Island queries, Palitha said that contrary to claims that the CEB proposed a 13.56% tariff increase to cover up losses caused by the importation of low-quality coal for the Norochcholai Lakvijaya coal-fired power plant, the current strategy seemed to have been adopted at the behest of the IMF.
Instead of granting tariff reduction for the third quarter in 2025, the PUCSL ordered an 18% increase, Palitha said. The trade unionist claimed that the Finance Ministry, at the behest of the IMF, directed both the CEB and the PUCSL to increase electricity tariffs by 20% in violation of the relevant Acts, he said.
Then in Oct, 2025, the CEB proposed a 6.8 % tariff increase at a time its profits were around Rs 22,000 mn. The CEB and PUCSL staged a drama over that proposal and finally, on the false pretext of the CEB’s failure to furnish its proposal on time, the revision was dropped, Palitha said. The SJB activist pointed out that the Opposition failed to highlight that consumers had been deprived of downward revision in spite of massive profits earned by the Board. “In fact, when Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody met trade unions, he very clearly declared that they were considering electricity power reduction, perhaps by 10%, 12% or 15%. But in the end nothing happened.”
Now the same drama is being enacted by the government, the CEB and the PUCSL, Palitha said.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
News
BASL protest march
Members of the BASL yesterday (16) staged a protest march over the murder of a lawyer and his wife in Akuregoda, Thalangama, last week. The BASL staged a protest march from the Supreme Court Complex to the BASL Head Office.
News
IMF MD here
Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Kristalina Georgieva arrived in Colombo yesterday (16) for top level discussions with the government. She is scheduled to leave tomorrow (18) after meeting government authorities and key stakeholders, observing firsthand the impact of Cyclone Ditwah, and discussing ways in which the IMF could support recovery efforts and contribute to building a more resilient future for all Sri Lankans, sources said.
-
Life style2 days agoMarriot new GM Suranga
-
Business1 day agoMinistry of Brands to launch Sri Lanka’s first off-price retail destination
-
Features2 days agoMonks’ march, in America and Sri Lanka
-
Midweek Review6 days agoA question of national pride
-
Business6 days agoAutodoc 360 relocates to reinforce commitment to premium auto care
-
Opinion5 days agoWill computers ever be intelligent?
-
Features2 days agoThe Rise of Takaichi
-
Features2 days agoWetlands of Sri Lanka:
