Connect with us

Editorial

Remembering Kadirgamar

Published

on

Tuesday 12th August, 2025

Two decades have elapsed since the assassination of Lakshman Kadirgamar, a statesman who adorned the firmament of Sri Lankan politics. His achievements, which were numerous, in various fields, have been well documented. As Sri Lanka’s Foreign Minister, he navigated the country’s external relations during turbulent times, and his invaluable service to the nation cost him his dear life; he fell victim to an LTTE sniper on 12 August 2005.

Yesterday, we published a review of Admiral of the Fleet Wasantha Karannagoda’s book, The Turning Point. The Navy’s contribution to the country’s war against the LTTE is well known, but not enough has been written about how the Navy, through years of meticulous planning, fighting and sacrifices, decimated the Sea Tigers. The same is true of a turning point Kadirgamar made in the Eelam War at a time when the myth of the LTTE’s invincibility had taken root. He was out of power at the time. This comment is about that watershed moment.

Much has been written about the UNP-led UNF’s victory in the 2001 general election and the signing of a ceasefire agreement, followed by several rounds of ‘peace talks’ although it was obvious that nothing was further from LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran’s mind than peace. For him a separate state was non-negotiable, and his intransigence knew no bounds. But there was no let-up in international pressure on Sri Lankan governments to pursue the Sisyphean task of negotiating peace with the LTTE, which used all ceasefires and ‘peace processes’ to further its military interests.

Prabhakaran would have used the Norwegian-crafted peace process to achieve his goal in the early 2000s but for a naval intelligence report that revealed his plan to cripple the Trincomalee harbour and the Palaly airstrip with simultaneous artillery attacks, bringing the movement of ships and aircraft to and from the North to a complete halt; had his efforts reached fruition, he would have been able to massacre thousands of troops deployed in that part of the country or give them safe passage under international supervision while creating conditions for a direct UN involvement in the conflict and perhaps resorting to UDI (unilateral declaration of independence).

In fact, the LTTE had already moved some of its artillery pieces to areas south of Trincomalee and Palaly under the cover of a fragile ceasefire. In late 2003, Kadirgamar was entrusted with the task of briefing the Indian government on the impending danger. Having returned from New Delhi, where he met a group of top-notch Indian leaders, he held a special briefing for two newspapers including The Island. His presentation featured several detailed maps prepared by the Navy, indicating newly set up LTTE’s gun positions and camps in strategic locations in the North and the East.

When the big story was broken, all hell broke loose, with the UNP-led UNF government threatening to withdraw special security provided to Kadirgamar and evict him from his official residence for trying to ‘scuttle the peace process’, which was a misnomer. Thankfully, it could not carry out its threat because it was weak due to its clashes with President CBK, who subsequently took over the Defence Ministry, prematurely dissolved Parliament and went on to win a snap general election that followed.

When hostilities resumed in 2006, the LTTE tried to carry out its aforementioned plan, but without much effect. The credit for foiling the LTTE’s grand plan should go to the Navy under Karannagoda’s command, Kadirgamar, and Kumaratunga. A naval officer who was instrumental in preparing the intelligence report under discussion became a victim of a political witch-hunt during the UNP-led Yahapalana government, and a similar fate has befallen some of the battle-scarred naval veterans who destroyed the LTTE’s floating armouries and neutralised the Sea Tigers to make this country safe.

The timing of the formalisation of the 2002 ceasefire here was of immense significance. One may recall that the Machakos Protocol, which paved the way for the creation of South Sudan in 2011, was signed between the Sudanese government and the Sudan People’s Liberation Army, a few months after the signing of Sri Lanka’s 2002 ceasefire agreement. Three of the self-appointed Co-Chairs of Sri Lanka’s peace process—namely, the US, the UK, and Norway—were associated with the Machakos Protocol as well. Neither Sudan nor South Sudan has achieved peace.

The Co-Chairs of the lopsided peace process obviously did not want Sri Lanka’s conflict to end with the elimination of the LTTE’s military wing. They made a determined bid to prevent the decapitation of the LTTE, but to no avail. During the final phase of Eelam War IV in 2009, the then President Mahinda Rajapaksa had to maintain radio silence, as it were, to avoid pressure from his western counterparts who wanted him to spare the LTTE leadership. No wonder those who refused to follow the dictates of those western powers during the war and went on to deliver a death blow to the LTTE are facing sanctions.

Democracy has been rekindled in the former conflict zone, where people now lead normal lives and elect their representatives; democratic dissent is tolerated, and children can go to school without fear of being abducted on the way and turned into cannon fodder. Sadly, Kadirgamar could not live long enough to see the conclusion of the war and the subsequent revival of democracy in the North and the East.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Editorial

A play without its protagonist

Published

on

Thursday 21st May, 2026

The annual Commemoration of War Heroes was held on Tuesday, and President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, in his address, pledged to fulfill the aspirations of those who had made the supreme sacrifice for the country. He said they had laid down their lives in the hope that their sacrifices would help build a better country. Last year, he drew criticism for avoiding the term ‘war heroes’ when referring to the fallen military personnel, but he used it on Tuesday. However, that commemorative event was like a play without its protagonist. All former war-winning military commanders were there, but ex-President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s absence was conspicuous. When Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath was asked, at Tuesday’s post-Cabinet media briefing, why Mahinda had not been invited to the commemoration, he said no political leaders had been invited. This claim is based on flawed logic.

Mahinda is not just a political leader; he is a former war-winning President and Commander-in-Chief. He and his family politicised and monopolised the war victory, misruled the country and bankrupted the economy, betraying the trust people reposed in them. But the fact remains that it was his unwavering leadership for the war that made the defeat of the LTTE possible. According to Article 33 of the Constitution, it is the President who declares war or peace. Military commanders merely follow orders from the President and Commander-in-Chief. If Mahinda had buckled under western pressure, the war would have ended prematurely and terrorism would have continued to plague the country.

Mahinda did not give in to pressure from the UK, the EU and the US during the final battle in 2009. British Foreign Minister David Miliband and his French counterpart Bernard Kouchner rushed here in a bid to pressure President Rajapaksa to suspend military operations before the decapitation of the LTTE and open an escape route for Prabhakaran. They even tried to visit the war zone. They were not given permission to do so because their presence there would have compelled the government to stop military operations. The Rajapaksa government also denied a visa to Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt, who wanted to join Miliband and Kouchner to save the LTTE leadership.

If Mahinda had bowed down to western powers and left the war unfinished, it would have been impossible to defeat terrorism; the LTTE would have recovered from military setbacks, acquired drone capability, etc., with the help of the western powers, driven by geopolitical interests and the so-called vote bank politics.

Time was when mothers and fathers did not travel together in buses and trains lest their children should be orphaned in case of LTTE bomb attacks. They also had to guard their children’s schools. The LTTE massacred civilians, especially in villages adjacent to the areas under its control. In the North and the East, people were deprived of their franchise, and democratic dissent was suppressed brutally. Forcible child conscription, extortion and political killings were rampant in those parts of the country while the LTTE was around. That reign of terror ended 17 years ago.

So, all those who were instrumental in defeating LTTE terrorism should be honoured. They include the war-time Presidents and defence ministers, members of the armed forces including their commanders, especially those who served during Eelam War IV, the police, and the Civil Defence Force members.

Having demonised the Rajapaksa family, the JVP-NPP government may have decided against inviting Mahinda to the Commemoration of War Heroes to avoid the embarrassment of President Dissanayake having him as a special guest. It is also possible that the government thought Mahinda’s presence would eclipse President Dissanayake. Be that as it may, the JVP leaders cannot deny that they enabled Mahinda to secure the presidency in 2005 and do what he did thereafter. The SLFP did not back Mahinda in the presidential race, and the then President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga did her best to queer the pitch for him to settle political scores albeit in vain. The JVP came to his rescue, and led his presidential election campaign from the front. One may recall that the present-day JVP leaders, especially President Dissanayake and Minister Herath, touted Rajapaksa’s election manifesto, Mahinda Chinthanaya, as a panacea, with the same zeal as street vendors. Videos of their snake-oil sales talk, as it were, from Mahinda’s election platform in 2005 are available in the digital realm. So, they can claim part of the credit for Mahinda’s leadership for the successful war on terror, and similarly part of the blame for his alleged wrongdoing should also fall on them.

There is no way the JVP-NPP government can justify the exclusion of Mahinda from the list of guests at the War Heroes’ Commemoration.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Servility, theatrics and lawfare

Published

on

Wednesday 20th May, 2026

The police did precious little to prevent the various events, held in the North and the East on Monday, to commemorate the LTTE members killed during Eelam War IV. Some of the youth who attended those commemorations were seen blatantly flouting traffic laws by riding motorcycles without wearing helmets in an unruly manner. The police looked the other way. But they went all out to prevent a group led by National Freedom Front Leader and former minister Wimal Weerawansa from paying a floral tribute to the War Heroes’ Memorial at Battaramulla on Monday. Subsequently, they claimed that they had done so in view of rehearsals for the following day’s commemorative event, and warned that legal action would be taken against Weerawansa. This is an instance of the police resorting to lawfare to harass and intimidate the political opponents of the government. It is something to be expected, for the JVP/NPP has elevated two of its Retired Police Collective members as the Secretary to the Public Security Ministry and the Director of the CID, which is apparently busy with political work rather than crime investigation.

The police statement on Monday’s incident at the War Heroes’ Memorial is as absurd a claim they made during the Mahinda Rajapaksa government when they were asked by the media why they had allowed a group of pro-government goons armed with clubs to operate alongside the riot police to crush an Opposition protest in Colombo. The then Police Spokesman had the audacity to claim those characters may have carried ‘sticks’ to chase away street dogs.

The police are adept at fabricating stories in a bid to justify their politically determined action aimed at pleasing governments. There is no way they can justify their action near the War Heroes’ Memorial on Monday. It was obvious that Weerawansa and his supporters sought political mileage by visiting the place with television crews in tow. However, there would have been no commotion if the police had allowed them to lay flowers at the memorial.

The police were part of the JVP/NPP ensemble that recently enacted the “Malwana drama”, where some members of the JVP’s university student wing grabbed a state-owned mansion set on fire during Aragalaya (2022). The JVP undergrads overcame what the police made out to be resistance, forced themselves into the mansion and spent several days there. The incident reminded us of “Police Kolama”, a comic segment in Sri Lanka’s masked folk drama. Subsequently, Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, in a cameo, displayed her acting skills by meeting the dramatis personae of the Malwana play, which was directed and produced by the JVP/NPP, and agreeing to have what remains of the mansion taken over by the University Grants Commission. They could have reached that agreement without an absurd drama. The police did not initiate any action against the JVP students for the forcible occupation of state property. They also looked on when a group of JVP members blatantly violated the law by parking their buses on the southern expressway on 01 May, 2025. They unashamedly sided with a JVP mob that stormed an FSP party office in Yakkala, assaulted FSP members and seized control of the place. The JVP/NPP politicians are free to drive under the influence of alcohol, and breathalyzers mysteriously disappear from police stations when they happen to cause accidents. But the police swing into action when Opposition politicians hold protests or commemorative events that are not to the liking of the JVP-NPP government.

Oddly, the JVP-led government has done to the police what the JVP accused the previous government of doing to them; it has reduced them to mere putty in its hands and uses them to suppress the Opposition. The police, who were accused of using extrajudicial methods to crush two JVP uprisings, are now at the beck and call of the JVP, which is emulating the previous governments in handling dissent. So much for the new political culture the JVP/NPP promised to usher in.

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake often claims that his government has restored the rule of law, and no person/institution is above the law. If he supposes so, one will say a la Mr. Bumble in Oliver Twist, the law is an ass.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Defeat of terrorism and triumph of hypocrisy

Published

on

Tuesday 19th May, 2026

Seventeen years have elapsed since the defeat of LTTE terrorism, which plagued the country for about a quarter century. If not for the successful military campaign that eliminated the LTTE leadership, thousands of lives would have been lost in terror attacks and on the battlefield since 2009, and it would not have been possible to rekindle democracy in the North and the East. Today, children can go to school without fear of being abducted and turned into cannon fodder by the LTTE; political dissent is no longer violently suppressed; people can exercise their franchise freely in the former war zone, and there are no political assassinations. Ironically, those who did not oppose the LTTE’s terror campaign or supported it are now championing democracy and human rights. Among them are prominent Tamil politicians, civil society activists and religious leaders.

Terrorism is not a means to an end. It is both the means and the end. Hence, the need to eliminate it in all its forms and manifestations. There were numerous attempts to persuade the LTTE to agree to a political solution, but Prabhakaran remained intransigent, and his terror had to be wiped out. There is space for the remaining LTTE members and their sympathisers to take to democratic politics. They ought to learn from the former southern terrorists.

What paved the way for the JVP’s re-entry into the democratic process and rise to power was the decimation of its leadership and military wing, which was responsible for many gruesome crimes in the late 1980s. The JVP killed thousands of dissenters and state workers who did not follow its illegal orders, and destroyed state assets worth billions of dollars. Today, a JVP-led government is trying to develop the country.

Attempts are being made in some quarters to revive memories of old battles to reclaim lost ground on the political front. Prominent among those who are doing so are SLPP politicians who were in power when the LTTE was defeated. They are trying to rouse nationalism in a bid to make a comeback. They would not have been in the current predicament if they had not misused the defeat of terrorism for political gain.

What the Rajapaksas and their allies did to the country, after defeating the LTTE, was like saving a damsel in distress and abusing her. They laboured under the misconception that the defeat of terrorism for which they provided political leadership was a special licence for them to do as they pleased. They sought to politicise and monopolise the war victory to accelerate their dynasty-building project and perpetuate their hold on power. The post-war Mahinda Rajapaksa administration became a government of the Rajapaksas by the Rajapaksas for the Rajapaksas, with a member of the ruling family in almost every key position in the state sector. They bulldozed their way through, launching as they did witch-hunts against their rivals. They also resorted to state terror to further their political interests. Blinded by the arrogance of power, they ruined things for themselves and suffered a humiliating electoral defeat in 2015. They succeeded in returning to power four years later, as the public thought they had changed and voted for them, only to be disillusioned again when they mismanaged the economy, indulged in corruption and bankrupted the country.

The Rajapaksas squandered an opportunity that presented itself, after the conclusion of the war, to bring about national reconciliation and defeat the LTTE ideology politically. The entry of war-winning Army Commander General Sarath Fonseka into the presidential fray in 2010 at the behest of the JVP and others, provided the pro-LTTE groups, here and overseas, with a rallying point; they crawled out of the woodwork and backed Fonseka in a bid to see the back of Mahinda Rajapaksa, albeit in vain. They succeeded in 2015, and emerged stronger, after enabling Maithripala Sirisena to secure the presidency. In a dramatic turn of events in 2024, they threw their weight behind the NPP led by the JVP.

An oft-heard lament is that reconciliation continues to elude this country. This sorry state of affairs has come about because reconciliation has become a victim of hypocrisy. Those who claim to champion reconciliation are using it to further their own interests, and those who should have made a serious effort to help achieve it after defeating terrorism did not care to do so and chose to advance their own political agenda.

Continue Reading

Trending