Connect with us

Features

Remembering Hiroshima: A painful lesson the world must not forget

Published

on

The A-bomb Dome or Genbaku dome as it stands today

The Pearl Harbour attack united American citizens like never before. Young men volunteered to fight, factories increased production, and the entire nation mobilised for war. Some may recall the fictional Rosie the Riveter flexing her muscles and with the words “We can do it”. As a result, many females started working in factories making munitions. The US would go on to play a decisive role in defeating the Axis powers.

Terrible tragedy of Hiroshima 80 years ago

On August 6, 1945, at 8:15 a.m., a single bomb dropped by a US aircraft changed the world forever. The city of Hiroshima in Japan was instantly turned into a fiery wasteland when the atomic bomb—nicknamed “Little Boy”—exploded in the sky above. It was the first time a nuclear weapon was used in war. Three days later, another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. Together, these bombings brought World War II to a close, but at a terrible human cost.

The bomb that hit Hiroshima released energy equivalent to 15,000 tons of TNT. It killed approximately 140,000 people by the end of 1945. Some died instantly. Many others suffered for days and weeks with severe burns, internal injuries, and radiation sickness.

Visiting Hiroshima in the year 2000 with my son, and visiting the museum, it was horrifying to see the models of burning human beings and the melting of their skins. The only remnant of the bomb was one lone bombed building; the A-bomb dome or Genbaku dome in Japanese. The Memorial Peace Park in Hiroshima attracts many Japanese and foreign tourists today.

In the years that followed, the tragedy deepened. Radiation exposure led to a sharp rise in cancer and other health problems. By 1950, the number of deaths due to the bomb had risen to 200,000. Survivors faced long-term effects. Many were disabled for life.

One of the most painful legacies of the bombing was leukaemia, a form of blood cancer. Studies show that from 1950 to 2000, over 10,000 survivors developed cancer, with leukaemia rates 2 to 3 times higher than average, especially among children who were exposed. For many survivors, the pain didn’t end with physical scars. They also faced social rejection, mental trauma, and the loss of family and friends.

Sadako Sasaki

The Pearl Harbour attack provoked the US

On the morning of December 7, 1941, Hawaii’s peace was shattered by the roar of aeroplanes and the thunder of explosions. The Japanese Imperial Navy had launched a surprise attack on the United States naval base at Pearl Harbour, located on the island of Oahu. This event pushed the United States into World War II and marked a turning point in global history.

While the attack caused devastating military losses, it is essential to note that very few civilians were killed. The target was a military installation, and Japan’s main goal was to destroy the U.S. Pacific Fleet. In contrast to bombings later in the war that targeted entire cities, Pearl Harbour was a military strike, not an attack on civilians.

At exactly 7:55 a.m. that day, waves of Japanese fighter planes, bombers, and torpedo planes descended on the harbour. In less than two hours, the US Navy had suffered enormous damage: 8 battleships were damaged or destroyed, including the USS Arizona, which exploded and sank, killing over 1,100 men. More than 300 aircraft were damaged or destroyed. Over 2,400 Americans were killed, almost all of them military personnel. About 1,000 more were wounded.

Despite the heavy blow, key parts of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, such as aircraft carriers, were not in the harbour at the time. This helped America to comeback in the Pacific. The low civilian death toll is significant, especially when compared to later events such as the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, where hundreds of thousands of civilians perished instantly.

The day after the attack, President Franklin D. Roosevelt delivered a powerful speech to Congress, calling December 7 “a date which will live in infamy.” The US declared war on Japan, officially entering World War II.

The Pearl Harbour attack united American citizens like never before. Young men volunteered to fight, factories increased production, and the entire nation mobilised for war. Some may recall the fictional Rosie the Riveter flexing her muscles and with the words “We can do it”. As a result, many females started working in factories making munitions. The US would go on to play a decisive role in defeating the Axis powers.

Although the bombing of Pearl Harbour was a strategic success for Japan in the short term, it was a strategic mistake in the long run. It awakened a sleeping giant. The US entry into the war helped turn the tide against Japan and its allies. In less than four years, the war ended with Japan’s defeat.

Sadako Sasaki and the sad Story of a thousand Origami paper cranes

One of the most heart-breaking stories to emerge from the aftermath of the Hiroshima atomic bombing was that of Sadako Sasaki, a young girl who became a global symbol of peace, hope, and the innocent victims of war.

Sadako was just two years old when the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. Though she was not visibly injured, she was exposed to the radiation from the blast. For years, she lived a happy, everyday life. She loved running and was one of the fastest members of her school relay team.

But ten years after the bombing, Sadako suddenly fell ill. In 1955, at the age of 12, she was diagnosed with leukaemia—a type of cancer caused by radiation exposure. At the hospital, Sadako learned of an old Japanese legend. If a person folds 1,000 origami paper cranes, the gods would grant them a wish. A crane is a large bird with a long neck. In Japan it represents longevity, happiness, and eternal youth, because mythical beliefs say it lives a thousand years.

Clinging to hope and determined to live, Sadako began folding paper cranes one by one. She used medicine wrappers, scraps of paper, and anything she could find. Her goal was simple but powerful: to fold 1,000 cranes and be granted the wish to recover and live.

With quiet courage, Sadako continued to fold, even as her body gradually grew weaker. She is believed to have folded more than 1,300 cranes, far exceeding her target. But despite her strength and determination, Sadako passed away on October 25, 1955, surrounded by her family.

Sadako’s story touched hearts around the world. Her classmates and friends were inspired by her bravery and began a campaign to build a monument in her honour. Today, the Children’s Peace Monument stands in the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park. On it are the words: “This is our cry. This is our prayer. Peace in the world.” Children from all over the world send paper cranes to Hiroshima every year, keeping Sadako’s spirit alive. The day I visited Hiroshima, hundreds of schoolchildren carried flowers to lay at the base of the Memorial.

Sadako Sasaki’s story serves as a poignant reminder of the human cost of war, particularly on children. Her paper cranes are not just folded paper—they are folded hope, love, and the desperate wish for peace. Though she did not survive, her message lives on: Let no child ever suffer like this again.

The aftermath of the N bomb

The day after the bomb, newspapers around the world carried the dramatic headlines. Most focused on the incredible power of the bomb and its potential to end World War II swiftly. But even amid celebration and shock, some newspapers and journalists raised early warnings about the terrible dangers of this new kind of weapon.

A few brave voices quickly pointed out the grave danger of entering the nuclear age. One of the most notable warnings came from the editorial page of The New York Times itself. Just days after the bombing, on August 9, 1945, the paper published an editorial titled “The Atomic Age”, which said: “For all we know, in unleashing atomic energy, man may be opening a door that he will never be able to close.” The editorial warned that although the bomb might help end the war, it also posed a serious moral and existential threat to the future of humanity.

Similarly, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch ran an editorial titled “Frankenstein’s Monster”, drawing comparisons to the famous tale of a man-made creation that grew out of control. The paper inquired whether humanity had created a force that could ultimately destroy its own creator.

Shortly after the bombings, a group of scientists who had worked on the Project began to speak out. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, first published in 1945, was born out of their concern. These scientists warned that nuclear weapons must never again be used in war. Their famous “Doomsday Clock” was created to symbolise how close the world is to self-destruction. Some newspapers quoted these scientists, noting that even those who built the bomb were now afraid of its power.

Outside the United States, the tone of newspaper coverage was often more sombre and critical. The Manchester Guardian in the UK (now The Guardian) was one of the first newspapers to question whether the use of the atomic bomb was morally justifiable.

The London Daily Mirror ran a headline: “Japan’s New Graveyard.” It warned that the bomb represented a new kind of horror—one that could erase entire cities in a flash and leave lasting suffering for generations.

In India, which was still under British rule, newspapers like The Hindustan Times and The Bombay Chronicle questioned the ethics of using such a powerful weapon on civilians.

Those early warnings—sometimes buried in editorial pages—have proven to be prophetic. The fears raised in August 1945 are still relevant today, as nuclear weapons remain a threat in global politics.

Lessons we must learn

After visiting Hiroshima in 2000 I was hoping that very soon the world will see a change to peace. Instead, 25 years later I find conflicts in many parts of the world. The world seems to have lost its conscience. Sri Lanka came out of a terrible conflict; however, I can see more hope for reconciliation here than in many other places. Wars in Indochina escalated in the 1970s but they all are peaceful and prospering countries today. Even without nuclear power, six million Jews were killed by the Nazis during 1941 to 1945. So, let us hope that the future will be better for the human race.

Today, nearly 80 years later, Hiroshima stands as a peaceful city. The Hiroshima Peace Memorial and Museum serve as a reminder of the horrors of war and the urgent need for peace. Every August, people around the world observe a moment of silence to remember the victims and pray that such a tragedy never happens again. Yet, looking at the world today, we must ask: Have we truly learned the lesson of Hiroshima?

In recent years, we have witnessed terrible wars and human suffering in different parts of the world. The Russia–Ukraine conflict has led to tens of thousands of deaths and millions displaced. Cities have been bombed, schools and hospitals destroyed, and children forced to grow up amid gunfire and fear.

In the Israel–Palestine conflict, we have seen neighbourhoods turned into rubble, families torn apart, and innocent lives lost on both sides. Airstrikes, ground assaults, and blockades have created one of the worst humanitarian crises in recent times. Wars only create widows, orphans and children without their mother or father, people without their spouses. War is not strange to us, Sri Lankans. The scars still remain, and the hatred towards the perpetrators still continues. In Sri Lanka, however, there are efforts being made to have lasting peace.

While these wars may not involve nuclear weapons, the suffering of ordinary people—especially children, women, and the elderly—is no less heart-breaking. The faces of survivors in Ukraine or Gaza today are hauntingly similar to those of Hiroshima’s Hibakusha (atomic bomb survivors and those affected by radioactivity).

The world has enough weapons now to destroy its population many times over. Yet, peace remains fragile, and global regulators remain ineffective.

As global citizens, we must raise our voices against violence. We must encourage our leaders to engage in dialogue, foster compassion, and cultivate understanding. We must remember that war is not a video game or a matter of pride and superiority. It is pain, destruction, and death.

On this August 6, let us honour the victims of Hiroshima by ensuring that their suffering was not in vain. Let us work to stop the madness of war and conflicts, wherever they occur. And let us teach our children not just history, but the value of peace.

by Sunil G Wijesinha ✍️
Consultant on Productivity and Japanese Management
Recipient of the “Order of the Rising Sun;
Gold and Silver Rays” by the Government of Japan.
bizex.seminarsandconsulting@gmail.com.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Cyclones, greed and philosophy for a new world order

Published

on

Floods caused by Cyclone Ditwah in Sri Lanka

Further to my earlier letter titled, “Psychology of Greed and Philosophy for a New World Order” (The Island 26.11.2025) it may not be far-fetched to say that the cause of the devastating cyclones that hit Sri Lanka and Indonesia last week could be traced back to human greed. Cyclones of this magnitude are said to be unusual in the equatorial region but, according to experts, the raised sea surface temperatures created the conditions for their occurrence. This is directly due to global warming which is caused by excessive emission of Greenhouse gases due to burning of fossil fuels and other activities. These activities cannot be brought under control as the rich, greedy Western powers do not want to abide by the terms and conditions agreed upon at the Paris Agreement of 2015, as was seen at the COP30 meeting in Brazil recently. Is there hope for third world countries? This is why the Global South must develop a New World Order. For this purpose, the proposed contentment/sufficiency philosophy based on morals like dhana, seela, bhavana, may provide the necessary foundation.

Further, such a philosophy need not be parochial and isolationist. It may not be  necessary to adopt systems that existed in the past that suited the times but develop a system that would be practical and also pragmatic in the context of the modern world.

It must be reiterated that without controlling the force of collective greed the present destructive socioeconomic system cannot be changed. Hence the need for a philosophy that incorporates the means of controlling greed. Dhana, seela, bhavana may suit Sri Lanka and most of the East which, as mentioned in my earlier letter, share a similar philosophical heritage. The rest of the world also may have to adopt a contentment / sufficiency philosophy with  strong and effective tenets that suit their culture, to bring under control the evil of greed. If not, there is no hope for the existence of the world. Global warming will destroy it with cyclones, forest fires, droughts, floods, crop failure and famine.

Leading economists had commented on the damaging effect of greed on the economy while philosophers, ancient as well as modern, had spoken about its degenerating influence on the inborn human morals. Ancient philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, and Epicurus all spoke about greed, viewing it as a destructive force that hindered a good life. They believed greed was rooted in personal immorality and prevented individuals from achieving true happiness by focusing on endless material accumulation rather than the limited wealth needed for natural needs.

Jeffry Sachs argues that greed is a destructive force that undermines social and environmental well-being, citing it as a major driver of climate change and economic inequality, referencing the ideas of Adam Smith, John Maynard Keynes, etc. Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Laureate economist, has criticised neoliberal ideology in similar terms.

In my earlier letter, I have discussed how contentment / sufficiency philosophy could effectively transform the socioeconomic system to one that prioritises collective well-being and sufficiency over rampant consumerism and greed, potentially leading to more sustainable economic models.

Obviously, these changes cannot be brought about without a change of attitude, morals and commitment of the rulers and the government. This cannot be achieved without a mass movement; people must realise the need for change. Such a movement would need  leadership. In this regard a critical responsibility lies with the educated middle class. It is they who must give leadership to the movement that would have the goal of getting rid of the evil of excessive greed. It is they who must educate the entire nation about the need for these changes.

The middle class would be the vanguard of change. It is the middle class that has the capacity to bring about change. It is the middle class that perform as a vibrant component of the society for political stability. It is the group which supplies political philosophy, ideology, movements, guidance and leaders for the rest of the society. The poor, who are the majority, need the political wisdom and leadership of the middle class.

Further, the middle class is the font of culture, creativity, literature, art and music. Thinkers, writers, artistes, musicians are fostered by the middle class. Cultural activity of the middle class could pervade down to the poor groups and have an effect on their cultural development as well. Similarly, education of a country depends on how educated the middle class is. It is the responsibility of the middle class to provide education to the poor people.

Most importantly, the morals of a society are imbued in the middle class and it is they who foster them. As morals are crucial in the battle against  greed, the middle class assume greater credentials to spearhead the movement against greed and bring in sustainable development and growth. Contentment sufficiency philosophy, based on morals, would form the strong foundation necessary for achieving the goal of a new world order. Thus, it is seen that the middle class is eminently suitable to be the vehicle that could adopt and disseminate a contentment/ sufficiency philosophy and lead the movement against the evil neo-liberal system that is destroying the world.

The Global South, which comprises the majority of the world’s poor, may have to realise, before it is too late, that it is they who are the most vulnerable to climate change though they may not be the greatest offenders who cause it. Yet, if they are to survive, they must get together and help each other to achieve self-sufficiency in the essential needs, like food, energy and medicine. Trade must not be via exploitative and weaponised currency but by means of a barter system, based on purchase power parity (PPP). The union of these countries could be an expansion of organisations,like BRICS, ASEAN, SCO, AU, etc., which already have the trade and financial arrangements though in a rudimentary state but with great potential, if only they could sort out their bilateral issues and work towards a Global South which is neither rich nor poor but sufficient, contented and safe, a lesson to the Global North. China, India and South Africa must play the lead role in this venture. They would need the support of a strong philosophy that has the capacity to fight the evil of greed, for they cannot achieve these goals if fettered by greed. The proposed contentment / sufficient philosophy would form a strong philosophical foundation for the Global South, to unite, fight greed and develop a new world order which, above all, will make it safe for life.

by Prof. N. A. de S. Amaratunga 
PHD, DSc, DLITT

Continue Reading

Features

SINHARAJA: The Living Cathedral of Sri Lanka’s Rainforest Heritage

Published

on

Damp and thick undergrowth

When Senior biodiversity scientist Vimukthi Weeratunga speaks of Sinharaja, his voice carries the weight of four decades spent beneath its dripping emerald canopy. To him, Sri Lanka’s last great rainforest is not merely a protected area—it is “a cathedral of life,” a sanctuary where evolution whispers through every leaf, stream and shadow.

 “Sinharaja is the largest and most precious tropical rainforest we have,” Weeratunga said.

“Sixty to seventy percent of the plants and animals found here exist nowhere else on Earth. This forest is the heart of endemic biodiversity in Sri Lanka.”

A Magnet for the World’s Naturalists

Sinharaja’s allure lies not in charismatic megafauna but in the world of the small and extraordinary—tiny, jewel-toned frogs; iridescent butterflies; shy serpents; and canopy birds whose songs drift like threads of silver through the mist.

“You must walk slowly in Sinharaja,” Weeratunga smiled.

“Its beauty reveals itself only to those who are patient and observant.”

For global travellers fascinated by natural history, Sinharaja remains a top draw. Nearly 90% of nature-focused visitors to Sri Lanka place Sinharaja at the top of their itinerary, generating a deep economic pulse for surrounding communities.

A Forest Etched in History

Centuries before conservationists championed its cause, Sinharaja captured the imagination of explorers and scholars. British and Dutch botanists, venturing into the island’s interior from the 17th century onward, mapped streams, documented rare orchids, and penned some of the earliest scientific records of Sri Lanka’s natural heritage.

Smallest cat

These chronicles now form the backbone of our understanding of the island’s unique ecology.

The Great Forest War: Saving Sinharaja

But Sinharaja nearly vanished.

In the 1970s, the government—guided by a timber-driven development mindset—greenlit a Canadian-assisted logging project. Forests around Sinharaja fell first; then, the chainsaws approached the ancient core.

 “There was very little scientific data to counter the felling,” Weeratunga recalled.

“But people knew instinctively this was a national treasure.”

The public responded with one of the greatest environmental uprisings in Sri Lankan history. Conservation icons Thilo Hoffmann and Neluwe Gunananda Thera led a national movement. After seven tense years, the new government of 1977 halted the project.

What followed was a scientific renaissance. Leading researchers—including Prof. Savithri Gunathilake and Prof. Nimal Gunathilaka, Prof. Sarath Kottagama, and others—descended into the depths of Sinharaja, documenting every possible facet of its biodiversity.

Thilak

 “Those studies paved the way for Sinharaja to become Sri Lanka’s very first natural World Heritage Site,” Weeratunga noted proudly.

A Book Woven From 30 Years of Field Wisdom

For Weeratunga, Sinharaja is more than academic terrain—it is home. Since joining the Forest Department in 1985 as a young researcher, he has trekked, photographed, documented and celebrated its secrets.

Now, decades later, he joins Dr. Thilak Jayaratne, the late Dr. Janaka Gallangoda, and Nadika Hapuarachchi in producing, what he calls, the most comprehensive book ever written on Sinharaja.

 “This will be the first major publication on Sinharaja since the early 1980s,” he said.

“It covers ecology, history, flora, fauna—and includes rare photographs taken over nearly 30 years.”

Some images were captured after weeks of waiting. Others after years—like the mysterious mass-flowering episodes where clusters of forest giants bloom in synchrony, or the delicate jewels of the understory: tiny jumping spiders, elusive amphibians, and canopy dwellers glimpsed only once in a lifetime.

The book even includes underwater photography from Sinharaja’s crystal-clear streams—worlds unseen by most visitors.

A Tribute to a Departed Friend

Halfway through the project, tragedy struck: co-author Dr. Janaka Gallangoda passed away.

 “We stopped the project for a while,” Weeratunga said quietly.

“But Dr. Thilak Jayaratne reminded us that Janaka lived for this forest. So we completed the book in his memory. One of our authors now watches over Sinharaja from above.”

Jumping spide

An Invitation to the Public

A special exhibition, showcasing highlights from the book, will be held on 13–14 December, 2025, in Colombo.

“We cannot show Sinharaja in one gallery,” he laughed.

“But we can show a single drop of its beauty—enough to spark curiosity.”

A Forest That Must Endure

What makes the book special, he emphasises, is its accessibility.

“We wrote it in simple, clear language—no heavy jargon—so that everyone can understand why Sinharaja is irreplaceable,” Weeratunga said.

“If people know its value, they will protect it.”

To him, Sinharaja is more than a rainforest.

It is Sri Lanka’s living heritage.

A sanctuary of evolution.

A sacred, breathing cathedral that must endure for generations to come.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Features

How Knuckles was sold out

Published

on

Knuckles range

Leaked RTI Files Reveal Conflicting Approvals, Missing Assessments, and Silent Officials

“This Was Not Mismanagement — It Was a Structured Failure”— CEJ’s Dilena Pathragoda

An investigation, backed by newly released Right to Information (RTI) files, exposes a troubling sequence of events in which multiple state agencies appear to have enabled — or quietly tolerated — unauthorised road construction inside the Knuckles Conservation Forest, a UNESCO World Heritage site.

At the centre of the unfolding scandal is a trail of contradictory letters, unexplained delays, unsigned inspection reports, and sudden reversals by key government offices.

“What these documents show is not confusion or oversight. It is a structured failure,” said Dilena Pathragoda, Executive Director of the Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ), who has been analysing the leaked records.

“Officials knew the legal requirements. They ignored them. They knew the ecological risks. They dismissed them. The evidence points to a deliberate weakening of safeguards meant to protect one of Sri Lanka’s most fragile ecosystems.”

A Paper Trail of Contradictions

RTI disclosures obtained by activists reveal:

Approvals issued before mandatory field inspections were carried out

Three departments claiming they “did not authorise” the same section of the road

A suspiciously backdated letter clearing a segment already under construction

Internal memos flagging “missing evaluation data” that were never addressed

“No-objection” notes do not hold any legal weight for work inside protected areas, experts say.

One senior officer’s signature appears on two letters with opposing conclusions, sent just three weeks apart — a discrepancy that has raised serious questions within the conservation community.

“This is the kind of documentation that usually surfaces only after damage is done,” Pathragoda said. “It shows a chain of administrative behaviour designed to delay scrutiny until the bulldozers moved in.”

The Silence of the Agencies

Perhaps, more alarming is the behaviour of the regulatory bodies.

Multiple departments — including those legally mandated to halt unauthorised work — acknowledged concerns in internal exchanges but issued no public warnings, took no enforcement action, and allowed machinery to continue operating.

“That silence is the real red flag,” Pathragoda noted.

“Silence is rarely accidental in cases like this. Silence protects someone.”

On the Ground: Damage Already Visible

Independent field teams report:

Fresh erosion scars on steep slopes

Sediment-laden water in downstream streams

Disturbed buffer zones

Workers claiming that they were instructed to “complete the section quickly”

Satellite images from the past two months show accelerated clearing around the contested route.

Environmental experts warn that once the hydrology of the Knuckles slopes is altered, the consequences could be irreversible.

CEJ: “Name Every Official Involved”

CEJ is preparing a formal complaint demanding a multi-agency investigation.

Pathragoda insists that responsibility must be traced along the entire chain — from field officers to approving authorities.

“Every signature, every omission, every backdated approval must be examined,” she said.

“If laws were violated, then prosecutions must follow. Not warnings. Not transfers. Prosecutions.”

A Scandal Still Unfolding

More RTI documents are expected to come out next week, including internal audits and communication logs that could deepen the crisis for several agencies.

As the paper trail widens, one thing is increasingly clear: what happened in Knuckles is not an isolated act — it is an institutional failure, executed quietly, and revealed only because citizens insisted on answers.

by Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Trending