Connect with us

News

Promise to grant police and land powers under 13 A: Udaya flays Sajith

Published

on

Udaya and Sajith

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Pivithuru Hela Urumaya (PHU) leader Udaya Gammanpila yesterday (10) condemned Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa for declaring his intention to fully implement the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.

Attorney-at-Law Gammanpila alleged that the declaration was made by presidential candidate Premadasa with his eye on Northern Province Tamil vote.

The Presidential election is expected to be held in Sept/Oct this year.

The PHU leader was referring to SJB’s Leader’s assurance given at an event held in Kilinochchi over the weekend. MP Premadasa emphasised that unlike other leaders he wouldn’t give false promises.

Colombo District MP Gammanpila said that the fellow Colombo District lawmaker wouldn’t have said so if he realised the implications of full implementation of police and land powers in terms of the 13th Amendment forced on Sri Lanka by India.

The late JR Jayewardene enacted 13th Amendment in Nov 1987 in accordance with Indo-Lanka Agreement of July 1987 that was forced on Sri Lanka after the notorious “parippu” drop over northern Sri Lanka by the Indian Air Force uninvited.

MP Gammanpila said that during the past 37 years eight presidents, including the SJB leader’s father, Ranasinghe Premadasa (Dec 1988- March 1993) refrained from granting police and land powers as they realised the inherent danger in such a move.

Recalling the merger of the Eastern Province with the Northern Province in terms of the Indo-Lanka Accord and the subsequent de-merger in Oct 2006, MP Gammanpila said that he deeply regretted the way the Opposition Leader disregarded warnings issued by the Maha Sangha and other concerned parties in this regard.

Full implementation of the 13th Amendment meant that the Eastern province would have to be re-merged with the Northern Province at the expense of the only Muslim majority Provincial Council in the country, MP Gammanpila said.

MP Gammanpila stressed that granting of police powers to a re-merged Northern-Eastern Province would pose a significant security threat. The JHU leader warned the SJB leader not to play politics with national security in a desperate bid to secure the backing of the northern electorate.

MP Gammanpila asserted that the SJB leader wouldn’t have promised full implementation of the 13th Amendment if he was aware of the ground situation here as well as developments in various parts of the world.

MP Gammanpila told The Island that 13th Amendment should be an issue handled cautiously by all political parties. Having defeated separatism 15 years ago, it would be a grave mistake on the part of the SJB leader or any other political party chief to encourage separatism at any level.

The bottom line was that Sri Lanka couldn’t under any circumstance grant police powers to provinces without risking a major security issue, he said.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Judicial vacancies: President keeps country guessing

Published

on

President

The NPP government has not taken a final decision regarding filling of the vacancies in the judiciary.

A group of Opposition MPs, led by SJB leader Sajith Premadasa, on 12 June, requested Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremeratne to take up the issue of judicial vacancies with President Dissanayake. Opposition sources said that there were four vacancies, each in the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, and the inordinate delay had adversely affected the judiciary.

Government sources indicated that there was no change in the status quo as regards filling of vacancies. Referring to the government proposal to extend the retirement age of judges, authoritative sources said that no final decision had been taken yet.

SJB lawmaker Dayasiri Jayasekera told The Island that they would raise the issue in Parliament this week.

He said that the deliberate delay in making appointments to superior courts and the move to extend the retirement age couldn’t be taken separately.

The MP noted that the Bar Association of Sri Lanka, the Lawyers’ Collective, the Colombo High Court Lawyers’ Association, Colombo Magistrate’s Court Lawyers’ Association and the Bar Association of Badulla had opposed the government move.

There hadn’t been any public statements in support of the government move, MP Jayasekera said, urging the government to end uncertainty in the judiciary.

by Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Sajith calls on Opposition parties to rally around SJB

Published

on

Sajith

SJB leader Sajith Premadasa has invited the UNP and other political parties to join his party. Premadasa, who is also the leader of the Opposition, has emphasised that the UNP and the SJB could reach a consensus on policies but his party wouldn’t, under any circumstances, accept whatever formula to share positions. Premadasa said so, speaking to the media over the weekend, after meeting the Mahanayaka Thera of the Malwatta Chapter of the Siyam Nikaya Most Venerable Thibbatuwawe Sri Siddhartha Sumangala Thera.

A statement issued by the Opposition Leader’s Office quoted MP Premadasa as having extended an invitation to all political parties to give up extremist policies and join the SJB.

The SJB leader alleged that the NPP government feared facing elections and that was the reason for the inordinate delay in holding Provincial Council polls. PC polls were last held in 2012, 2013 and 2014, on a staggered basis. Premadasa said that if PC polls were held his party would definitely win the majority of PCs.Premadasa also urged the government to reduce electricity tariffs and fuel prices.

Continue Reading

News

Ex-EC Chief slams govt. over PC polls delay

Published

on

Deshapriya

Former Chairman of the Election Commission, Mahinda Deshapriya, on Saturday, strongly criticised the continued postponement of local government elections, declaring that every day without elections constitutes a violation of both the Constitution and democratic principles.

Speaking during an interview with journalist Bhanuka Rajapaksa, on Hiru TV, on Saturday, Deshapriya described the current administration of local government institutions by unelected officials as fundamentally undemocratic and contrary to the spirit of representative governance.

Deshapriya said local authorities, across the country, are presently being managed by secretaries and bureaucrats rather than elected representatives, depriving citizens of their democratic right to be governed by individuals, chosen through the electoral process.

“If the Constitution recognises and provides for local government institutions, then it is the responsibility of the State to ensure that elections are held and that these bodies are administered by representatives, elected by the people,” he said.

Deshapriya rejected attempts to justify the prolonged delay, arguing that responsibility for the situation rests with the government.

He noted that while various political parties have publicly stated their readiness to face elections, the ruling administration possesses the authority to resolve any issues relating to the electoral system.

The former Election Commission chief pointed out that the government enjoyed a two-thirds majority in Parliament, enabling it to enact any legislative amendments required to facilitate the conduct of elections. Instead, he said, successive committees and review processes had been used to postpone a final decision.

He also referred to efforts by opposition legislators who have moved motions seeking to address concerns relating to the electoral framework and expedite the holding of local government polls.

Deshapriya warned that any attempt to appoint a fresh delimitation committee could further delay the electoral process, making it unlikely that local government elections would be held within the current year.

He also dismissed claims that financial constraints have prevented the conduct of elections. Expressing surprise at such assertions, he questioned how funding shortages could be cited as a reason for postponement while expenditure continues in other sectors.

According to Deshapriya, the existence of laws establishing local government institutions imposes an obligation on the State to ensure that those institutions are populated through democratic means.

“The legal framework exists. If elected representatives are not appointed through elections and institutions continue to function under unelected administrators, that is a failure of the State,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending