Connect with us

News

GSP+ in jeopardy: GL

Published

on

Prof. Peiris

Former External Affairs Minister Prof. G.L. Peiris has warned that the European Union’s GSP-plus concessions will be jeopardised if the NPP government fail to introduce an internationally acceptable anti-terrorism law in place of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).

Prof. Peiris issued the warning at a media briefing called by the People’s United Opposition at the Flower Road Office of former President Ranil Wickremesinghe on Monday (22).

Prof. Peiris said lawyers, civil society and professionals strongly opposed the new anti-terrorism law proposed by Justice and National Integration Minister Harshana Nanayakkara six months ago. Having realised that it couldn’t secure the required public support, on behalf of the government, Minister Nanayakkara declared, in Kilinochchi, recently, that another anti-terrorism law would be placed before the people, within two months. According to the top law academic, what has been rejected was far worse than the PTA currently in use.

Sri Lanka first received–GSP-plus in July, 2005, but was revoked in 2010 over war crimes allegations. The EU granted the same in May, 2017.

Declaring that they were in the dark regarding the latest proposed law, the former parliamentarian said that an anti-terrorism law, compatible with international standards, couldn’t be produced without wider consultations among all interested parties.

Sri Lanka has ratified all 27 core international conventions on human rights, labour standards, environmental protection and good governance.

Prof. Peiris said that during his second tenure as the Foreign Minister, the then government tendered a written assurance to the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) that a new anti-terrorism law would be introduced.

Referring to four-member delegation of the United Nations Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture (SPT) visiting Sri Lanka from 15 to 24 June, 2024, Prof. Peiris emphasized the responsibility on the part of the government to adhere with universally accepted human rights norms.

At the onset of the briefing Prof. Peiris flayed the government over the way opposition activist Sugeeshwara Bandara had been arrested by police in Kollupitiya, very similar to operations directed at the underworld. Pointing out that the police also took into custody Binoy Hettiarachchi, a media coordinator at the Flower Road Office, Prof. Peiris alleged that the NPP government was suppressing political opposition. (SF)



News

PAFFREL raises concerns over Anti-Corruption (Amendment) Bill

Published

on

Anura and Rohana

Executive Director of People’s Action for Free and Fair Elections (PAFFREL) Rohana Hettiarachchi yesterday (28) said that there were three major concerns regarding the Anti-Corruption (Amendment) Bill 2026. Acknowledging the recent Supreme Court determination, in respect of the above-mentioned Bill, that three of the provisions were not consistent with the Constitution, requiring a special majority in Parliament, with one clause requiring approval by the people at a Referendum, Hettiarachchi said nonetheless PAFFREL had decided to bring their concerns to the notice of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake.

Responding to The Island queries, Hettiarachchci said that PAFFREL sent a letter, dated 24 Sept., to President Dissanayake, regarding the issue at hand.

Petitions against the Bill was heard before a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justices Shiran Gooneratne, Mahinda Samayawardena and Sampath Wijeratne.

PAFFREL and Transparency International Sri Lanka (TISL) were among the petitioners who challenged the proposed amendments to the Anti-Corruption Act No. 9 of 2023. “We did so in public interest,” Hettiarachchchi said, adding that three major concerns were (i) the breadth of the proposed redaction power and the proposed criminalisation of certain uses of publicly accessible redacted asset declarations, particularly in relation to freedom of expression, and the public’s right to meaningfully receive and impart information (ii) raising of the State or public-corporation shareholding threshold for certain asset declaration obligations from 25% to 50%, as this could exclude officers of State-linked entities in which the State holds less than 50%, in spite of such entities exercising public functions and managing public resources and (iii)role of the Director General Ranga Dissanayake.

Hettiarachchchi emphasised that though the PARREL appreciated the way CIABOC DG handled his responsibilities, centreing of power on one person was not acceptable.

Hettiarachchi urged President Dissanayake and the 159-member government parliamentary group to pay attention to concerns raised by those who moved court against the controversial Bill and address their concerns though the Parliament received the SC determination.

An International Monetary Fund mission that visited Colombo recently warned that the proposed amendments could weaken the country’s anti-corruption framework.

The mission, led by Evan Papageorgiou, was in the country from 10 to 23 September for discussions on the seventh review of the Extended Fund Facility and the 2026 Article IV consultation. (SF)

Continue Reading

News

First cases taken up by SC after enactment of 22A dismissed

Published

on

The Supreme Court yesterday (28) dismissed two petitions filed by retired Flight Lieutenant Shantha Jayathilake against Deputy Inspector General of Police of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Shani Abeysekara and Secretary to the Ministry of Public Security Ravi Seneviratne, and Rev. Father Cyril Gamini, alleging them of committing contempt of court.

They were the first cases dealt by the Supreme Court after the enactment of the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution.

The recipient of gallantry medal alleged that contempt of court had been committed through an affidavit previously submitted to the Supreme Court by Shani Abeysekara and Ravi Seneviratne.

The other petition alleged that contempt of court had been committed through the contents of a complaint submitted to the Criminal Investigation Department by Rev. Father Cyril Gamini.

The Supreme Court ordered that both petitions be dismissed without being taken up for hearing.

Continue Reading

News

Now NR named 4th suspect in Krrish case

Published

on

Namal

The Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) yesterday (28) named former Minister and leader of the SLPP parliamentary group Namal Rajapaksa as the fourth suspect in the Krrish case before the Colombo Chief Magistrate’s Court.

The MP was named as the fourth suspect in the wake of the arrest and remanding of former Executive Officer and Director of the Krrish Group, Janaki Siriwardena, regarding the payment of Rs. 70 mn to Namal Rajapaksa to facilitate the land transaction. Police arrested Ms. Siriwardena on 24 September and she was remanded till 6 Oct. pending investigations.

The investigation focuses on 4.3 acre land development in the Fort area that began in the 2013-2014 period. Investigations were launched in 2016 by the Yahapalana government, following a complaint lodged by Wasantha Samarasinghe, now a Minister in the current Cabinet.

The Indian company in this controversy is Krrish Transworks Colombo (Pvt.) Ltd .

The CIABOC named Namal Rajapaksa as a suspect in the Krrish case while he was remanded over two cases in respect of Airbus bribery probe. (SF)

Continue Reading

Trending