News
Private member’s Bill deemed unconstitutional:Tissa says he only complied with ‘Bills Office’ request
… rejects Dr. Amarasekera’s concerns
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB) lawmaker Tissa Attanayake says that he moved the controversial ‘Human Rights Organisation (Incorporation) Act’ on the request of Bills Office of the Parliament.
National List MP Attanayake insists he only tried to help the Bills Office as he felt it was a quite legitimate request. The former General Secretary of the UNP acknowledged that he was aware of the unsuccessful bids made in 2013 and 2015 to move the same Bill.
When The Island pointed out that the Supreme Court recently deemed the Bill unconstitutional, MP Attanayake pointed out that Parliament adopted a transparent process in that regard. “I have nothing to hide. In fact, I have absolutely no interest in this particular Bill. Sometimes, the Bills Office seeks our help to present Bills that had been held up for various reasons,” MP Attanayake said.
Attanayake is one of the seven National List MPs in the 54-member SJB parliamentary group.
Asked whether he was aware of Dr. Gunadasa Amarasekera, on behalf of the Federation of National Organisations (FNO) recently taking up the matter with SJB and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa, MP Attanayake said that he explained the issue at hand to the party leader. Declaring his move on behalf of the Bills Office nothing but routine assistance provided by MPs on request, lawmaker Attanayake acknowledged that the SJB leader inquired from him about the issue.
Dr. Amarasekera wrote to MP Premadasa with copies to Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa and Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena in the wake of The Island report, headlined ‘SC deems SJB MP’s move unconstitutional’ published, with strapline ‘How Parliament violated Standing Orders and Constitution in gazetting twice rejected controversial Bill’ on Sept.09 edition.
MP Attanayake dismissed accusations that he had been involved in a clandestine project meant to undermine the country. “Anyone who believes I have been part of any such project should have his or her head examined,” MP Attanayake.
Responding to another query, MP Attanayake emphasized that the course of action followed by the Parliament as regards the disputed Bill shouldn’t have created such a controversy.
Dr. Amarasekera has requested Premier Rajapaksa, Speaker Abeywardena and SJB leader Premadasa to inquire into the matter.
The Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, Justice Mahinda Samayawardhena and Justice Arjuna Obeyesekere ruled that Clause 6 of the Bill is not consistent with Article 76(1) of the Constitution. The SC has also ruled that Clause 7 of the Bill is not consistent with Articles 3, 4 and 12(1) of the Constitution. Having said so, the SC declared that in terms of the Article 123(2) of the Constitution, the Bill should be passed by a special majority in line with paragraph (2) of Article 84 and endorsed at a Referendum.
Dr. Wasantha Bandara, Raja Goonerathne and Nuwan Ballantudawa moved the SC in terms of Article 121 of the Constitution. In their petition, the Attorney General was named the respondent.
Dr. Amarasekera pointed out in his letter Dr. Bandara said that the same Private Bill had been previously submitted by H. Farook in 2013 (not Hunais Farook as previously reported) and Ali Zahir Moulana in 2015. However, on both occasions, they had failed to proceed with the project due to objections raised by the relevant ministers, Dr. Amarasekera said.
According to the petition the Bill had been gazetted on July 20, 2021 and placed on the Order Paper of Parliament on August 3 without obtaining the Attorney General’s opinion. Therefore the procedure adopted by Parliament not only violated Standing Orders but Article 78 (2) of the Constitution as well, the SC noted on the basis of submissions made on behalf of the petitioners.
MP Attanayake said that he was given an opportunity to submit the Bill in question with required amendments in terms of the SC ruling. “I didn’t want to do that. Therefore, I have nothing to do with it anymore.”
Asked whether he obtained prior permission from the party to move that Bill, MP Attanayake insisted that there was absolutely no requirement to do so. Members moved Private Bills all the time, the MP said.
Dr. Amarasekera said that Parliament should inquire into this. How Bills Ofice secured privately an MP’s help to move such a controversial matter without it being subjected to Attorney General’s perusal. Dr. Amarasekera said that MP Attanayake’s claim pertaining to the role played by the Bills Office should be properly inquired into.
News
PUCSL and Treasury under IMF spotlight as CEB seeks 11.5% power tariff hike
The Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) and the Treasury are facing heightened scrutiny as the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) presses for an 11.5 percent electricity tariff increase, a move closely tied to IMF-driven state-owned enterprise (SOE) reforms aimed at curbing losses and easing fiscal pressure on the State.
The proposed hike comes as the Treasury intensifies efforts to reduce the budgetary burden of loss-making SOEs under Sri Lanka’s IMF programme, which places strong emphasis on cost-reflective pricing, improved governance and the elimination of quasi-fiscal deficits.
Power sector sources said the PUCSL has completed its technical evaluation of the CEB proposal and is expected to announce its determination shortly.
The decision is being closely watched not only as a test of regulatory independence, but also as an indicator of how Treasury-backed fiscal discipline is being enforced through independent regulators.Under the IMF agreement, Sri Lanka has committed to restructuring key SOEs, such as, the CEB to prevent recurring losses from spilling over into public finances.
Treasury officials have repeatedly warned that continued operational losses at the utility could ultimately require state intervention, undermining fiscal consolidation targets agreed with the IMF.
The CEB has justified the proposed 11.5 percent hike by citing high generation costs, foreign currency loan repayments and accumulated legacy losses, arguing that further tariff adjustments are necessary to stabilise finances and avoid a return to Treasury support.
However, critics argue that IMF-aligned reforms should not translate into routine tariff hikes without meaningful improvements in efficiency, cost controls and governance within the utility.
Trade unions and consumer groups have urged the PUCSL to resist pressure from both the CEB and fiscal authorities to simply pass costs on to consumers.
They also note that improved hydropower availability should reduce dependence on expensive thermal generation, easing cost pressures and giving the regulator room to moderate any tariff increase.
Energy analysts say the PUCSL’s ruling will reflect how effectively the Treasury’s fiscal objectives are being balanced against the regulator’s statutory duty to protect consumers, warning that over-reliance on tariff increases could erode public support for IMF-backed reforms.
Business chambers have cautioned that another electricity price hike could weaken industrial competitiveness and slow economic recovery, particularly in export-oriented and energy-intensive sectors already grappling with elevated costs.
Electricity tariffs remain one of the most politically sensitive aspects of IMF-linked restructuring, with previous hikes triggering widespread public discontent and raising concerns over social impact.
The PUCSL is expected to outline the basis of its decision, including whether the proposed 11.5 percent increase will be approved in full, scaled down, or restructured through slab-based mechanisms to cushion low-income households.
An energy expert stressed that Sri Lanka navigates IMF-mandated fiscal and SOE reforms, the forthcoming ruling is widely seen as a defining moment—testing not only the independence of the regulator, but also the Treasury’s ability to pursue reform without deepening the burden on consumers.
By Ifham Nizam ✍️
News
Bellana says Rs 900 mn fraud at NHSL cannot be suppressed by moving CID against him
Massive waste, corruption, irregularities and mismanagement at laboratories of the country’s premier hospital, revealed by the National Audit Office (NAO), couldn’t be suppressed by sacking or accusing him of issuing death threats to Health Secretary Dr. Anil Jasinghe, recently sacked Director of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL) Dr. Rukshan Bellana told The Island.
Dr. Bellana said so responding to Dr. Jasinghe’s request for police protection claiming that he (Bellana) was directly responsible for threatening him.
The NPP government owed an explanation without further delay as the queries raised by NAO pertained to Rs 900 mn fraud/loss caused as a result of procurement of chemical reagents for the 2022 to 2024 period remained unanswered, Dr. Bellana said, pointing out that NAO raised the issue in June last year.
Having accused all other political parties of corruption at all levels, the NPP couldn’t under any circumstances remain mum on NAO’s audit query, DR. Bellana said, claiming that he heard of attempts by certain interested parties to settle the matter outside legal procedures.
The former GMOA official said that the NPP’s reputation was at stake. Perhaps President Anura Kumara Dissanayake should look into this matter and ensure proper investigation. Dr. Bellana alleged that those who had been implicated in the NAO inquiry were making an attempt to depict procurement of shelf time expired chemical reagents as a minor matter.
By Shamindra Ferdinando ✍️
News
First harvest of rice offered to Dalada Maligawa
Continuing a centuries-old tradition, dating back to the era of ancient kings, the annual ‘Aluth Sahal Mangalya’—the offering of alms prepared from the maiden harvest of rice—was ceremonially observed at the Sri Dalada Maligawa on Duruthu Full Moon Poya Day, 03rd January.
The religious observances were conducted with the participation of Ven. Thibbatuwawe Sri Medhankara Thera, a member of the Thevava (officiating clergy) of the Sacred Tooth Relic, and Diyawadana Nilame Pradeep Nilanga Dela.
In keeping with long-established customs, paddy harvested from lands belonging to the Sri Dalada Maligawa was brought from the Atuwa (granary) in Pallekele. The newly harvested rice was subsequently prepared and offered as Buddha Pooja to the Sacred Tooth Relic.
Text and Pic by SK Samarnayake ✍️
-
News2 days agoHealth Minister sends letter of demand for one billion rupees in damages
-
News5 days agoLeading the Nation’s Connectivity Recovery Amid Unprecedented Challenges
-
Features6 days agoIt’s all over for Maxi Rozairo
-
Opinion4 days agoRemembering Douglas Devananda on New Year’s Day 2026
-
News6 days agoDr. Bellana: “I was removed as NHSL Deputy Director for exposing Rs. 900 mn fraud”
-
News5 days agoDons on warpath over alleged undue interference in university governance
-
Features6 days agoRebuilding Sri Lanka Through Inclusive Governance
-
Business5 days agoSri Lanka Tourism surpasses historic milestone with record tourist arrivals in 2025
