Connect with us

News

President tells judiciary to keep off his turf

Published

on

President Wickremesinghe

President Ranil Wickremesinghe on Sunday said that the judiciary should not interfere with the affairs of the Executive.

Speaking at a ceremony where freehold land deeds were distributed under the Urumaya at the Mahiyangana Public Stadium, the President said it was Parliament that had judiciary powers.

President Wickremesinghe highlighted the history of the Urumaya programme, which was initiated in 2002 and 2003 but was subsequently halted due to a court decision.

Wickremesinghe said that if the programme had been implemented 20 years back, the people could have been granted free land rights earlier.

“The Urumaya programme was launched in this country in 2002 and 2003 but it was suspended due to a court decision. I acted according to the Land Development Ordinance, which was prepared by my grandfather, C L Wickremesinghe, who served as the Government Agent in the North Central Province at that time.

“D. S. Senanayake, then the Minister of Agriculture, visited Anuradhapura to inspect the old tanks, some of which had been renovated while others, including the Parakrama Samudraya were slated for renovation. Thereafter, the focus of the government shifted to settling the people in that area.

“During this period, D.S. Senanayake informed my grandfather of the establishment of a new department called the Land Development Department and instructed him to take charge of it and draft the necessary laws. My grandfather prepared and passed those laws, became the first Land Development Commissioner, and settled the people in the area. The aim was to provide land to the landless people of the wet zone, establish villages in these areas, and develop both the wet zone and the newly established villages. This law was created to achieve that goal.

“When I reviewed his files, I discovered a significant issue: many people in Sri Lanka at that time could not read or write. Consequently, various individuals exploited them by including them in agreements one by one and attempting to seize their land through loans. To address this, the land licence system was created.

“The situation in 1935 was vastly different from today. Now, every family in this country has well-educated members, including graduates, doctors, and lawyers. Therefore, such exploitation is unlikely to happen today. However, back then, the lack of education made people vulnerable to such schemes.

“We implemented this programme when we started the Mahaweli movement.

However, after 10-15 years, it was no longer necessary as people protected their lands. I believed they would not sell their land, but eventually, people began to expect land rights. This necessitated a new law to provide these lands under the Land Development Ordinance. I presented the draft law, but the Supreme Court ruled that a referendum was necessary to pass such legislation.

“If we had been given the opportunity to implement that programme back then, we could have confirmed freehold land rights for the people 20 years ago. However, foreign investors were later given free land instead. If it was possible to allocate government land to the Shangri-La Hotel under the Land Ordinance, why can’t I, as the President, grant land rights to two million people?

“Some have warned that this matter will go to court, but it’s important to remember that the authority lies not with the court but with Parliament. I have always maintained that the judiciary should not interfere with the executive.

In 1978, Minister Gamini Dissanayake initiated the Uluhitiya project here. Today, I am here to start the programme of giving freehold land deeds to all those who came from Uluhitiya. This is your right, not a government favour,” he said.



News

Opposition holds NPP Cabinet responsible for coal scam, three times bigger than bond fraud

Published

on

Prof. G. L. Peiris

The Opposition yesterday called for the entire Cabinet-of-Ministers to accept responsibility for the coal scam. Addressing the media at the Flower Road Office of UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe, former Foreign Minister Prof. G. L. Peiris emphasised that Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody’s resignation, in the wake of the damning report issued by the National Audit Office (NAO), has now implicated the entire Cabinet-of-Ministers.

Prof. Peiris asserted that Jayakody, who had been indicted in the Colombo High Court over alleged corruption, during the Yahapalana administration, stepped down after the NPP failed to suppress the truth on the coal scam.

The ex-Minister declared that Jayakody’s resignation, the first since the formation of new government, with a super majority in Parliament, was a devastating setback for the current dispensation.

The internationally recognised legal scholar said that a future government would move courts against the entire NPP Cabinet. Referring to the NAO report submitted to Parliament, Prof. Peiris emphasised that there was absolutely no ambiguity regards allegations directed at the Energy Ministry. The NAO report proved that the Indian company, Trident Champhar, that won the major contract, didn’t even have the required registration.

Prof. Peiris said that the coal scam was three times bigger than the Treasury bond scams, perpetrated during the Yahapalana time (SF)

Continue Reading

News

Case against Yoshitha and Daisy Forrest postponed

Published

on

The Colombo High Court yesterday ordered that the case, filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act against Yoshitha Rajapaksa, son of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, and his grand-aunt Daisy Forrest Wickramasinghe, be recalled on June 10.

The case was taken up before High Court Judge Rashmi Singappuli.

At the hearing, State Counsel informed the court that a related case, on similar charges, had been filed before High Court No. 08. The court was further informed that a revised indictment has been directed to be filed in that case, necessitating the submission of a revised indictment in the present case as well.

State Counsel requested time to report on the progress of those proceedings.

Accordingly, the judge ordered that the case be called on June 10 and directed that progress be reported on that date.

The case pertains to three indictments filed by the Attorney General alleging that between March 31, 2009, and December 12, 2013, the accused had committed an offence under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act by depositing over Rs. 59 million in three private banks, the source of which could not be explained.

Continue Reading

News

Three-judge bench rejects request by ex-IGP Pujith

Published

on

 A three-judge bench of the Colombo Special High Court yesterday rejected a request by former Inspector General of Police (IGP) Pujith Jayasundera to introduce additional facts to a statement he had previously made from the dock.

Jayasundera is an accused in the case filed over alleged criminal negligence in failing to prevent the 2019 Easter Sunday terrorist attacks, despite prior intelligence warnings.

The order was delivered by the bench, presided over by Justice Priyantha Liyanage.

Meanwhile, retired Senior Deputy Inspector General (SDIG) Nandana Munasinghe and Deputy Inspector General (DIG) in charge of the Eastern Province, Waruna Jayasundera, appeared before court as defence witnesses.

Continue Reading

Trending