Connect with us

News

President Rajapaksa had no hand in revoking detention of Riyaj- Counsel

Published

on

Easter carnage

By Chitra Weerarathne

President’s Counsel Sanjeewa Jayawardena, yesterday, told the Court of Appeal that the President had never had any hand in revoking any detention order issued against Riyaj Bathiudeen, the brother of Rishad Bathiudeen.

At the outset Faiz Mustapha PC, who appeared for the petitioner Riyaj Bathiudeen told the Court of Appeal that the petitioner had not been involved in terrorist activity, according to investigation reports of recent times. Petitioner was entitled to resist wrongful arrest. It was not a case of hiding. It was avoiding wrongful arrest. There was no responsible suspicion for the arrest of Riyaj. There was no basis to arrest him originally or now. The only basis was a telephone conversation with an Islamic extremist who had attempted to bomb the Cinnamon Grand Hotel. The calls had been business oriented and nothing else. The mobile phone used by Riyaj, had been linked to so many other phones on miscellaneous deals.

Riyaj had received telephone calls on the export of copper, which was a business deal. No basis at all for the arrest of Riyaj Bathiudeen. Attempts should not be made to arrest Riyaj on incomplete investigations, the Counsel said.

Sanjeewa Jayawardena, PC appeared for the intervention against the writ application by Riyaj Bathiudeen. One is by the Reverend Father Lawrence Ramanayke and the other by another concerned party counsel.

The President had assured that at no time he had said that he had a hand in the revoking of any detention order against Riyaj, Counsel explained. Riyaj Bathiudeen has had several phone calls with the brother of the person who attempted to bomb the Hotel, in 2019. The counsel said hundred members of Parliament in September 2020 complained to the President that the Investigations against Riyaj had not been properly conducted. They said any detention order against him should not be revoked. The security of the People was vital.

There were photographs of Riyaj sitting together with Zahran, the NTJ Leader, counsel added.

The Additional Solicitor General Sarath Jayamanna, PC, told the Court of Appeal that on September 19, 2020, Riyaj had withdrawn his fundamental rights violation petition against state officials. On September 22, Riyaj withdrew his Habeas Corpus application against state officials. Hence no litigation remained over any type of harassment. The bombings were the most deadly act committed on April 21, 2019, which killed so many persons, all over the country. When evidence surfaced people had to be arrested, the ASG said.

The ASG explained that the family had acquired assets by money laundering. The accounts of Riyaj and his wife were huge and unbelievable.

The arrest would be completed at the end of the on-going investigation. The writ application, at this stage was premature, he added. The Attorney General had only ordered that investigations be conducted where necessary, ASG Jayamanne added.

Riyaj Bathiudeen had filed a writ application in the Court of Appeal, requesting the Court to prevent his likely arrest by the CID. He had said it was baseless to arrest him. Rev. Father Lawrence Ramanayake, of ‘Sethsevana’ Archbishop’s House, Borella, Colombo had filed an Intervention, objecting to the writ application by Riyaj Bathiudeen. The priest has said that Riyaj was a suspect as regards the Easter Sunday attacks of April 21, 2019. Those suicide blasts killed 256 persons and injured 500 others.

Sanjeewa Jayawardena, PC, appeared with Rukshan Senadheera and Maneesha Dissanayake, instructed by Sanjay Fonseka for the intervenient.

The bench comprised Justice Mahinda Samayawardene and Justice Arjuna Obeysekera. The Court of Appeal reserved the order on whether to issue notice on the respondent police officers and to grant interim relief for Riyaj Bathiudeen for October 21, 2020.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Two arrested over Manipay killing

Published

on

Manipay police have arrested two persons in connection with the ongoing investigation into the killing of a person who returned from Switzerland recently.

The suspects were apprehended in the Tellippalai area.

Police said that following the killing, gold jewellery and other valuables had been robbed. Police believe that the suspect had come to buy jewellery on the invitation of the victim and then killed him before making off the gold.

The incident took place on o6 June. The suspects were to be produced before the Jaffna Magistrate.

By Dinasena Ratugamage

Continue Reading

News

IIT Madras and University of Vavuniya establish new academic partnership

Published

on

The Deputy High Commissioner of Sri Lanka in Chennai, Dr. Ganesanathan Geathiswaran, attended the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signing ceremony between the University of Vavuniya, Sri Lanka and the Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT Madras) on 29 May 2026 at IIT Madras.

The delegation from the University of Vavuniya was led by Vice-Chancellor, Prof. A. Atputharajah, and included Acting Registrar, R. Jeyakumar; Bursar, L. Ram Ramanan; Dean of the Faculty of Business Studies, Janaki Thevaruban; Dean of the Faculty of Technological Studies, V. Senthooran; Representative of the Faculty of Applied Science, N. Edwin Linosh and Director of the Centre for International Affairs, Dr. Koperunthevy Kalainathan.

The MoU marks a significant step towards strengthening academic cooperation, research collaboration, student and faculty exchanges, and institutional partnerships between the two higher education institutions.

Addressing the gathering, Dr. Geathiswaran congratulated both institutions on this important milestone and highlighted the growing educational and people-to-people ties between Sri Lanka and India. He expressed confidence that the partnership would create valuable opportunities for innovation, knowledge sharing, and academic excellence, further enhancing bilateral cooperation in higher education.

Continue Reading

News

Free Lawyers’, too,opposes extension of judges’ retirement age

Published

on

The Free Lawyers’ organisation has opposed the government’s move to increase the retirement age of Appeals Court and Supreme Court judges through a constitutional amendment.

In a statement issued over the weekend, the association noted that it had taken serious note of the government’s proposal to extend the retirement age of Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court judges, currently set at 63 and 65 years respectively by a further two years through a constitutional amendment.

It also pointed out that there are currently eight vacancies in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, and alleged that the President has failed for a prolonged period to fill these positions, despite being constitutionally required to do so.

The organisation further stated that this failure could be considered a serious constitutional breach, which could even form the basis for an impeachment motion against the President.

It also highlighted that a large number of cases are currently pending before the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal. It emphasised that, in order to expedite justice, not only should court infrastructure be improved, but judicial vacancies must also be filled promptly to speed up hearings.

However, the group warned that extending the service period of judges, while neglecting these essential measures, would not help reduce delays in court proceedings.

It further alleged that the government’s move to extend the retirement age of judges, while ignoring these key issues, raises strong suspicions of having underlying motives.

The organisation also warned that such actions could raise serious questions regarding the independence of the judiciary.

Continue Reading

Trending