Connect with us

News

PF-IISS dialogue: Colombage stresses importance of foreign policy of neutrality

Published

on

Foreign Secretary Admiral (retd) Dr. Jayanath Colombage said that Sri Lanka followed what he called a foreign policy of neutrality whilst remaining non-aligned amidst strategic competition in the Indian Ocean, regardless of the global crisis caused by the raging the Covid-19 pandemic.

FS Colombage said so during a virtual dialogue arranged by the Pathfinder Foundation (PF) and the UK-based International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) on the current status of Sri Lanka-United Kingdom relations.

The following is the text of a statement issued by PF: “The dialogue broadly looked at three focused areas. Session 1 on Maritime Security Cooperation was Chaired by Dr. Rahul Roy Choudhury with Nick Childs and Rohan Gunaratna presenting on behalf of the UK and Sri Lanka respectively. Session 2 on China-Sri Lanka Economic Cooperation included H.M.G.S. Palihakkara as the Chair and Ganeshan Wignaraja and Sir Hugo Swire as the speakers. Kshenuka Seneviratne Chaired Session 3 on The Way Ahead for UK – SL relations, whilst the speakers were Indrajit Coomaraswamy and Stephen Evans. The Keynote Session was chaired by Desmond Bowen, Associate Fellow, IISS and former Director General of International Policy at the Ministry of Defence in the UK. The Keynote remarks were made by Admiral (retd.) Prof. Jayanath Colombage, Sri Lanka’s Foreign Secretary. 

“At the start of his keynote address, the Foreign Secretary said that his views were his personal, highlighted his close relations with the British High Commission in Colombo and that the two countries were engaged in close bilateral relations on many spheres. He observed that the economic relations between the two countries were of paramount importance to Sri Lanka at a time when the present pandemic had an adverse impact on the island’s economy.

“Leading on to the post Brexit phase, the Foreign Secretary mentioned that Sri Lanka was looking forward to enhancing its trade with the UK as one of its large export markets. In addition, tourism from the UK repesented a large segment, which brought in much needed foreign exchange, which has come to a standstill due to the adverse pandemic situation. However, he was positive of the success of the country’s inoculation programme against Covid-19, which he believed would result in a more conducive environment for trade and tourism. 

“With regard to the importance of a strategic dialogue, the Foreign Secretary highlighted the ongoing strategic competition in the Indian Ocean, which despite Covid constraints, continued unabated.  Speaking of the ongoing global power struggle, he said Sri Lanka’s response was to follow a foreign policy of neutrality whilst remaining non-aligned.

“He finally spoke on the human rights issue, where the UK had played a key role heading the Contact Group on Sri Lanka in the United Nations Human Rights Council. He stressed that it was time; the UK recognized the steady, tangible progress being made by Sri Lanka in this respect. As a founding member of the Commonwealth, Sri Lanka considered the UK to be an important partner and requested the UK to lend its support to Sri Lanka.

“Adopting a similar position in his concluding remarks, the State Minister for Regional Cooperation Tharaka Balasuriya observed that perception matters in geopolitics, where ill-informed narratives take precedence and it was important to change such perceptions. Focusing on relations between the two countries, he stressed that economic cooperation was most important, whilst there were certain existentialist issues, such as climate change that need addressing.

“He also spoke of the contentious issue of human rights, stressing that Sri Lanka always strived for good governance, not just due to the pressure of the international community but as it was a priority in any civilized society. With regard to economic cooperation, the Minister pointed out another false narrative that Sri Lanka favoured China. He clarified that most of the Chinese companies being state owned, tend to be more competitive, when compared to others. Post-Covid cooperation, the Minster stated, had tremendous potential in areas such as ICT and the health sectors, highlighting that the Government of Sri Lanka has been in touch with its British counterparts in this regard. He also mentioned that a Preferential Trade Agreement will be beneficial to both countries.

“Finally, the Minister observed that both the UK and Sri Lanka should reciprocate each other’s support in order to gain the most from the long-standing relationship and respect different values of sovereign states. The UK has been a great friend to Sri Lanka, which, over the years, has considered the former as an example for democracy and best practices. Thus, having a strategic partnership in the future will be beneficial to both SL and the UK, he concluded.

“Taking into consideration historical relations and the lead role played by the UK with regard to the recent resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on Sri Lanka, the two institutions thought that it would be a good idea to have an interaction covering all aspects of bilateral relations between the two countries, so that the two sides will have a better appreciation and understanding of each other’s priorities and concerns.

Approximately 20 participants each from Sri Lanka and the UK, including representatives of the House of Lords, House of Commons, members of Parliament, government officials, experts, academics, senior media personnell, etc., participated in the virtual dialogue.  Among the parliamentarians from Sri Lanka, in addition to the Minister of State for Regional Cooperation Tharaka Balasuriya; MP Eran Wickramaratne and former minister Faiszer Musthapha attended the dialogue, while the participants of the UK comprised of Lord Birt, Crossbench Peer; Lord Sheikh, Lord Marland and Mark Logan MP, Vice Chair, All Party Parliamentary Group on Sri Lanka.”



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Geneva takes up Sallay’s case and govt. ignores opportunity to answer accusations

Published

on

Suresh Sallay

The government has chosen not to respond to questions raised by the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) regarding the detention of retired Maj. Gen. Suresh Sallay in connection with the ongoing investigations into the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks.

The Criminal Investigation Department (CID) arrested the ex-official in late February this year. The Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health and the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers have jointly raised the issue on 20 July, 2026.

Drawing attention of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to what they called alleged arbitrary detention of Sallay, former Director General of the State Intelligence Service (SIS) and former Director of Military Intelligence (DMI), under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), as well as allegations of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment while in custody, resulting in the grave deterioration of his health, and imminent risks of retaliation through further torture and ill-treatment resulting in irreparable harm, should he be released from hospital and returned to custody, the UN sought the government explanation with a 60-day period.

The UN has stated: “This communication, and any response received from your Excellency’s Government, will be made public via the communications reporting website at the 60 days mark. Should your Excellency’s Government respond within 60 days, both the communication and the response, may be published before the 60 days mark. The communications and responses

will also be made available in the subsequent periodic report to be presented to the Human Rights Council.”

In the absence of the government’s response, the UN posted the letter, dated 20 July, 2026, addressed to President Dissanayake. The full letter can be accessed https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=31125

Continue Reading

News

Section of wartime KKS High Security Zone vacated to facilitate economic development in the area

Published

on

The Army, last week, vacated an area, within the wartime high security zone in the Jaffna peninsula. The Defence Ministry said that an extent of 187.56 acres of land, belonging to the Cement Corporation in Kankesanthurai, Jaffna, has been released by the military. The released land, located in Grama Niladhari Division J/233, Kankesanthurai West, within the Valikamam North (Tellippalai) Divisional Secretariat Division, had been utilised by the Sri Lanka Army since the middle of 1997.

The release of the 187.56-acre extent forms part of the initiative to make State land available for the proposed investment zone in Kankesanthurai, thereby facilitating future investment and economic development in the area.

Continue Reading

News

Lawyer lodges complaint against Govt. Printer, Media Ministry Secy.

Published

on

A complaint has been lodged with the Colombo Fraud Investigation Bureau against the Government Printer and the Secretary to the Ministry of Media regarding the online release of falsified documents bearing a forged Speaker’s certificate.

Attorney-at-Law Aruna Laksiri has lodged a complaint with the Colombo Fraud Investigation Bureau requesting legal action against the Government Printer of the Department of Government Printing (No. 118, Dr. Danister de Silva Mawatha, Colombo 08), Prasanna Jayaratne, and the Secretary to the Ministry of Mass Media (Asidisi Medura, 163, Kirulapone Mawatha, Polhengoda, Colombo 05), Dr. Anil Jasinghe.

The complaint alleges the commission of offences by forging and uploading falsified documents online using a forged Speaker’s certification, failure to perform statutory duties, and misappropriation of public property.

The complaint states that a copy of the English translation of the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution was downloaded and printed from the official website of the Government Printing Department (www.documents.gov.lk), which operates under the Ministry of Mass Media. On its outer cover and on page 1, the text “certified on 25th of September, 2026” is inscribed inside brackets.

The complaint pointed out that the Speaker has certified an English translation. Under Articles 23, 79, 83, and 80 of the Constitution, Parliament enacts laws and the Speaker certifies bills strictly in the Sinhala and Tamil languages; under the Constitution, therefore the Speaker cannot apply such certification to an English translation.

Continue Reading

Trending