Connect with us

News

Petitioner demands explanation over change of LPG composition

Published

on

‘Govt. cannot remain silent over Prof. Walpolage contradicting Litro Chairman’

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Attorney-at-Law Nagananda Kodituwakku says the government owes an explanation as regards recent gas explosions, especially in the wake of the declaration made by Prof. Shantha Walpolage, the Chairman of the Committee, appointed by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to probe the recent gas-related incidents, that the change in the composition of gas in 12.5 kg domestic gas cylinders was the cause of the continuing blasts.

Kodituwakku, who has moved the Court of Appeal, in his capacity as the General Secretary of the Vinivida Foundation seeking a series of immediate measures to prevent further harm to the public, told The Island yesterday Prof. Walpolage had not only confirmed the basis for his petition but also contradicted Litro Chairman Theshara Jayasinghe.

The civil society activist pointed out that Prof. Walpolage made the Committee’s position clear at a media briefing held at the Government Information Department on Dec 21, the day after he handed over the report to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. Responding to another query, Kodituwakku said what really shocked him was that on the day Prof. Walpolage handed over the report, the Litro Chairman told a media briefing arranged by the President’s Media Division the gas composition hadn’t been changed.

Lawyer Kodituwakku has moved the Court of Appeal in terms of Article 140 of the Constitution. Among the 10 respondents are gas suppliers, SLIC owned Litro and private enterprise Laugfs Gas PLC and trade minister Bandula Gunawardena and Consumer Protection State Minister Lasantha Alagiyawanna.

Chaired by Prof Shantha Walpolage of the University of Moratuwa, the committee comprised Senior Deputy Inspector General (SDIG) Deshabandu Tennakoon, Prof. Ajith de Alwis of University of Moratuwa, Prof. W.D.W. Jayathilaka of University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Prof. Pradeep Jayaweera, Commissioner of the Sri Lanka Inventors Commission Prof Narayan Sirimuthu, Additional Director General of Technical Services Dr. Sudarshana Somasiri and Senior Deputy Director of the Sri Lanka Standards institute Sujeewa Mahagama.

The committee also obtained the assistance of Dr. Saliya Jayasekara of the University of Moratuwa.

Lawyer Kodituwakku pointed out that Senior DIG Tennakoon, who had been a member of Prof. Walpolage’s team was present at the PMD media briefing where the Litro Chairman insisted the original composition remained. Secretary to the Ministry of Technology Jayantha de Silva who had been present at the handing over of the committee report to the President also participated at the PMD media briefing, Kodituwakku said. He said that the PMD website still carried a comprehensive report titled ‘No change in Litro gas composition and no need to have any unnecessary fear.’

Public litigation activist Koditiwakku alleged that a major fraud had been perpetrated by those responsible for ensuring safety and security of the people. The petitioner said that subsequent to the handing over of the report to the President, Secretary to the Ministry of Technology Jayantha de Silva acknowledged on ‘Hiru’ that he was not aware who ordered the change in gas composition in the domestic cylinder.

Petitioner questioned the failure on the part of the Secretary to the Ministry of Technology to establish the circumstances under which the composition was changed.

The Court of Appeal bench comprising Justice Dr. Ruwan Fernando and Justice Sampath K.B. Wijeratne on Dec 17 delivered judgment in respect of the petition filed by lawyer Kodituwakku.

Kodituwakku challenged gas suppliers’ claim they retained 80 percent Butane and 20 percent Propane composition. The activist asserted that the lives of consumers were at serious risk due to the change of the composition.

Asked whether the petitioner had obtained information that could prove the Litro management might still resort to change of gas composition, lawyer Kodituwakku said that he submitted to Court of Appeal a document issued by the Director, HSE & Quality Assurance, Litro Jayantha Basnayake with regard to the claimed comparative advantages of the gas composition new premium hybrid 18 liter gas cylinder due to the increase in the Propane content. Kodituwakku said that the official compared the advantage of the new product due to the change of the composition with that of 12.5 kg cylinder.

Kodituwakku said that the change of composition by increasing the Propane content resulted in sharp reduction of the period consumers were able to use a cylinder. In other words, the change of composition was meant to enhance sales at the expense of foreign exchange, he pointed out.

Kodituwakku said that the happenings at the Litro should be investigated. The government couldn’t turn a blind eye to the shocking revelations at the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) the previous Litro management blocked the government audit for two years before Theshara Jayasinghe was brought in July 2021 in place Anil Koswatte.

Kodituwakku said that the Opposition as well as the media should have vigorously campaigned against gas-related explosions. There hadn’t been previous such instances that affected consumers in all parts of the country simultaneously, Kodituwakku said.

How could the government remain silent when SLIC owned 99 percent of Litro shares? Kodituwakku asked, urging civil society organizations to take up the case.

In spite of repeated assurances given to the public, the Consumer Affairs Authority (CAA) and suppliers hadn’t complied with the Court of Appeal directives issued on Dec 17, Kodituwakku said.

The Court of Appeal directed:

Preventing and/or prohibiting the 4th (Laugfs) and 5th (Litro) Respondents from releasing gas cylinders meant for domestic use without (i) displaying on the gas cylinders the gas composition as may be prescribed by the Sri Lanka Standards Institute (2nd Respondent); (ii) the required level of Ethyl Mercaptan in the gas cylinders as may be prescribed by the Sri Lanka Standards Institute (Mrs. Siddhika Senaratne, DG, Sri Lanka Standards Institute 2 nd Respondent); and (iii) the shrink wrap in the respective colours as stipulated by the Consumer Affairs Authority (Maj. General Shantha Dissanayake, Chairman, CAA 1st Respondent), until proper investigations are carried out by the 1st and 2nd Respondents.2.Directing the 4th and the 5th Respondents to recall all full, sealed and unused gas cylinders meant for domestic use that are either available in the market or with the consumers (if such consumers so wished to return), and replace those recalled gas cylinders with new full gas cylinders on a free of charge basis until the above order is satisfied.

The case will be taken up again on Dec 31.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

‘Accountability issues’: Successive govts. failed armed forces: Shavendra

Published

on

Gen. Silva

“US, UK sanctions effectively prevented me from travelling to other countries as well”

Former GOC of the 58 Division General Shavendra Silva yesterday (18) found fault with successive governments since 2009 for failing to counter unsubstantiated war crimes accusations. The failure on the part of them led to punitive international measures against senior officers who spearheaded the offensive against the LTTE, the Gajaba veteran said.

Appearing on Derana 24/7 with Chathura Alwis, the former Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) declared his angst at the country’s failure at political level to address the issues at hand. The most decorated soldier was commenting on the 16th anniversary of the eradication of the LTTE’s conventional military capacity.

Sri Lanka brought the war to a successful conclusion on May 18, 2009, by bringing the entire northern province under government control. LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran was killed in the banks of the Nanthikadal lagoon on the following morning.

Referring to the US travel ban imposed on him, his wife and two daughters in February 2020 and the British sanctions declared in March this year, Gen. Silva said the US and British action had effectively restricted his overseas travel to south Asia.

The UK sanctioned Admiral of the Fleet Wasantha Karannagoda, former Army Commander Jagath Jayasuriya as well as former LTTE battlefield commander Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan alias Karuna.

Gen. Silva highlighted the protests carried out by pro-LTTE activists in London in February this year targeting Yohani de Silva whose father served as the GOC of 55 Division engaged in the Vanni offensive.

The protest was organised by the Tamil Youth Organisation of the UK.

Responding to another query, Gen. Silva, in his first interview since retirement as CDS on Dec 31, 2024, said that GoCs Gen Jagath Dias (57 Division), Gen. Kamal Gunaratne (53 Division), Maj. Gen. Nandana Udawatte (59 Division), Maj. Gen. Prasanna de Silva (55 Division) and Chagie Gallage as well as those who commanded Task Forces faced punitive international action.

Gen. Silva’s retirement coincided with the abolition of the Office of CDS by the NPP government.

At the onset of the interview, Gen. Silva strongly emphasised the need to celebrate the eradication of terrorism and liberation of the people. The outspoken ex-soldier said that the armed forces and police paid a very heavy price to bring the war to an end, a war that many believed couldn’t be brought to a successful conclusion. Gen. Silva pointed out the absurdity in doing away with military celebration as Sri Lanka still marks the end of WW I and WW 11.

On behalf of all Division and Task Force commanders on the northern front, I take this opportunity to thank officers and men and families of those who paid the supreme sacrifice and the wounded.

Gen. Silva asserted that the armed forces as a whole suffered as a result of their failure to conduct post-war examination of operations undertaken by fighting formations deprived of the opportunity to correctly establish their roles. The former Army Commander said that the other countries always undertook such examinations immediately after the end of operations.

Gen. Silva said that since the end of war the country never made an honest attempt to record the events thereby setting the record straight.

The Yahapalana government co-sponsored the US accountability resolution against the war-winning armed forces in Oct 2015.

Gen. Silva explained that failure on the part of political and military leaderships to reach consensus on a common narrative contributed to the growing international pressure on the country.

Appreciating the NPP government summoning Canadian High Commissioner Eric Walsh over the recent unveiling of so-called Tamil genocide memorial in Ontario, Gen. Silva said that before his retirement he briefed President Anura Kumara Dissanayake regarding the challenges faced on the Geneva front.President Dissanayake promised to look into this matter and take appropriate measures, Gen. Silva said. “I believe the President as promised will address the issues at hand.”

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Govt. likely to lose more votes in N&E unless it adopts remedial measures

Published

on

Ambika

Ex-HRCSL member:

Human rights lawyer and former member of the Human Rights Commission (HRCSL) Ambika Satkunanathan has warned that the National People’s Power (NPP) will face the prospect of further drop in its vote share in the North and the East in the next Provincial Council polls unless it takes remedial measures.

Asked what would be the likely scenario at the forthcoming Provincial Council polls, Satkunanathan said that she didn’t want to speculate. However, if the NPP failed to acknowledge its mistakes and did not adopt remedial measures, its share of the vote amongst Tamils and Muslims was likely to be further reduced, the civil society activist said.

The Illankai Thamil Arasu Kadchi (ITAK) contested 58 Local Government authorities at the recently concluded election. The ITAK won 40 out of 58 local authorities at the expense of the NPP that secured all northern and eastern electoral districts, except Batticaloa, at the parliamentary polls conducted last November.

The ITAK went it alone at the LG polls in the wake of the collapse of the TNA that served the interests of the LTTE during the war and threw its weight behind retired General Sarath Fonseka at the 2010 presidential election, less than a year after the eradication of the LTTE. General Fonseka secured all predominantly Tamil speaking electoral districts with the TNA backing but lost the election by 1.8 million votes.

Asked what had made the northern and eastern electorates switch allegiance to the ITAK and other Tamil parties within months after voting for NPP at the parliamentary polls, Ambika said: “Tamils have evolved into pragmatic voters and a range of factors likely influenced their vote at the local government election. Firstly, they have not seen any substantive or meaningful movement towards addressing their historical grievances and demands. For instance, instead of releasing lands occupied or that have been appropriated by the state, the government issued a gazette covering 5,940 acres of land in the Northern Province that it is seeking to appropriate. This is being done in what can only be called an insidious manner because they are not using the Land Appropriation Act, which would clearly demonstrate their intent to appropriate but the Land Settlement Ordinance. Where the repeal of the Prevention of Terrorism Act is concerned, they have appointed a committee to study the issue whereas the repeal of the law does not require any further study.

Asked whether the significant gains made by Tamil political parties at the expense of NPP and so-called Anura wave strengthened Tamil nationalism in the North-East, Ambika said President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s or NPP’s win in the presidential and parliamentary elections is not demonstrative of the weakening of Tamil nationalism and the win of the Tamil parties at the local government elections does not illustrate the strengthening of Tamil nationalism.

This is because, like in the 2010 Presidential election, the pragmatic Tamil vote, which to the external observer may seem like abandonment of their historical demands, in the eyes of the community is a way of safeguarding the community at that instance and making the best of a bad situation. It in no way means they have given up their historical demands. Also, Tamil nationalism over the years has taken on many forms and the electoral choice is not always a reliable indicator of it, she said.

Tamil political sources said that the ITAK would go it alone at the Provincial Council polls. Sources said that the ITAK would seek to consolidate its position against the backdrop of recent electoral success after significant setbacks in last Sept and November at national elections.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Parliament to meet from May 20 to 23

Published

on

(From L to R) Leader of the House Minister Bimal Ratnayake, Speaker Dr Jagath Wickremanayake, Secretary General of Parliament Kushani Rohandheera, Deputy Speaker Dr Rizvih Salih and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa at the business committee meeting

Parliament will meet from Tuesday (20) to Friday (23), according to Secretary General Kushani Rohanadeera.The decision was made at the Committee on Parliamentary Business meeting held last Friday under the chairmanship of Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramanayake.

The sittings will open on Tuesday (20) at 9.30 am with business under Standing Order 22(1) to (6), followed by an hour of oral questions. Statements by party leaders under Standing Order 27(2) are scheduled for 11 am, ahead of a debate on the Order under the Excise (Special Provisions) Act, which will run until 5 pm. The day’s proceedings will close with a half-hour debate on an Opposition-led adjournment motion.

On Wednesday (21), business resumes at 9.30 am, with oral questions at 10 am, followed by questions under Standing Order 27(2). The House will then debate financial regulations issued under the Finance Acts of 2003 and 2018 until 5 pm, before wrapping up with a session on the adjournment motion.

Thursday’s (22) sitting will follow a similar format, with a key debate on regulations under the Imports and Exports (Control) Act No. 1 of 1969 scheduled from 11.30 am to 5 pm. The Government will table the adjournment motion for the final half-hour of the day.

On Friday (23), after the usual question sessions, the House will take up the second reading of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill, with the debate running from 11.30 am to 5 pm, followed by the closing adjournment motion discussion.

Continue Reading

Trending