News
Parliamentary resolution on SLC non-binding – Deputy Speaker
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Deputy Speaker Ajith Rajapakshe yesterday (10) said that a unanimous decision taken by Parliament to ask the top management of Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) to vacate office was non-binding. Therefore, the SLC wouldn’t comply with the decision taken by Parliament, the Deputy Speaker said.
The Hambantota District MP said so when The Island asked him whether Parliament would inform SLC of its decision. “Actually, our decision in this regard is irrelevant,” the Deputy Speaker said, adding that SLC had to be dealt with, according to the relevant laws.
A joint resolution on SLC moved by Sajith Premadasa, in his capacity as the Opposition Leader, was endorsed by Minister Nimal Siripala de Silva. The Parliament endorsed the resolution, titled ‘the removal of the corrupt SLC management’ without a vote.
Responding to another query, the Deputy Speaker pointed out that such pronouncements, regardless of the institution/institutions implicated, wouldn’t have any legal impact, at all. However, SLC Secretary Mohan de Silva resigned immediately after the Sports Minister announced an interim committee.
Sports Ministry Secretary Kanapathipillai Mahesan said that the Ministry was following up on the matter. Mahesan, who received the appointment as Sports Ministry Secretary in January this year said that the Ministry would have to consult the Attorney General in that regard. Referring to the SLC moving court against the appointment of a seven-member Interim Committee, in place of SLC, by the Sports Minister, the former District Secretary said that he was in the process of receiving a legal opinion. Mahesan indicated that the Ministry would take action on the basis of the opinion expressed by the AG.
Mahesan acknowledged that Parliament is the supreme body in the land. Therefore, regardless of the legality of the resolution, the announcement made by Parliament couldn’t be ignored, the official said, adding that in this case lawmaker Ranasinghe had acted in terms of the powers exercised by him as a member of the Cabinet.
Deputy Speaker Rajapaksa said that political parties couldn’t have been unaware that the joint resolution wouldn’t compel SLC bosses to go.
Auditor General W.P.C. Wickremaratne was not available for comment. The Island asked Jathika Jana Balawegaya MP Vijitha Herath why he was missing at the time Parliament unanimously adopted the joint resolution. The Gampaha District MP pointed out that some interested parties were making an attempt to deceive the public that the JJB skipped the parliamentary proceedings. “MP Harini Amarasuriya attended Parliament along with me though JVP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake was out of the country,” MP Herath said, adding that there couldn’t be any suspicion regarding their absence in Parliament towards the end of the proceedings as a vote didn’t take place.
MP Herath said that the bottom-line is that the joint resolution couldn’t compel SLC bosses to quit morally on the weight of opinion against them. The MP noted that the Court of Appeal on Oct 07 suspended for a period of two weeks Sports Minister Ranasinghe’s Gazette that paved the way for appointment of an Interim Committee. The JVPer said that the issues at hand couldn’t be addressed by ad-hoc measures.
News
CEB seeking tariff hike while making huge profits, says opposition trade union leader
Convenor of the Samagi Joint Trade Union Alliance affiliated with the Samagi Jana Balawegaya, Ananda Palitha, yesterday (16) said that the Ceylon Electricity Board was seeking to raise electricity tariffs by 13.56% percent although it had earned a profit of more than Rs 22,000 mn.
The CEB recently submitted its proposal to the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for an electricity tariff revision for the second quarter of this year – the period effective from April 1 to June 30.
Palitha alleged that the PUCSL, in spite of knowing the massive profit earned by the CEB, at the expense of the hapless public, had chosen to allow the state enterprise to propose an additional burden.
The economic, technical and safety regulator of the electricity industry, and the designated regulator for petroleum and water services industries, should exercise its powers in terms of the PUCSL Act No. 35 of 2002 and the Sri Lanka Electricity Act No. 20 of 2009 to provide relief, the veteran trade unionist said.
Palitha emphasised that the PUCSL had the right to intervene on behalf of electricity consumers but, unfortunately, chose to facilitate the CEB’s despicable strategy. “The proposal to increase tariffs by 13.56% was meant to divert attention. The real issue at hand is the percentage of electricity tariff reduction,” Palitha said. The former UNPer found fault with the Opposition for failing to expose the CEB.
Taking into consideration the Rs 22,000 millionplus profit, the PUCSL could order the CEB to grant relief to consumers, Palitha said, adding that the CEB and PUCSL, together, deprived electricity consumers tariff reduction in the first quarter of this year, too.
In January this year, the CEB asked for a 11.59% tariff increase though it was enjoying Rs 22,000 mn profit at that time, the trade unionist said.
Palitha said that as the PUCSL received all data available to the CEB it was fully aware of the finances of the state enterprise.
In January, 2025, regardless of the NPP government floating the idea regarding as much as a 37% tariff increase, the PUCSL granted a 20% tariff reduction (25% of Rs 22,000 mn profit), Palitha said.
According to him, as a result of relief granted to the consumers, the profits had been reduced to Rs 16,000 mn but by June 2025 profits had increased to Rs 18,000 mn and there was a need to grant tariff reduction. But, the NPP, having always lashed out at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in the run up to the presidential election, held in September 2024, started playing a different tune.
Responding to The Island queries, Palitha said that contrary to claims that the CEB proposed a 13.56% tariff increase to cover up losses caused by the importation of low-quality coal for the Norochcholai Lakvijaya coal-fired power plant, the current strategy seemed to have been adopted at the behest of the IMF.
Instead of granting tariff reduction for the third quarter in 2025, the PUCSL ordered an 18% increase, Palitha said. The trade unionist claimed that the Finance Ministry, at the behest of the IMF, directed both the CEB and the PUCSL to increase electricity tariffs by 20% in violation of the relevant Acts, he said.
Then in Oct, 2025, the CEB proposed a 6.8 % tariff increase at a time its profits were around Rs 22,000 mn. The CEB and PUCSL staged a drama over that proposal and finally, on the false pretext of the CEB’s failure to furnish its proposal on time, the revision was dropped, Palitha said. The SJB activist pointed out that the Opposition failed to highlight that consumers had been deprived of downward revision in spite of massive profits earned by the Board. “In fact, when Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody met trade unions, he very clearly declared that they were considering electricity power reduction, perhaps by 10%, 12% or 15%. But in the end nothing happened.”
Now the same drama is being enacted by the government, the CEB and the PUCSL, Palitha said.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
News
BASL protest march
Members of the BASL yesterday (16) staged a protest march over the murder of a lawyer and his wife in Akuregoda, Thalangama, last week. The BASL staged a protest march from the Supreme Court Complex to the BASL Head Office.
News
IMF MD here
Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Kristalina Georgieva arrived in Colombo yesterday (16) for top level discussions with the government. She is scheduled to leave tomorrow (18) after meeting government authorities and key stakeholders, observing firsthand the impact of Cyclone Ditwah, and discussing ways in which the IMF could support recovery efforts and contribute to building a more resilient future for all Sri Lankans, sources said.
-
Life style2 days agoMarriot new GM Suranga
-
Business1 day agoMinistry of Brands to launch Sri Lanka’s first off-price retail destination
-
Features2 days agoMonks’ march, in America and Sri Lanka
-
Midweek Review6 days agoA question of national pride
-
Business6 days agoAutodoc 360 relocates to reinforce commitment to premium auto care
-
Opinion5 days agoWill computers ever be intelligent?
-
Features2 days agoThe Rise of Takaichi
-
Features2 days agoWetlands of Sri Lanka:
