Connect with us

News

Parliamentary resolution on SLC non-binding – Deputy Speaker

Published

on

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Deputy Speaker Ajith Rajapakshe yesterday (10) said that a unanimous decision taken by Parliament to ask the top management of Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) to vacate office was non-binding. Therefore, the SLC wouldn’t comply with the decision taken by Parliament, the Deputy Speaker said.

The Hambantota District MP said so when The Island asked him whether Parliament would inform SLC of its decision. “Actually, our decision in this regard is irrelevant,” the Deputy Speaker said, adding that SLC had to be dealt with, according to the relevant laws.

A joint resolution on SLC moved by Sajith Premadasa, in his capacity as the Opposition Leader, was endorsed by Minister Nimal Siripala de Silva. The Parliament endorsed the resolution, titled ‘the removal of the corrupt SLC management’ without a vote.

Responding to another query, the Deputy Speaker pointed out that such pronouncements, regardless of the institution/institutions implicated, wouldn’t have any legal impact, at all. However, SLC Secretary Mohan de Silva resigned immediately after the Sports Minister announced an interim committee.

Sports Ministry Secretary Kanapathipillai Mahesan said that the Ministry was following up on the matter. Mahesan, who received the appointment as Sports Ministry Secretary in January this year said that the Ministry would have to consult the Attorney General in that regard. Referring to the SLC moving court against the appointment of a seven-member Interim Committee, in place of SLC, by the Sports Minister, the former District Secretary said that he was in the process of receiving a legal opinion. Mahesan indicated that the Ministry would take action on the basis of the opinion expressed by the AG.

Mahesan acknowledged that Parliament is the supreme body in the land. Therefore, regardless of the legality of the resolution, the announcement made by Parliament couldn’t be ignored, the official said, adding that in this case lawmaker Ranasinghe had acted in terms of the powers exercised by him as a member of the Cabinet.

Deputy Speaker Rajapaksa said that political parties couldn’t have been unaware that the joint resolution wouldn’t compel SLC bosses to go.

Auditor General W.P.C. Wickremaratne was not available for comment. The Island asked Jathika Jana Balawegaya MP Vijitha Herath why he was missing at the time Parliament unanimously adopted the joint resolution. The Gampaha District MP pointed out that some interested parties were making an attempt to deceive the public that the JJB skipped the parliamentary proceedings. “MP Harini Amarasuriya attended Parliament along with me though JVP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake was out of the country,” MP Herath said, adding that there couldn’t be any suspicion regarding their absence in Parliament towards the end of the proceedings as a vote didn’t take place.

MP Herath said that the bottom-line is that the joint resolution couldn’t compel SLC bosses to quit morally on the weight of opinion against them. The MP noted that the Court of Appeal on Oct 07 suspended for a period of two weeks Sports Minister Ranasinghe’s Gazette that paved the way for appointment of an Interim Committee. The JVPer said that the issues at hand couldn’t be addressed by ad-hoc measures.



News

PAFFREL raises concerns over Anti-Corruption (Amendment) Bill

Published

on

Anura and Rohana

Executive Director of People’s Action for Free and Fair Elections (PAFFREL) Rohana Hettiarachchi yesterday (28) said that there were three major concerns regarding the Anti-Corruption (Amendment) Bill 2026. Acknowledging the recent Supreme Court determination, in respect of the above-mentioned Bill, that three of the provisions were not consistent with the Constitution, requiring a special majority in Parliament, with one clause requiring approval by the people at a Referendum, Hettiarachchi said nonetheless PAFFREL had decided to bring their concerns to the notice of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake.

Responding to The Island queries, Hettiarachchci said that PAFFREL sent a letter, dated 24 Sept., to President Dissanayake, regarding the issue at hand.

Petitions against the Bill was heard before a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justices Shiran Gooneratne, Mahinda Samayawardena and Sampath Wijeratne.

PAFFREL and Transparency International Sri Lanka (TISL) were among the petitioners who challenged the proposed amendments to the Anti-Corruption Act No. 9 of 2023. “We did so in public interest,” Hettiarachchchi said, adding that three major concerns were (i) the breadth of the proposed redaction power and the proposed criminalisation of certain uses of publicly accessible redacted asset declarations, particularly in relation to freedom of expression, and the public’s right to meaningfully receive and impart information (ii) raising of the State or public-corporation shareholding threshold for certain asset declaration obligations from 25% to 50%, as this could exclude officers of State-linked entities in which the State holds less than 50%, in spite of such entities exercising public functions and managing public resources and (iii)role of the Director General Ranga Dissanayake.

Hettiarachchchi emphasised that though the PARREL appreciated the way CIABOC DG handled his responsibilities, centreing of power on one person was not acceptable.

Hettiarachchi urged President Dissanayake and the 159-member government parliamentary group to pay attention to concerns raised by those who moved court against the controversial Bill and address their concerns though the Parliament received the SC determination.

An International Monetary Fund mission that visited Colombo recently warned that the proposed amendments could weaken the country’s anti-corruption framework.

The mission, led by Evan Papageorgiou, was in the country from 10 to 23 September for discussions on the seventh review of the Extended Fund Facility and the 2026 Article IV consultation. (SF)

Continue Reading

News

First cases taken up by SC after enactment of 22A dismissed

Published

on

The Supreme Court yesterday (28) dismissed two petitions filed by retired Flight Lieutenant Shantha Jayathilake against Deputy Inspector General of Police of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Shani Abeysekara and Secretary to the Ministry of Public Security Ravi Seneviratne, and Rev. Father Cyril Gamini, alleging them of committing contempt of court.

They were the first cases dealt by the Supreme Court after the enactment of the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution.

The recipient of gallantry medal alleged that contempt of court had been committed through an affidavit previously submitted to the Supreme Court by Shani Abeysekara and Ravi Seneviratne.

The other petition alleged that contempt of court had been committed through the contents of a complaint submitted to the Criminal Investigation Department by Rev. Father Cyril Gamini.

The Supreme Court ordered that both petitions be dismissed without being taken up for hearing.

Continue Reading

News

Now NR named 4th suspect in Krrish case

Published

on

Namal

The Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) yesterday (28) named former Minister and leader of the SLPP parliamentary group Namal Rajapaksa as the fourth suspect in the Krrish case before the Colombo Chief Magistrate’s Court.

The MP was named as the fourth suspect in the wake of the arrest and remanding of former Executive Officer and Director of the Krrish Group, Janaki Siriwardena, regarding the payment of Rs. 70 mn to Namal Rajapaksa to facilitate the land transaction. Police arrested Ms. Siriwardena on 24 September and she was remanded till 6 Oct. pending investigations.

The investigation focuses on 4.3 acre land development in the Fort area that began in the 2013-2014 period. Investigations were launched in 2016 by the Yahapalana government, following a complaint lodged by Wasantha Samarasinghe, now a Minister in the current Cabinet.

The Indian company in this controversy is Krrish Transworks Colombo (Pvt.) Ltd .

The CIABOC named Namal Rajapaksa as a suspect in the Krrish case while he was remanded over two cases in respect of Airbus bribery probe. (SF)

Continue Reading

Trending