Connect with us

News

Opposition demands more slots on Parliamentary Business Committee

Published

on

Govt. insists on capping its members to ensure functionality

In the previous Parliament, where there were six Opposition parties, 10 slots were allocated for the Opposition at the Committee on Parliamentary Business.

However, there were now 12 Opposition parties represented in Parliament but only four slots had been allocated  for them in the same Committee, Chief Opposition Whip, SJB MP Gayantha Karunathilaka told Parliament on Friday (06).

“We met Speaker Ashoka Ranwala Friday morning to discuss this. How can we manage with four slots?” he asked.

Meanwhile, MP Ramanathan Archchuna, representing Independent Group 17 from Jaffna, urged the Speaker to allocate to him at least 30 seconds in each session because the Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa would not allocate time for him to speak. “As you know I can’t go to his office to talk to him. Please consider my plight and give me some time during each session. Even 30 seconds is enough,” he said.

Opposition leader Sajith Premadasa said the standing orders of Parliament would not be violated by increasing the number of members in the Committee on Parliamentary Business. “This won’t increase expenses. I urge the government to increase the number of Opposition MPs. I can guarantee that the Opposition MPs won’t just try to disrupt,” he said.

Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam of the All Ceylon Tamil Congress (ACTC) said that although he was an Opposition MP, he did not have a working relationship with the main Opposition. Most of the political parties in Parliament only had a single MP, he said. “Standing orders were created when there was effectively a two-party system. These do not accommodate the reality of the present Parliament. The Committee on Parliamentary Business must have at least one member from each party in Parliament,” he said.

Chief Government Whip, Minister Nalinda Jayatissa said the Committee on Parliamentary Business was the most important Committee in Parliament. According to Standing Orders, the Committee should comprise seven ex officio members and 12 other MPs.

“When we increase the non ex officio members to 16, the Committee on Parliamentary Business will have 23 members. I think we have to cap the number at this point. The number of political parties represented in Parliament may increase or decrease depending on the election. The number of parties can go up to 20 even. If we keep on increasing the number of members, we won’t have functioning committees. We can’t have 50 members in the Committee on Parliamentary Business,” he said.

Jayatissa said the Opposition leader and the Chief Opposition Whip are already included in the seven ex officio group. The government has agreed that four other MPs should be included in the non ex officio group. “There are six slots for the Opposition. It’s up to the Opposition to divide these slots among the MPs. If there is a problem with the Opposition not having enough time to express themselves in Parliament, we are willing to discuss and allocate some of our time. However, we urge the Speaker not to increase the number of members in the Committee on Parliamentary Business to more than 23,” he said.

Leader of the House, Bimal Rathnayake said they agree to allocate one more position at the Committee to the Opposition and the Opposition Leader must talk to the parties and appoint an MP. “By default, an additional slot will be given to the government, bringing the number of members in the Committee on Parliamentary Business to 16, excluding seven ex officio members” he said.

Minister Rathnayake said the Committee on Parliamentary Business must not be conflated with the party leaders group. This is also not the only Committee in Parliament. “The Parliament may someday decide that all political parties in Parliament must be represented in the Committee on Parliamentary Business. However, no such decision has been taken. There is an ad-hoc grouping called the party leaders meeting. The Committee on Parliamentary Business can’t accommodate everyone. The Committee is limited to a certain number of experienced, reasonable groups for a reason. The Committee on Parliamentary Business must start and end at a stipulated time. Our opinion is that this Committee must have a limited number of MPs. We can’t accommodate every party. This is the reality. I urge you to accept this reality,” he said.

Given that the Opposition Leader and the Chief Opposition Whip represent the SJB, the other four slots can be given to Ilankai Tamil Arasu Kachchi (ITAK), New Democratic Front (NDF), Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) and to one other party.

“We have decided to give the Chairmanship of the Committee on Public Accounts (COPA) to an Opposition MP. We have also increased the number of members of COPA. People who can’t enter the Business Committee can join COPA because we think oversight should be increased. However, we will keep the Chairmanship of the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) because we need to investigate what the previous government has done. We can’t let a former Minister sit at the helm of COPE,” he said.



News

Creditor receives USD 2.5 mn as Lankan public bears loss from theft of Treasury funds

Published

on

Amidst ongoing accusations that the theft of USD 2.5 mn (nearly 1 bn Rupees) from the Treasury hadn’t been properly investigated, The Island learns that the relevant payments had been made to the actual creditor on the instructions of the Finance Ministry.

Confirming the inquiries made by us, authoritative sources said that payments had been made to several accounts through the US banks. Earlier, Sri Lanka released funds to fake foreign accounts in spite of warnings regarding the suspicions about the process.

The funds were part of a bilateral debt repayment to Australia with a settlement due in September 2025. The payment was part of a $ 22.9 million debt settlement.

The lapses occurred in the wake of far reaching changes regarding the debt management functions. In terms of a particular condition of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Sri Lanka’s debt management functions that had been previously handled by the Central Bank were transferred to a new institution established under the General Treasury—the Public Debt Management Office (PDMO).

Sources said that regardless of the loss of USD 2.5 mn, Sri Lanka couldn’t have defaulted and therefore payments had been made.

Sources who closely followed the issue said that the government owed an explanation and public apology regarding the loss of USD 2.5 mn and how fresh payments were made.

Sources said that the USD 2.5 mn paid to fake accounts had been lost and could never be traced. CoPF Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva has said that the NPP government has told the IMF that stolen USD 2.5 mn would be recovered from the public by introducing an amendment to the budget.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Former Minister Nalin raises defence of double jeopardy

Published

on

Nalin Fernando

The Court of Appeal  yesterday (18) postponed until June 25 the hearing of a petition filed by former Minister Nalin Fernando seeking the dismissal of an indictment brought against him by the Attorney General in connection with the controversial ‘Carrom Boards’ case.

The petition was taken up before a bench comprising Justices P. Kumararatnam and Pradeep Hettiarachchi.

Appearing for the petitioner, President’s Counsel Ali Sabry, instructed by Attorney-at-Law Ramzi Bacha, informed court that Fernando had already been convicted and sentenced to 30 years rigorous imprisonment in a case instituted by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) arising from the same incident.

Counsel argued that the Attorney General had subsequently filed a separate case based on the same set of charges and maintained that subjecting an accused person to a second prosecution for the same offence was contrary to law.

He submitted that preliminary objections on the issue had been raised before the Colombo High Court but were dismissed by the trial judge.

The petitioner has therefore sought a declaration from the Court of Appeal that the indictment filed by the Attorney General is unlawful and requested that the charges be set aside.

The court directed that the matter be called again on June 25, when the Attorney General is expected to present submissions on the petition.

The case stems from allegations that during the 2015 presidential election campaign, 14,000 carrom boards and 11,000 checkers boards were imported and distributed through Lanka Sathosa outlets for allocation to political offices of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, resulting in an estimated loss of Rs. 39 million to the State.

Based on those allegations, the Attorney General has instituted proceedings against Fernando before the Colombo High Court under the Public Property Act.

Continue Reading

News

UNP asks whether govt. obtained findings of FBI probe into 2019 Easter Sunday carnage

Published

on

The UNP yesterday called on the government to clarify whether it had sought access to evidence and documents gathered during a United States investigation into the 2019 Easter Sunday terrorist attacks.

In a statement, the UNP has recalled that then Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe requested the U.S. government to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the attacks immediately after they occurred, citing limitations in local investigative capacity. A similar request was also made during a telephone conversation with then U.S. President Donald Trump on April 22, 2019, the statement said.

According to the UNP, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) subsequently carried out an extensive investigation in collaboration with Sri Lankan agencies, including the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), Military Intelligence and the State Intelligence Service. The findings were later submitted to the Sri Lankan authorities and accepted by the relevant institutions.

The party noted that FBI Special Agent Merrilee R. Godwin had filed a 71-page affidavit before the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in November 2020 following a two-year investigation. A criminal case was later instituted in Los Angeles naming suspects who had already been taken into custody in Sri Lanka.

Pointing out that material collected during the U.S. investigation remains in the possession of the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice, the UNP has asked the government whether it formally requested access to those records after reopening investigations into the attacks.

The UNP has stressed the importance of making the documents available to Sri Lankan judicial authorities, arguing that they could assist efforts to establish the full circumstances surrounding the Easter Sunday attacks.

Continue Reading

Trending