Connect with us

News

Opposition asks govt. to make new Constitution

Published

on

Instead of adopting piecemeal measures

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB)-led Opposition, yesterday (29) pledged to work with the National Movement for Social Justice (NMSJ) to scuttle the proposed 20th Amendment to the Constitution.

General Secretary of the SJB Ranjith Madduma Bandara made the pledge on behalf of its leader Sajith Premadasa, at a meeting chaired by NMSJ Chief former Speaker Karu Janasuriya at Hotel Janaki in Colombo 5.

The Opposition grouping reached a consensus on a common action plan to oppose the 20th Amendment both in and outside parliament.

The SLPP commands a two-thirds majority in Parliament whereas the main Opposition consists of 54 members.

The Opposition held the meeting as the Supreme Court began hearing petitions filed against the 20th Amendment. The audience was informed that as many as 39 cases against the government had been filed.

Jayasuriya declared that they had the backing of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), Thamil Makkal Thesiya Kuttani (TMTK), the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC), All Ceylon Makkal Congress (ACMC) as well as the Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU).

However, the JVP wasn’t represented at the meeting. Defeated Gampaha District candidate Arjuna Ranatunga represented the UNP, while lawmakers Mano Ganesan and Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam addressed the gathering on behalf of the Democratic People’s Front and Ahila Illankai Thamil Congress, respectively.

The former Speaker recently succeeded Prof. Sarath Wijesuriya, who took over the civil society organisation in late 2015 following Ven. Maduluwawe Sobitha Thera’s demise.

Alleging that the 20th Amendment would grant dictatorial powers to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, Jayasuriya strongly criticised the proposed law on six specific reasons, namely (1) the parliament would be reduced to a puppet in the hands of the President (2) the executive wouldn’t be answerable to the parliament, the judiciary and the people. Those institutions coming under the purview of the President wouldn’t be subjected to the auditing process (3) politicisation of the entire election process (4) facilitating waste, corruption and irregularities by abolishing the Audit Service Commission and the National Procurement Commission (5) weakening of the judiciary and (6) enabling dual citizen to enter parliament.

Both Jayasuriya and Maddumabandara pointed out that the government project faced unexpected opposition with growing protests against the proposed law.

SJB MP Rajitha Senaratne told the gathering that they would conduct a countrywide protest campaign on Oct 5 against the 20th Amendment. It would be followed by a rally at Hyde Park on Oct 8, where all political parties represented in parliament and civil society groups were scheduled to participate.

MP Senaratne found fault with the media for not vigorously campaigning against the 20th Amendment.

Jayasuriya led the call for the government to abandon the hasty bid to enact 20th Amendment and take tangible measures in consultation with all stakeholders, both in and out of parliament to introduce a new Constitution acceptable to all communities.

The government was warned of dire consequences of unilateral efforts to enact 20th Amendment that would deliver a knockout blow to democratic way of life. Dr. Senaratne alleged that President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s recent declaration that public servants should accept his verbal directives as circulars, signaled an extremely dangerous trend.

MP Mano Ganesan said that the urgent requirement today was to address the national question. Declaring that the national issue couldn’t be addressed by enacting the 20th Amendment, he urged the government to abandon the project. Instead of 20th Amendment, the government should initiate immediate action to bring in a new Constitution, he added.

Among those present on the occasion were civil society activists Constitutional Council member Javid Yusuf and Prof. Rohan Samarajeeva.

The Opposition fiercely attacked the SLPP bid to do away with State auditing process. “How could the SLPP justify abolishing the audit process?” MP Ganesan asked, claiming that many government members were disappointed at the way the ruling party handled the 20th Amendment. Opposition speakers insisted the SLPP couldn’t justify 20th Amendment by claiming the 19th Amendment had been introduced to keep the Rajapaksas at bay.

The NMSJ said that it was ready to lead a high profile campaign similar to the one which had paved the way for the change of government in 2015. The NMSJ said that the SLPP shouldn’t misrepresent the mandates it received at presidential and parliamentary polls, in Nov 2019 and Aug 2020 to bring about a dictatorship.



News

Financial contributions received for ‘Rebuilding Sri Lanka’ Fund

Published

on

By

The Government’s ‘Rebuilding Sri Lanka’ Fund, established to provide relief and support to communities affected by Cyclone Ditwah, continues to receive financial contributions on a daily basis.

Accordingly, the Containers Transport Owners Association made a financial contribution of Rs. 1.5 million, while the Association of SriLankan Airlines Licensed Aircraft Engineers contributed Rs. 1.35 million to the Fund.

The respective cheques were formally presented to the Secretary to the President, Dr. Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, at the Presidential Secretariat on Friday (19).

The occasion was attended by  W. M. S. K. Manjula, Chairman of the Containers Transport Owners Association, together with  Dilip Nihal Anslem Perera and  Jayantha Karunadhipathi.

Representing the Association of SriLankan Airlines Licensed Aircraft Engineers were Deshan Rajapaksa,  Samudika Perera and  Devshan Rodrigo handed over the cheque.

Continue Reading

News

UNICEF representatives and PM discuss rebuilding schools affected by the Disaster

Published

on

By

A meeting between Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya and a delegation of UNICEF representatives was held on Saturday,  (December 20) at the Prime Minister’s Office.

During the meeting, the Prime Minister explained the measures taken by the Government to ensure the protection of the affected student community and to restore the damaged school system, as well as the challenges encountered in this process.

The Prime Minister stated that reopening schools located in landslide-prone areas would be extremely dangerous. Accordingly, the Government is focusing on identifying such schools and relocating them to suitable locations based on scientific assessments.

The Prime Minister further noted that financial assistance has been provided to students affected by the disaster, enabling parents to send their children back to school without an additional financial burden. Emphasizing that school is the safest place for children after their homes, the Prime Minister expressed confidence that the school environment would help restore and improve students’ mental well-being

The Prime Minister also highlighted that attention has been given to several key areas, including the relocation of disaster-affected schools, restoration of school infrastructure, merging and operating certain schools jointly, facilitating teaching and learning through digital and technological strategies, and providing special transportation facilities. She emphasized that the Government is examining these issues and is committed to finding long-term solutions.

The UNICEF representatives commended the Government’s commitment and the initiatives undertaken to restore the education sector and assured their support to the Government. Both parties also discussed working together collaboratively on future initiatives.

The meeting was attended by the UNICEF representatives to Sri Lanka Emma Brigham, Lakshmi Sureshkumar, Nishantha Subash, and Yashinka Jayasinghe, along with Secretary to the Ministry of Education Nalaka Kaluwewa, Director of Education Dakshina Kasturiarachchi, Deputy Directors Kasun Gunarathne and Udara Dikkumbura.

(Prime Minister’s Media Division)

Continue Reading

News

NMRA laboratory lacks SLAB accreditation

Published

on

Dr. Sanjeewa

Drug controversy:

 “Setting up state-of-the-art drug testing facility will cost Rs 5 billion”

 Activists call for legal action against politicians, bureaucrats

Serious questions have been raised over Sri Lanka’s drug regulatory system following revelations that the National Medicines Regulatory Authority’s (NMRA) quality control laboratory is not accredited by the Sri Lanka Accreditation Board (SLAB), casting doubt on both the reliability of local test results and the adequacy of oversight of imported medicines.

Medical and civil rights groups warn that the issue points to a systemic regulatory failure rather than an isolated lapse, with potential political and financial consequences for the State.

Chairman of the Federation of Medical and Civil Rights Professional Associations, Specialist Dr. Chamal Sanjeewa, said the controversy surrounding the Ondansetron injection, which was later found to be contaminated, had exposed deep weaknesses in drug regulation and quality assurance.

Dr. Sanjeewa said that the manufacturer had confirmed that the drug had been imported into Sri Lanka on four occasions this year, despite later being temporarily withdrawn from use. The drug was manufactured in India in November 2024 and in May and August 2025, and imported to Sri Lanka in February, July and September. On each occasion, 67,600 phials were procured.

Dr. Sanjeewa said the company had informed the NMRA that the drug was tested in Indian laboratories, prior to shipment, and passed all required quality checks. The manufacturer reportedly tested the injections against 10 parameters, including basic quality standards,

pH value, visual appearance, component composition, quantity per phial, sterility levels, presence of other substances, bacterial toxin levels and spectral variations.

According to documents submitted to the NMRA, no bacterial toxins were detected in the original samples, and the reported toxin levels were within European safety limits of less than 9.9 international units per milligram.

Dr. Sanjeewa said the credibility of local regulatory oversight had come under scrutiny, noting that the NMRA’s quality control laboratory was not SLAB-accredited. He said establishing a fully equipped, internationally accredited laboratory would cost nearly Rs. 5 billion.

He warned that the failure to invest in such a facility could have grave consequences, including continued loss of life due to substandard medicines and the inability of the State to recover large sums of public funds paid to pharmaceutical companies for defective drugs.

“If urgent steps are not taken, public money will continue to be lost and accountability will remain elusive,” Dr. Sanjeewa said.

He added that if it was ultimately confirmed that the drug did not contain bacterial toxins at the time it entered Sri Lanka, the fallout would be even more damaging, severely undermining the credibility of the country’s health system and exposing weaknesses in health administration.

Dr. Sanjeewa said public trust in the health sector had already been eroded and called for legal action against all politicians and public officials responsible for regulatory failures linked to the incident.

by Chaminda Silva ✍️

Continue Reading

Trending