Connect with us

News

Opp. seeks IMF intervention to rein in corruption

Published

on

Prof. G.L.

‘How come gold smuggling MP remains on Ethics and Privileges Committee’?

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The Opposition would seek the IMF’s commitment to rein in rampant corruption with the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government in spite of the country being declared bankrupt over a year ago, former External Affairs Minister Prof. G. L. Peiris said yesterday (11).

Addressing the media at the Nawala Office of Nidahasa Janatha Sabhawa, the senior SLPP rebel group member said that the Opposition intended to furnish transcripts of the three-day debate on the No-Confidence-Motion (NCM) against Health Minister Keheliya Rambukwella to the IMF delegation. The former minister said that the outcome of the debate had proved beyond any doubt that the government was bent on making a killing at the expense of the public.

The IMF visit is scheduled for this week ahead of their approval of the second tranche of the bailout package.

“We’ll ask the IMF to pressure the government over corruption,” Prof. Peiris said, adding that the international lending agency couldn’t absolve itself of the responsibility against backdrop of its commitment to make available USD 2.9 bn over a period of four years.

The Opposition could muster the support of only 73 lawmakers whereas 113 voted against the NCM. Thirty-eight MPs failed to cast their ballot at the vote held last Friday (08).

The top SLPP spokesperson said that the Opposition would brief the IMF of two other contentious issues to emphasize the failure not only on the part of the government to reign in corruption but how the Parliament encouraged the same.

Prof. Peiris said that there couldn’t be a better example than the favoured treatment received by Muslim National Alliance (MNA) MP Ali Sabry Raheem, arrested at the BIA in March this year, after being caught in a massive smuggling bid, to prove the Parliament as an institution protected such elements.

Regardless of representations made by Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa and other Opposition MPs, the government parliamentary group and Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena continued to shield the MP, Prof. Perris said.

Customs at the BIA in early March thwarted an attempt made by lawmaker Raheem to smuggle in undeclared gold worth Rs. 74 mn and a large consignment of smartphones valued at Rs. 4.2 mn. The MP walked free within hours after paying a Rs 7.5 mn fine, though in terms of Customs Ordinance, the MP could have been imposed a fine three times the value of confiscated goods, in this particular case gold and smartphones.

Prof. Peiris found fault with Speaker Abeywardena turning a blind eye to the incident that tarnished the image of Parliament at a time the public expected the House to take a tougher stand on corruption. The former internationally distinguished law academic pointed out that the Parliament was in a dilemma as the gold smuggling MP continued to serve the Committee on Ethics and Privileges.

How the Parliament could explain the Ethics and Privileges Committee being asked to examine the conduct of one of its members accused of gold smuggling at a time the government was struggling to increase State revenue, Prof. Peiris asked.

All Ceylon Makkal Congress (ACMC) nominated Raheem to contest Puttalam at the last general election in August 2020.  ACMC and Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) fielded a group of candidates under the MNA banner.

Prof. Peiris said that they would also brief the IMF delegation regarding a major loophole in recently enacted much touted anti-corruption law that conveniently left out provision to deal with stolen funds now stashed overseas. “When we sought an explanation as to why the new law didn’t deal with the issue at hand, the government assured necessary amendments would be made later. That explanation cannot be accepted,” Prof. Peiris said, alleging that the powers that be were continuing in their cavalier fashion regardless of the further deterioration of the overall situation.

Prof. Peiris said that recently a parliamentary watchdog committee examined how a foreign investor received tax free status for a period of 17 years while those struggling to make ends meet were burdened with further taxes. The government resorted to domestic debt-restructuring regardless of the consequences caused by the inclusion of EPF and ETF in the process, the lawmaker said. But those who invested heavily here under an emergency situation were not touched, the MP said. The IMF should be mindful of the situation, the former minister said, urging all stakeholders to reexamine the situation here.



Latest News

70,297 persons still in safety centers

Published

on

By

The Situation Report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 06:00AM on 16th December 2025 shows that 70,297 persons belonging to 22,338 house holds are still being housed at 731 safety centers established by the government.

The number of deaths due to the recent disastrous weather  stands at 643 while 183 persons are missing.

Continue Reading

News

MEPA to crack down on marine polluters

Published

on

… Warns would-be polluters of criminal prosecution, hefty fines and even blacklisting

The Marine Environment Protection Authority (MEPA) has warned that ship owners, operators and local entities responsible for marine pollution will face criminal prosecution, heavy financial penalties and possible blacklisting, MEPA Chairman Samantha Gunasekera said yesterday.

Gunasekera told The Island that Sri Lanka would no longer tolerate negligence and regulatory breaches that threaten the country’s marine ecosystems, coastal livelihoods and national economy.

“Any party that pollutes our seas—whether foreign vessels or local operators—should be prepared to face the full force of the law,” Gunasekera said. “There will be no room for excuses, delays or backdoor negotiations when marine pollution is involved.”

He said MEPA has intensified surveillance of major shipping routes, ports and environmentally sensitive zones amid rising maritime traffic through Sri Lankan waters, which remain among the busiest in the Indian Ocean.

by Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

SC delegation, headed by CJ Surasena, observes Indian Supreme Court in action

Published

on

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, with Indian judicial officials

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, departed to New Delhi on the 11th of December, 2025, for an official visit to the Supreme Court of India as part of the ongoing official visit by the delegation to India.

The group was accorded a ceremonial welcome in the Court’s main hall, led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant. CJI Kant told the assembled Judges that “the Indian judiciary was honoured to host” their Sri Lankan counterparts, expressing hope that the visit would be “meaningful and very constructive” and underscoring the “close emotional bonds” between the two countries.

The focal point of the programme was a special sitting of the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Surasena joined CJI Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi on the bench, presiding over the Court as a guest Justice. He was accompanied by nine other Supreme Court justices from Sri Lanka, who took seats in the well of CJI Kant’s courtroom to observe the day’s proceedings.

Supreme Court Bar Association President Vikas Singh formally greeted the delegation and praised Justice Surasena’s reformist efforts. Singh recalled the Sri Lankan Chief Justice’s own maxim, “If you want something you have never had, then you have got to do something you have never done”, highlighting the bold changes Surasena had introduced to modernise Sri Lanka’s Court system. Singh noted that these initiatives, particularly court digitization, were aimed at eradicating “the persisting problems of law delays” and streamlining case backlogs.

The Sri Lankan Judges spent the morning observing live Supreme Court proceedings in CJI Kant’s courtroom. This first-hand exposure to Indian court operations formed a key part of the programme’s judicial engagement. During the hour-long session, the visiting justices witnessed a range of cases on the Supreme Court’s roster, with Justice Surasena and the delegation following arguments from the front. The experience was designed to be immersive and following the hearing the Sri Lankan Judges were briefed on India’s own initiatives towards a digitalised court system, e-filing and case management systems.

The official programme then shifted to capacity-building and information exchange. In the early afternoon, Indian Supreme Court officials gave the Sri Lankan delegation detailed briefings on India’s technological initiatives. Court registrars demonstrated the e-filing system and other e-initiatives implemented by the Supreme Court of India. Additional presentations outlined the Court’s new case management systems and administrative reforms. These sessions highlighted how digital tools and better case-listing procedures have been used in India to increase efficiency. The Sri Lankan judges asked questions about India’s experience with electronic court records and the integration of technology in daily judicial work, reflecting their own interest in similar reforms back home.

The visit underscored the growing collaboration between the Indian and Sri Lankan judiciaries. Throughout the proceedings, both sides emphasised their shared legal traditions and mutual respect. As Chief Justice Surasena noted during the sitting, India is Sri Lanka’s “closest neighbour,” and historic links, even dating back to ancient epics, form the backdrop for today’s judicial dialogue. CJI Kant remarked that having the chief justices of two vibrant democracies together on the bench was a “significant moment” for the rule of law.

The Sri Lankan delegation continued its programme in Delhi on 12 December with a visit to the Delhi High Court and its International Arbitration and Mediation Centres. The exchange visit is expected to deepen judicial cooperation and provide practical insights for both courts. Officials on both sides say the engagement aimed at sharing best practices in court administration, reinforce legal ties and support ongoing reforms aimed at reducing case backlogs and delays.

Continue Reading

Trending